Specific Individuals of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Are Able to Show Time-Place Learning

Using demand-feeders, time-place learning association of food was investigated in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in 2 small raceways (TR1 and TR2). In order for the fish to be visually identified, they were tagged individually and their behaviour and distribution were monitored by cameras. Equipping with a demand-feeder, TR1 was assigned to test 2 times/1 place (2T/1P) while 2 demand-feeders were used in TR2 assigned to test 2 times/2 places (2T/2P). After 26 days of restricted feeding (RF) the fish were deprived of food for 3 days. The results of the present study indicate that, at the group level, rainbow trout are not able to clearly demonstrate time-place learning except for some fish in the group. These fish were identified as dominants, in terms of a higher rate of agonistic acts or a greater amount of food eaten. Feeding behaviour was largely influenced by social dominance of the group, especially through territoriality.

Specific Individuals of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Are Able to Show Time-Place Learning

Using demand-feeders, time-place learning association of food was investigated in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in 2 small raceways (TR1 and TR2). In order for the fish to be visually identified, they were tagged individually and their behaviour and distribution were monitored by cameras. Equipping with a demand-feeder, TR1 was assigned to test 2 times/1 place (2T/1P) while 2 demand-feeders were used in TR2 assigned to test 2 times/2 places (2T/2P). After 26 days of restricted feeding (RF) the fish were deprived of food for 3 days. The results of the present study indicate that, at the group level, rainbow trout are not able to clearly demonstrate time-place learning except for some fish in the group. These fish were identified as dominants, in terms of a higher rate of agonistic acts or a greater amount of food eaten. Feeding behaviour was largely influenced by social dominance of the group, especially through territoriality.

___

  • Wahl O. Neue Untersuchungen über das Zeitgedächtnis der Bienen. J Comp Physiol 16: 529-589, 1932.
  • Krebs JR, Biebach H. Time-place learning by garden warblers (Sylvia borin): route or map? Ethol 83: 248-256, 1989.
  • Falk H, Biebach H, Krebs JR (1992) Learning in a time-place pattern of food availability: a comparison between an insectivorous and a granivorous weaver species (Ploceus bicolor and Eupletes hordeaceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 9-15, 1992.
  • Boulos Z, Logothetis DE. Rats anticipate and discriminate between two daily feeding times. Physiol Behav 48: 523-529, 1990.
  • Mistlberger RE, De Groot MHM, Bossert JM, Marchant EG. Discrimination of circadian phase in intact and suprachiasmatic nuclei-ablated rats. Brain Res 739: 12-18, 1996.
  • Carr JAR, Wilkie DM. Rats use an ordinal timer in daily time-place learning task. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 23: 232-247, 1997.
  • Carr JAR, Wilkie DM. Characterization of the timing strategy used by rats in an interval time-place task. Anim Behav Proc 24: 151- 162, 1998.
  • Carr JAR, Wilkie DM. Rats are reluctant to use circadian timing in a daily time-place task. Behav Proc 44: 287-299, 1999.
  • Carr JAR, Tan AO, Wilkie DM. Further evidence that rats use ordinal timing in a daily time-place learning task. Behav Proc 44: 287- 299, 1999.
  • Widman DR, Gordon D, Timberlake W. Response cost and time- place discrimination by rats in maze tasks. Ani Learn Behav 28: 298-309, 2000.
  • Widman DR, Sermania CM, Geniosmore KE. Evidence for time- place learning in the Morris water maze without food restriction but with increased response cost. Behav Proc 67: 183-193, 2004.
  • Thorpe CM, Wilkie DM. Interval time-place learning by rats: varying reinforcement contingencies. Behav Proc 70: 156-167, 2005.
  • Reebs SG. Time-place learning in golden shiners (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Behav Proc 36: 253-262, 1996.
  • Reebs SG. Time-place learning based on food but not on predation risk in a fish, the inanga (Galaxias maculatus). Ethol 105: 361-371, 1999.
  • Gomez-Laplaza LM, Morgan E. Time-place learning in the cichlid angelfish, Pterophyllum scalare. Behav Proc, 30: 171-181, 2005.
  • Sanchez-Vazquez FJ, Madrid JA (2001) Feeding anticipatory activity. In: Houlihan, D., Boujard, T., Jobling, M. (Eds.), Food Intake in Fish. Blackwell Science Ltd., London: 2001.
  • Kieffer JD, Colgan PW. The role of learning in fish behaviour. Reviews in Fish Biol Fisher 2: 125-143, 1992.
  • Koolhaas JM, De Boer SF, Bohus B. Motivational systems or motivational states: behavioural and physiological evidence. App Anim Behav Sci 53: 131-143, 1995.
  • Sneddon LU. The bold and the shy: individual differences in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 62: 971-975, 2003.
  • Rekila T, Harri M, Ahola L. Validation of the feeding test as an index of fear in farmed blue (Alopex lagopus) and silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Physiol Behav 62: 805-810, 1997.
  • Landless PJ. Demand-feeding behaviour of rainbow trout. Aquacul 7: 11-26, 1976.
  • Brännäs E, Alanärä A. Monitoring the feeding activity of individual fish with a demand feeding system. J Fish Biol 42: 209-215, 1993.
  • Alanärä A, Brännäs E. Dominance in demand-feeding behaviour in Arctic char and rainbow trout: the effect of stocking density. J Fish Biol 48: 242-254, 1996.
  • Chen WM, Naruse M, Tabata M. The effect of social interactions on circadian self-feeding rhythms in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum. Physiol Behav 76: 281-287, 2002.
  • Brännäs E, Berglund U, Eriksson LO. Time learning and anticipatory activity in groups of Arctic charr. Ethol 111: 681-692, 2005.
  • Jobling M. Feeding of char in relation to aquaculture. Nordic Journal of Freshw Res 71: 102-112, 1995.
  • McCarthy ID, Carter CG, Houlihan DF. The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J Fish Biol 41: 257-263, 1992.
  • Jobling M, Koskela J. Interindividual variations in feeding and growth in rainbow trout during restricted feeding and in a subsequent period of compensatory growth. J Fish Biol 49: 658- 667, 1996.
  • Alanärä A, Brännäs E. Diurnal and nocturnal feeding activity in Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Fish Aqua Sci 54: 2894-2900, 1997.
  • Gelineau A, Corraze G, Boujard T. Effects of restricted ration, time- restricted access and reward level on voluntary food intake, growth and growth heterogeneity of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed on demand with self-feeders. Aquacul 167: 247-258, 1998.
  • Davis MW, Olla BL. Aggression and variation in growth of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) juveniles in seawater: effects of limited rations. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 44: 192-197, 1987.
  • Thorpe CM, Huntingford FA (Eds). The importance of feeding behavior for the efficient culture of salmonid fishes. Baton Rouge: The World Aquaculture Society. World Aquaculture Workshops: 1992.
  • Grant JWA. Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. Mar Behav Physiol 23: 137-153, 1993.
  • Jobling M. Simple indices for the assessment of the influences of social environment on growth performance, exemplified by studies on Arctic char. Aquacul Internat 3: 60-65, 1995.
  • Jobling M. Effect of feeding frequency on food intake and growth of Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus L. J Fish Biol 23: 177-185, 1993.
  • Brown JL. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wils Bull 76: 160-169, 1964.
  • Moutou KA, McCarthy ID, Houlihan DF. The effect of ration level and social rank on the development of fin damage in juvenile rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 52: 756-770, 1998.
  • Keeley ER, Grant JWA. Allometric and environmental correlates of territory size in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aqua Sci 52: 186-196, 1995.
  • Chen WM, Tabata M. Influence of reward level on vertical distribution and growth of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss fed on demand with self-feeders. Fish Sci 69: 331-336, 2003.
  • Magurran AE. Individual differences and alternative behaviours. In: Pitcher TJ (Ed.), Behavior of Teleost Fishes. Chapman and Hall, London; 1993.
  • Adams CE, Huntingford FA, Turnbull JF et al. Alternative competitive strategies and the cost of food acquisition in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquacul 167: 17-26, 1998.
  • McCarthy ID, Gair DJ, Houlihan DF. Feeding rank and dominance in Tilapia rendalli under defensible and indefensible patterns of food distribution. J Fish Biol 55: 854-867, 1999.
  • Fausch KD. Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can J Zool 62: 441-451, 1984.
  • Metcalfe NB, Huntingford FA, Graham WD et al. Early social status and the development of life-history strategies an Atlantic salmon. Proc Roy Soci Lon B 236: 7-19, 1989.
  • Johnsson JI. Individual recognition affects aggression and dominance relations in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Ethol 103: 267-282, 1997.
  • Brännäs, E, Alanärä A, Magnhagen C. The social behaviour of fish. In: Keeling LJ, Gonyou HW (Eds.), Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. CABI, Oxon, pp. 275-304, 2001.
  • Chen WM, Naruse M, Tabata M. Circadian rhythms and individual variability of self-feeding activity in groups of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum. Aquacul Res 33: 491-500, 2002.
  • Ferster CB, Skinner BF. Schedules of Reinforcement. Appleton- Century-Crofts, New York; 1957.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Effect of Hyperosmotic Stress and Nitrogen Starvation on Growth and b-Galactosidase Synthesis in Kluyveromyces lactis and Kluyveromyces marxianus

Sezai TÜRKEL, Elif ARIK, Sinem GÜZELVARDAR

Sensitivity of Kinetoplastids to Aminoglycoside: Correlation with the 3’ Region of the Small Subunit rRNA Gene

A. S. Hamad ELGAZWY, Masoom M. YASINZAI

The effect of hperosmotic stress and nitrogen starvation growth and $ Beta$-galactosidase synthesis in kluyveromyces lactis and kluyveromyces marxianus

Sezai TÜRKEL, Elif ARIK, Sinem GÜZELVARDAR

Antioxidant and Vasorelaxant Activities of Flavonoids from Amygdalus lycioides var. horrida

Hossein BABAEI, Omid SADEGHPOUR, Lutfun NAHAR, Abbas DELAZAR, Hossein NAZEMIYEH, Mohammad Reza MANSOURI, Naser POURSAEID, Solmaz ASNAASHARI, Sedigheh Bamdad MOGHADAM, Satyajit Dey SARKER

Androgenesis in Anther Culture of Lithuanian Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars

Rita ASAKAVICIUTE

The Antioxidant Activity of Some Medicinal Plants

Prateek Kumar JAIN, Veerasamy RAVICHANDRAN, Simant SHARMA, Ram K. AGRAWAL

Gamma Ray- and EMS-Induced Bold-Seeded High-Yielding Mutants in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Aijaz A. WANI, Mohammad ANIS

Sensitivity of Kinetoplastids to Aminoglycoside: Correlation with the 3’ Region of the Small Subunit rRNA Gene

A. S. Hamad ELGAZWY, Masoom M. YASINZAI

Specific Individuals of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Are Able to Show Time-Place Learning

Mohammad Saeed HEYDARNEJAD, John PURSER

Comparative Antioxidant Activity of Some Edible Plants

Zaha A. EL-AGBAR, Ashok K. SHAKYA, Nooman A. KHALAF, Makbula AL-HAROON