Flower closure in the field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis): a field test of the pollination hypothesis

Although the behavioral plasticity of flower traits has received considerable attention, its adaptive value is not thoroughly understood. We experimentally examined flower opening/closure in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), a species with short flower persistence (1 day) in which adaptive responses to pollination were not previously expected. In line with the pollination hypothesis we suggested that flower exposure in this species should respond to pollination. More specifically, we predicted that flower closure in the pollinated flowers would be quicker than that in unpollinated flowers. As predicted, the unpollinated flowers were open for a longer time than the pollinated flowers. There was no difference, however, between the self- and cross-pollinated flowers in terms of flower longevity. There was an inverse relationship between flower longevity and fertility, which also suggests that pollination leads to reduced flower longevity. Collectively, our results suggest that field bindweed flowers respond to pollination adaptively, because prolonged flower longevity may increase the likelihood of successful pollination and flower closure reduces energy spent on flower maintenance and/or intraspecific competition with genetically familiar flowers. The behavioral plasticity of flower closure does not seem to be restricted only to plants with high flower longevity.

Flower closure in the field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis): a field test of the pollination hypothesis

Although the behavioral plasticity of flower traits has received considerable attention, its adaptive value is not thoroughly understood. We experimentally examined flower opening/closure in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), a species with short flower persistence (1 day) in which adaptive responses to pollination were not previously expected. In line with the pollination hypothesis we suggested that flower exposure in this species should respond to pollination. More specifically, we predicted that flower closure in the pollinated flowers would be quicker than that in unpollinated flowers. As predicted, the unpollinated flowers were open for a longer time than the pollinated flowers. There was no difference, however, between the self- and cross-pollinated flowers in terms of flower longevity. There was an inverse relationship between flower longevity and fertility, which also suggests that pollination leads to reduced flower longevity. Collectively, our results suggest that field bindweed flowers respond to pollination adaptively, because prolonged flower longevity may increase the likelihood of successful pollination and flower closure reduces energy spent on flower maintenance and/or intraspecific competition with genetically familiar flowers. The behavioral plasticity of flower closure does not seem to be restricted only to plants with high flower longevity.

___

  • Abdala Robers L, Parra Tabla V, Navarro J (2007). Is floral longevity influenced by reproductive costs and pollination success in Cohniella ascendens (Orchidaceae)? Ann Bot 100: 1367–1371.
  • Ashman TL, Schoen DJ (1994). How long should flowers live? Nature 371: 788–791.
  • Berjano R, Arista M, Talavera M, Ariza MJ, Ortiz PL (2014). Plasticity and within plant sex-ratio variation in monoecious Emex spinosa. Turk J Bot 38: 258–267.
  • Betini GS, Norris DR (2012). The relationship between personality and plasticity in tree swallow aggression and the consequences for reproductive success. Anim Behav 83: 137–143.
  • Brys R, Jacquemyn H (2011). Variation in the functioning of autonomous self-pollination, pollinator services and floral traits in three Centaurium species. Ann Bot 107: 917–925.
  • Clark MJ, Husband BC (2007). Plasticity and timing of flower closure in response to pollination in Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). Int J Plant Sci 168: 619–625.
  • Dafni A, Firmage D (2000). Pollen viability and longevity: practical, ecological and evolutionary implications. Pl Syst Evol 222: 113–132.
  • De Kroon H, Huber H, Stuefer JF, van Groenendael JM (2005). A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytol 166: 73–82.
  • Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2013). Between-individual differences in behavioural plasticity within populations: causes and consequences. Anim Behav 85: 1031–1039.
  • Ferval M, Legal L, Gers C, Pelissier C, Winterton P, Sanchez Lopez JA, Corona Rangel ML, Torres KB (2013). When island-like populations at high elevation show genetic divergence despite no morphological variability: the case of Lupinus montanus in Central Mexico. Turk J Bot 37: 789–801.
  • Frederickson ME, Ravenscraft A, Hernández LMA, Booth G, Astudillo V, Miller GA (2013). What happens when ants fail at plant defence? Cordia nodosa dynamically adjusts its investment in both direct and indirect resistance traits in response to herbivore damage. J Ecol 101: 400–409.      
  • Fründ J, Carsten F, Dormann CF, Tscharntke T (2011). Linne’s floral clock is slow without pollinators —flower closure and plant- pollinator interaction webs. Ecol Lett 14: 896–904.
  • Fürstenberg Hägg J, Zagrobelny M, Bak S (2013). Plant defense against insect herbivores. Int J Mol Sci 14: 10242–10297. 
  • Gagliano M (2013). Green symphonies: a call for studies on acoustic communication in plants. Behav Ecol 24: 789–796.
  • Gianoli E (2004). Plasticity of traits and correlations in two populations of Convolvulus arvensis (Convolvulaceae) differing in environmental heterogeneity. Int J Plant Sci 165: 825–832.
  • Giménez Benavides L, Dötterl S, Jürgens A, Escudero A, Iriondo JM (2007). Generalist diurnal pollination provides greater fitness in a plant with nocturnal pollination syndrome: assessing the effects of a Silene-Hadena interaction. Oikos 116: 1461–1472.
  • Kremen C, Williams NM, Bugg RL, Fay JP, Thorp RW (2004). The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecol Lett 7: 1109–1119.
  • Larson DL, Andeerson PJ, Newton W (2001). Alien plant invasion in mixed-grass prairie: effects of vegetation type and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecol Appl 11: 128–141.
  • Metlen KL, Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM (2009). Plant behavioural ecology: dynamic plasticity in secondary metabolites. Plant Cell Environ 32: 641–653.
  • Miner BG, Sultan SE, Morgan SG, Padilla DK, Relyea RA (2005). Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 685–692.
  • Miyake T, Yahara T (1999). Theoretical evaluation of pollen transfer by nocturnal and diurnal pollinators: when should a flower open? Oikos 86: 233–240.
  • Mulligan GA (1972). Autogamy, allogamy and pollination in some Canadian weeds. Can J Bot 50: 1767–1771.
  • Mulligan GA (1973). Colour, brightness, and other floral characteristics attracting insects to the blossoms of some Canadian weeds. Can J Bot 51: 1939–1952.
  • Mulligan GA, Findlay JN (1970). Reproductive systems and colonization in Canadian weeds. Can J Bot 48: 859–860.
  • Nadel D, Danin A, Power RC, Rosen AM, Bocquentin F, Tsatskin A, Rosenberg D, Yeshurun R, Weissbrod L, Rebollo NR et al. (2013). Earliest floral grave lining from 13,700–11,700-y-old Natufian burials at Raqefet Cave, Mt. Carmel, Israel. Proc Ntl Acad Sci USA 110: 11774–11778.
  • Patiño S, Jeffree C, Grace J (2002). The ecological role of orientation in tropical convolvulaceous flowers. Oecologia 130: 373–379.
  • Primack RB (1985). Longevity of individual flowers. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16: 15–37.
  • Relyea RA (2002). Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecol Mon 72: 523–540.
  • Scalone R, Albach D (2014). Cytological evidence for gametophytic self-incompatibility in the genus Veronica. Turk J Bot 38: 197– 201.
  • Sigmond H (1929). Über das aufblühen von Hedera helix L. und Beeinflussung dieses Vorganges durch das Licht. Beih Bot Zentr 46: 68–92 (in German).
  • Sigmond H (1930). Die Entfaltung Bluütenknospe zweier Oenothera- Arten. Teil II. Beih Bot Zentr 47: 69–138 (in German).
  • Schemske DW (1980). Evolution of floral display in the orchid Brassavola nodosa. Evolution 34: 489–493.
  • Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 372–378.
  • Solecki RS (1971). Shanidar: The First Flower People. New York, NY, USA: Knopf.
  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002). Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83: 1421–1432.
  • Sultan SE (2003). Phenotypic plasticity in plants: a case study in ecological development. Evol Devel 5: 25–33.
  • Tylianakis JM, Klein AM, Tscharntke T (2005). Spatiotemporal variation in the diversity of hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 86: 3296–3302.
  • van Doorn WG (1997). Effects of pollination on floral attraction and longevity. J Exp Bot 48: 1615–1622.
  • van Doorn WG, van Meeteren U (2003). Flower opening and closure: a review. J Exp Bot 54: 1801–1812.     
  • Waddington KD (1976). Foraging patterns of Halictid bees at flowers of Convolvulus arvensis. Psyche 83: 112–119.
  • Weaver SE, Riley WR (1982). The biology of Canadian weeds. 53. Convolvulus arvensis L. Can J Plant Sci 62: 461–472.
  • West-Eberhard MJ (1989). Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20: 249–278.
  • Willson FM, Schemske DW (1980). Pollinator limitation, fruit production, and floral display in pawpaw (Asimina triloba). Bull Torr Bot Club 107: 401–408.
  • Yokota S, Yahara T (2012). Pollination biology of Lilium japonicum var. abeanum and var. japonicum: evidence of adaptation to the different availability of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators. Plant Sp Biol 27: 96–105.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Exogenous proline and proline-enriched Lolium perenne leaf extract protects against phytotoxic effects of nickel and salinity in Pisum sativum by altering polyamine metabolism in leaves

Muhammad Adnan SHAHID, Rashad Mukhtar BALAL, Muhammad Aslam PERVEZ, Tahira ABBAS, Muhammad Anjum AQEEL, Muhammad Mansoor JAVAID, Francisco GARCIA-SANCHEZ

Exogenous proline and proline-enriched Lolium perenne leaf extract protects against phytotoxic efects of nickel and salinity in Pisum sativum by altering polyamine metabolism in leaves

Muhammad Mansoor JAVAID, Muhammad Anjum AQEEL, Francisco GARCIA SANCHEZ, Muhammad Adnan SHAHID, Rashad Mukhtar BALAL, Muhammad Aslam PERVEZ, Tahira ABBAS

Ellenberg’s indicator values for soil nitrogen concentration and pH in selected swamp forests in the Central Black Sea region of Turkey

Burak SÜRMEN, Hamdi Güray KUTBAY, Dudu Duygu KILIÇ, Rena HÜSEYİNOVA, Mahmut KILINÇ

Molecular variability of plantain ecotypes from the genus Musa (Musaceae)

Rakeshkumar CHOUDHARY, Raghunath KESHAVACHANDRAN, Rema MENON

Flower closure in the field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis): a field test of the pollination hypothesis

Pavol PROKOP, Dominika NEUPAUEROVÁ

Allium efeae (Amaryllidaceae), a new species from northwest Anatolia, Turkey

İlker GENÇ, Fatma Neriman ÖZHATAY

Triacontanol-induced changes in growth, yield, leaf water relations, oxidative defense system, minerals, and some key osmoprotectants in Triticum aestivum under saline conditions

Shagufta PERVEEN, Muhammad SHAHBAZ, Muhammad ASHRAF

Ellenberg’s indicator values for soil nitrogen concentration and pH in selected swamp forests in the Central Black Sea region of Turkey

Burak SÜRMEN, Hamdi Güray KUTBAY, Dudu Duygu KILIÇ, Rena HÜSEYİNOVA, Mahmut KILINÇ

A new natural hybrid between Prosthechea cochleata and P. radiata (Orchidaceae) from Alta Verapaz, Guatemala

Edgar MÓ, William CETZAL-IX, Germán CARNEVALI, Eduardo PÉREZ-GARCÍA, Saikat BASU

Reseda malatyana (Resedaceae), a new chasmophytic species from eastern Anatolia, Turkey

Hasan YILDIRIM, Serdar Gökhan ŞENOL