Karyotypic phylogeny and polyploidy variations of Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae) taxa in Turkey
Karyotypic phylogeny and polyploidy variations of Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae) taxa in Turkey
Chromosomal data can provide very valuable information about karyotypic phylogeny and speciation. This is the first studyon karyotype phylogeny and polyploidy variations of the genus Paronychia. In this context, the results are these: (1) in 14 taxa, thefirst report on chromosomes numbers; (2) in 2 taxa, equal chromosome numbers as in the previous report; (3) in all taxa, the firstreport of detailed karyotype analyses; (4) karyotype asymmetry data and generally symmetrical karyotypes; (5) karyotypic variationsby mechanisms of dysploidy and polyploidy; and (6) phylogenetic relationships in Paronychia. The data indicate that Anatolia is animportant area for the distribution of Paronychia. In light of all data, karyotype evolution is briefly summarized. The ancestral karyotypewas x = 9 (millions of years ago). The karyotypes (x = 8 and x = 7) were then shaped by dysploidy. The rate of polyploidization thensignificantly increased in the genus. However, data should be supported by molecular analysis. In addition, the chromosome numbersof 8 species of Turkish Paronychia is still unknown. The determination of the karyological data of all species is very important tounderstand karyotype evolution and chromosomal phylogeny in Paronychia.
___
- Altay D, Eroğlu HE, Hamzaoğlu E, Koç M (2017). Karyotype analysis
of some taxa of Dianthus section Verruculosi (Caryophyllaceae,
Sileneae). Turkish Journal of Botany 41: 367-374. doi: 10.3906/
bot-1612-30
- Altınordu F, Peruzzi L, Yu Y, He XJ (2016). A tool for the
analysis of chromosomes: KaryoType. Taxon 65: 586-592.
doi: 10.12705/653.9
- Alvarez S (2010). Evolution and systematics of locally endemic
Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae) in South America. MS, Uppsala
Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Baltisberger M, Hörandl E (2016). Karyotype evolution supports
the molecular phylogeny in the genus Ranunculus
(Ranunculaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and
Systematics 18: 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.11.001
- Bittrich V (1993). Caryophyllaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer J, Bittrich
V (editors). The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants,
Magnoliid, Hamamelid, and Caryophyllid Families. Vol. 2.
Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 206-236.
- Blackburn KB, Morton JK (1957). The incidence of polyploidy in the
Caryophyllaceae of Britain and of Portugal. New Phytologist
56: 344-351. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1957.tb06979.x
- Chaudhri MN (1967). Paronychia Mill. In: Davis PH (editor). Flora
of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 2. Edinburgh, UK:
Edinburgh University Press, pp. 250-262.
- Chaudhri MN (1968). A Revision of the Paronychinae. Utrecht,
Netherlands: Tilburg, H. Gianotten.
- Demirci Kayıran S, Özhatay FN (2017). A karyomorphological
study on the genus Muscari Mill. growing in Kahramanmaraş
(Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany 41: 289-298. doi: 10.3906/
bot-1605-6
- Diosdado JC, Pastor J (1994). Estudio cariologico del gĕnero
Paronychia Miller (Caryophyllaceae) en Andalucĭa (Espana).
Acta Botanica Malacitana 19: 89-95 (in Spanish).
- Eroğlu HE, Şimşek N, Koç M, Hamzaoğlu E (2013). Karyotype
analysis of some Minuartia L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa. Plant
Systematics and Evolution 299: 67-73. doi: 10.1007/s00606-
012-0703-8
- Eroğlu HE (2015). Which chromosomes are subtelocentric or
acrocentric? A new karyotype symmetry/asymmetry index.
Caryologia 68: 239-245. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2015.1032614
- Eroğlu HE, Doğan H, Altay D, Budak Ü (2017). The medicinal plant
of genus Paronychia and the karyotype analysis of Paronychia
adalia. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite 4 (3):
103-107. doi: 10.21448/ijsm.363827
- Fedorov AA (1974). Chromosome Numbers of Flowering Plants.
Leningrad, USSR: Komarov Botanical Institute.
- Harpke D, Carta A, Tomović G, Ranđelović V, Ranđelović N et
al. (2015). Phylogeny, karyotype evolution and taxonomy
of Crocus series Verni (Iridaceae). Plant Systematics and
Evolution 301: 309-325. doi: 10.1007/s00606-014-1074-0
- Hartman RL (1972). Paronychia pulvinata – P. sessiliflora: A
cytological and chemical study. Journal of the ColoradoWyoming Academy of Science 7: 102-102.
- Hartman RL (1974). Rocky mountain species of Paronychia
(Caryophyllaceael. A morphological, cytological, and chemical
study. Brittonia 26: 256-263.
- Küpfer P (1980). Contribution à la cytotaxonomie de quelques
orophytes Iraniens. Revue de Biologie et d’Ecologie
Mediterranéenne 7: 37-48 (in French).
- Levan AK, Fredga K, Sandberg AA (1964). Nomenclature for
centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201-220.
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1964.tb01953.x
- Lorenzo Andreu A, García Sanz MP (1950). Cromosomas somáticos
de plantas espontáneas en la estepa de Aragón. II. Anales de la
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei 2: 12-63 (in Spanish).
- Löve Á (1975). IOPB Chromosome Number Reports XLIX. Taxon
24: 501-516.
- Martin E, İçyer Doğan G, Karaman Erkul S, Eroğlu HE (2019).
Karyotype analyses of 25 Turkish taxa of Astragalus from the
sections Macrophyllium, Hymenostegis, Hymenocoleus, and
Anthylloidei (Fabaceae). Turkish Journal of Botany 43: 232-
242. doi: 10.3906/bot-1807-1
- Metzgar J, Stamey M, Ickert-Bond S (2016). Genetic differentiation
and polyploid formation within the Cryptogramma crispa
complex (Polypodiales: Pteridaceae) Turkish Journal of Botany
40: 231-240. doi: 10.3906/bot-1501-54
- Paszko B (2006). A critical review and a new proposal of karyotype
asymmetry indices. Plant Systematics and Evolution 258: 39-
48. doi: 10.1007/s00606-005-0389-2
- Peruzzi L, Eroğlu HE (2013). Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to
measure and what to measure? Comparative Cytogenetics 7:
1-9. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v7i1.4431
- Peruzzi L, Carta A, Altınordu F (2017). Chromosome diversity
and evolution in Allium (Allioideae, Amaryllidaceae). Plant
Biosystems 151: 212-220. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2016.1149123
- Runemark H (1996). Mediterranean chromosome number reports 6
(590-678). Flora Mediterranea 6: 223-243.
- Suda J, Kyncl T, Freiova R (2003). Nuclear DNA amounts in
Macaronesian angiosperms. Annals of Botany 92: 153-164.
- Şirin E, Bozkurt M, Uysal T, Ertuğrul K (2019). Karyomorphological
features of Turkish Centaurea (subgenus Cyanus, Asteraceae)
species and its taxonomic importance. Turkish Journal of
Botany 43: 538-550. doi: 10.3906/bot-1811-28
- Zhang C, Cao D, Kang L, Duan J, Ma X et al. (2014). Ploidy
variation and karyotype analysis in Hemerocallis spp.
(Xanthorrhoeaceae) and implications on daylily breeding.
New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 42:
183-193. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2013.877040