YIELD COMPONENTS IN MUNG BEAN [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

YIELD COMPONENTS IN MUNG BEAN [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

This study was conducted to evaluate the yield components in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.)Wilczek] using the correlation, path and factor analyses. It was found that there was considerable variation for the characters studied. Factor 1 composed of 100-grain weight, podlength, pod width, branches per plant and pods per plant. The grain weight was stronglycorrelated with pod length and pod width. Pods per plant were significantly and positivelyassociated with branches per plant. Factor 2 consisted of biological, straw and grainyields. The seed yield was highly associated with biological and straw yields. Factor 3comprised of seed per pod, pods and flowers per peduncle. The fourth factor was onlythe days to flowering. The last factor was plant height. The total factors had 74% ofthe total variance induced by the characters. It was firstly concludedthat the factor analysis together with path and correlationcoefficients could successfully be used for determining characters usable for selection in themung bean breeding programs

___

  • Ahmed, Z.U., M.A.Q. Shaikh, M.A. Majid and S. Begum, 1981. Correlation studies in agronomiccharacters of mung bean (Vigna radiata). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Science 8:3-36.
  • Bahl, P.N., R.B. Mehra and D.B. Raju, 1976. Path analysis and its implications for chickpea breeding. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 77: 67-71.
  • Bos, I., and P. Caligari, 1995. Selection Methods in Plant Breeding. Published by Chapman andHall, 2-6 Boundary Row, London, SE1 8HN, UK.
  • Cagirgan, M.I. and M.B. Yildirim, 1990. An application of factor analysis to data from control andmacro mutant populations of ‘Quantum’ barley. J. Fac. of Agric. of Akdeniz University4: 125-138.
  • Canci, H. and C. Toker, 2009. Evaluation of Yield Criteria for Drought and Heat Resistance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Agronomy & Crop Science 195: 47-54.
  • Cattel, R.B., 1965. Factor analysis: An introduction to essentials. I. The propose and underlyingmodels. Biometrics 21: 190- 215.
  • Dewey, D.L. and K.H. Lu, 1959. A correlation and pathcoefficient analysis of components ofcrested wheatgrass seed production. Agron. J. 51: 515-518.
  • Duarte, R.A. and M.W. Adams, 1972. A path coefficient analysis of some yield componentsinterrelations in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop. Sci. 12: 579-582.
  • Godshalk, E.B. and D.H. Timothy, 1988. Factor and principal component analyses as alternativeto index selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 352-360.
  • IBPGR, 1985. Descriptors for Vigna mungo and V. radiata (Revised). International Board forPlant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.
  • Islam, M.Z. and M.A.Q. Shaikh, 1978. Correlation and pathcoefficient analysis of yield and yieldcomponents in lentil. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Science 5: 67-72.
  • Karadavut, U. 2009. Path analysis for yield and yield components in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Turkish J. of Field Crops, 14: 97-104.
  • Lee, J. and P.J. Kaltsikes, 1973. Multivariate statistical analysis of grain yield and agronomic characters in durum wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 43: 226-231.
  • Majid, M.A, S. Khanum, M.A.Q. Saikh and A.D. Bhuiya, 1982. Genetic variability and correlationstudies in black gram. Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture 7: 98-102. MINITAB 2000. Minitab Statistical Software vers. 13.1
  • Remanandan, P., D.V.S.S.R. Sastry and M.H. Mengesha, 1988. ICRISAT Pigeonpea GermplasmCatalog: Evaluation and Analysis. Patencheru, A.P. 502 324, India.
  • Shamsuzzaman, K.M., M.R.H. Khan and M.A.Q. Saikh, 1983. Genetic variability and charactersassociation in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Bangladesh Journal ofAgricultural Res. 8: 1-5.
  • Tickoo, J.L. and H.K. Jain, 1988. Mungbean. In: B. Baldev, S. Ramanujam and H.K. Jain, (Eds.), Pulse Crops (Grain Legumes, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India, pp. 161-188.
  • Toker, C., 1998. Estimate of heritabilities and genotype by environment interactions for 100- grain weight, days to flowering and plant height in kabuli chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Turk. J. Field Crops 3, 16-20.
  • Toker, C. and M.I. Cagirgan, 2003. Selection criteria in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Acta Agric.Scan. Section B, Soil and Plant Science 53: 42-45.
  • Toker, C., 2004. Evaluation of selection criteria using phenotypic and factor analysis inchickpea. Acta Agric. Scan. Section B, Soil and Plant Science 54:45-48.10
  • Toker, C. and M.I. Cagirgan, 2004. The use of phenotypic correlations and factor analysis indetermining characters for grain yield selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Hereditas 140: 226-228.