Cytogenetic effects of endogenous sex hormones depending on smoking habits

This study was conducted with the aim of determining the effects of periodical hormonal fluctuations related to the menstrual cycle on chromosome sensitivity and cytotoxicity. The study group consisted of 8 healthy donors (4 nonsmokers and 4 smokers). Cytogenetic tests were done in vitro (in test tubes), and the known mutagenic effect of mitomycin C was added to determine chromosome sensitivity. Blood was drawn from the donors at specified time intervals (follicular phase, ovulation phase, and luteal phase), and control groups and mitomycin C-treated groups were formed. In the controls, the highest sister chromatid exchange frequency was detected in the follicular phase and the lowest frequency was detected in the luteal phase of nonsmokers. In smokers, the highest sister chromatid exchange frequency was detected in the ovulation phase and the lowest frequency was detected in the luteal phase. In terms of chromosomal aberrations, the highest values were detected in the follicular phase and the lowest values were detected in the luteal phase in nonsmokers. On the contrary, the highest rate of anomaly was detected in the luteal phase and the lowest rate of anomaly was detected in the follicular phase in smokers. However, there was no statistically significant difference between these findings. The data of the MMC application were similar in both groups. In this study, both the follicular phase and the ovulation phase showed slightly higher chromosome sensitivity, while the chromosomes in the luteal phase were the most stable. These results are probably due to hormonal fluctuation.

Cytogenetic effects of endogenous sex hormones depending on smoking habits

This study was conducted with the aim of determining the effects of periodical hormonal fluctuations related to the menstrual cycle on chromosome sensitivity and cytotoxicity. The study group consisted of 8 healthy donors (4 nonsmokers and 4 smokers). Cytogenetic tests were done in vitro (in test tubes), and the known mutagenic effect of mitomycin C was added to determine chromosome sensitivity. Blood was drawn from the donors at specified time intervals (follicular phase, ovulation phase, and luteal phase), and control groups and mitomycin C-treated groups were formed. In the controls, the highest sister chromatid exchange frequency was detected in the follicular phase and the lowest frequency was detected in the luteal phase of nonsmokers. In smokers, the highest sister chromatid exchange frequency was detected in the ovulation phase and the lowest frequency was detected in the luteal phase. In terms of chromosomal aberrations, the highest values were detected in the follicular phase and the lowest values were detected in the luteal phase in nonsmokers. On the contrary, the highest rate of anomaly was detected in the luteal phase and the lowest rate of anomaly was detected in the follicular phase in smokers. However, there was no statistically significant difference between these findings. The data of the MMC application were similar in both groups. In this study, both the follicular phase and the ovulation phase showed slightly higher chromosome sensitivity, while the chromosomes in the luteal phase were the most stable. These results are probably due to hormonal fluctuation.

___

  • Adami HO, Lipworth L, Titus-Ernstoff L, Hsieh CC, Hanberg A, Ahlborg U, Baron J, Trichopoulos D (1995). Organochlorine compounds and estrogen-related cancers in women. Cancer Causes Control 6: 551–566.
  • Ahmad ME, Shadab GG, Hoda A, Afzal M (2000). Genotoxic effects of estradiol-17β on human lymphocyte chromosomes. Mutat Res 466: 109–115.
  • Albertini RJ, Anderson D, Douglas GR, Hagmar L, Hemminki K, Merlo F, Natarajan AT, Norppa H, Shuker DE, Tice R et al. (2000). IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. Mutat Res 463: 111–172.
  • Barrett-Connor E, Khaw KT (1987). Cigarette smoking and increased endogenous estrogen levels in men. Am J Epidemiol 126: 187–92.
  • Cavalieri E, Frenkel K, Liehr JG, Rogan E, Roy D (2000). Estrogens as endogenous genotoxic agents—DNA adducts and mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 27: 75–94.
  • Cavalieri EL, Rogan EG (2002). Unified mechanism in the initiation of cancer. Ann NY Acad Sci 959: 341–354.
  • Charlier C, Plomteux G (2002). Environmental chemical pollution and toxic risk for humans: the particular role of organochlorine pesticides. Ann Biol Clin 60: 37–46.
  • Cocchi L, Scarcelli V, Puliti A, Barale R, Sbrana I (2005). Endogenous sex hormones affect the mutagen-induced chromosome damage by altering a caffeine-sensitive checkpoint. Mutat Res 570: 281–288.
  • Cutolo M, Capellino S, Montagna P, Ghiorzo P, Sulli A, Villaggio B (2005). Sex hormone modulation of cell growth and apoptosis of the human monocytic/macrophage cell line. Arthritis Res Ther 7: 1124–1132.
  • Daniel M, Martin AD, Faiman C (1992). Sex hormones and adipose tissue distribution in premenopausal cigarette smokers. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 16: 245–54.
  • Djelic N, Djelic D (2002). Enhanced sister-chromatid exchange rate in human lymphocytes exposed to 17β estradiol in vitro. Arch Med Res 33: 148–151.
  • Evans HJ (1984). Human peripheral blood lymphocytes for the analysis of chromosome aberrations in mutagen tests. In: Kilbey BJ, Legator M, Nicholson W, Ramel C, editors. Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, pp. 405–427.
  • Fischer WH, Keiwan A, Schmitt E, Stopper H (2001). Increased formation of micronuclei after hormonal stimulation of cell proliferation in human breast cancer cells. Mutagenesis 16: 209–212.
  • Fowden AL, Forhead AJ (2009). Hormones as epigenetic signals in developmental programming. Exp Physiol 94: 607–625.
  • Iwai K, Mizuno S, Miyasaka Y, Mori T (2005). Correlation between suspended particles in the environmental air and causes of disease among inhabitants: cross-sectional studies using the vital statistics and air pollution data in Japan. Environ Res 99: 106–117.
  • Jaakkola S, Lyytinen HK, Dyba T, Ylikorkala O, Pukkala E (2011).
  • Endometrial cancer associated with various forms of postmenopausal hormone therapy: a case control study. Int J Cancer 128: 1644–1651.
  • Joseph-Lerner N, Fejgin M, Ben-Nun I, Legum C, Amiel A (1993).
  • The correlation between the frequency of sister-chromatid exchange and human reproductive hormones. Mutat Res 300: 247–252. Kojima M, Fukunaga K, Sasaki M, Nakamura M, Tsuji M, Nishiyama T (2005). Evaluation of estrogenic activities of pesticides using an in vitro reporter gene assay. Int J Environ Heal R 15: 271– 2
  • Landi S, Barale R (1999). Sister chromatid exchanges, chromosome aberrations and micronuclei in female lymphocytes: correlations with biological rhythms, miscarriages and contraceptive pill use. Mutagenesis 14: 581–586.
  • Lee W, Kang CW, Su CK, Okubo K, Nagahama Y (2012). Screening estrogenic activity of environmental contaminants and water samples using a transgenic medaka embryo bioassay. Chemosphere 88: 945–952.
  • Li G, Zu L, Wong PK, Hui X, Lu Y, Xiong J, An T (2012). Biodegradation and detoxification of bisphenol A with one newly-isolated strain Bacillus sp. GZB: kinetics, mechanism and estrogenic transition. Bioresource Technol 114: 224–230.
  • Liehr JG (1997). Dual role of oestrogens as hormones and procarcinogens: tumour initiation by metabolic activation of oestrogens. Eur J Cancer Prev 6: 3–10.
  • Liehr JG (2000). Is estradiol a genotoxic mutagenic carcinogen? Endocr Rev 21: 40–54.
  • Mace ML Jr, Daskal Y, Wray W (1978). Scanning electron microscopy of chromosome aberrations. Mutat Res 52: 199–206.
  • Meek MD, Finch GL (1999). Diluted mainstream cigarette smoke condensates activate estrogen receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated gene transcription. Environ Res 80: 9–17.
  • Meeks JJ, Sheinfeld J, Eggener SE (2012). Environmental toxicology of testicular cancer. Urol Oncol 30: 212–215.
  • Nebert DW, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Daly AK (1999). Genetic epidemiology of environmental toxicity and cancer susceptibility: human allelic polymorphisms in drugmetabolizing enzyme genes, their functional importance, and nomenclature issues. Drug Metab Rev 31: 467–487.
  • Nussey S, Whitehead SA (2001). Principles of Endocrinology. Oxford: Bios Press.
  • Perry PE, Thompson EJ (1984). The methodology of sister chromatid exchanges. In: Kilbey BJ, Legator M, Nicholson W, Ramel C, editors. Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures, 2nd ed.
  • Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, pp. 495–529. Preston-Martin S, Pike MC, Ross RK, Jones PA, Henderson BE (1990). Increased cell division as a cause of human cancer. Cancer Res 50: 7415–7421.
  • Rudel RA, Brody JG, Spengler JD, Vallarino J, Geno PW, Sun G, Yau A (2001). Identification of selected hormonally active agents and animal mammary carcinogens in commercial and residential air and dust samples. J Air Waste Manage 51: 499–513.
  • Sæther S, Bakken K, Lund E (2012). The risk of breast cancer linked to menopausal hormone therapy. Tidsskr Norske Laege 132: 1330–1334.
  • Sofuoglu M, Babb DA, Hatsukami DK (2001). Progesterone treatment during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: effects on smoking behavior in women. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 69: 299–304.
  • Stellman SD, Djordjevic MV, Muscat JE, Gong L, Bernstein D, Citron L, White A, Kemeny M, Busch E, Nafziger AN (1998). Relative abundance of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in adipose tissue and serum of women in Long Island, New York. Cancer Epidem Biomar 7: 489–496.
  • Thomford PJ, Mattison DR. (1986). The effect of cigarette smoking on female reproduction. J Ark Med Soc 82: 597–604.
  • Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Ünal F, Sancak S (2009). Genotoxic effects of herbicide Illoxan (Diclofop-Methyl) on Allium cepa L. Turk J Biol 33: 283–290.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Genotoxic and safety assessment of 2 parabens in somatic cells of in vivo Drosophila melanogaster

Arif AYAR, Handan UYSAL

Evaluation of phytotoxic and mutagenic effects of some cinnamic acid derivatives using the Triticum test

Alexandra JITAREANU, Silvica PADUREANU, Gabriela TATARINGA, Cristina TUCHILUS, Ursula STANESCU

Computational design of a pentapeptide inhibitor for fibroblast growth factor receptor 3b (FGFR3b)

Mehmet Ali ÖZTÜRK

Purification and characterization of trehalase from seeds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Maimona KORD, Elhusseiny YOUSSEF, Hanaa AHMED, Ebtesam QAID

In vitro mutagenesis of Etlingera elatior (Jack) and early detection of mutation using RAPD markers

Muhamad Fahmi YUNUS, Maheran Abd AZIZ, Mihdzar Abdul KADIR, Siti Khalijah DAUD, Azmi Abdul RASHID

The S-genotyping of wild-grown apricots reveals only self-incompatible accessions in the Erzincan region of Turkey

Júlia HALÁSZ, Attila HEGEDÜS, Bernadett SZIKRISZT, Sezai ERCİŞLİ, Emine ORHAN, Hakan Murat ÜNLÜ

Genetic diversity of golden root (Rhodiola rosea L.) in northern Norway based on recently developed SSR markers

Zsuzsanna GYÖRGY, Erling FJELLDAL, Anna SZABÓ, Paul Eric ASPHOLM, Andrzej PEDRYC

Establishment and optimization of cell growth in suspension culture of Papaver bracteatum: a biotechnology approach for thebaine production

Reza FARJAMINEZHAD, Nasser ZARE, Rasool ASGHARI-ZAKARIA, Manoochehr FARJAMINEZHAD

Biopotential of Verbesina encelioides (stem and leaf powders) in silver nanoparticle fabrication

Himakshi BHATI-KUSHWAHA, Chander Parkash MALIK

A comparative study of EGF effects on in vitro bovine embryo development in monoculture and sequential media

Azadeh ZAHMATKESH, Mahmood Amiri ROUDBAR, Morteza Daliri JOUPARI