Infusing Technical Communication and Teamwork within the ECE Curriculum

This paper highlights a unique approach to infusing formal training and practice in oral and written communication and teamwork development in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at the University of Utah. Faculty and graduate (Ph.D.) students from the College of Humanities have teamed up with faculty from engineering to develop communication and teamwork instruction that is integrated into the existing engineering curriculum. These skills are used as a vehicle to provide better understanding of engineering concepts and their applications.

Infusing Technical Communication and Teamwork within the ECE Curriculum

This paper highlights a unique approach to infusing formal training and practice in oral and written communication and teamwork development in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at the University of Utah. Faculty and graduate (Ph.D.) students from the College of Humanities have teamed up with faculty from engineering to develop communication and teamwork instruction that is integrated into the existing engineering curriculum. These skills are used as a vehicle to provide better understanding of engineering concepts and their applications.

___

  • John C. Bean, Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing. Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2001
  • NSF. Integrated System-Level Design in Electrical Engineering, NSF Project EEC-0431958. Description available online at: www.ece.utah.edu/∼cfurse/NSF, 2005
  • Deanna P. Dannels, et al., “Challenges in Learning Communication Skills in Chemical Engineering,” Commu- nication Education, 53, pp. 50 – 59, 2003
  • J. D. Ford, L. A. Riley, “Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: A Look at Curricula, Courses, and Support Systems,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92, pp. 325-328, 2003 The Boyer Commission Report, Retrieved March , from http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/ Purdue, “Higher Order Concerns (HOCs) and Lower Order Concerns (LOCs).” (1995-2004). Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University, Retrieved February , from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl hocloc,html
  • Earl A. Smith, et al. “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices.” Journal of Engineering Educa- tion, Jan. 2005
  • Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. www.abet.org. Deanna P. Dannels, “Communication Across the Curriculum and in the Disciplines: Speaking in Engineering,” Communication Education, 51 , pp. 254 – 268, 2002 LeCourt & Kiefer. WAC Clearinghouse, Retrieved March , from http://wac.colostate.edu/intro/pop4a.cfm
  • Bruce Ballenger, The Curious Researcher (4thed.). New York: Pearson/Longman. 2004.
  • James Britton, et al., The Development of Writing Abilities (11-18). London: MacMillan Education, 1975
  • Susan H. McLeod, “Writing Across the Curriculum: An Introduction.” In S. H. McLeod & M. Soven (Eds.), Writing Across the Curriculum: A Guide to Developing Programs. Sage Publications., 1992
  • Nancy Sommers, (Dir. Expository Writing Program). “Shaped by Writing: The Undergraduate Experience.” Harvard University. 2004, Retrieved 2004, from http://fas.harvard.edu/∼expos.
  • Art Young, Teaching Writing Across the Curriculum (4thed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pear- son/Prentice Hall, 2006
  • Pradeep K. Agrawal, “Integration of Critical Thinking and Technical Communications into Undergraduate Laboratory Courses.” Proceedings, 1997 ASEE Annual Conference, 1997
  • CLEAR, (2005). www.ece.utah.edu/∼cfurse/CLEAR
  • L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, (Eds.), A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. 2001.
  • L. Reave, ”Technical Communication Instruction in Engineering Schools: A Survey of Top-Ranked U.S. and Canadian Programs,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18 , pp. 452 – 490, 2004.