Exploration of geothermal potential using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Ağrı, Eastern Turkey

Exploration of geothermal potential using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Ağrı, Eastern Turkey

The demand for energy is increasing day by day worldwide due to population growth, industrialization and rising living standards. Geothermal energy, one of the alternative energy sources, is preferred in terms of providing environmentally friendly, quality and regular energy. Our country is rich in geothermal resource potential. However, there are still many unexplored geothermal resources. In this study, fuzzy-AHP method was used to determine the geothermal potential of Ağrı province. Five criteria such as geological formations, hot / mineral springs, lineaments, land surface temperature and hydrothermal alteration zones were evaluated to determine the having geothermal potential. The maps of lineament, land surface temperature and hydrothermal alteration zones were prepared using Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS satellite images. Each criterion was weighted with the fuzzy-AHP method, analyzed in the GIS environment, and the geothermal potential index (GPI) of the study area was calculated. As a result, areas with very high, high, medium and low geothermal potential were determined in the study area. According to the GPI map of the study area, Ağrı provincial center, Patnos, Eleşkirt, and Doğubayazıt regions have high geothermal potential. In addition, the known geothermal fields in the study area have been identified as areas with very high geothermal potential. These data reveal the accuracy of the study and used method.

___

  • Abuzied SM, Kaiser MF, Shendi EAH, Abdel-Fattah MI (2020). Multicriteria decision support for geothermal resources exploration based on remote sensing, GIS and geophysical techniques along the Gulf of Suez coastal area, Egypt. Geothermics 88: 101893.
  • Akkuş İ, Alan H (2016). Turkey’s geothermal resources, projections, problems and recommendations report. TMMOB Chamber of Geological Engineers, 89 p (in Turkish).
  • Asgharnıay Hasan Kıyadeh A (2019). Diyadin (Ağrı) Güneyinin Tektonik Özellikleri ve Jeotermal Potansiyeli, MSc, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Avdan U, Jovanovska G (2016). Algorithm for automated mapping of land surface temperature using LANDSAT 8 satellite data. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Sensors 1480307.
  • Aydın H, Karakuş H, Mutlu H (2020). Hydrogeochemistry of geothermal waters in eastern Turkey: Geochemical and isotopic constraints on water-rock interaction. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 390: 106708.
  • Baba A, Şaroğlu F, Akkuş I, Özel N, Yeşilnacar Mİ et al. (2019). Geological and hydrogeochemical properties of geothermal systems in the southeastern region of Turkey. Geothermics 78: 255-271.
  • Bilić T, Raos S, Ilak P, Rajšl I, Pašičko R (2020). Assessment of Geothermal Fields in the South Pannonian Basin System Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tool. Energies 13 (5): 1026.
  • Brahim FB, Boughariou E, Makni J, Bouri S (2020). Evaluation of groundwater hydrogeochemical characteristics and delineation of geothermal potentialities using multi criteria decision analysis: Case of Tozeur region, Tunisia. Applied Geochemistry 113: 104504.
  • Buckley JJ (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17: 233-247.
  • Burçak M, Yıldırım T, Yücel M (1997). Geothermal - Geophysical Report of Ağrı Diyadin Geothermal Area MTA Report. Ankara. No. 10020 (in Turkish).
  • Çakır Y, Tanyolu E (1998). The Geology of Taşlıçay (Ağrı) Region, In Geological Engineering 20th Year Symposium Proceedings, pp.11-20 (in Turkish).
  • Cambazoğlu S, Yal GP, Eker AM, Şen O, Akgün H (2019). Geothermal resource assessment of the Gediz Graben utilizing TOPSIS methodology. Geothermics 80: 92-102.
  • Chang DY (1992). Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision. Optimization Techniques and Applications 1: 352
  • Chang DY (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95: 649-55.
  • Demer S, Memiş Ü (2015). Afyonkarahisar Jeotermal Sahalarının Hidrojeokimyası ve Jeotermo metre Uygulamaları. Journal of Natural & Applied Sciences 19 (2): 66-77.
  • Eltez M, Doğan MA, Durukan M, Hepbaşlı A (2001). Diyadin integrated geothermal application. Proceedings of Twentysixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University, Stanford, 406-412.
  • ENVI (2009). Atmospheric Correction Module: QUAC and FLAASH User’s Guide. http://www.exelisvis.com/portals/0/pdfs/envi/ Flaash_Module.pdf2009
  • Gupta H, Roy S (2007). Geothermal Century. Energy: An Alternative Resource for The 21st, Amsterdam/Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Haklıdır FS, Balaban TÖ (2019). A review of mineral precipitation and effective scale inhibition methods at geothermal power plants in West Anatolia (Turkey). Geothermics 80: 103-118.
  • Haklıdır FS, Şengün R (2020). Hydrogeochemical similarities and differences between high temperature geothermal systems with similar geologic settings in the Büyük Menderes and Gediz Grabens of Turkey. Geothermics 83: 101717.
  • Haklıdır FS, Şengün R, Aydın H (2021). Characterization and Comparison of geothermal fluids geochemistry within the Kızıldere Geothermal Field in Turkey: New findings with power capacity expanding studies. Geothermics 94: 102110.
  • Hanano M (2000). Two different roles of fractures in geothermal development. In: Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress 2000, Kyushu–Tohoku, Japan, pp. 2597-2602.
  • Hepbaşlı A, Özgener L (2004). Development of geothermal energy utilization in Turkey: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8: 433-460.
  • Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ruan D (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 87: 171-184
  • Kardaş S (2019). Tectonic Features and Geothermal Potential of Northern Diyadın (Ağrı), Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, MSc. Thesis, 67 p. (in Turkish).
  • Keskin B (1998). Ağrı-Diyadin Geothermal Area Geological Survey Report and Geothermal Potential. Doğan Jeotermal, Ankara (in Turkish).
  • Lee SK, Mogi G, Hui KS (2013). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)/data envelopment analysis (DEA) hybrid model for efficiently allocating energy R&D resources: In the case of energy technologies against high oil prices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 21: 347-355.
  • Macharia MW, Gachari MK, Mundia CN, Kuria DN (2018). A GISbased approach for exploring geothermal resources along part of the Kenyan rift. Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology for Development. JASETD 3 (1): 1-34
  • Meng F, Liang X, Xiao C, Wang G (2021). Geothermal resource potential assessment utilizing GIS-based multi criteria decision analysis method. Geothermics 89: 101969.
  • Mertoğlu O, Şimsek Ş, Başarır N (2020). Geothermal energy use: projections and country update for Turkey. In Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • MTA (2021). Turkey Geothermal Resources Distribution and Application Map. http://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/hizmetler/ jeotermal-harita, Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2021.
  • Mutlu H. Aydın H, Kazancı A (2013). Geochemical and Isotopic Findings of Diyadin Ağrı Geothermal Field. In: 11. National Installation Engineering Congress, Geothermal Energy Seminar, İzmir, Turkey, pp.47-67. (in Turkish).
  • Noorollahi Y, Ghasempour R, Jalilinasrabady S (2015). A GIS based integration method for geothermal resources exploration and site selection. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 33 (2): 243- 257.
  • Noorollahi Y, Itoi R, Fujii H, Tanaka T (2008). GIS integration model for geothermal exploration and well siting. Geothermics 37: 107-131.
  • Pasvanoğlu S (2013). Hydrogeochemistry of thermal and mineralized waters in the Diyadin (Ağrı) area, Eastern Turkey. Applied Geochemistry 38: 70-81.
  • Pasvanoğlu S, Güler S (2010). Hydrogeological and Geothermal Features of Hot and Mineralized Waters of the Ağrı - Diyadin (Turkey). Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010 Bali, Indonesia.
  • Rahmati O, Samani AN, Mahdavi M, Pourghasemi HR, Zeinivand H (2015). Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy processand GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 8 (9): 7059-7071.
  • Rajeshwari A, Mani ND (2014). Estimation of land surface temperature of Dindigul district using Landsat 8 data. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3 (5): 122-126.
  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 287.
  • Sanlıyuksel D, Baba A (2011). Hydrogeochemical and isotopic composition of a low-temperature geothermal source in northwest Turkey: case study of Kirkgecit geothermal area. Environmental Earth Sciences 62 (3): 529-540.
  • Şaroğlu F, Yılmaz Y (1986). Geological evolution and basin models in the neotectonic period in Eastern Anatolia. MTA Journal,107: 73-94. (in Turkish).
  • Şenel M, Ercan T (2002). 1 / 500.000 Scaled Geology Map Van Sheet. MTA General Directorate, Ankara. (in Turkish).
  • Şener E, Şener Ş, Davraz A (2018). Groundwater potential mapping by combining fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process and GIS in Beyşehir Lake Basin, Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 11 (8): 187.
  • SERKA (Serhat Development Agency) (2014). Ağrı Province Mineral Water Research, Final Report, 174 p. (in Turkish).
  • Şimşek Ş (2003). Hydrogeological and isotopic survey of geothermal fields in the Buyuk Menderes graben, Turkey. Geothermics 32 (4-6): 669-678.
  • Sobrino JA, Jimenez-Munoz JC, Paolini L (2004). Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat TM 5, Remote Sensing of Environment 90 (4): 434-440.
  • Sobrino JA, Raissouni N (2000). Toward remote sensing methods for land cover dynamic monitoring: application to Morocco, International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 353-66.
  • Taibi A, Atmani B (2017). Combining Fuzzy AHP with GIS and Decision Rules for Industrial Site Selection. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia & Artificial Intelligence 4 (6): 60-69.
  • Teke O, Yaşar E (2018). Geothermal energy and integrated resource management in Turkey. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources 4 (1): 1-10.
  • TMMOB (2021). The Reality of Geothermal Power Plants in The Büyük Menderes Basin and The Environmental Effects of Geothermal Power Plants Installed in Aydın, Union of Turkish Engineers and Architects Chambers, ISBN 978-605-01-1397-6, Ankara.
  • Traore M, Wambo JDT, Ndepete CP, Tekin S, Pour AB et al. (2020). Lithological and alteration mineral mapping for alluvial gold exploration in the south east of Birao area, Central African Republic using Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) data. Journal of African Earth Sciences 170: 103933.
  • Tüfekçi N, Suzen ML, Gulec N (2010). GIS based geothermal potential assessment: a case study from Western Anatolia, Turkey. Energy 35 (1): 246–261.
  • Üçgün F (2019). The Petrography - Geochemistry of Volcanic Rocks Around in Davut - Tazekent Villages (Diyadin - Ağrı) and the Characteristics of the Diyadin Geothermal Field, MSc, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • USGS (2019). Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook, Ed.Zanter, K., EROS Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA, 114 p.
  • Van Laarhoven PJ, Pedrycz W (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy sets and Systems 11 (1-3): 229-241.
  • Wang F, Qin ZH, Song CY, Tu LL, Karnieli A, Zhao SH (2015). An improved mono-window algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from landsat 8 thermal infrared sensor data. Remote Sensing 7: 4268-4289.
  • Wang K, Yuan B, Ji G, Wu X (2018). A comprehensive review of geothermal energy extraction and utilization in oilfields. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 168: 465-477.
  • Yalçın M, Gül FK (2017). A GIS-based multi criteria decision analysis approach for exploring geothermal resources: Akarcay basin (Afyonkarahisar). Geothermics 67: 18-28.
  • Yan B, Qiu S, Liu Z, Changlai X (2017). Characteristics of the geothermal water in Changbai Mountain volcanic region, northeast of China. Arabian Journal of Geoscience 10 (12): 261 doi: 10.1007/s12517-017-3039-4
  • Yousefi H, Ehara S, Noorollahi Y (2007). Geothermal potential site selection using GIS in Iran. In: Proceedings of the 32nd workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California pp. 174-82.
  • Yousefi H, Noorollahi Y, Ehara S, Itoi R, Yousefi A et al. (2010). Developing the geothermal resources map of Iran. Geothermics 39 (2): 140-151.
  • Zanter K (2019). LANDSAT 8 (L8) Data Users Handbook (LSDS1574 Version 5.0). United States Geological Survey, South Dakota.
Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0985
  • Yayın Aralığı: 6
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Structural controls and hydrogeochemical properties of geothermal fields in the Varto region, East Anatolia

Hasan SÖZBİLİR, Alper BABA, İskender DÖLEK, Taygun UZELLİ, Mehmet Furkan ŞENER, Ramazan Kadir DİRİK

Seismic velocity characterisation and survey design to assess CO2 injection performance at Kızıldere geothermal field

Gualtiero BÖHM, Mahmut PARLAKTUNA, Şevket DURUCAN, Burak PARLAKTUNA, Çağlar SINAYUÇ, Martijn T.G. JANSSEN, Erdinç ŞENTÜRK, Erinç TONGUÇ, Öncü DEMİRCİOĞLU, Flavio POLETTO, Cinzia BELLEZZA, Biancamaria FARINA

Surface heat flow in Western Anatolia (Turkey) and implications to the thermal structure of the Gediz Graben

Bülent Oktay AKKOYUNLU, Mete TAYANÇ, Elif BALKAN-PAZVANTOĞLU, Kamil ERKAN, Müjgan ŞALK

Numerical modeling of fluid flow and heat transfer in Kurşunlu geothermal field-KGF (Salihli, Manisa / Turkey)

Toygar AKAR, Ünsal GEMİCİ, Melis SOMAY-ALTAŞ, Gültekin TARCAN

Exploration of geothermal potential using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Ağrı, Eastern Turkey

Erhan ŞENER, Şehnaz ŞENER

Hydrogeochemical and isotopic monitoring of the Kestanbol geothermal field (Northwestern Turkey) and its relationship with seismic activity

Deniz ŞANLIYÜKSEL YÜCEL, Harika MARMARA, Süha ÖZDEN

Geothermal reservoir rocks of the Büyük Menderes Graben (Turkey): stratigraphic correlation by a multiproxy approach

Dorothee SIEFERT, Markus WOLFGRAMM, Thomas KÖLBEL, Johannes GLODNY, Jochen KOLB, Elisabeth EICHE

Harcourt granite scCO2 water interaction: a laboratory study of reactivity and modelling of hydrogeochemical processes

Ranjith Pathegama GAMAGE, Badulla Liyanage AVANTHI ISAKA

Use of geothermal resources in Konya Plain Project (KOP) Region for tourism, health purposes, agricultural, industrial and distict heating

Hasan Hüseyin ÖZTÜRK, Barış ÇARIKCI, Merve SEFA, Kevser MERMER AKMAZ, Ayşe ÜSTÜNOLDU KANDEMIR, Feza ŞEN

Simulation and parametric study on a novel modified Kalina cycle

Jun ZHOU, Jie PENG, Jiaqi ZHANG, Guobin LEI, Shengchao SHI, Fuzhi QI, Jiawei XU, Dongxi LIU, Qingyao MENG