Comparative study between measured and estimated wind energy yield

Comparative study between measured and estimated wind energy yield

This paper proposes a power-speed (P-V) model of the wind turbine by assuming three different functions for the first performance region; cubic, quadratic and uncorrected cubic. These three functions have been compared with the manufacturer models of five different wind turbines which were installed in five different locations in Jordan; Tafila, Hofa, Fujeij, Al Rajef, and Deahan. The wind turbine of these wind farms are considered as large scale HAWT in the range of Mw. The generated P-V models are developed by applying a new method described in this paper which is basically based on generating a multiplier factor x. In this study, the quadratic model shows the highest correlation compared with the other models. The wind energy yield for the selected wind farms has been estimated by a mathematical modelling based on Rayleigh distribution function, derived in this paper. The energy yield using this mathematical model has been compared with the measured energy output of four wind farms, Tafila, Hofa, Al Rajef, and Deahan. The measured energy were provided by the operators of these wind farms which are: Jordan Wind Project Company(JWPC), Central Electricity Generation Company (CEGC), Green Watts Renewable Energy (GWRC)and Korean Southern Power Company(KOSPO). Results show that the estimated energy using the quadratic wind turbine model for all wind farms are very close to the actual output. Accuracy analysis for the quadratic model resulted in an error of less than 10 % between the measured and estimated energy output for all wind farms. The capacity factors for the selected wind farms have been estimated using the quadratic P-V model. Results show that Tafila wind farm has the highest capacity factor which is around 47 % .

___

  • [1] EL-Shimy M. A new strategy for wind turbine selection using optimization based on rated wind speed. Elsevier Journal of Renewable Energy 2010; 35 (8): 1870-1878.
  • [2] Perkin S, Garrett D, Jensson P. Optimal wind turbine selection methodology: a case-study for Búrfell, Iceland. Elsevier Journal of Renewable Energy 2015; 75: 165-172.
  • [3] Mathew S, Pandey KP, Kumar A. Analysis of wind regimes for energy estimation. Elsevier Journal of Renewable Energy 2002; 25 (3): 381-399.
  • [4] Aghbalouab N, Charkib N, Elazzouzic SR, Reklaoui K. A probabilistic assessment approach for wind turbine-site matching. Elsevier International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2018; 103: 497-510.
  • [5] Shoaib M, Siddiqui I, Rehman S, Khan S, Alhems LM. Assessment of wind energy potential using wind energy conversion system. Elsevier Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 216: 346-360.
  • [6] Wang J, Hu J, Ma K. Wind speed probability distribution estimation and wind energy assessment. Elsevier Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016; 60: 881-899.
  • [7] Albadi M, El-Saadany E. Wind turbines capacity factor modeling— a novel approach. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 2009; 24 (3): 1637-1638.
  • [8] Mathew S, Lim C, Petra M, Philip G, Noorfathine M et al. Marching the characteristics of low wind speed turbines with candidate wind regimes. Elsevier Journal of Energy Procedia 2016; 95: 286-293.
  • [9] Abul’Wafa A. Matching wind turbine generators with wind regime in Egypt. Elsevier Journal of Electric Power Systems Research 2011; 81: 894-898.
  • [10] Golnary F, Moradi H. Dynamic modelling and design of various robust sliding mode controls for the wind turbine with estimation of wind speed. Elsevier Journal of Applied Mathematical Modelling 2019; 65: 566-585.
  • [11] Bataineh KM, Dalalah D. Assessment of wind energy potential for selected areas in Jordan. Elsevier Journal of Renewable Energy 2013; 59: 75-81.
  • [12] Celik AN. A statistical analysis of wind power density based on the Weibull and Rayleigh models at the southern region of Turkey. Elsevier Journal of Renewable Energy 2004; 29 (4): 593-604.
  • [13] Al-Quraan A, Stathopoulos T, Pillay P. Comparison of wind tunnel and on site measurements for urban wind energy estimation of potential yields. Elsevier Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 2016; 158: 1-10.
  • [14] Al-Quraan A, Alrawashdeh H. Correlated capacity factor strategy for yield maximization of wind turbine energy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy Generation and Applications; Al-Ain, UAE; 2018. pp. 264-267
  • [15] Sedaghat A, Alkhatib F, Eilaghi A, Sabati M, Mostafaeipour A. A new strategy for wind turbine selection using optimization based on rated wind speed. Elsevier Journal of Energy Procedia 2019; 160: 582-589.
  • [16] Chen J, Wang F, Stelson KA. A mathematical approach to minimizing the cost of energy for large utility wind turbines. Elsevier Journal of Applied Energy 2018; 228: 1413-1422.
  • [17] Arias-Rosales A, Osorio-Gómez G. Wind turbine selection method based on the statistical analysis of nominal specifications for estimating the cost of energy. Elsevier Journal of Applied Energy 2018; 228: 980-998.
  • [18] Stathopoulos T, Alrawashdeh H, Al-Quraan A, Blocken B, Dilimulati A et al. Urban wind energy: some views on potential and challenges. Elsevier Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 2018; 179: 146-157.
  • [19] Al-Quraan A, Pillay P, Stathopoulos T. Use of a wind tunnel for urban wind power estimation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting; Washington, DC, USA; 2014. pp. 1-5.
  • [20] Boudia SM , Benmansour A, Hellal MAT. Wind resource assessment in Algeria. Elsevier Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society 2016; 22: 171-183.
  • [21] Paraschiv LS, Paraschiv S, Ion IV. Investigation of wind power density distribution using Rayleigh probability density function. Elsevier Journal of Energy Procedia 2019; 157: 1546-1552.
  • [22] Azad K, Rasul M, Halder P, Sutariya J. Assessment of wind energy prospect by weibull distribution for prospective wind sites in Australia. Elsevier Journal of Energy Procedia 2019; 160: 348-355.
  • [23] Habali SM, Amr M, Saleh I, Ta’ani R. Wind as an alternative source of energy in Jordan. Energy Conversion Management Journal 2001; 42(3): 339–357.
  • [24] Bidaoui H, ElAbbassi I, ElBouardi A, Darcherif A. Wind speed data analysis using Weibull and Rayleigh distribution functions, case study: five cities northern Morocco. Elsevier Journal of Procedia Manufacturing 2019; 32: 786-793.
  • [25] Stathopoulos T. Introduction to Wind Engineering, Wind Structure and Wind-Building Interaction. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2007.
  • [26] Eminoglu U, Turksoy O. Power curve modeling for wind turbine systems: a comparison study. Taylor and Francis International Journal of Ambient Energy 2019; 1: 1-11. doi: 10.1080/01430750.2019.1630302
  • [27] Carrillo C, Montan AFO, Cidra J, Diaz-Dorado E. Review of power curve modeling for wind turbines. Elsevier Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013; 21: 572-581.
  • [28] Al-Masri HM, Al-Quraan A, AbuElrub A, Ehsani M. Optimal coordination of wind power and pumped hydro energy storage. MDPI Journal of Energies 2019; 12 (22): 4387.