DRY MATTER YIELD AND SILAGE QUALITY OF SOME WINTER CEREALS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT STAGES UNDER MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE CONDITIONS

Winter cereals can provide feed earlier than annual grasses since they are generally more adaptable to early sowing due to their higher tolerance of dry conditions. Cereals are also better suited to single-cut silagemaking, whereas annual grasses require multiple cuts or grazings to be fully utilised. A field and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of different harvest stages on the dry matter yield and silage quality of some winter cereals, during 2009-2011 growing season. Effects of three different harvest stages (early heading, milky stage, mid-dough stage) on five cereals (Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, Secale cereale, Triticosecale, Avena sativa) were tested. The experiment was arranged in split block with four replications. Results indicated that, it was possible to produce an average of 10.9 t ha-1 dry matter yield and an average of 9.2% crude protein content at mid-dough stage in regions with Mediterranean-type climates. It was also concluded that Avena sativa should be preferred for high biomass yield and should be cut at the beginning of mid-dough maturity stages for higher quality silage

PDF

___

Alcicek,A. and K.Ozkan. 1996. Zur quantitativen Bestimmung von Milch-, Essig- und Buttersäuren in Silage mit Hilfe eines Destillationsverfahren, J.of Agr.Fac.of Ege Univ, 33(2- 3):191-198.
Ben-Ghedalia,D., A.Kabala, J.Miron and E.Yosef. 1995. Silage fermentation and in vitro degradation of monosaccharide constituents of wheat harvested at two stages of maturity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43:2428–2431.
Bergen,W.G., T.M.Byrem and A.L.Grant. 1991. Ensiling characteristics of whole-crop small grains harvested at milk and dough stages. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1766–1774.
Bocchi,S., G.Lazzaroni, N.Berardo and T.Maggiore. 1996. Evaluation of triticale as a forage plant through the analysis of the kinetics of qualitative from stem elongation to maturity. Kluwer Acad. Publishers, 827-834.
Brand,T.S., C.W.Cruywagen, D.A.Brandt, M.Viljoen and W.W.Burger. 2003. Variation in the chemical composition, physical characteristics and energy values of cereal grains produced in the Western Cape area of South Africa, South African Journal of Animal Science 33(2):117-126.
Brink,G.E. and G.C.Martin. 1986. Barley vs oat companion crops. I. Forage yield and quality response during alfalfa establishment. Crop Sci. 26:1060-1067.
Budaklı Çarpıcı, E., N.Çelik and G.Bayram, 2010. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate, Turk. J. Field Crops, 15(2):128-132.
Cherney,J.H. and G.C.Martin. 1982. Small grain crop forage potential: I.Biological and chemical determinants of quality and yield, Crop Sci. 22:227-231.
De Ruiter, J.M, and R.Hanson. 2004. Whole crop cereal silageproduction and use in dairy, beef, sheep and deer farming. Christchurch, NZ: NZ Institute for Crop and Food Research Ltd.
De Ruiter,J.M., R.Hanson, A.S.Hay, K.W.Armstrong and R.D.Harrison-Kirk. 2002. Whole-crop cereals for grazing and silage: balancing quality and quantity, Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 64: 181–189.
Delogu,G., N.Faccini, P.Faccioli, F.Reggiani, M.Lendini, N.Berardo and M.Odoardi. 2002. Dry matter yield and quality evaluation at two phenological stages of forage triticale grown in the Po Valley and Sardinia Italy, Field Crops Research 74:207-215.
Juskiw,P.E., J.H.Helma and D.F.Salmona. 2000. Forage yield and quality for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals, Crop Sci. 40:138–147.
Kaiser,A.G., J.W.Piltz, H.M.Burns and N.E.Griffiths. 2004. Successful Silage, Edition 2.Dairy Australia and NSW Department of Primary industries, NSW DPI, Orange.
Khorasani,G.R., P.E.Jedel, J.H.Helm and J.J.Kennelly. 1997. Influence of stage of maturity on yield components and chemical composition of cereal grain silages. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 77:259–267.
Kristensen,N.B., K.H.Sloth, O.Højberg, N.H.Spliid, C.Jensen and R.Thøgersen. 2010. Effects of microbial inoculants on corn silage fermentation, microbial contents, aerobic stability, and milk production under field conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 93:3764–3774.
McCartney,D.H. and A.S.Vaage. 1994. Comparative yield and feeding value of barley, oat and triticale silages, Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74: 91-96.
Neal,J.S., W.J.Fulkerson and L.C.Campbell. 2010. Differences in yield among annual forages used by the dairyindustry under optimal and deficit irrigation. Crop and Pasture Science 61(8):625–638.
Pereira-Crespo,S., B.Fernández-Lorenzo, J.Valladares, A.González-Arráez and G.Flores. 2010. Effects of seeding rates and harvest date on forage yield and nutritive value of pea-triticale intercropping, Options Méditerranéennes, A no. 92,-The contributions of grasslands to the conservation of Mediterranean biodiversity, 215-218.
Petterson,K. 1988. Ensiling of Forages: Factors affecting silage fermentation and quality, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Uppsala, 46p.
Pugnaire,F.I. and F.S.Chapin. 1992. Environmental and physiological factors governing nutrient resorption efficiency in barley, Oecologia 90:120-126.
SAS Institute. 1998. INC SAS/STAT user’s guide release 7.0, Cary, NC, USA.
Schneider,S., R.Vogel and U.Wyss. 1991. Die eignung von triticale zur bereitung von ganzpflanzensilage. Landwirtschaft Schweiz Band 4:407–411.
Siefers,M.K. and K.K.Bolsen. 1997. Agronomic and silage quality traits of winter cereals. 1st Silage Congress in Turkey, Bursa, 201-203.
Stell,R.G.D., J.A.Torrie and D.A.Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A.Biometrical Approach 3rd Edi. Mc Graw Hill Book. INC. NY.
Twidwell,E.K., K.D.Johnson, J.H.Cherney and H.W.Ohm. 1987. Forage yield and quality of soft red winter wheats and a winter triticale. Appl. Agric. Res. 2:84–88.