Tokat ili Kazova bölgesi tarım işletmelerinde kaynak kullanım etkinliği ve verimlilik

işletmesinden anket yolu ile elde edilen 1994-1995 yılına ait veriler çalışmanın ana materyalini oluşturmaktadır. Translog üretim fonksiyonunun kullanıldığı çalışmada, input-input ilişkilerinin belirlenmesinde Ailen yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen tahmin denklemleri ekonometrik analize tabi tutulmuş ve her bir tahmin denklemine ait marjinal analizler (Faktörlerin Marjinal üretim Elastikiyeti, fonksiyonun üretim elastikiyeti, faktörlerin etkinlik katsayıları ve Ailen Kısmi İkame Elastikiyeti) hesaplanmış ve yorumlanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular ışığında, işletmelerde faktörlerin etkin kullanımı ile tarımsal gelirin artırılabileceği söylenebilir. İşletmelerde kullanılan gübre miktarının ve yetiştirilen hayvan sayısının mevcut ahır kapasitelerine göre yetersiz olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca işletmelerde işgücü fazlalığı ortaya çıkmıştır.

The efficency of resource allocation and productivity in the agricultural farms in Kazova region Tokat province

This study covers agricultural farms in Kazova area of Tokat province. The main material of the study was the data obtained from 134 farms by survey in period of 1994- 1995. In the study, translog production fonction and Allen Partial Elasticity of Substitution (AES) in order to determine input-input relation were used. Estimated equations analyzed econometrictly and marginal analysis belonging to the each estimated equations which are marginal production elasticity. Production elasticity of function, coefficient of efficiency and AES were analyzed and commented. In the light of findings, it can be said that farming income might be increased by efficient usage of factors in the farms. It was determined that the amount of fertilizer used and number of cows grown compare to the present stable capacity were unsufficient in the farms. Also an excessive labor supply was found out in the farm.

PDF

___

1.Akçay, Y., Esengün, K., (1997) Translog Üretim Fonksiyonu ve BirUygulama, Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt:21,Say›: 5, ISSN 1300-011X, Ankara .
2.Allen, R, G, D., (1938). Mathematical Analysis for Economists, St.Martins Press, Mew York.
3.Anderson, R., Sweeney, J.D. ,Williams, S., A.,T., (1990). Statisticsfor Business and Economics, West Publishing Company, NewYork.
4.Aras, A., (1988) Tar›m Muhasebesi. Ege Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yay›n No:486, Bornova, ‹zmir.
5.Bernt, E., R. And Christensen, L., (1973). “The Translog Functionand The Substitution of Equipments, Stuructures and Labor in U.S.Manifacturing 1926-68,”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 1.
6.Boisvert, R., H., (1980). Estimating Elasticities of FactorSubstitution Using Translog Production and Cost Function ,(Unpublished M.S. Thesis), Cornell University, The Deparment ofAgr. Eco. USA.
7.Bonnieux, F., (1989). “Estimating Reginal Level Input Demand forFrench Agriculture Using a Translog Production Function”,European Review of Agricultural Economics., Amsterdam.
8.Brown, W.S., (1991) Introducing Econometrics, West PublishingComp. , New York.
9.Chambers, R.G., (1988).Applied Production Analysis, CambridgeUniversity Press, Chambridge.
10. Chiang, C.A., (1986). Fundamenthal Methods of MathematicalEconomics, Mc-Graw-Hill Inc., New York.
11. Cramer, G.l., (1988). Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness,John Willey and Sons, New york.
12. Debertin, L.D., (1986) Agricultural Production Economics, McMillan Publishing Comp., New York.
13. Dillon, J, L., (1966). The Analysis of respons in Crop and Live stokProduction, Pergamon Press, New York.
14. Esengün, K., Karkacıer, O., Akçay, Y., (1995). A Comparison ofFarmer Application With The Use of Fertilizer Suggested byAgricultural Research Insitutions and The Determination of TheLevel of Optimum Use of Fertilizer in Tokat, IX th InternationalSymposium of CIEC Kufladas›/Ayd›n.
15. Glass, C:J. And McKillop, G.D., (1989). A Multi-Product Multi-Input Function Analysis of Northern Ireland Agriculture”, 1955-85., Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 40, No. 1.
16. Hammad, K., (1986). An Aggregate Production Function forJordan”, METU Studies in Development, No. 3-4, Ankara.
17. Heady, E.O. and Dillon, J.l., (1961). Agricultural ProductionFunctions, Ames, Iowa.
18. Henderson, J.M., and Quant, R.E., (1980). Micro EconomicTheory, A Mathematical Approach, Mc-Graw-Hill, New York.
19. İşyar, Y., (1994) Ekonometrik Metotlar, Uluda¤ Üniv. Bas›mevi,Bursa.
20. Judge, G.G., (1988) Introduction to the Theory and Practice ofEconometrics, John Willey and Sons Inc., New York.
21. Karagölge, C., (1973) Arazi Tasarruf fiekillerine Göre Erzurum‹lindeki Tar›m ‹flletmelerinin Ekonomik Analizi, Atatürk Üniv. Zir.Fak. Yay›n No: 153, Erzurum.
22. Karkacıer, O. ve Ang›n, N., (1993) Tokat-Turhal ‹lçesi S›¤›rBesicili¤i ‹flletmelerinin Fonksiyonel Analizi, Türk Tar›m veOrmanc›l›k Dergisi, Cilt: 17, say›: 3, Ankara.
23. Lessner, R., (1982). The Translog Production Model, (UnpublishedM.S. Thesis,) Cornell University. The Deparment of Agr. Eco. USA.
24. Mirotchie, M. and Taylor, D.B., (1993). “Resource Allocation andproductivity of Cereal State Farms in Ethiopia”, The Journal of TheInternational of Agriculture Economics, Vol. 8, Amsterdam.
25. Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, L.D., (1991) Econometric Modelsand Economic Forecasts, Mc Graw- Hill, Inc., New York.
26. Sugiyanto, W., (1987). Aplication Supply Response and DemandTheory: The Case of Indenoseian Price Support of Paddy,Nebraska, (Unpublished PhD Thesis).
27. Thjssen, G., (1992) A Compaorison of Production TechnologyUsing Primal and Dual Approaches: The Case of Dutche DairyFarms, European Review of Agricultural Economics. Amsterdam.
28. Varian, H.R., (1992). Micro Economic Analysis, W.W. Norton andComp., New York.
29. Zoral, Y.K., (1973) Cobb-Douglas Üretim Fonksiyonunun Yukar›Pasinler Ovas›ndaki Patates Üretimine Uygulanmas›, Atatürk Üniv.Yay›nlar› No:303, Sevinç Matbaas›, Ankara.
30. Zoral, Y.K., (1984) Üretim Ekonomisi, Dokuz Eylül Üniv. Yay›nNo: 52, ‹zmir