The effects of harvesting time on the physicochemical components of aronia berry

The effects of harvesting time on the physicochemical components of aronia berry

The aim of this work was to compare ‘Nero’ and ‘Viking’ aronia cultivars and to determine the optimum harvest dates of eachcultivar for various utilizations. For this purpose, we characterized the changes in both aronia cultivars’ physicochemical componentsover their harvest period and identified the correlations between them. Mean berry weight, dry matter, soluble solid content, antioxidantactivity, and anthocyanin content of berries of both cultivars increased until the second and third weeks of September. They then begandecreasing gradually, whereas total phenol content and condensed tannins kept increasing until 27 October. It was observed that berriesof ‘Nero’ ripened 15 days earlier than those of ‘Viking’. As a result, anthocyanin content of ‘Nero’ peaked earlier (25 August) than thatof ‘Viking’. The highest correlation (r = 0.75, P < 0.01) was found between anthocyanin and firmness; antioxidant activity was slightlycorrelated with total phenol content (r = 0.57, P < 0.01) and total anthocyanin (r = 0.49, P < 0.05). In terms of yield, the optimum harvesttime for both cultivars was found to be the second week of September. Taking also into account the anthocyanin content, antioxidantcapacity, and total phenol, the optimum harvest time was determined to be during the second and third weeks of September. On theother hand, the optimum harvest time for dry consumption was found to be during the first and second weeks of October.

___

  • Alibabic A, Skender A, Orascanin M, Sertovic E, Bajric E (2018). Evaluation of morphological, chemical, and sensory characteristics of raspberry cultivars grown in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 42: 67-74.
  • Andrzejewska J, Sadowska K, Rogowski L (2015). The effect of plant age and harvest time on the content of chosen components and antioxidative potential of black chokeberry fruit. Acta Scientiorum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 14 (4): 105-114.
  • Atanassova M, Bagdassarian VC (2009). Determination of tannins content by titrimetric method for comparison of different plant species. Journal of Chemical Technology Metallurgy 44 (4): 413-415.
  • Bate-Smith EC (1973). Tannins in herbaceous leguminosae. Phytochemistry 12: 1809.
  • Bolling BW, Taheri R, Pei R, Kranz S, Yu M et al. (2015). Harvest date affects aronia juice polyphenols, sugars and antioxidant activity, but not anthocyanin stability. Food Chemistry 187: 189-196.
  • Connor AB, Luby JJ, Fin CE, Hancock JF (2002). Genotypic and environmental variation in antioxidant activity, total phenolics and anthocyanin content among blueberry cultivars. Journal of American Society Horticultural Science 127: 238-244.
  • Ercisli S, Tosun M, Duralija B, Voca S, Sengul M et al. (2010). Phytochemical content of some black (Morus nigra L.) and purple (Morus rubra L.) mulberry genotypes. Food Technology Biotechnology 48 (1): 102-106.
  • Esatbeyoğlu T, Winterhalter P (2010). Preparation of dimeric procyanidins B1, B2, B5, and B7 from a polymeric procyanidin fraction of black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa). Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry 58: 5147-5153.
  • Eyduran SP, Ercisli S, Akin M, Beyhan Ö, Geçer AEK (2015). Organic acids, sugars, vitamin c, antioxidant capacity, and phenolic compounds in fruits of white (Morus alba L.) and black (Morus nigra L.) mulberry genotypes. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 88: 134-138.
  • Fredes C, Montenegro G, Zoffoli JP, Santander F, Robert P (2014). Comparison of total phenolic content, total anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity of polyphenol rich fruits grown in Chile. Ciencia e investigación agraria 41 (1): 49-60.
  • Guney M, Kafkas S, Koc A, Aras S, Keles H et al. (2019). Characterization of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) accessions by simple sequence repeat markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 43: 69-79.
  • Halasz J, Pedryc A, Ercisli S, Yilmaz KU, Hegedus A (2010). S-genotyping supports the genetic relationships between Turkish and Hungarian apricot germplasm. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 135 (5): 410-417.
  • Hudec J, Bakos D, Mravec D, Kobida L, Burdova M et al. (2006). Content of phenolic compounds and free polyamines in black chokeberry after application of polyamine biosynthesis regulators. Journal Agriculture Food Chemistry 54: 3625-3628.
  • Jakobek L, Seruga M, Medvidovic-Kosanovic M, Novak I (2007). Antioxidant activity and polyphenols of aronia in comparison to other berry species. Acta Scientific Agriculture 72: 301-306.
  • Jeppsson N, Johansson R (2000). Changes in fruit quality in black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) during maturation. Journal Horticulture Science Biotechnology 75: 340-350.
  • Kaack K, Kühn BF (1992). Black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) for manufacture of a food colorant. Tidsskrift Planteavl 96: 183-196.
  • Kahkönen MP, Hopia AI, Hinonen M (2001). Berry phenolics and their antioxidant activity. Journal Agriculture Food Chemistry 49: 4076-4082.
  • Kalt W, Mcdonald JE, Donner H (2000). Anthocyanins, phenolics and antioxidant capacity of processed lowbush blueberry products. Journal of Food Science 65 (3): 390-393.
  • Karaçalı İ (2004). Bahçe ürünlerinin muhafaza ve pazarlanması. 4th ed. Bornova, İzmir, Turkey: Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish).
  • Kawecki Z, Tomaszewska Z (2006). The effect of various soil management techniques on growth and yield in the black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa).Journal of Fruit Ornamental Plant Research 14: 67-73.
  • Krupa T, Tomala K (2007). Antioxidant capacity, anthocyanin content profile in ‘Bluecrop’ blueberry fruit. Vegetable Crop Research Bulletin 66: 129-141.
  • Kulling SE, Rawel HM (2008). Chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) – a review on the characteristic components and potential health effects. Planta Medica 74: 1625-1634.
  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biotechnology Chemistry 139: 265-275.
  • Ochmian I, Grajkowski J, Smolik M (2012). Comparison of some morphological features, quality and chemical content of four cultivars of chokeberry fruits (Aronia melanocarpa). Notulae Botanicae Horticulture Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 40: 253- 260.
  • Pirie A, Mullins MG (1977). Interrelationships of sugars, anthocyanins, total phenols and dry weight in the skin of grape berries during ripening. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 28 (4): 204-209.
  • Pogorzelski E, Wilkowska A, Kobus M (2006). Inhibiting effect of tannin in chokeberry must on the winemaking process. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Science 15/56: 49-53.
  • Poyraz Engin S, Mert C (2018). Aronya (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx) Elliot) meyvesinin bitkisel ve fitokimyasal özellikleri ile kullanım olanakları. In: Keskin N, editor. Proceedings of the ISMS Current Academic Studies and Agricultural Sciences, 15–16 November 2018; Ankara, Turkey. Cetinje, Montenegro: Ivpe, pp. 13-22.
  • Poyraz Engin S, Mert C, Boz Y, Fidancı A, İkinci A (2018). Growing aronia berry (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliot). In: Binici T, Sakin E, Çopur O, Özbakır G, Odabaşıoğlu İ, Şmşek E, editors. Proceedings of the UGAP 1st International GAP Agriculture & Livestock Congress, 25–27 April 2018; Şanlıurfa, Turkey. Harran University Faculty of Agriculture, pp. 308-309.
  • Retamales JB, Hancock JF (2018). Blueberries: Growth Regulators. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: MPG Books Group.
  • Serce S, Ercisli S, Sengul M, Gunduz K, Orhan E (2010). Antioxidant activities and fatty acid composition of wild grown myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) fruits. Pharmacogn Mag 6: 9-12. Skupień K, Oszmiański, J (2007). The effect of mineral fertilization on nutritive value and biological activity of chokeberry fruit. Journal of Agriculture Food Science 16 (1): 46-55.
  • Šnebergrová J, Čížková H, Neradová E, Kapci B, Rajchl A et al. (2014). Variability of characteristic components of aronia. Czech Journal of Food Science 32: 25-30.
  • Strigl AW, Leitner E, Pfannhauser W (1995). Qualitative und quantitative analyse der anthocyane in schwarzen apfelbeeren (Aronia melanocarpa Michx. Ell.) mittels TLC, HPLC und UV/ VIS-spektrometrie. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel Untersuchung und Forschung 201 (3): 266-268 (in German with an abstract in English)
  • Strik B, Finn C, Wrolstad R (2003). Performance of chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) in Oregon, USA. Acta Horticulturae 626: 447-451.
  • Tanaka T, Tanaka A (2001). Chemical components and characteristics of black chokeberry. Journal of Japanese Society Food Science Technology 48: 606-610.
  • Thaipong K, Boonnprakob U, Crosby K, Cisneros- Zevallos L et al. (2006). Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. Journal of Food Composition Analysis 19: 669-675.
  • Wada L, Ou B (2002). Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Oregon caneberries. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry 50: 3495-3500.
  • Wu X, Gu L, Prior RL, McKay S (2004). Characterization of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in some cultivars of Ribes, Aronia and Sambucus and their antioxidant capacity. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry 52: 7846-7856.
  • Zheng W, Wang SY (2003). Oxygen radical absorbing capacity of phenolics in blueberries, cranberries, chokeberries and lingonberries. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry 51: 502-509.