Genetic diversity and relationships within and among Onobrychis species using molecular markers

Little is known about the taxonomic relationships of the genus Onobrychis (Fabaceae). To study inter- and intraspecific variations and the relationships among the species, 102 accessions (33 species) of the genus Onobrychis were evaluated using 22 inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Almost all the species belonging to the section Onobrychis clustered together. A similar pattern was found with the species belonging to the section Hymenobrychis, while those of the section Lophobrychis did not cluster together. The results indicate that the section Lophobrychis has a comparatively derived organization that can be attributed to the differences in their taxonomic delimitation. Geographical pattern was found to be associated with the genetic diversity within the species. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) indicated a high association among the sections Lophobrychis, Heliobrychis, and Hymenobrychis. Thus, the present subgeneric classification of Onobrychis (Onobrychis and Sisyrosema) was not supported. The results based on Nei's similarity suggest that some species in the genus Onobrychis (especially O. Altissima) might have been outcrossing with reproductive ability with O. Viciifolia. Our results suggest that species with x = 7 chromosome are closer to O. Viciifolia than to those with x = 8. Therefore, a base number n = 8 can be assumed for this genus (within Onobrychis genus basal), changing to 7 through aneuploid loss.

Genetic diversity and relationships within and among Onobrychis species using molecular markers

Little is known about the taxonomic relationships of the genus Onobrychis (Fabaceae). To study inter- and intraspecific variations and the relationships among the species, 102 accessions (33 species) of the genus Onobrychis were evaluated using 22 inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Almost all the species belonging to the section Onobrychis clustered together. A similar pattern was found with the species belonging to the section Hymenobrychis, while those of the section Lophobrychis did not cluster together. The results indicate that the section Lophobrychis has a comparatively derived organization that can be attributed to the differences in their taxonomic delimitation. Geographical pattern was found to be associated with the genetic diversity within the species. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) indicated a high association among the sections Lophobrychis, Heliobrychis, and Hymenobrychis. Thus, the present subgeneric classification of Onobrychis (Onobrychis and Sisyrosema) was not supported. The results based on Nei's similarity suggest that some species in the genus Onobrychis (especially O. Altissima) might have been outcrossing with reproductive ability with O. Viciifolia. Our results suggest that species with x = 7 chromosome are closer to O. Viciifolia than to those with x = 8. Therefore, a base number n = 8 can be assumed for this genus (within Onobrychis genus basal), changing to 7 through aneuploid loss.

___

  • Abou-El-Enain MM (2002). Chromosomal criteria and their phylogenetic implications in the genus Onobrychis Mill, Sect. Lophobrychis (Leguminosae) with special reference to Egyptian species. Bot J Linn Soc 139: 409–414.
  • Ahangarian S, Kazempour-Osaloo Sh, Maassoumi AA (2007). Molecular phylogeny of the tribe Hedysareae with special reference to Onobrychis (Fabaceae) as inferred from nrDNA ITS sequences. Iranian Journal of Botany 13: 64–74.
  • Arslan E, Ertuğrul K, Tugay O, Dural H (2012). Karyological studies of the genus Onobrychis Mill. and the related genera Hedysarum L. and Sartoria Boiss. & Heldr. (Fabaceae, Hedysareae) from Turkey. Caryologia 65: 11–17.
  • Arslan E, Ertuğrul K (2010). Genetic relationships of the genera Onobrychis, Hedysarum, and Sartoria using seed storage proteins. Turk J Bot 34: 67–73.
  • Ball PW (1968). Onobrychis Miller. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentin SM, editors. Flora Europaea, Vol. 2. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–191.
  • Bornet BC, Muller FP, Branchard M (2002). Highly informative nature of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) sequences amplified using tri- and tetra-nucleotide primers from DNA of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. ‘botrytus’ L.). Genome 45: 890–896.
  • Budak H, Shearman RC, Parmaksiz I, Dweikat I (2004). Comparative analysis of seeded and vegetative biotype buffalograsses based on phylogenetic relationship using ISSRs, SSRs, RAPDs, and SRAPs. Theor Appl Genet 109: 280–288.
  • Davis PH, Mill RR, Tan K (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement), Vol 10. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 561–588.
  • Emre I, Turgut-balık D, Sahin A, Kursat M (2007). Total electrophoretic band patterns of some Onobrychis species growing in Turkey. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 2: 123–126.
  • Falistocco E (1991). Chromosome study and genome relationships in perennial species of Onobrychis. Genet Breed 45: 25–31.
  • Fang D, Kurueger RR, Roose ML (1998). Phylogenetic relationships among selected Citrus germplasm accessions revealed by Inter- simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 1234: 612–617.
  • Fu X, Ning G, Gao L, Bao M (2008). Genetic diversity of Dianthus accessions as assessed using two molecular marker systems (SRAPs and ISSRs) and morphological traits. Sci Hortic- Amsterdam 117: 263–270.
  • Goldblatt P (1981). Cytology and the phylogeny of Leguminosae. In: Polhill RM, Raven PH, editors. Advances in Legume Systematics, Vol. 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 427–463.
  • Gömürgen AN (1996). Meiotic analysis of selected material of sainfoin and its progeny with branched and unbranched peduncles. Turk J Bot 20: 399–411.
  • Hayot Carbonero C, Carbonero F, Smith LMJ, Brown TA (2012). Phylogenetic characterisation of Onobrychis species with special focus on the forage crop Onobrychis viciifolia Scop. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59: 1777–1788.
  • Hedge IC (1970). Onobrychis. In: Davis PH, editor. Flora of Turkey and the Aegean Islands, Vol. 3. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 584–589.
  • Hesamzadeh Hejazi SM, Ziaei Nasab M (2010). Cytotaxonomy of some Onobrychis (Fabaceae) species and populations in Iran. Caryologia 63: 18–31.
  • Khatoon S, Ali S (1991). Chromosome numbers in subfamily Papilionoideae (Leguminosae) from Pakistan. Willdenowia 20: 159–165.
  • Lewke Bandara N, Papini A, Mostl S, Brown T, Smith LMJ (2013). A phylogenetic analysis of genus Onobrychis and its relationships within the tribe Hedysareae (Fabaceae). Turk J Bot 37: 981–992.
  • Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 4321–4325.
  • Nei M (1972). Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106: 283–292.
  • Pavlova DK, Manova VI (2000). Pollen morphology of the genera Onobrychis and Hedysarum (Hedysarea, Fabaceae) in Bulgaria. Ann Bot Fenn 37: 207–217.
  • Powell W, Morgante M, Ander C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingy S, Rafalaski A (1996). The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2: 225–238.
  • Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ (1999). A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98: 107–112.
  • Ranjbar M, Hajmoradi F, Karamian R (2012). An overview on cytogenetics of the genus Onobrychis (Fabaceae) with special reference to O. sect. Hymenobrychis from Iran. Caryologia 65: 187–198.
  • Ranjbar M, Karamian R, Hadadi A (2009). Biosystematic study of Onobrychis vicifolia Scop. and Onobrychis altissima Grossh. (Fabaceae) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 15: 85–95.
  • Ranjbar M, Karamian R, Hajmoradi F (2010). Chromosome number and meiotic behavior of two populations of Onobrychis chorassanica Bunge (O. sect. Hymenobrychis) in Iran. Journal of Cell and Molecular Research 2: 49–55.
  • Rohlf FJ (1998). NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.00. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.
  • Roldan-Ruiz I, Dendauw J, Bockstaele EV, Depicker A, Loose MD (2000). AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp.). Mol Breed 6: 125–134.
  • Safaei Chaei Kar S, Ghanavati F, Naghavi MR, Amirabadi-zade H, Rabiee R (2014). Molecular phylogenetics of the Onobrychis genus (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) using ITS and trnL–trnF DNA sequence data. Aust J Bot 62: 235–250.
  • Sepet S, Emre I, Kiran Y, Kursat M, Sahin A (2011). Karyological studies on eight species of Onobrychis genus in Turkey. Biologia 66: 996–1002.
  • Sikdar B, Bhattacharya M, Mukherjee A, Banerjee A, Ghosh E, Ghosh B, Roy SC (2010). Genetic diversity in important members of Cucurbitaceae using isozyme, RAPD and ISSR markers. Biol Plantarum 54: 135–140.
  • Su Y, Wang T, Ouyang P (2009). High genetic differentiation and variation as revealed by ISSR markers in Pseudotaxus chienii (Taxaceae), an old rare conifer endemic to China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 37: 579–588.
  • Wang X, Wang D, Li D, Duan D (2006). Genetic analysis of the gametophytes of Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae) with ISSR method. Aquaculture 258: 250–256.
  • Wolfe AD, Randle CP (2001). Relationships within and among species of the Holoparasitic genus Hyobanche (Orobanchaceae) inferred from ISSR banding patterns and nucleotide sequences. Syst Bot 26: 120–130.
  • Wolfe AD, Xiang QY, Kephart SR (1998). Diploid hybrid speciation in Penstemon (Scrophulariaceae). P Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5112–5115.
  • Yeh, FC, Yang R, Boyle T (1999). Popgene version 1.32: Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. University of Alberta, Edmonton.
  • Yildiz B, Ciplak B, Aktoklu E (1999). Fruit morphology of sections of the genus Onobrychis Miller (Fabaceae) and its phylogenetic implications. Isr J Plant Sci 47: 269–282.
  • Zarrabian M, Majidi M, Ehtemam MH (2013). Genetic diversity in a worldwide collection of sainfoin using morphological, anatomical, and molecular markers. Crop Sci 53: 2483–2496.
  • Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D (1994). Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176–183.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Influence of foliar application of silicon on chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthetic pigments, and growth in water-stressed wheat cultivars differing in drought tolerance

Kobra MAGHSOUDI, Yahya EMAM, Muhammad ASHRAF

Influence of culture media and carbon sources on biomass productivity and oil content of the algae Sirogonium sticticum, Temnogyra reflexa, Uronema elongatum, and Chroococcus turgidus

Aftab ALAM, Saleem ULLAH, Sahib ALAM, Hamid Ullah SHAH, Saadia AFTAB, Muhammad SIDDIQ, Nazish MANZOOR

Systematic placement of the Turkish endemic genus Ekimia (Apiaceae) based on morphological and molecular data

Dmitry LYSKOV, Galina DEGTJAREVA, Tahir SAMIGULLIN, Michael PIMENOV

Mechanisms of tolerance differences in cucumber seedlings grafted on rootstocks with different tolerance to low temperature and weak light stresses

Yan LI, Xuemei TIAN, Min WEI, Qinghua SHI, Fengjuan YANG, Xiufeng WANG

Flow cytometric estimation of the nuclear genome size of 22 Echinops (Asteraceae) taxa from Turkey

Handan ŞAPCI, Monika REWERS, Cem VURAL, Elwira SLIWINSKA

Transferability of barley retrotransposon primers to analyze genetic structure in Iranian Hypericum perforatum L. populations

Razea Asadkhani MAMAGHANI, Seyed Abolghasem MOHAMMADI, Saeid AHARIZAD

Differential expression of soluble pyrophosphatase isoforms in Arabidopsis upon external stimuli

Zahide Neslihan ÖZTÜRK, Steffen GREINER, Thomas RAUSCH

Floral function in relation to floral structure in two Periploca species (Periplocoideae) Apocynaceae

Samia HENEIDAK, Yougasphree NAIDOO

Genetic diversity and relationships within and among Onobrychis species using molecular markers

Mohammad ZARRABIAN, Mohammad Mahdi MAJIDI

Taxonomic revision of Astragalus L. section Onobrychoidei DC. (Fabaceae) in Turkey

Murat EKİCİ, Hasan AKAN, Hasan AKAN, Zeki AYTAÇ