EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PLANT DENSITIES ON THE FRUIT YIELD AND SOME RELATED PARAMETERS AND STORAGE LOSSES OF FODDER WATERMELON (Citrillus lanatus var. citroides) FRUITS

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PLANT DENSITIES ON THE FRUIT YIELD AND SOME RELATED PARAMETERS AND STORAGE LOSSES OF FODDER WATERMELON (Citrillus lanatus var. citroides) FRUITS

This study was conducted in order to determine the effect of different plant densities (4762, 7143, 9524, 14286, 28571 plants ha-1) on the fruit yield and some other yield components of fodder watermelon under typical Mediterranean climate conditions during summer period of 2012 and 2013. Results indicated that average number of fruit per plant increased by decreasing plant densities but not single fruit weight and soluble solid content. It was suggested that 9524 plants ha-1 (210x50cm) of fodder watermelon was the most successful crop density regarding the total fruit yield (189 t ha-1). It was also concluded that fodder watermelon fruits can be easily stored 210 days with 24% weight loss without any rot

___

  • Acar, R. 2009. Forage watermelon (Citrillus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai var. citroides (Balley) Mansf.), Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Vol:3, pp:784-788.
  • Acar, B., R. Acar, B. Uzan and M. Direk. 2014. Effect of different irrigation levels on forage watermelon yield in Middle Anatolian Region of Turkey, International Journal of Agriculture and Economic Development, 2(1):10-15.
  • Acar, R., M.M. Özcan, G. Kanbur and N. Dursun. 2012. Some physico-chemical properties of edible and forage watermelon seeds, Iran. J. Chem. Eng., 31(4):41-47.
  • Akimtoye, H.A., A.A. Kintomo and A.A. Adekunke. 2009. Yield and fruit quality of watermelon in response to plant population, International J.of Veg. Sci, 15:369-380.
  • Aquino, J.G., M.A. Queiroz, S.M.C. Araujo, G. Bandel and P.S. Martins. 2000. Implications of the introgression between Citrillus colocynthis and C.lanatus characters in the taxonomy, Evoluationary dynamics and breeding of watermelon. Plant Gen.Resour.Newsl, 121, 15-19.
  • Duthie, J.A., J.W. Schrefler, B.W. Roberts and J.V. Edelson. 1999. Plant density dependent variation in marketable yield, fruit biomass, and marketable fraction in watermelon. Crop Sci. 39:406–412.
  • Geren, H., R. Avcıoglu, H. Soya, B. Kır, G. Demiroglu and Y.T. Kavut. 2011. A preliminary investigation on the yield and some yield characteristics of forage watermelon (Citrillus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai var. citroides (Balley) Mansf.) grown as second crop, 4th National Seed Congress of Turkey, 14-17 June 2011, Samsun, Vol.2, p.157-161.
  • Lyon, D.J. 2009. How do plant populations affect yield? Agricultural Research Division of IANR, University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
  • NeSmith, D.S. 1993. Plant spacing influences watermelon yield and yield components, Hort.Science, 28(9):885-887.
  • Ramírez, M.V.H., M.R. Salinas and F.C. Ferre. 2009. Influence of grafted watermelon plant density on yield and quality in soil infested with melon necrotic spot virus, Hort.science 44(7):1838–1841.
  • SAS Institute. 1998. INC SAS/STAT user’s guide release 7.0, Cary, NC, USA.
  • Sanders, D.C., J.D. Cure and J.R. Schultheis. 1999. Yield response of watermelon to planting density, planting pattern, and polyethylene mulch, Hort.science, 34(7):1221–1223.
  • Schultheis, J., R. Hassell, T. Kelley, R. Kumar, G. Miller, S. Olson and T.C. Wehner. 2009. Grafted watermelon: evaluation of rootstocks, cultivars and planting density for high yield and Fusarium wilt control, North Carolina State University, www.nationalwater melonassociation.com
  • Silva, R.L.N.V. 2003. Chemical composition, intake and apparent digestibility of diets containing different levels of forage watermelon bran (Citrullus lanatus cv. citroides) and guandu hay (Cajanus cajan cv. D1 Type), in sheep. Salvador, Bahia, 2003 82f. Dissertation (Master's degree in Tropical Veterinary Medicine), School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Bahia.
  • Silva, R.L.N.V., G.G.Leal de Araújo, E.P.do Socorro, R.L.Oliveira, A.F.G.Neto and A.R.Bagaldo. 2009. Levels of forage watermelon meal in diets for sheep. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38(6):1142-1148.
  • Simić, A., H. Geren, S. Vučković, S. Petrović and Ž. Dželetović. 2012. Comparison of fruit yield and some yield characteristics of forage watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) grown in Turkey and Serbia, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Animal Science, November 8th–10th, 2012, Book I, pp.496-503.
  • Simić, A., S. Vučković, S. Petrović, H. Geren and Đ. Moravčević. 2011. Possibilities of growing forage watermelons in Serbia. 5th Symposium with international Participation “Innovations in Crop and Vegetable Production”, Belgrade 20-22 October, Serbia, Book of abstracts, p.85-86.
  • Simić, A., H. Geren, S. Vučković, S. Petrović and Đ. Moravčević. 2013. Fruit yield and quality of irrigated forage watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) grown in Serbia. 2nd International Symposium and 18th Scientific Conference of Agronomists of Republic of Srpska, Book of abstracts, Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina, March 26-29, 2013, p:178-179.
  • Walters, S.A. 2009. Influence of plant density and cultivar on mini triploid watermelon y