Retention and Transport of Hexavalent Chromium in Calcareous Karst Soils

Hexavalent chromium, which is a highly toxic and soluble form of the element chromium, is a common soil and groundwater contaminant found in many contaminated sites throughout the world and poses a serious risk to human health when released into environment. The objective of this study was to determine transport and retention behaviour of aqueous Cr(VI) species in a highly calcareous and alkaline top soil of a karst system that is vulnerable to contamination. Batch sorption studies and column experiments conducted at both saturated and unsaturated steady-state flow conditions were used to evaluate the sorption/desorption and the transport of Cr(VI) in the alkaline soil conditions. The results of batch experiments indicated that Cr(VI) sorption was linear up to 200 mg L-1 of Cr(VI) initial concentration. Kd values obtained from both batch and column studies showed that Cr(VI) sorption was relatively low. The average Kd value obtained from batch studies (0.53 L Kg-1) was about six times higher than the average Kd value (0.09 L Kg-1) obtained from column studies. The results of the column experiments showed that transport of Cr(VI) was slightly retarded compared to non-reactive tracer at both saturated and unsaturated flow conditions. Extraction studies conducted on the soil columns also revealed that Cr(VI) oxyanions (dominantly CrO4-2, HcrO4-) were only temporarily retained by adsorption to easily exchangeable sorption sites in the soil and the sorption was reversible. Low retardation factors and Kd values obtained from column experiments suggest that Cr(VI) species are very mobile and bioavailable in highly calcareous soil conditions. This increases the spreading of contamination in such contaminated systems with Cr(VI) and contamination risk of groundwater resources. However, if the bioavailability is a key factor for remediating Cr(VI) contaminated soil, as in phytoremediation, increased availability of Cr(VI) for plant uptake in calcareous soil will enhance its removal.

Retention and Transport of Hexavalent Chromium in Calcareous Karst Soils

Hexavalent chromium, which is a highly toxic and soluble form of the element chromium, is a common soil and groundwater contaminant found in many contaminated sites throughout the world and poses a serious risk to human health when released into environment. The objective of this study was to determine transport and retention behaviour of aqueous Cr(VI) species in a highly calcareous and alkaline top soil of a karst system that is vulnerable to contamination. Batch sorption studies and column experiments conducted at both saturated and unsaturated steady-state flow conditions were used to evaluate the sorption/desorption and the transport of Cr(VI) in the alkaline soil conditions. The results of batch experiments indicated that Cr(VI) sorption was linear up to 200 mg L-1 of Cr(VI) initial concentration. Kd values obtained from both batch and column studies showed that Cr(VI) sorption was relatively low. The average Kd value obtained from batch studies (0.53 L Kg-1) was about six times higher than the average Kd value (0.09 L Kg-1) obtained from column studies. The results of the column experiments showed that transport of Cr(VI) was slightly retarded compared to non-reactive tracer at both saturated and unsaturated flow conditions. Extraction studies conducted on the soil columns also revealed that Cr(VI) oxyanions (dominantly CrO4-2, HcrO4-) were only temporarily retained by adsorption to easily exchangeable sorption sites in the soil and the sorption was reversible. Low retardation factors and Kd values obtained from column experiments suggest that Cr(VI) species are very mobile and bioavailable in highly calcareous soil conditions. This increases the spreading of contamination in such contaminated systems with Cr(VI) and contamination risk of groundwater resources. However, if the bioavailability is a key factor for remediating Cr(VI) contaminated soil, as in phytoremediation, increased availability of Cr(VI) for plant uptake in calcareous soil will enhance its removal.

___

  • ADRIANO, D.C. 2001. Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment: Biogeochemistry, Bioavailability, and Risks of Metals. Springer, New York.
  • AIDE, M.T. & CUMMINGS, M.F. 1997. The influence of pH and phosphorus on the adsorption of chromium (VI) on boehmite. Soil Science 162, 599–603.
  • AVUNDAINAYAGAM, S., NAIDU, R., KOOKANA, R.S., ALSTON, A.M., McCLURE, S. & SMITH, L.H. 2001. Effects of electrolyte composition on chromium desorption in soils contaminated by tannery waste. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 1077–1089.
  • BANKS, M.K., SCHWAB, A.P. & HENDERSON, C. 2006. Leaching and reduction of chromium in soil as affected by soil organic content and plants. Chemosphere 62, 255–264.
  • BARTLETT, R.J. & KIMBLE, J.M. 1976. Behavior of chromium in soils: II. Hexavalent forms. Journal of Environmental Quality 5, 383–386.
  • BHUTANI, M.M., MITRA, A.K. & KUMARI, R. 1992. Adsorption of Cr(VI) on manganese dioxide from aqueous solution. Microchimica Acta 107, 19–26.
  • BOLON, N.S. & THIAGARAJAN, S. 2001. Retention and plant availability of chromium in soils as affected by lime and organic matter amendments. Australian Journal of Soil Research 1091–1103. 39,
  • CHEN, J.M. & HAO, O.J. 1996. Environmental factors and modeling in microbial chromium(VI) reduction. Water Environment Research 68, 1156–1164.
  • DESMEDT, F., WAUTERS, F. & SEVILLA, J. 1986. Study of tracer movement through unsaturated sand. Journal of Hydrology 85, 169–181.
  • DESMEDT, F. & WIERENGA, P.J. 1978. Solute transport through soil with non-uniform water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 7–10.
  • DOISY, R.J., STREETEN, H.P., FREIBERG, J.M. & SCHNEIDER, A.J. 1976. Chromium metabolism in man and biochemical effects. In: PRASAD, A.S. (ed), Trace Elements in Human Health and Disease II. Academic Press, New York, 79–104.
  • DPT, 2001. Management and Usage of Water Basins. 8thfive-years development plan, Ankara. DPT: 2555–ÖİK: 571 [in Turkish, unpublished].
  • EARY, L.E. & RAI, D. 1991. Chromate reduction by subsurface soils under acidic conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55, 676–83.
  • ECHEVERRIA, J., MORERA, T. & GARRIDO, J. 1999. Metal-induced chromium(VI) sorption by two calcareous soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37, 431–441.
  • EPA, 1992. METHOD 7196 Chromium, Hexavalent (Colorimetric). Revision 1, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • EPA, 1996. METHOD 3060 A. Alkaline Digestion for Hexavalent Chromium. Revision 2, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • FENDORF, S. 1995. Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters. Geoderma 67, 55–71.
  • FRANÇOISE, C.R. & ALAIN, M.B. 1991. Aqueous geochemistry of chromium: A review. Water Resources 25, 807–816.
  • GAMERDINGER, A.P. & KAPLAN, D.I. 2001. Physical and chemical determinants of colloid transport and deposition in water- unsaturated sand and Yucca Mountain tuff material. Environmental Science and Technology 35, 2497–2504.
  • GAMERDINGER, A.P., KAPLAN, D.I., WELLMAND.M. & SERNE, R.J. 2001. Two-region flow and decreased sorption of uranium (VI) during transport in Hanford groundwater and unsaturated sands. Water Resources Research 37, 3155–3162.
  • GAUDET, J.P., JEGAT, H., VACHAUD, G. & WIERENGA, P.J. 1977. Solute transfer, with exchange between mobile and immobile water, through unsaturated sand. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 665–671.
  • GRIFFIOEN, J.W., BARRY, D.A. & PARLANGE, J.-Y. 1998. Interpretation of two-region model parameters. Water Resources Research 34, 373–384.