The Effects of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Full Season and Double-Cropped Soybean

Compared to full season soybean cropping systems, seed yield reduction is a major concern in double-cropped soybean production systems. This study was conducted at the Research Farm of Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey, to determine if it is possible to enhance the yield of both full season and double-cropped soybean by narrowing row spacing. Two soybean cultivars, A3935 and S4240, were planted using row widths of 30, 50, and 70 cm, and twin row (50 25 50 cm) in 2004 and 2005. Seed yield and the other investigated plant parameters of double-cropped soybean were lower compared to full season soybean. Row spacing had a significant effect on plant height, number of nodes per plant, main-stem pod and seed number, branch pod and seed number, and seed yield in both cropping systems. The highest seed yield (4142.5 kg ha-1) averaged over years was obtained from a 50-cm row width in full season soybean cropping, whereas a 30-cm row width had the highest seed yield (3241.5 kg ha -1) in double-cropped soybean. In full season soybean production, a 23% yield increase was recorded when row width was shifted from 70 to 50 cm, and no yield increase was recorded by further narrowing the row width. In double-cropped soybean, 24.8%, 59.5%, and 35.6% yield increases were recorded when soybean was planted in 50 and 30 cm, and twin row width, respectively, instead of a 70-cm row width. Our results indicated that yield reductions in double-cropped soybean production could be alleviated by narrowing the row width in the eastern Mediterranean region.

The Effects of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Full Season and Double-Cropped Soybean

Compared to full season soybean cropping systems, seed yield reduction is a major concern in double-cropped soybean production systems. This study was conducted at the Research Farm of Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey, to determine if it is possible to enhance the yield of both full season and double-cropped soybean by narrowing row spacing. Two soybean cultivars, A3935 and S4240, were planted using row widths of 30, 50, and 70 cm, and twin row (50 25 50 cm) in 2004 and 2005. Seed yield and the other investigated plant parameters of double-cropped soybean were lower compared to full season soybean. Row spacing had a significant effect on plant height, number of nodes per plant, main-stem pod and seed number, branch pod and seed number, and seed yield in both cropping systems. The highest seed yield (4142.5 kg ha-1) averaged over years was obtained from a 50-cm row width in full season soybean cropping, whereas a 30-cm row width had the highest seed yield (3241.5 kg ha -1) in double-cropped soybean. In full season soybean production, a 23% yield increase was recorded when row width was shifted from 70 to 50 cm, and no yield increase was recorded by further narrowing the row width. In double-cropped soybean, 24.8%, 59.5%, and 35.6% yield increases were recorded when soybean was planted in 50 and 30 cm, and twin row width, respectively, instead of a 70-cm row width. Our results indicated that yield reductions in double-cropped soybean production could be alleviated by narrowing the row width in the eastern Mediterranean region.

___

  • Arslan, M., N. İşler and S. Çalışkan. 2006. Effects of cultivar maturity on growth and yield of double cropped soybean. Acta Agric. Scan. Section B-Soil and Plant, 56: 39-46.
  • Beatty, K.D., I.L. Eldridge and A.M. Simpson, Jr. 1982. Soybean response to different planting patterns and dates. Agron. J. 74: 859-862.
  • Board, J E. and W. Hall. 1984. Premature flowering in soybean yield reductions at non-optimal planting dates as influenced by temperature and photoperiod. Agron. J. 76: 700-704.
  • Board, J.E. and J.R. Settimi. 1986. Photoperiod effect before and after flowering on branch development in determinate soybean. Agron. J. 78: 995-1102.
  • Board, J.E. and B.G. Harville. 1992. Explanation for greater light interception in narrow- vs. wide- row soybean. Crop Sci. 32: 198-202.
  • Board, J.E. and B.G. Harville. 1994. A criteria for acceptance of narrow-row culture in soybean. Agron. J. 86: 1103-1106.
  • Boerma, H.R. and D.A. Ashley. 1982. Irrigation, row spacing, and genotype effects on late and ultra-late planted soybeans. Agron. J. 78: 995-1002.
  • Boquet, D.J., K.L. Koonce and D.M. Walker. 1982. Selected determinate soybean cultivar yield response to row spacings and planting dates. Agron. J. 74: 136-138.
  • Boquet, D.J. 1990. Plant population density and row spacing effects on soybean at post-optimal planting dates. Agron. J. 82: 59-64.
  • Boquet, D.J. 1998. Yield and risk utilizing short-season soybean production in the mid-southern USA. Crop Sci. 38: 1004-1010.
  • Bowers, G.R., J.L. Rabb, L.O. Ashlock and J.B. Santini. 2000. Row spacing in the early soybean production system. Agron. J. 92: 524-531.
  • Bullock, D., S. Khan and A. Rayburn. 1998. Soybean yield response to narrow rows is largely due to enhanced early growth. Crop Sci. 38: 1011-1016.
  • Cooper, R.L. 1977. Response of soybean cultivars to narrow rows and planting dates under weed-free conditions. Agron. J. 69: 89-92.
  • Cooper, R.L. 1981. Development of short-statured soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 21: 127-131.
  • Devlin, D.L., D.L. Fjell, J.P. Shroyer, W.B. Gordon, B.H. Marsh, L.D. Maddux, V.L. Martin and S.R. Duncan. 1995. Row spacing and seeding rates or soybean in low and high yielding environments. J. Prod. Agric. 8: 215-222.
  • Egli, D.B., R.D. Guffy and J.J. Heitholt. 1987. Factors associated with reduced yields of delayed plantings of soybean. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 159: 176-185.
  • Egli, D.B. and Z. Yu. 1991. Crop growth rate and seeds per unit area in soybean. Crop Sci. 31: 439-442.
  • Egli, D.B. 1994. Mechanisms responsible for soybean yield response to equidistant planting patterns. Agron. J. 86: 1046-1049.
  • Fehr, W.R. and C.E. Caviness. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, Special Reports, 80.
  • Grabau, L.J. and T.W. Pfeiffer. 1989. Stubble losses of Kentucky soybeans. Agronomy Notes Vol. 22, No. 2. University of Kentucky
  • Heatherly, L.G. 1988. Planting date, row spacing, and irrigation effects on soybean grown on clay soil. Agron. J. 80: 227-231.
  • Holmes, M.G. and H. Smith. 1977. The function of phytochrome in the natural environment: II. The influence of vegetation canopies on the spectral energy distribution of natural daylight. Photochem. Photobiol. 25: 539-545.
  • Johnson, R.R. 1987. Crop management. In: Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, 2nd ed. (Ed. J.R. Wilcox), American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 355-390.
  • Kane, M.V., C.C. Steele and L.J. Grabau. 1997. Early maturing soybean cropping system: I. Yield response to planting date. Agron. J. 89, 454-458.
  • Palmer, J.H. and C. Privette. 1992. Guidelines for drilling soybeans. Soybean leaflet no. 9. Clemson Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv.
  • Parks, W.L., J. Davis, R. Evans, M. Smith, T. McCutchen, L. Safely and W. Sanders. 1982. Soybean yields as affected by row spacing and within row plant density. Univ. Of Tennessee Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 615.
  • Quattara, S. and D.B. Weaver. 1995. Effects of growth habit on yield components of late planted soybean. Crop Sci. 35-411-378.
  • Taylor, H.M. 1980. Soybean growth and yield as affected by row spacing and by seasonal water supply. Agron. J. 72: 543-547.
  • Taylor, H.M., W.K. Mason, A.T.P. Bennie and H.R. Rowse. 1982. Responses of soybeans to two row spacings and two soil water levels. I. An analysis of biomass accumulation, canopy development, solar radiation interception and components of seed yield. Field Crop Res. 5: 1-4.
  • Weber, C.R. and W.R. Fehr. 1966. Seed yield losses form lodging combine harvesting in soybeans. Agron. J. 58: 287-289.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Bitki Gelişmesini Teşvik Eden Bakterilerin Arpa gelişimi, Besin Alımı, Bazı Toprak Özellikleri ve Bakteri Sayısına Etkisi

Ramazan ÇAKMAKÇI, Mesude Figen DÖNMEZ, Ümmügülsüm ERDOĞAN

The Effects of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Full Season and Double-Cropped Soybean

Sevgi ÇALIŞKAN, Mehmet ARSLAN, İlhan ÜREMİŞ, Mehmet Emin ÇALIŞKAN

Impact of Alkaline Dust Pollution on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon

Ömer KARA, İlyas BOLAT

Pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus in pine seedlings under greenhouse conditons

İsmail BAYSAL, Süleyman AKBULUT, Beşir YÜKSEL, Metin SERİN, Mahir ERDEM

Estimates of Broad-Sense Heritability for Seed Yield and Yield Components of Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)

Mevlüt TÜRK, Sebahattin ALBAYRAK, Necmettin ÇELİK

Depth of dormancy and desicction tolerance inAcer trautvetteri Medv. Seeds

Mustafa YILMAZ

Pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus in Pine Seedlings under Greenhouse Conditions

Süleyman AKBULUT, Beşir YÜKSEL, Metin SERİN, İsmail BAYSAL, Mahir ERDEM

Depth of Dormancy and Desiccation Tolerance in Acer trautvetteri Medv. Seeds

Mustafa YILMAZ

Effects of Soil Solarization and Organic Amendment Treatments for Controlling Meloidogyne incognita in Tomato Cultivars in Western Anatolia

Galip KAŞKAVALCI

The Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Barley Seedling Growth, Nutrient Uptake, Some Soil Properties, and Bacterial Counts

Ramazan ÇAKMAKÇI, Mesude Figen DÖNMEZ, Ümmügülsüm ERDOĞAN