A novel proton-exchange porous silicon membrane production method for µDMFCs

A novel proton-exchange porous silicon membrane production method for µDMFCs

This study introduces a new production method to use as a porous silicon-based proton exchange membrane for µDMFCs. In this respect, EIS, fuel crossover test, and fuel cell performance test at the µDMFC sample cell are performed at room temperature on a porous silicon-based membrane that was produced for passive mode µDMFC as a proton exchange membrane. The reason for performing the fuel crossover test is to ensure the silicon opened pores along the silicon wafer and to examine the fuel permeability of the membrane. The fuel crossover test shows that the fuel cell provides energy for about 60 min with a 50 mL fuel. EIS reveals proton permeability of proton exchange membrane. The calculated value of the conductivity of the membrane is 0.0016 S/cm. OCV of the system is 0.4V, whereas values (with highest power density is 0.1 mW/cm²and with the highest current density is 0.39 mA/cm²) are low. However, porous silicon is not a natural proton conductor. Hence, these values can be increased by different ways such as porous silicon functionalized, or serial connection of fuel cells. On the other hand, the value of OCV is consistent with the previous studies. In sum, this study presents a simple, cost-effective, and short time-consuming method for the production of porous silicon as proton-conducting membrane behavior.

___

  • 1. Ehteshami SMM, Chan SH. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells to store renewable energy in the future energy network–potentials and challenges. Energy Policy 2014; 73, 103-109.
  • 2. Sharma S, Ghoshal SK. Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: from production to applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 43, 1151-1158.
  • 3. Lim BH, Majlan EH, Daud WRW, Husaini T, Rosli MI. Effects of flow field design on water management and reactant distribution in PEMFC: a review. Ionics 2016; 22 (3): 301-316.
  • 4. Singh S, Jain S, Venkateswaran PS, Tiwari AK, Nouni MR et al. Hydrogen: A sustainable fuel for future of the transport sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 51, 623-633.
  • 5. Baretto L, Makihira A, Riahi K. The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: A sustainable development scenario. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2003; 28 (3): 267-284.
  • 6. Baldauf M, Preidel W. Status of the development of a direct methanol fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 1999; 84 (2): 161-166.
  • 7. Miyake N, Wainright JS, Savinell RF. Evaluation of a sol-gel derived Nafion/silica hybrid membrane for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell applications: II. Methanol uptake and methanol permeability. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2001; 148 (8): 905-909.
  • 8. Suzuki H, Yoshida Y, Mehta MA, Watanabe M, Fujinami T. Proton conducting borosiloxane solid electrolytes and their composites with Nafion®. Fuel Cells 2002; 2 (1): 46-51.
  • 9. Wang M, Wang X, Wu S, Tan Z, Liu L et al. Nano porous silicon membrane with channels for micro direct methanol fuel cells. In: Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS), IEEE International Conference; Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 2011. pp. 968-997.
  • 10. Sakaue E. Micromachining/nanotechnology in direct methanol fuel cell. In: Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. 18th IEEE International Conference; 2005. pp. 600-605.
  • 11. Kamarudin SK, Daud WRW, Ho SL, Hasran UA. Overview on the challenges and developments of micro-direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC). Journal of Power Sources 2007; 163 (2): 743-754.
  • 12. Zhou YA, Wang XH, Wu ZL, Wu XM, Liu LT. Passive fuel delivery based on hydrophobic porous silicon for micro direct methanol fuel cells. In: Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 2011 IEEE 24th International Conference; Cancun, Mexico; 2011. pp. 1321-1324.
  • 13. Pichonat T, Gauthier-Manuel B, Hauden D. A new proton-conducting porous silicon membrane for small fuel cells. Chemical Engineering Journal 2004; 101 (1-3): 107-111.
  • 14. Pichonat T, Gauthier-Manuel B. Realization of porous silicon based miniature fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 2006; 154 (1): 198-201.
  • 15. Chu KL, Shannon MA, Masel RI. Porous silicon fuel cells for micro power generation. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 2007; 17 (9): 243-249.
  • 16. Gold S, Chu KL, Lu C, Shannon MA, Masel RI. Acid loaded porous silicon as a proton exchange membrane for micro-fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 2004; 135 (1-2): 198-203.
  • 17. Wang M, Liu L, Wang X. A novel proton exchange membrane based on sulfo functionalized porous silicon for monolithic integrated micro direct methanol fuel cells. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2017; 253, 621-629.
  • 18. Gör M, KaracalıT. Porous Silicon Based Membrane Fabrication for Proton Transportation. 13th Nanoscience & Nanotechnology Conference; Antalya, Turkey; 2017.
  • 19. Ahmed M, Dincer I. A review on methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells: challenges and achievements. International Journal of Energy Research 2011; 35 (14): 1213-1228.
  • 20. Rhee YW, Ha SY, Masel RI. Crossover of formic acid through Nafion® membranes. Journal of Power Sources 2003; 117 (1-2): 35-38.
  • 21. Pichonat T, Gauthier-Manuel B. A new process for the manufacturing of reproducible mesoporous silicon membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2006; 280, 494-500.