Molecular variability of plantain ecotypes from the genus Musa (Musaceae)

Twelve plantain ecotypes were characterized for molecular variability using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Out of the 60 RAPD and 40 ISSR primers tested, 16 RAPD and 14 ISSR primers were found polymorphic, and were used for molecular profiling of the plantain ecotypes. The average number of bands per primer, average number of polymorphic bands per primer, mean polymorphic information content (PIC) value, resolving power (Rp), and marker indices (MI) for RAPD primers were 8.63, 3.25, 0.87, 15.49, and 2.86, whereas the respective values for the ISSR assay were 7.93, 4.14, 0.85, 12.49, and 3.55. The genetic similarity coefficient was calculated using the Jaccard coefficient. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA)-based clustering pattern remained more or less similar for RAPD, ISSR, and combined RAPD and ISSR data. Clustering was strongly supported by high bootstrap values. The genotypes Njockkon and Changalikodan (similarity coefficient > 0.94) and Manjeri Nendran (a) and Manjeri Nendran (b) (similarity coefficient > 0.89) were more closely related than the other ecotypes. The principal component analysis (PCA) showed results similar to those of the dendrogram. The results revealed that ISSR would be a better tool than RAPD for evaluation of genetic diversity in plantain ecotypes. Further, huge variability exists among the plantain ecotypes, which can be utilized for germplasm collection, in situ conservation, and development of high yielding nutritionally superior cultivars in Musa L. breeding programs.

Molecular variability of plantain ecotypes from the genus Musa (Musaceae)

Twelve plantain ecotypes were characterized for molecular variability using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Out of the 60 RAPD and 40 ISSR primers tested, 16 RAPD and 14 ISSR primers were found polymorphic, and were used for molecular profiling of the plantain ecotypes. The average number of bands per primer, average number of polymorphic bands per primer, mean polymorphic information content (PIC) value, resolving power (Rp), and marker indices (MI) for RAPD primers were 8.63, 3.25, 0.87, 15.49, and 2.86, whereas the respective values for the ISSR assay were 7.93, 4.14, 0.85, 12.49, and 3.55. The genetic similarity coefficient was calculated using the Jaccard coefficient. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA)-based clustering pattern remained more or less similar for RAPD, ISSR, and combined RAPD and ISSR data. Clustering was strongly supported by high bootstrap values. The genotypes Njockkon and Changalikodan (similarity coefficient > 0.94) and Manjeri Nendran (a) and Manjeri Nendran (b) (similarity coefficient > 0.89) were more closely related than the other ecotypes. The principal component analysis (PCA) showed results similar to those of the dendrogram. The results revealed that ISSR would be a better tool than RAPD for evaluation of genetic diversity in plantain ecotypes. Further, huge variability exists among the plantain ecotypes, which can be utilized for germplasm collection, in situ conservation, and development of high yielding nutritionally superior cultivars in Musa L. breeding programs.

___

  • Alam A, Naik PK, Mishra GP (2008). Congruence of RAPD and ISSR markers for evaluation of genomic relationship among 28 populations of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle from Himachal Pradesh, India. Turk J Bot 33:1–12.
  • Bornet B, Muller C, Paulus F, Branchard M (2002). Highly informative nature of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) sequences amplified using tri- and tetra-nucleotide primers from DNA of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.). Genome 45: 890–896.
  • Crouch HK, Crouch JH, Madsen S, Vuylsteke DR, Ortiz R (2000). Comparative analysis of phenotypic and genotypic diversity among plantain landraces (Musa spp., AAB group). Theor Appl Genet 101: 1056–1065.
  • Lawrence MJ (2000). Population genetics of the homomorphic self- incompatibility polymorphisms in flowering plants. Ann Bot- London 85: 221–226.
  • Manimekalai R, Nagarajan P (2006). Interrelationships among coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) accessions using RAPD technique. Genet Resour Crop Ev 53: 1137–1144.
  • Menon R, Aravindakshan K (1998). Collection, characterization and evaluation of Nendran varieties in India. Progress report of the World Bank Assisted Banana Improvement Project BIP-3 (Revised), Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur.
  • Menon R, Aravindakshan K, Chandralekha CT (2002). Evaluation of plantain (Musa AAB) variability in South India. In: Global conference on banana and plantain, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, pp. 22–23.
  • Modgil M, Mahajan K, Chakrabarti SK, Sharma DR, Sobti RC (2005). Molecular analysis of genetic stability in micropropagated apple rootstock MM106. Scientia Horticu-Amsterdam 104: 151–160.
  • Mukherjee A, Sikdar B, Ghosh B, Banerjee A, Ghosh E, Bhattacharya M, Roy SC (2013). RAPD and ISSR analysis of some economically important species, varieties, and cultivars of the genus Allium (Alliaceae). Turk J Bot 37: 605–618.
  • NHB [National Horticulture Board] (2011). Area, production and productivity of banana [online]. Website: http://nhb.gov.in/ OnlineClient/rptProduction.aspx. [accessed 22 December 2013].
  • Poerba YS, Ahmad F (2010). Genetic variability among 18 cultivars of cooking bananas and plantains by RAPD and ISSR markers. Biodiversitas 11: 118–123.
  • Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ (1999). A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98: 107–112.
  • Racharak P, Eiadthong W (2007). Genetic relationship among subspecies of Musa acuminate Colla and A-genome consisting edible cultivated bananas assayed with ISSR markers. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 29: 1479–1489.
  • Ray T, Dutta I, Saha P, Das S, Roy SC (2006). Genetic stability of three economically important micropropagated banana (Musa spp.) cultivars of lower Indo-Gangetic plains, as assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Tiss Org 85: 11–21.
  • Rohlf FJ (2000). NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.1. Setauket, NY, USA: Exeter Publishing Ltd.
  • Simmons MP, Zhang LB, Webb CT, Muller K (2007). A penalty of using anonymous dominant markers (AFLPs, ISSRs and RAPDs) for phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42: 528–542.
  • Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Ziegle J (1997). An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.) comparison with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 95: 163–173.
  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973). Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco, CA, USA: Freeman and Company.
  • Solouki M, Mehdikhani H, Zeinali H, Emamjomeh AA (2008). Study of genetic diversity in Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) based on morphological traits and molecular markers. Scientia Hortic-Amsterdam 117: 281–287.
  • Venkatachalam L, Sreedhar RV, Bhagyalakshmi N (2008). The use of genetic markers for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and phylogenetic relationships among banana cultivars. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47: 974–985.
  • Yap I, Nelson RJ (1996). Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrogram. IRRI. Discussion paper series no 14, International Rice Institute, Manila, Philippines. http://www.irri.org/science/software/winboot.asp.
  • Zhao WG, Zhang JQ, Wangi YH, Chen TT, Yin Y, Huang YP, Pan Y, Yang Y (2006) Analysis of genetic diversity in wild populations of mulberry from western part of northeast China determined by ISSR markers. Genet Mol Biol 17: 196–203.
  • Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D (1994). Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176–183.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK