___

• Babu RE, Mani VP, Gupta HS (2004). Combining high protein quality and hard endosperm traits through phenotypic and marker assisted selection in maize. In: Fischer T, editor. Proceedings of the Fourth International Crop Science Congress on New directions for a diverse planet, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 50–55.
• Balestre M, Von Pinho RG, Souza JC, Lima JL (2008). Comparison of maize similarity and dissimilarity genetic coefficients based on microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Res 7: 695–705.
• Bantte K, Prasanna BM (2004). Endosperm protein quality and kernel modification in the QPM inbred lines. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 13: 57–60.
• Barata C, Carena MJ (2006). Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data. Euphytica 151: 339–349.
• Benchimol LL, Souza JC, Garcia AAF, Kono PMS, Mangolin CA, Barbosa AMM, Coelho ASG (2000). Genetic diversity in tropical maize inbred lines: heterotic group assignment and hybrid performance determined by RFLP markers. Plant Breeding 119: 491–496.
• Bidhendi MZ, Choukan R, Darvish F, Mostafavi K, Majidi E (2012). Inbred lines into heterotic groups using diallel analysis. World Acad Sci 67: 1368–1371.
• Bingham ET, Groose RW, Woodfield DR, Kidwell KK (1994). Complementary gene interaction in alfalfa is greater in autotetraploids than diploids. Crop Sci 34: 823–829.
• Biswas TK, Sana NK, Badal RK, Huque EM (2001). Biochemical study of some oilseeds (brassica, sesame and linseed). Pakist J Biol Sci 4: 1002–1005.
• Botstain D, White RL, Skolnick M, Dawid RW (1980). Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314–331.
• Dias LA, Picoli EA, Rocha RB, Alfenas AC (2004). A priori choice of hybrid parents in plants. Genet Mol Res 6: 356–368.
• Dubreuil P, Dufour P, Krejci E, Causse M, Viennede, Gallais A, Charcosset A (1996). Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci 36: 790–799.
• Dudley JW, Saghai-Maroof MA, Rufener GK (1991). Molecular markers and groups of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci 31: 718–723.
• Fan XM, Tan J, Chen HM, Yang JY (2003). Heterotic grouping for tropical and temperate maize inbreds by analyzing combining ability and SSR markers. Maydica 48: 251–257.
• Geleta LF, Labuschagne MT, Viljoen CD (2004). Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on morphological traits and AFLP markers in pepper. Plant Breeding 123: 467–473.
• Gethi JG, Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Smith ME, Kresovich S (2002). SSR variation in important U.S. maize inbred lines. Crop Sci 42: 951–958.
• Griffing B (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust J Biol Sci 9: 463–493.
• Guimaraes PS, Paterniani MEAGZ, Luders RR, Souza AP (2007). Correlation between the heterosis of maize hybrids and genetic divergence among lines. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 38: 243–250.
• Hahn V, Blankenhorn K, Schwall M, Melchinger AE, Malecot G, Jaccard P (1995). Relationships among early European maize inbreds. III: Genetic diversity revealed with RAPD markers and comparison with RFLP and pedigree data. Maydica 40: 299–310.
• Hallauer AR, Russell WA, Lamkey KR (1988). Corn breeding. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW, editors. Corn and Corn Improvement. Madison, WI, USA: ASA, pp. 469–564.
• Humphries EC (1956). Mineral components and ash analysis. Soil Sci 100: 112–117.
• Jompuk C, Samphantharak K, Chowchong S, Choosak J, Krisda S, Surapol C (2000). Genetic diversity of corn hybrids from different sources in Thailand as verified by their heterotic pattern and inbreeding depression. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 34: 205–209.
• Kara ŞM (2001). Evaluation of yield and yield components in inbred maize lines I. Heterosis and line × tester analysis of combining ability. Turk J Agric For 25: 383–391.
• Kwon SJ, Ha WG, Hwang HG, Yang SJ, Choi HC, Moon HP, Ahn SN (2002). Relationship between heterosis and genetic divergence in ‘Tongil’-type rice. Plant Breeding 121: 487–492.
• Legesse BW, Myburg AA, Pixley KV, Botha AM (2006). Genetic diversity of African maize inbred lines revealed by SSR markers. Hereditas 144: 10–17.
• Li MS, Zhang SH, Pan GT, Li XH, Xia XC, Tian QZ, Bai L (2005). Combining ability and heterotic grouping of CIMMYT subtropical quality protein maize lines. Sci Agric Sinica 38: 671–677.
• Librando RP, Magulama EE (2008). Classifying white inbred lines into heterotic groups using yield combining ability effects. USM R&D J 16: 99–103.
• Martin JM, Talbert LE, Lanning SP, Blake NK (1995). Hybrid performance in wheat as related to parental diversity. Crop Sci 35: 104–108.
• Melchinger AE (1999). Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S, editors. The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. Madison, WI, USA: CSSA, pp. 9–118.
• Melchinger AE, Gumber RK (1998). Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. In: Lamkey KR, Staub JE, editors. Concepts and Breeding of Heterosis in Crop Plants. Madison, WI, USA: CSSA, pp. 29–44.
• Menkir A, Melake BA, Ingelbrecht I, Adepoju A (2004). Grouping of tropical mid-altitude maize inbred lines on the basis of yield data and molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1582– 1590.
• Messmer MM, Melchinger AE, Boppenmaier J, Herrmann RG, Brunklaus JE (1992). RFLP analyses of early-maturing European maize germplasm - I. Genetic diversity among flint and dent inbreds. Theor Appl Genet 83: 1003–1012.
• Moreno-Gonzalez J (1988). Diallel crossing system in sets of flint and dent inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 133: 37–49.
• Mumm RH, Dudley JW (1994). A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds: I. Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop Sci 34: 842– 851.
• Mungoma C, Pollack LM (1988). Heterotic patterns among ten corn belt and exotic maize populations. Crop Sci 28: 500–504.
• Musteata S, Mistret S (2002). Estimation of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines with common pedigree. Cercetari de Genetica Vegetala si Animala 7: 167–176.
• Nei M, Li WH, Livini C, Ajmone MP, Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Motto M (1992). Genetic diversity of maize inbred lines within and among heterotic groups revealed by RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 84: 17–25.
• Panse VG, Sukhatme PV (1961). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Research Workers. New Delhi: ICAR.
• Parentoni SN, Magalhaes JV, Pacheco CAP, Santos MX, Abadie T, Gama EEG, Guimaraes PEO, Meirelles WF, Lopes MA, Vasconcelos MJV et al. (2001). Heterotic groups based on yieldspecific combining ability data and phylogenetic relationship determined by RAPD markers for 28 tropical maize open pollinated varieties. Euphytica 121: 197–208.
• Pinto RMC, Garcia AAF, Souza JCL (2001). Allocation of maize lines from BR-105 and BR-106 populations to heterotic groups. Sci Agric 58: 541–548.
• Prasanna BM, Vasal SK, Kassahun B, Singh NN (2001). Quality protein maize. Current Sci 81: 1308–1319.
• Pushpavalli SNCVL, Sudan C, Mohammadi SA, Nair SK, Prasanna, BM, Gadag RN, Singh NN (2002). Analysis of simple sequence repeat (SSR) polymorphism in the Indian maize inbred lines. J Genet Breed 56: 229–236.
• Qian W, Sass O, Meng J, Li M, Frauen M, Jung C (2007). Heterotic patterns in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): I. Crosses between spring and Chinese semi-winter lines. Theor Appl Genet 115: 27–34.
• Rafalski A, Wisniewska I, Adamczyk J, Gawe M, Krolikowski Z (2001). Molecular analysis of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines. Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roslin 217: 127–137.
• Ranatunga MAB (2006). Genetic diversity analysis of maize inbreds determined with morphometric traits and simple sequence repeat markers. MSc, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
• Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Frisch M (2005). Genetical and mathematical properties of similarity and dissimilarity coefficients applied in plant breeding and seed bank management. Crop Sci 45: 1–7.
• Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Xia XC, Warburton ML, Hoisington DA, Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Bohn M, Frisch M (2003). Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci 43: 1275–1282.
• Riaz A, Li Q, Quresh Z, Swati MS, Quiros CF (2001). Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica napus inbred lines on sequence related amplified polymorphism and its relation to hybrid performance. Plant Breeding 120: 411–415.
• Riday H, Brummer EC, Campbell TA, Luth D, Cazcarro PM (2003). Comparisons of genetic and morphological distance with heterosis between Medicago sativa subsp. sativa and subsp. falcata. Euphytica 131: 37–45.
• Ridley WP, Sidhu RS, Pyla PD, Nemeth MA, Breeze ML, Astwood JD (2002). Comparison of the nutritional profile of glyphosate tolerant corn event NK603 with that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.). J Agr Food Chem 50: 7235–7243.
• Rolf FJ (1997). Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.02i. New York: Exeter Software. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984).
• Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. P Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 8014–8018.
• Sant VJ, Patankar AG, Sarode ND, Mhase LB, Sainani MN, Deshmukh RB, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS (1999). Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analysing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98: 1217–1225.
• Semagn K, Magorokosho C, Vivek BS, Makumbi D, Beyene Y, Mugo S, Prasanna BM, Warburton ML (2012). Molecular characterization of diverse CIMMYT maize inbred lines from eastern and southern Africa using single nucleotide polymorphic markers. BMC Genomics 13: 113.
• Senior ML, Murphy JP, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1998). Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci 38: 1088–1098.
• Smith OS, Sullivan H, Hobart B, Wall SJ (2000). Evaluation of a divergent set of SSR markers to predict F1 grain yield performance and grain yield heterosis in maize. Maydica 45: 235–241.
• Soengas P, Ordas B, Malvar RA, Revilla P, Ordas A (2003). Heterotic patterns among flint maize populations. Crop Sci 43: 844–849.
• Tams SH, Bauer E, Oettler G, Melchinger AE, Schon CC (2006). Prospects for hybrid breeding in winter triticale: II. Relationship between parental genetic distance and specific combining ability. Plant Breeding 125: 331–336.
• Tan J, Fan XM, Yang JY, Chen HM, Yang RF (2004). Study on relationship between genetic distance based on molecular markers and heterosis on yield of maize. Southwest China J Agr Sci 17: 278–281.
• Theymoli Balasubramanian, Sadasivam S (1987). Estimation of amino acids and proteins: laboratory techniques. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 37–41.
• Tian QZ, Li XH, Li MS, Jiang W, Zhang SH (2004). Molecular marker assisted selection of quality protein maize. J Maize Sci 12: 108– 110.
• Vasal SK (1999). Quality protein maize – story. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Improving Human Nutrition through Agriculture - The Role of International Agricultural Research. Manila, the Philippines: IRRI.
• Vasal SK (2000). The quality protein maize story. Food Nutr. Bull 21: 445–450.
• Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Gonzalez CF, Beck DL, Crossa J (1993). Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT’s quality protein maize germplasm: II. Subtropical. Crop Sci 33: 51–57.
• Vaz Patto MC, Satovic Z, Pego S, Fevereiro P (2004). Assessing the genetic diversity of Portuguese maize germplasm using microsatellite markers. Euphytica 137: 63–72.
• Wang YB, Wang ZH, Wang YP, Zhang X, Lu LX (1997). Studies on the heterosis utilizing models of main maize germplasm in China. Sci Agric Sin 30: 16–24.
• Wu J (1983). Review of germplasm basis of major maize hybrids in China. China Agric Sin 16: 1–8.
• Wu M (2000). Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis in maize as revealed by AFLPs and RAPDs. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 74: 62–63.
• Xia XC, Reif JC, Hoisington DA, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Warburton ML (2004). Genetic diversity among CIMMYT maize inbred lines investigated with SSR markers: I. Lowland tropical maize. Crop Sci 44: 2230–2237.
• Xia XC, Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Hoisington DA, Beck D, Pixley K, Warburton ML (2005). Genetic diversity among CIMMYT maize inbred lines investigated with SSR markers. II. Subtropical, tropical, mid-altitude and highland maize inbred lines and their relationships with elite U.S. and European Maize. Crop Sci 45: 2573–2582.
• Xingming F, Jing T, Bihua H, Feng L (2001). Analyses of combining ability and heterotic groups of yellow grain quality protein maize inbreds. In: Poland D, editor. Proceedings of Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, Baoshan Yunnan Province, China, pp. 143–148.
• Yu Y, Wang R, Shi Y, Song Y, Wang T, Li Y (2007). Genetic diversity and structure of the core collection for maize inbred lines in China. Maydica 52: 181–194.
• Zeng SX (1990). The maize germplasm base of hybrids in China. Sci Agric Sin 23: 1–9.
• Zhang S, Li X, Yuan L, Li M, Peng Z (2002). Heterotic groups and exploitation of heterosis - methodology, strategy and use in hybrid maize breeding in China. In: Srinivasan G, Zaidi PH, Prasanna BM, Gonzalez F, Lesnick K, editors. Proceedings of the Eight Asian Regional Maize Workshop: New Technologies for the New Millennium. Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 64–72.
• Zhao JR, Guo JL, Wei DM, Kong, YF (1999). Heterotic grouping of China’s main maize inbred lines with RAPD marker technique. Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica 14: 32–37.