A hybrid tracking system for image-guided spine surgery using a tracked mobile C-arm: a phantom study

A hybrid tracking system for image-guided spine surgery using a tracked mobile C-arm: a phantom study

In recent years, an increasing number of various surgeries are observed utilizing fluoroscopy. The radiation exposure received by patients and medical staff and the surgical guidance in multiple planes frequently necessitate the positioning of a mobile C-arm. Operative navigation enables a mobile C-arm to provide multiplanar surgical guidance and decreases the radiation dose to the patient and operating room personnel. In this study, we propose a videobased tracked mobile C-arm (referred to as a tracked C-arm system ) to position the system. This system defines a reference framework to maintain the video-optical tracker data and computed tomography (CT) or cone-beam CT images alignment as fine as possible despite patient or tracker movement. By employing our uniquely designed sixfacetreference marker attached to the spine phantom, registration between the video-optical tracker and the spine phantom is maintained at arbitrary angles of the mobile C-arm. The tracked C-arm system provides a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001) in target registration error in comparison with the conventional system: 0.80 ± 0.34 mm versus 1.60 ± 0.43 mm, respectively. The tracked C-arm system is designed to generate digitally reconstructed radiograph images from the mobile C-arm perspective, with projection error on the order of 0.74 ± 0.13 mm. Integration of the hybrid tracking system with mobile C-arm guidance has the capability to provide registration, reduce radiation exposure, and improve target registration accuracy.

___

  • [1] Boszczyk BM, Bierschneider M, Panzer S, Panzer W, Harstall R, Schmid K, Jaksche H. Fluoroscopic radiation exposure of the kyphoplasty patient. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 347-355.
  • [2] Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine 2000; 25: 2637-2645.
  • [3] Synowitz M, Kiwit J. Surgeon’s radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg-Spine 2006; 4: 106-109.
  • [4] Theocharopoulos N, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Occupational exposure from common fluoroscopic projections used in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85: 1698-1703.
  • [5] Foley KT, Simon DA, Rampersaud YR. Virtual fluoroscopy: computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Spine 2001; 26: 347-351.
  • [6] Euler E, Heining S, Riquarts C, Mutschler W. C-arm-based three-dimensional navigation: a preliminary feasibility study. Comput Aided Surg 2003; 8: 35-41.
  • [7] van de Kraats EB, Carelsen B, Fokkens WJ, Boon SN, Noordhoek N, Niessen WJ, van Walsum T. Direct navigation on 3D rotational x-ray data acquired with a mobile propeller C-arm: accuracy and application in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 5769.
  • [8] van de Kraats EB, Walsum Tv, Kendrick L, Noordhoek NJ, Niessen WJ. Accuracy evaluation of direct navigation with an isocentric 3D rotational X-ray system. Med Image Anal 2006; 10: 113-124.
  • [9] Sorensen S, Mitschke M, Solberg T. Cone-beam CT using a mobile C-arm: a registration solution for IGRT with an optical tracking system. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 3389.
  • [10] Feuerstein M, Mussack T, Heining SM, Navab N. Intraoperative laparoscope augmentation for port placement and resection planning in minimally invasive liver resection. IEEE T Med Imaging 2008; 27: 355-369.
  • [11] Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Takahata M, Sudo H, Ohshima S, Minami A. Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique. Spine 2007; 32: 1543-1550.
  • [12] Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 235-240.
  • [13] Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 2007; 32: E56-E64.
  • [14] Ritter D, Mitschke M, Graumann R. Markerless navigation with the intra-operative imaging modality SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D. Electromedica 2002; 70: 31-36.
  • [15] Dressel P, Wang L, Kutter O, Traub J, Heining SM, Navab N. Intraoperative positioning of mobile C-arms using artificial fluoroscopy. In: IEEE 2010 SPIE Medical Imaging; 23 February 2010; San Diego, CA, USA. Bellingham, WA, USA: IEEE. pp. 762506-762506.
  • [16] Navab N, Heining SM, Traub J. Camera augmented mobile C-arm (CAMC): Calibration, accuracy study, and clinical applications. IEEE T Med Imaging 2010; 29: 1412-1423.
  • [17] Cho Y, Moseley DJ, Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems. Med Phys 2005; 32: 968-983.
  • [18] Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD. Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE T Pattern Anal 1987; 9: 698-700.
  • [19] West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, Maurer Jr CR, Maciunas RJ. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001; 48: 810-817.
  • [20] Fitzpatrick JM, West JB. The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE T Med Imaging 2001; 20: 917-927.
  • [21] Siddon RL. Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. Med Phys 1985; 12: 252-255.
  • [22] Labadie RF, Shah RJ, Harris SS, Cetinkaya E, Haynes DS, Fenlon MR, Juszczyk AS, Galloway RL, Fitzpatrick JM. In vitro assessment of image-guided otologic surgery: submillimeter accuracy within the region of the temporal bone. Otolaryng Head Neck 2005; 132: 435-442.
  • [23] Strong EB, Rafii A, Holhweg-Majert B, Fuller SC, Metzger MC. Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery. Otolaryng Head Neck 2008; 134: 1080-1084.
  • [24] Fried MP, Kleefield J, Gopal H, Reardon E, Ho BT, Kuhn FA. Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope 1997; 107: 594-601.
  • [25] Hamming NM, Daly MJ, Irish JC, Siewerdsen JH. Effect of fiducial configuration on target registration error in intraoperative cone-beam CT guidance of head and neck surgery. In: IEEE 2008 Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 20–25 August 2008; Vancouver, Canada. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE. pp. 3643-3648.
  • [26] Maier-Hein L, Tekbas A, Seitel A, Pianka F, M¨uller SA, Satzl S, Schawo S, Radeleff B, Tetzlaff R, Franz AM. In vivo accuracy assessment of a needle-based navigation system for CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the liver. Med Phys 2008; 35: 5385-5396.
  • [27] Birkfellner W, Solar P, Gahleitner A, Huber K, Kainberger F, Kettenbach J, Homolka P, Diemling M, Watzek G, Bergmann H. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implan Res 2001; 12: 69-78.
  • [28] Labadie RF, Shah RJ, Harris SS, Cetinkaya E, Haynes DS, Fenlon MR, Juscyzk AS, Galloway RL, Fitzpatrick JM. Submillimetric target-registration error using a novel, non-invasive fiducial system for image-guided otologic surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2004; 9: 145-153.
  • [29] Blostein SD, Huang TS. Error analysis in stereo determination of 3-D point positions. IEEE T Pattern Anal 1987; 9: 752-765.
  • [30] Chang C, Chatterjee S. Quantization error analysis in stereo vision. In: IEEE 1992 Signals, Systems and Computers; 26–28 October 1992; Pacific Grove, CA, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1037-1041.
  • [31] Gallup D, Frahm JM, Mordohai P, Pollefeys M. Variable baseline/resolution stereo. In: IEEE 2008 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 23–28 June 2008; Anchorage, AK, USA. Fort Collins, CO, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-8.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK