Transmission power control using state estimation-based received signal strength prediction for energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks

Transmission power control using state estimation-based received signal strength prediction for energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks

In battery-operated wireless sensor networks, the quality of service requirements such as throughput and energy efficiency must be stringently maintained while the least amount of energy is consumed. Since a major portion of energy is spent by the transceiver operations, transmission power control (TPC) in the medium access control (MAC) layer can bring about considerable energy efficiency. Since TPC algorithms will have a direct impact on the received signal strength index (RSSI) at the receiver, RSSI is the primary input parameter for any TPC algorithm. The objective of the proposed work is to decide on the exact value of transmission power required for the next transmission that will ensure an RSSI just above the threshold level at the receiver. Since this involves estimation of RSSI for the next transmission, we propose three state estimation techniques, namely Kalman filter (KF), extended KF (EKF), and unscented KF (UKF) to predict the RSSI accurately. This predicted value is used as an input for an artificial neural network (ANN)-based TPC algorithm. The effectiveness of the estimation techniques is verified by the prediction error. The accuracy of prediction is reflected in the TPC algorithm in terms of reduced power utilization

___

  • [1] Mo Y, Ambrosino R, Sinopoli B. Sensor selection strategies for state estimation in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. Automatica 2011; 47: 1330-1338.
  • [2] Ribeiro A, Schizas JD, Roumeliotis SI, Giannakis GB. Kalman filtering in WSN. IEEE Contr Syst Mag 2010; 30: 66-86.
  • [3] Qin F, Dai X, Mitchell JE. Effective SNR estimation for wireless sensor network using Kalman filter. Ad Hoc Netw 2013; 11: 944-958.
  • [4] Wang C, Chen X, Li W. Energy efficient distributed Kalman filter for wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE 2014 11th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control; 7–9 April 2014; Miami, Florida: IEEE. pp. 161-166.
  • [5] Niida S, Suzuki T, Takeuchi Y. Experimental results of outer loop transmission power control using wideband CDMA for IMT-2000. In: IEEE 2000 51st Vehicular Technology Conference; 15–18 May 2000; Tokyo, Japan: IEEE. pp. 775-779.
  • [6] Dutta A, Sarin S. Performance optimization in GSM networks through dynamic power control. In: IEEE 2002 5th International Conference on High Speed Networks and Multimedia Communications Conference; 3–5 July 2002; Jeju Island, Korea: IEEE. pp. 197-201.
  • [7] Kubisch M, Karl H, Wolisz A, Zhong LC, Rabaey J. Distributed algorithms for transmission power control in wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE 2003 Wireless Communications and Networking Conference; 20–20 March 2003; New Orleans, USA: IEEE. pp. 558-563.
  • [8] Son D, Krishnamachari B, Heidemann J. Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks. In: First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks; 4–7 October 2004; Santa Clara, USA: IEEE. pp. 289-298.
  • [9] Kim J, Chang S, Kwon Y. ODTPC On-demand transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Information Networking; 23–25 January 2008; Busan, South Korea: IEEE. pp. 1-5.
  • [10] Masood MMY, Ahmed G, Khan NM (2012). A Kalman filter based adaptive on demand transmission power control (AODTPC) algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Emerging Technologies; 8–9 October 2012; Islamabad, Pakistan: IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • [11] Jin S, Fu J, Xu L. The transmission power control method for wireless sensor networks based on LQI and RSSI. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science AsiaSim; 27–30 October 2012; Shanghai, China; pp. 37-44.
  • [12] Akbulut A, Ozta¸s O. Control in networked systems with fuzzy logic. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2013; 21: 225-233. ¨
  • [13] Sheu JP, Hsieh KY, Cheng YK. Distributed transmission power control algorithm for wireless sensor networks. J Inf Sci Eng 2009; 25: 1447-1463.
  • [14] Chen J. RSSI based indoor power localization in Wireless Sensor Network. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its applications 2011; 5: 408-416.
  • [15] Jiang T, Sidiropoulos ND, Giannakis GB. Kalman filtering for power estimation in mobile communications. IEEE T Wirel Commun 2003; 2: 151-161.
  • [16] Rappaport T. Wireless Communications Principles and Practices. 2nd edition. London, UK 2002: Pearson.
  • [17] Simon D. Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity and Nonlinear Approaches. 1st edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA 2006: John Wiley and Sons.
  • [18] Kim J, Kwon Y. Interference-aware transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. IEICE T Commun 2008; 11: 3434-3441.
  • [19] Sabitha R, Thyagarajan T. Fuzzy logic based transmission power control algorithm for energy efficient MAC protocol in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems 2012; 9: 247-265.
  • [20] Ramakrishnan S, Thangavelu T. Performance enhancement of fuzzy logic based transmission power control in wireless sensor networks using Markov based RSSI prediction. European Journal of Scientific Research 2011; 59: 68-84.