Impact of Alkaline Dust Pollution on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon

The effect of alkaline dust pollution emitted from Bartın cement plant on the soil microbial biomass carbon was investigated using the chloroform fumigation-extraction (CFE) method. Microbial biomass C (Cmic) values ranged from 157.82 to 1201.51 µg g-1 soils in the polluted area and from 726.70 to 1529.14 µg g-1 soils in the control area. Soils polluted with alkaline cement dust resulted in significant reductions in Cmic levels compared to control soils. Microbial biomass C correlated negatively with CaCO3 content (r = -0.52, P < 0.05) and positively with soil organic C (r = 0.67, P < 0.01). Cmic:Corg ratio proved to be a reliable soil microbial parameter for describing the change in the man-made ecosystem. Mean Cmic:Corg ratio was 2.55 and 3.09 in the polluted soils and control soils, respectively. The decrease in this ratio was an indication of soil degradation in the polluted soils. A significant decline in the Cmic:Corg ratio in cement dust-polluted soils also indicated that this parameter can serve as a good indicator of soil health.

Impact of Alkaline Dust Pollution on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon

The effect of alkaline dust pollution emitted from Bartın cement plant on the soil microbial biomass carbon was investigated using the chloroform fumigation-extraction (CFE) method. Microbial biomass C (Cmic) values ranged from 157.82 to 1201.51 µg g-1 soils in the polluted area and from 726.70 to 1529.14 µg g-1 soils in the control area. Soils polluted with alkaline cement dust resulted in significant reductions in Cmic levels compared to control soils. Microbial biomass C correlated negatively with CaCO3 content (r = -0.52, P < 0.05) and positively with soil organic C (r = 0.67, P < 0.01). Cmic:Corg ratio proved to be a reliable soil microbial parameter for describing the change in the man-made ecosystem. Mean Cmic:Corg ratio was 2.55 and 3.09 in the polluted soils and control soils, respectively. The decrease in this ratio was an indication of soil degradation in the polluted soils. A significant decline in the Cmic:Corg ratio in cement dust-polluted soils also indicated that this parameter can serve as a good indicator of soil health.

___

  • Anderson, T.H. 2003. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to assess soil quality. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 285-293.
  • Anderson, T.H. and K.H. Domsch. 1986. Carbon assimilation and microbial activity in soil. Zeitsch. Pflanz. Boden. 149: 457-468.
  • Anderson, T.H. and K.H. Domsch. 1989. Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic-C in arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21: 471-479.
  • Bååth, E., Å. Frostegård and H. Fritze. 1992. Soil bacterial biomass, activity, phospholipid fatty acid pattern, and pH tolerance in an area polluted with alkaline dust deposition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 4026-4031.
  • Beyer, L., H.P. Blume and M. Peters. 1991. Biological activity and organic matter transformations in typical soils of Schleswig- Holstein. Geoderma. 49: 273-284.
  • Black, C.A. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part I Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Part II Chemical and Microbiological Properties. ASA, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
  • Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agr. J. 54: 464-465.
  • Brookes, P.C., D.S. Powlson and D.S. Jenkinson. 1984. Phosphorus in the soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 16: 169-175.
  • Brookes, P.C., A. Landman, G. Pruden and D.S. Jenkinson. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and release of soil nitrogen; a rapid extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17: 837-842.
  • Brookes, P.C. 1995. The use of microbial parameters in monitoring soil pollution by heavy metals. Biol. Fert. Soils 19: 269-279.
  • Chander, K. and P.C. Brookes. 1993. Residual effects of zinc, copper and nickel in sewage sludge on microbial biomass in a sandy loam. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25: 1231-1239.
  • Dick, R.P. 1992. A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40: 25-36.
  • Doran, J.W. and T.B. Parkin. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality, p. 3-35. In: Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment (Eds. Doran, J.W., D.C. Coleman and B.A. Stewart). Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin. USA.
  • Farmer, A. M. 1993. The effects of dust on vegetation. Environ. Pollut. 79: 63-75.
  • Insam, H. and K.H. Domsch. 1988. Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass on choronosequences of reclamation sites. Microb. Ecol. 15:177-188.
  • İncecik, S. 1994. Hava Kirliliği. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Matbaası, İstanbul.
  • Jenkinson, D.S. and J.N. Ladd. 1981. Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In: Soil Biochemistry (Eds. Paul, E.A. and J.N. Ladd). Decker, New York, pp 415-471.
  • Klose, S., K.D. Wernecke and F. Makeschin. 2004. Microbial activities in forest soils exposed to chronic depositions from a lignite power plant. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36: 1913-1923.
  • Klose, S. and F Makeschin. 2004. Chemical properties of forest soils along a fly ash deposition gradient in eastern Germany. Eur. J. Forest Res. 123: 3-11.
  • Liblik, V., M. Pensa and A. Rätsep. 2001. Air pollution zones and harmful pollution levels of alkaline dust for plants. In: Proceeding of the 2ndair quality and management at urban, regional and global scales (Eds. Topçu, S., M.F. Yardım and S. Incecik). İstanbul, pp 170-177.
  • Lorenz, K., K.H. Feger and E. Kandeler. 2001. The response of soil microbial biomass and activity of a Norway spruce forest to liming and drought. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 164: 9-19.
  • Mandre, M. 1995. Physiological and biochemical responses of coniferous trees to alkaline dust impact. In: Dust Pollution and Forest Ecosystem, A Study of Conifers in an Alkalized Environment. (Ed. M. Mandre) Institute of Ecology publication 3/1995, Tallinn, pp 44-65.
  • Nannipieri, P., S. Grego and B. Ceccanti. 1990. Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 6: 293-355.
  • Nielsen, M.N. and A. Winding. 2002. Microorganisms as indicators of soil health. National Environmental Research Institute, Technical report n. 338. Denmark
  • Perrott, K.W., S.U. Sarathchandra and B.W. Dow. 1992. Seasonal fertilizer effects on a hill country soil under pasture. Austr. 383-394. J. Soil Res. 30:
  • Pinzari, F., A.Trinchera, A. Benedetti and P. Sequi. 1999. Use of biochemical indices in the Mediterranean environment: comparison among soils under different forest vegetation. J. Microbiol. Meth. 36: 21-28.
  • Pitchel, J.R. and J.M. Hayes. 1990. Influence of fly ash on soil microbial activity and populations. J. Environ. Qual. 19: 593-597.
  • Powlson, D.S., P.C. Brookes and B.T. Christensen. 1987. Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19: 159-164.
  • Rowell, D.L. 1994. Soil science: methods and applications. Longman Scientific and Technical: Singapore.
  • Schimel, D.S., B.H. Braswell, E.A. Holland, R. McKeown, D.S. Ojima, T.H. Painter, W.J. Parton and A.R. Townsend. 1994. Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Global Biogeochem. Cycling 8: 279-293.
  • Scott, N.A., C.V. Cole, E.T. Elliott and S.A. Huffman. 1996. Soil textural control on decomposition and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60: 1102-1109.
  • Sparling, G.P. 1992. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Aust. J. Soil. Res. 30: 195-207.
  • Sparling, G.P. 1997. Soil microbial biomass, activity and nutrient cycling as indicators health (Eds., Pankhurst, C., B.M. Doube and V.V.S.R. Gupta) CAB International, Wallingford, pp 97-119.
  • Stern, A.C. 1976. Air pollution. Measurement, monitoring and surveillance of air pollution, 3rded., Academic Press, New York.
  • Vance, E.D., P.C. Brookes and D.S. Jenkinson. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19: 703-707.
  • Wolters, V., K. Eckschmitt and G. Scholle. 1995. 10 Jahre Waldkalkung-Wirkungen auf Bodenorganismen und biologische Umsetzungsprozesse. Allg. Forstz. 50: 936-941.
  • Wong, M.H. and J.W.C. Wong. 1986. Effects of fly ash on soil microbial activity. Environ. Pollut. 40: 127-144.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Impact of Alkaline Dust Pollution on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon

Ömer KARA, İlyas BOLAT

Pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus in Pine Seedlings under Greenhouse Conditions

Süleyman AKBULUT, Beşir YÜKSEL, Metin SERİN, İsmail BAYSAL, Mahir ERDEM

Pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus mucronatus in pine seedlings under greenhouse conditons

İsmail BAYSAL, Süleyman AKBULUT, Beşir YÜKSEL, Metin SERİN, Mahir ERDEM

Bitki Gelişmesini Teşvik Eden Bakterilerin Arpa gelişimi, Besin Alımı, Bazı Toprak Özellikleri ve Bakteri Sayısına Etkisi

Ramazan ÇAKMAKÇI, Mesude Figen DÖNMEZ, Ümmügülsüm ERDOĞAN

Depth of dormancy and desicction tolerance inAcer trautvetteri Medv. Seeds

Mustafa YILMAZ

Effects of Soil Solarization and Organic Amendment Treatments for Controlling Meloidogyne incognita in Tomato Cultivars in Western Anatolia

Galip KAŞKAVALCI

The Effects of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Full Season and Double-Cropped Soybean

Sevgi ÇALIŞKAN, Mehmet ARSLAN, İlhan ÜREMİŞ, Mehmet Emin ÇALIŞKAN

Bending Moment Capacity of Metal Plate Connected Wood-Splice Joints Constructed with Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Lumber

Ergün GÜNTEKİN

The Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Barley Seedling Growth, Nutrient Uptake, Some Soil Properties, and Bacterial Counts

Ramazan ÇAKMAKÇI, Mesude Figen DÖNMEZ, Ümmügülsüm ERDOĞAN

Estimates of Broad-Sense Heritability for Seed Yield and Yield Components of Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)

Mevlüt TÜRK, Sebahattin ALBAYRAK, Necmettin ÇELİK