Short-term load forecasting using mixed lazy learning method

A novel short-term load forecasting method based on the lazy learning (LL) algorithm is proposed. The LL algorithm's input data are electrical load information, daily electricity consumption patterns, and temperatures in a specified region. In order to verify the ability of the proposed method, a load forecasting problem, using the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection electrical load data, is carried out. Three LL models are proposed: constant, linear, and mixed models. First, the performances of the 3 developed models are compared using the root mean square error technique. The best technique is then selected to compete with the state-of-the-art neural network (NN) load forecasting models. A comparison is made between the performances of the proposed mixed-model LL as the superior LL model and the radial basis function and multilayer perceptron NN models. The results reveal significant improvements in the precision and efficiency of the proposed forecasting model when compared with the NN techniques.

Short-term load forecasting using mixed lazy learning method

A novel short-term load forecasting method based on the lazy learning (LL) algorithm is proposed. The LL algorithm's input data are electrical load information, daily electricity consumption patterns, and temperatures in a specified region. In order to verify the ability of the proposed method, a load forecasting problem, using the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection electrical load data, is carried out. Three LL models are proposed: constant, linear, and mixed models. First, the performances of the 3 developed models are compared using the root mean square error technique. The best technique is then selected to compete with the state-of-the-art neural network (NN) load forecasting models. A comparison is made between the performances of the proposed mixed-model LL as the superior LL model and the radial basis function and multilayer perceptron NN models. The results reveal significant improvements in the precision and efficiency of the proposed forecasting model when compared with the NN techniques.

___

  • Table Detailed values of different load forecasting methods on the first day of January 2007.
  • The simulation results show a significant improvement in both reduced RMSE and computational speed.
  • An overall 5% improvement in the accuracy of load forecasting using the MLL technique compared with the
  • RBF and MLP NN techniques has been achieved. A further improvement is observed in the computation rate
  • of the proposed MLL technique. It is 5 times faster than the MLP NN technique.
  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM. Time Series Analysis-Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, CA, USA: Holden-Day, 1970.
  • Kandil MS, El-Debeiky SM, Hasanien NE. Long-term load forecasting for fast developing utility using a knowledge
  • based expert system. IEEE T Power Syst 2002; 17: 491–496.
  • Xiao Z, Zhong SYB, Sun C. BP neural networks with rough set for short term load forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 2009; 36: 273–279.
  • Xia C, Wang J, Menery KM. Short, medium and long term load forecasting model and virtual load forecaster based
  • on redial bases function neural network. Int J Elec Power 2010; 32: 743–750.
  • Ho KL, Hsu YY, Yang CC. Short-term load forecasting using a multilayer neural network with an adaptive learning
  • algorithm. IEEE T Power Syst 1992; 7: 141–149.
  • Chen ST, Yu DC, Moghaddamjo AR. Weather sensitive short-term load forecasting using non-fully connected
  • artificial neural network. IEEE T Power Syst 1992; 7: 1098–1105.
  • Hippert HS, Pedreira CE, Souza RC. Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: a review and evaluation.
  • IEEE T Power Syst 2001; 16: 44–55.
  • Al-Kamdari AM, Soliman SA, Al-Hawary ME. Fuzzy short-term electrical load forecasting. Int J Elec Power 2004; 26: 111–122.
  • Pai PF. Hybrid ellipsoidal fuzzy systems in forecasting regional electricity loads. Energ Convers Manage 2006; 47: 2283–2289.
  • Chuangxin BY, Cao GY. Short-term load forecasting using a new fuzzy modeling strategy. In: 5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation Conference; June 2004; Hangzhou, China. pp. 5045–5049.
  • Gao RG, Soukalas LHT. Neural-wavelet methodology for load forecasting. J Intell Robot Syst 2001; 10: 149–157.
  • Bashir Z, El-Hawary ME. Short-term load forecasting by using wavelet neural networks. In: Canadian Electrical
  • and Computer Engineering Conference; March 2000; Halifax, Canada. pp. 163–166.
  • Tao D, Xiuli W, Xifan W. A combined model of wavelet and neural network for short term load forecasting. In: International Conference on Power System Technology; October 2002. pp. 2331–2335.
  • Liang RH, Cheng CC. Short-term load forecasting by a neuro-fuzzy approach. Int J Elec Power 2002; 24: 103–111.
  • Xiao MW, Min BX, Shun ML. Short-term load forecasting with artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. In: International Conference on Power System Technology; October 2002. pp. 1101–1104.
  • Ansarimehr P, Barghinia S, Habibi H, Vafadar N. Short-term load forecasting for Iran National Power System
  • using artificial neural network and fuzzy expert system. In: International Conference on Power System Technology; October 2002. pp. 1082–1085.
  • Barzamini R, Menhaj MB, Khosravi A, Kamalvand SH. Short-term load forecasting for Iran National Power System and its regions using multilayer perceptron and fuzzy inference systems. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; August 2005; Montreal, Canada. pp. 2619–2624.
  • Birattari M, Bontempi G, Bersini H. Lazy learning: a local method for supervised learning. In: Jain LC, Kacprzyk J, editors. New Learning Paradigms in Soft Computing. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag GmbH, 1999. pp. 97–136.
  • Aha DW. Lazy Learning. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
  • Bertolissi E. Data-driven techniques for direct adaptive control: the lazy and the fuzzy approaches. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2001; 3: 3–14.
  • Bontempi GL. The local paradigm for modeling and control: from neuro-fuzzy to lazy learning. Fuzzy Set Syst 2001; 4: 59–71.
  • Bontempi GL. Lazy learning for control design. In: European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks; April 1998; Bruges, Belgium. pp. 73–78.
  • Corani G. Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning.
  • Ecol Model 2005; 185: 513–529.
  • Sorjamaa A. Pruned Lazy Learning Models for Time Series Prediction. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology, 2007.
  • Aha DW, editor. Special issue on lazy learning. Artif Intell Rev 1997; 11: 1–6. Riverola FF, Iglesias EL, D´ıaz F, M´endez JR, Corchado JM. Spam hunting: an instance-based reasoning system for spam labelling and filtering. Decis Support Syst 2006; 43: 722–736.
  • Bontempi G, Birattari M, Bersini H. Local learning for iterated time-series prediction. In: International Conference on Machine Learning; 1999; San Francisco, CA, USA. pp. 32–38.
  • Capacity Adequacy Planning Department. PJM LOAD/ENERGY forecasting model. White paper. Valley Forge, PA, USA: PJM Interconnection, 2007.
  • Birattari M, Bontempi GL. Lazy Learning. Brussels, Belgium: Free University of Brussels, 1999.
  • Birattari M, Bontempi G. Lazy learning vs. speedy: a fast algorithm for recursive identification and recursive validation of local constant models. Technical report TR/IRIDIA/99-6. Brussels, Belgium: IRIDIA-ULB, 1999.
  • Maron O, Moore A. The racing algorithm: model selection for lazy learners. Artif Intell Rev 2006; 11: 193–225.
  • Goodwin GC, Sin KS. Adaptive Filtering Prediction and Control. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1984.
  • Ho KL, Hsu YY, Chen CF, Lee TE, Liang CC, Lai TS, Chen KK. Short term load forecasting of Taiwan power system using a knowledge-based expert system. IEEE T Power Syst 1990; 5: 1214–1221.
  • Goia A, May C, Fusai G. Functional clustering and linear regression for peak load forecasting. Int J Forecasting 2010; 26: 700–711.
  • Kariniotakis GN. Load forecasting using dynamic high-order neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Forum on the Applications of Neural Networks to Power Systems; April 1993; Yokohoma, Japan. pp. 801–805.
  • Hippert HS, Tailor JW. An evaluation of Bayesian techniques for controlling model complexity and selecting inputs
  • in a neural network for short-term load forecasting. Neural Networks 2010; 23: 386–395.
  • Buhmann MD, Ablowitz MJ. Radial Basis Functions Theory and Implementations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University, 2003.
  • Chen S, Cowan CFN, Grant PM. Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE T Neural Networ 1991; 2: 224–230.
  • Poggio T, Girosi F. Networks for approximation and learning. Proc IEEE 1990; 78: 1484–1487.
  • Jones RD, Lee YC, Barnes CW, Flake GW. Function approximation and time series prediction with neural networks.
  • In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; June 1990; San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 649–665.
  • Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1998.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Control of oxygen excess ratio in a PEM fuel cell system using high-order sliding-mode controller and observer

Seyed Mehdi RAKHTALA, Abolfazl Ranjbar NOEI, Reza GHADERI, Elio USAI

A hierarchic approach based on swarm intelligence to solve the traveling salesman problem

Mesut GÜNDÜZ, Mustafa Servet KIRAN, Eren ÖZCEYLAN

A new cascaded multilevel inverter with series and parallel connection ability of DC voltage sources

Ebrahim BABAEI, Saeed Sheermohammadzadeh GOWGANI, Mehran SABAHI

Simulation of locating buried objects via fringe pattern-based measurements in an optical fiber sensor-integrated continuous-wave ground-penetrating radar system

Asaf Behzat ŞAHİN, Hatice Gonca BULUR

Sensitivity analysis and optimum design for the stator of synchronous reluctance machines using the coupled finite element and Taguchi methods

Hossein AZIZI, Abolfazal VAHEDI

Adaptive network-based inference system models on multiband patch antenna design

Erdem DEMİRCİOĞLU, Murat Hüsnü SAZLI, Orhan ŞENGÜL, Şehabeddin Taha ˙IMECİ, Hakkı Alparslan ILGIN

Enhancing sliding mode control with proportional feedback and feedforward: an experimental investigation on speed sensorless control of PM DC motor drives

Mehmet DAL

A novel efficient model for the power flow analysis of power systems

Amir SAFDARIAN, Mahmud FOTUHI-FIRUZABAD, Farrokh AMINIFAR

Investigation of respiratory and heart rate variability in hypertensive patients

Ramazan ALDEMİR, Mahmut TOKMAKÇI

MRAS-based sensorless speed backstepping control for induction machine, using a flux sliding mode observer

Mohamed MOUTCHOU, Ahmed ABBOU, Hassan MAHMOUDI