Evaluation of phytotoxic and mutagenic effects of some cinnamic acid derivatives using the Triticum test

Five cinnamic acid derivatives [cinnamic acid, 2,3-dibromo-3-phenyl-propanoic acid, 2,3-dibromo-3-(3-bromophenyl)-propanoic acid, 2,3-dibromo-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-propanoic acid, and 2,3-dibromo-3-(3-bromo-4-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-propanoic acid] were found to be active against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and their minimal bactericidal concentrations were determined (100 µg/mL). The first step in assessing their toxicological potential was the phytotoxicity and genotoxicity evaluation on Triticum aestivum. Wheat seeds were exposed to solutions of the tested compounds (100 µg/mL) for 24 and 48 h. The development of roots and seedlings, germination percentage, mitotic index, chromosomal aberrations, and total polyphenol content were analyzed. The substances caused in most experimental cases a slight inhibition in the growth of the tested plantlets in comparison to the control, with the exception of 2,3-dibromo-3-(3-bromo-4-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-propanoic acid (48 h of exposure). All compounds inhibited the germination process and mitotic activity. No aberrant metaphases were generated, but abnormal anatelophases appeared, and 4 types of chromosomal aberrations were identified: chromosome bridges, chromosome fragments, micronuclei, and multipolar anatelophases. Wheat plantlet metabolism was also affected; the total polyphenol content decreased in the treated plantlets.

Evaluation of phytotoxic and mutagenic effects of some cinnamic acid derivatives using the Triticum test

Five cinnamic acid derivatives [cinnamic acid, 2,3-dibromo-3-phenyl-propanoic acid, 2,3-dibromo-3-(3-bromophenyl)-propanoic acid, 2,3-dibromo-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-propanoic acid, and 2,3-dibromo-3-(3-bromo-4-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-propanoic acid] were found to be active against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and their minimal bactericidal concentrations were determined (100 µg/mL). The first step in assessing their toxicological potential was the phytotoxicity and genotoxicity evaluation on Triticum aestivum. Wheat seeds were exposed to solutions of the tested compounds (100 µg/mL) for 24 and 48 h. The development of roots and seedlings, germination percentage, mitotic index, chromosomal aberrations, and total polyphenol content were analyzed. The substances caused in most experimental cases a slight inhibition in the growth of the tested plantlets in comparison to the control, with the exception of 2,3-dibromo-3-(3-bromo-4-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)-propanoic acid (48 h of exposure). All compounds inhibited the germination process and mitotic activity. No aberrant metaphases were generated, but abnormal anatelophases appeared, and 4 types of chromosomal aberrations were identified: chromosome bridges, chromosome fragments, micronuclei, and multipolar anatelophases. Wheat plantlet metabolism was also affected; the total polyphenol content decreased in the treated plantlets.

___

  • Akaneme FI, Amaefule CC (2012). Evaluation of the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of aqueous leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss using the Allium test. J Med Plants Res 6: 3898–3907.
  • Anesini C, Ferraro G, Filip R (2008). Total polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of commercially available tea (Camellia sinensis) in Argentina. J Agr Food Chem 56: 9225–9229.
  • Azimi A, Shahriari F, Fotovat A, Qale RK, Agje KH (2013). Investigation of DNA changes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) induced by cadmium using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Afr J Biotechnol 12: 1921–1929.
  • Bankova V (2009). Chemical diversity of propolis makes it a valuable source of new biologically active compounds. JAAS 1: 23–28.
  • Çelik TA, Aslantürk ÖS (2010). Evaluation of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Inula viscosa leaf extracts with Allium test. J Biomed Biotechnol 1: 1–8.
  • CLSI (2008). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Approved Standard M07-A8 and Informational Supplement M100-S19. Wayne, PA, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
  • Crago B, Ferrato C, Drews SJ, Svenson LW, Tyrrell G, Louie M (2012).
  • Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in food samples associated with foodborne illness in Alberta, Canada from 2007 to 2010. Food Microbiol 32: 202–205.
  • Da Cunha FM, Duma D, Assreuy J, Buzzi FC, Niero R, Campos MM, Calixto JB (2004). Caffeic acid derivatives: in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory properties. Free Radical Res 38: 1241–1253.
  • Dragoeva A, Koleva V, Hasanova N, Slanev S (2012). Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of diphenyl-ether herbicide GOAL (Oxyfluoren) using the Allium cepa test. Res J Mut 2: 1–9.
  • Fenech M (2000). The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 455: 81–95.
  • Fiskesjo G (1985). The Allium test as a standard in environmental monitoring. Hereditas 102: 99–112.
  • Galloway SM (2000). Cytotoxicity and chromosome aberrations in vitro: experience in industry and the case for an upper limit on toxicity in the aberration assay. Environ Mol Mutagen 35: 191–201.
  • Gamborg OL, Wetter LR (1975). Plant Tissue Culture Methods. Saskatoon, Canada: National Research Council of Canada.
  • Gutiérrez-Larraínzar M, Rşa J, De Arriaga D, Valle P, GarcíaArmesto MR (2013). In vitro assessment of synthetic phenolic antioxidants for inhibition of foodborne Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Food Control 30: 393–399.
  • Hoseiny Rad M, Aivazi AA, Jagannath S (2011). Cytogenetic and biochemical effects of imazethapyr in wheat (Triticum durum). Turk J Biol 35: 663–670.
  • Jităreanu A, Tătărîngă G, Zbancioc AM, Tuchiluș C, Stănescu U (2011). Antimicrobial activity of some cinnamic acid derivatives. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 115: 965–971 (article in Romanian with an abstract in English).
  • Kalcheva V, Dragoeva A, Kalchev K, Enchev D (2009). Determination of cytotoxic effect of 4-bromo-N, N-diethyl-5,5-dimethyl-2,5dihydro-1,2-oxaphosphol-2-amine 2-oxide. Biotechnol Biotec Eq 23: 414–417.
  • Kumar S, Arya SK, Roy BK, Singh AK (2010). The effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid and isoproturon herbicides on the mitotic activity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) root tips. Turk J Biol 34: 55–66.
  • Lee WM, An YJ, Yoon H, Kweon HS (2008). Toxicity and bioavailability of copper nanoparticles to the terrestrial plants mung bean (Phaseolus radiates) and wheat (Triticum aestivum): plant agar test for water-insoluble nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 1915–1921.
  • Lupașcu D, Tuchiluş C, Lupuşoru CE, Ghiciuc C, Şutu M, Neagu A, Profire L (2012). Synthesis and biological evaluation of some new rutin semisynthetic derivatives as antibacterial agents. Farmacia 60: 556–564.
  • Maistro EL, Angeli JPF, Andrade SF, Mantovani MS (2011). In vitro genotoxicity assessment of caffeic, cinnamic and ferulic acids. Genet Mol Res 10: 1130–1140.
  • Narasimhan B, Belsare D, Pharande D (2004). Esters, amides and substituted derivatives of cinnamic acid: synthesis, antimicrobial activity and QSAR investigations. Eur J Med Chem 39: 827–834.
  • Pădureanu S (2008). Citogenetic effects induced by sodium nitrite on mitotic division at Triticum aestivum L. Lucr St Seria Agronomie 51: 3–8.
  • Palanikumar L, Ragunathan I, Panneerselvam N (2011). Chromosome aberrations induced by curcumin and aloin in Allium cepa L. root meristem cells. Turk J Biol 35: 145–152.
  • Panneerselvam N, Palanikumar L, Gopinathan S (2012). Chromosomal aberrations induced by Glycidol in Allium cepa
  • L. root meristem cells. IJPSR 3: 300–304. Sharma P (2011). Cinnamic acid derivatives: a new chapter of various pharmacological activities. J Chem Pharm Res 3: 403–423.
  • Sharma S, Nagpal A, Vig AP (2012). Genoprotective potential of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. against mercury-induced genotoxicity in Allium cepa L. Turk J Biol 36: 622–629.
  • Sousa SM, Silva PS, Campos JMS, Viccini FL (2009). Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of two medicinal species of Verbenaceae. Caryologia 62: 326–333.
  • Truță E, Zamfirache MM, Olteanu Z (2011). Caffeine induced genotoxic effects in Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Raphanus sativus L. Bot Serb 35: 49–54.
  • Vishnoi S, Agrawal V, Kasana VK (2009). Synthesis and structureactivity relationships of substituted cinnamic acids and amide analogues: a new class of herbicides. J Agr Food Chem 57: 3261–3265.
  • Wronka M, Kuras M, Tykarska T, Podstolski A, Zobel AM (1995). Inhibition of the production of phenolic compounds in Brassica napus 2-amino-oxyacetic acid. Ann Bot-London 75: 319–324.
  • Xu F, Zhang S, Shao R, Zhen Y (2005). Anticancer activity of sodium caffeate and its mechanism. Acta Pharm Sinic 26: 1248–1252.
  • Yildiz M, Arikan EV (2008). Genotoxicity testing of quizalofopP-ethyl herbicide using the Allium cepa anaphase-telophase chromosome aberration assay. Caryologia 61: 45–52.
  • Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Ünal F, Sancak C (2009). Genotoxic effects of herbicide Illoxan (Diclofop-Methyl) on Allium cepa L. Turk J Biol 33: 283–290.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Computational design of a pentapeptide inhibitor for fibroblast growth factor receptor 3b (FGFR3b)

Mehmet Ali ÖZTÜRK

Purification and characterization of trehalase from seeds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Maimona KORD, Elhusseiny YOUSSEF, Hanaa AHMED, Ebtesam QAID

A comparative study of EGF effects on in vitro bovine embryo development in monoculture and sequential media

Azadeh ZAHMATKESH, Mahmood Amiri ROUDBAR, Morteza Daliri JOUPARI

Characterization, antifungal activity, and cell immobilization of a chitinase from Serratia marcescens MO-1

Sezer OKAY, Murat ÖZDAL, Esabi Başaran KURBANOĞLU

The S-genotyping of wild-grown apricots reveals only self-incompatible accessions in the Erzincan region of Turkey

Júlia HALÁSZ, Attila HEGEDÜS, Bernadett SZIKRISZT, Sezai ERCİŞLİ, Emine ORHAN, Hakan Murat ÜNLÜ

Genetic diversity of golden root (Rhodiola rosea L.) in northern Norway based on recently developed SSR markers

Zsuzsanna GYÖRGY, Erling FJELLDAL, Anna SZABÓ, Paul Eric ASPHOLM, Andrzej PEDRYC

Evaluation of phytotoxic and mutagenic effects of some cinnamic acid derivatives using the Triticum test

Alexandra JITAREANU, Silvica PADUREANU, Gabriela TATARINGA, Cristina TUCHILUS, Ursula STANESCU

Evaluation of antioxidative effects of twelve 3-substituted-5,5-diphenylhydantoins on human colon cancer cell line HCT-116

Ana OBRADOVIC, Jovana ZIZIC, Nemanja TRISOVIC, Bojan BOZIC, Gordana USCUMLIC, Biljana BOZIC, Snezana MARKOVIC

Genotoxic and safety assessment of 2 parabens in somatic cells of in vivo Drosophila melanogaster

Arif AYAR, Handan UYSAL

Establishment and optimization of cell growth in suspension culture of Papaver bracteatum: a biotechnology approach for thebaine production

Reza FARJAMINEZHAD, Nasser ZARE, Rasool ASGHARI-ZAKARIA, Manoochehr FARJAMINEZHAD