Quantifying the bathymetric stripping gravity corrections of global seawater and major lakes over Turkey

Quantifying the bathymetric stripping gravity corrections of global seawater and major lakes over Turkey

Gravity data inversion or interpretation requires the removal of the gravitational effects of the a priori known geologic and/or morphologic features within the Earth’s system to model and reveal the remaining signals of the unknown anomalous subsurface density distributions. The Bouguer gravity anomalies reduced by the normal gravitational field of the Earth and the gravitational attraction of the topographic masses above the sea level are frequently used in geophysics for this purpose. However, density contrast effects of the other major known elements, such as offshore seawater, inland water bodies, glaciers, and/or sediments can be removed from the Bouguer gravity anomalies, which is denoted as stripping in gravimetry, to unmask the remaining gravitational signal of the sought anomalous masses. Stripping the Bouguer anomaly off seawater density contrast has become possible with the releases of freely available high-resolution global ocean bathymetry data. Moreover, the bathymetry data from recent hydrographic surveys over the inland water bodies with high-precision echo sounders has given rise to the opportunity to determine the stripping effects of the lake water density contrast. In this study, we quantify the global seawater bathymetry stripping effects along with lake water stripping of some greatest Turkish lakes on a regular 1’ × 1’ grid at the Earth’s surface over Turkey including offshore. The seawater bathymetric corrections vary from 132 to 418 mGal over the seas and show a long-wavelength pattern over the inland with a mean value of 133 mGal. It produces significant variations onshore close to the coasts and on some islands up to 163 mGal. Although the bathymetric gravity stripping due to the lake water density contrast has negligible effects on their surrounding land areas, the water masses can produce notable effects on the lake surfaces reaching up to few tens of mGals at their deepest area, which should be considered in the microgravimetry studies over the lakes.

___

  • Asgharzadeh MF, von Frese RRB, Kim HR, Leftwich TE, Kim JW (2007). Spherical prism gravity effects by Gauss-Legendre quadrature integration. Geophysical Journal International 169: 1-11.
  • Becker JJ, Sandwell DT, Smith WHF, Braud J, Binder B et al. (2009). Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30_PLUS. Marine Geodesy 32: 355-371.
  • Bielik M, Rybakov M, Lazar M (2013). Tutorial: The gravity-stripping process as applied to gravity interpretation in the eastern Mediterranean. The Leading Edge 32: 410.
  • Bomford G (1971). Geodesy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • D’Urso MG (2013). On the evaluation of the gravity effects of polyhedral bodies and a consistent treatment of related singularities. Journal of Geodesy 87: 239-252.
  • Grombein T, Seitz K, Heck B (2013). Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid. Journal of Geodesy 87: 645- 660.
  • Groten E, Becker M (1995). Methods and experiences of high precision gravimetry as a tool for crustal movement detection. Journal of Geodynamics 19: 141-157.
  • Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967). Physical geodesy. San Francisco, CA, USA: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Hinderer J, Legros H, Crossley D (1991). Global earth dynamics induced gravity changes. Journal of Geophysical Research 96: 20257-20265.
  • Hinze WJ, Aiken C, Brozena J, Coakley B, Dater D et al. (2005). New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database. Geophysics 70: J25-J32.
  • Hinze WJ, von Frese RRB, Saad AH (2013). Gravity and magnetic exploration: Principles, practices and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hwang C, Hsu HJ, Chang ETY, Featherstone WE, Tenzer R et al. (2014). New free-air and Bouguer gravity fields of Taiwan from multiple platforms and sensors. Tectonophysics 611: 83-93.
  • Kuhn M, Seitz K (2005). Comparison of Newton’s integral in the space and frequency domains. In: Sansò F, editor. A window on the future of geodesy. IAG symposia, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, pp. 386-391.
  • Kuhn M, Featherstone WE, Kirby JF (2009). Complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies over Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 56: 213-223.
  • Mazzotti S, Lambert A, Henton J, James T, Courtier N (2011). Absolute gravity calibration of GPS velocities and glacial isostatic adjustment in mid-continent North America. Geophysical Research Letters 38: L24311.
  • Mikuška J, Pašteka R, Marušiak I (2006). Estimation of distant relief effect in gravimetry. Geophysics 71: J59-J69.
  • Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000). The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. Journal of Geodesy 74: 552-560.
  • Novák P (2000). Evaluation of gravity data for the Stokes-Helmert solution to the geodetic boundary-value problem. Technical Report, No. 207, UNB, Fredericton, Canada.
  • Novák P (2010). High resolution constituents of the Earth gravitational field. Surveys in Geophysics 31: 1-21.
  • Olson CJ, Becker JJ, Sandwell DT (2016). SRTM15_PLUS: Data fusion of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) land topography with measured and estimated seafloor topography. NCEI Accession 0150537.
  • Reguzzoni M, Sampietro D (2015). GEMMA: an Earth crustal model based on GOCE satellite data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 35: 31-43.
  • Sandwell DT, Müller RD, Smith WHF, Garcia E, Francis R (2014). New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science 346: 65-67.
  • Simav M, Yildiz H (2019). Evaluation of EGM2008 and latest GOCE based satellite only global gravity field models using densified gravity network: a case study in south-western Turkey. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 60: 49-68.
  • Simav M (2021). Results from the first strapdown airborne gravimetry campaign over the Lake District of Turkey. Survey Review. Volume: 53, Issue: 380, pp: 447-453. DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2020.1826140.
  • Simeoni O, Brueckl E (2009). Gravity stripping supports tectonic interpretation of the eastern Alps. Geophysical Research Abstracts 11: 7355.
  • Tenzer R, Hamayun K, Vajda P (2008a). Global secondary indirect effects of topography, bathymetry, ice and sediments. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 38: 209-216.
  • Tenzer R, Hamayun K, Vajda P (2008b). Global map of the gravity anomaly corrected for complete effects of the topography, and of density contrasts of global ocean, ice, and sediments. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 38: 357-370.
  • Tenzer R, Hamayun K, Vajda P (2009). Global maps of the CRUST 2.0 crustal components stripped gravity disturbances. Journal of Geophysical Research 114: 05408.
  • Tenzer R, Vajda P, Hamayun K (2010). A mathematical model of the bathymetry-generated external gravitational field. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 40: 31-44.
  • Tenzer R, Gladkikh V, Novák P, Vajda P (2012a). Spatial and spectral analysis of refined gravity data for modelling the crust– mantle interface and mantle-lithosphere structure. Surveys in Geophysics 33: 817-839.
  • Tenzer R, Novák P (2012b). Bathymetric stripping corrections to gravity gradient components. Earth Planets Space 64: e21-e24.
  • Tenzer R, Novák P, Vladislav G (2012c). The bathymetric stripping corrections to gravity field quantities for a depth-dependent model of seawater sensity. Marine Geodesy 35: 198-220.
  • Timmen L (2010). Absolute and relative gravimetry. In: Xu G, editor. Sciences of geodesy-I: advances and future directions, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 1-48.
  • Torge W (1989). Gravimetry. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. Tozer B, Sandwell DT, Smith WHF, Olson C, Beale JR et al. (2019). Global bathymetry and topography at 15 arcsec: SRTM15+. Earth and Space Science 6: 1847-1864.
  • Tsoulis D (2012). Analytical computation of the full gravity tensor of a homogeneous arbitrarily shaped polyhedral source using line integrals. Geophysics 77: F1–F11.
  • Uieda L, Barbosa VCF, Braitenberg C (2016). Tesseroids: Forward-modeling gravitational fields in spherical coordinates. Geophysics 81: F41-F48.
  • Vajda P, Vaníček P, Novák P, Meurers B (2004). On evaluation of Newton integrals in geodetic coordinates: Exact formulation and spherical approximation. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 34: 289-314.
  • Vajda P, Vaníček P, Meurers B (2006). A new physical foundation for anomalous gravity. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 50: 189- 216.
  • Vajda P, Ellmann A, Meurers B, Vaníček P, Novák P et al. (2008). Global ellipsoid referenced topographic, bathymetric and stripping corrections to gravity disturbance. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 52: 19-34.
  • Vajda P, Foroughi I, Vaníček P, Kingdon R, Santos M et al. (2020). Topographic gravimetric effects in earth sciences: Review of origin, significance and implications. Earth-Science Reviews 211: 103428.
  • van der Meijde M, Pail R, Bingham R, Floberghagen R (2015). GOCE data, models, and applications: A review. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 35: 4-15.
  • Vaníček P, Novák P, Martinec Z (2001). Geoid, topography, and the Bouguer plate or shell. Journal of Geodesy 75: 210-215.
  • Wild-Pfeiffer F, Heck B (2007). Comparison of the modelling of topographic and isostatic masses in the space and the frequency domain for use in satellite gravity gradiometry. In: Kılıçoğlu A, Forsberg R, editors. Proceedings of 1st international symposium of the IGFS. Gravity field of the Earth, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 309-314.
  • Wild-Pfeiffer F (2008). A comparison of different mass elements for use in gravity gradiometry. Journal of Geodesy 82: 637-653.