Elevated in-soil CO2affects physiology and growth of Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis seedlings under an artificial CO2release experiment

Elevated in-soil CO2affects physiology and growth of Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis seedlings under an artificial CO2release experiment

It is important to understand how woody species are affected by elevated in-soil CO2 for carbon capture and storage (CCS). Astudy was conducted to analyze the effects of artificially released in-soil CO2 on the physiology and growth of 4-year-old Pinus densifloraand 3-year-old Quercus variabilis seedlings. Approximately 7.9 kg CO2 plot–1 d–1 was released at a depth of 0.5 m over the period from20 June to 20 July 2017. For both species, chlorophyll fluorescence and content, photosynthetic rate, and leaf size significantly decreasedafter the CO2 release. However, stomatal behavior varied between these species under the elevated in-soil CO2 conditions. Elevatedin-soil CO2 inhibited plant physiological functions by limiting available in-soil O2. The leaf size of treatment plots showed significantlylower values of 0.60 ± 0.05 cm2 for P. densiflora and 12.05 ± 1.47 cm2 for Q. variabilis compared to those of control plots of 0.90 ± 0.09cm2 for P. densiflora and 21.84 ± 3.62 cm2 for Q. variabilis, whereas the number of leaves increased from 2697 ± 153 leaves to 3121 ±255 leaves for P. densiflora and from 95 ± 4 leaves to 288 ± 52 leaves for Q. variabilis. It was found that the decrease in leaf size resultedin a second flush, which increased the total leaf area per seedling. The biomass of P. densiflora significantly decreased in the treatmentplots (P < 0.05). Q. variabilis showed an increase in mortality, with a low percentage of fine root (

___

  • Attia Z, Domec J-C, Oren R, Way DA, Moshelion M (2015). Growth and physiological responses of isohydric and anisohydric poplars to drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 66: 4373- 4381.
  • Austin MP, Groves RH, Fresco LMF, Laye PE (1986). Relative growth of six thistle species along a nutrient gradient with multispecies competition. Journal of Ecology 73: 667-684.
  • Bachu S (2000). Sequestration of CO2 in geologic media: criteria and approaches for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Conversion and Management 41: 953-970.
  • Barnes JD, Balaguer L, Manrique E, Elvira S, Davison AW (1992). A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 32: 85-100.
  • Bellante GJ, Powell SL, Lawrence RL, Repasky KS, Dougher T (2014). Hyperspectral detection of a subsurface CO2 leak in the presence of water stressed vegetation. PLoS ONE 9: e108299.
  • Benson SM, Gasperikova E, Hoversten GM (2005). Monitoring protocols and life-cycle costs for geologic storage of carbon dioxide. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7): 1259-1266.
  • Borchert R (1975). Endogenous shoot growth rhythms and indeterminate shoot growth in Oak. Physiologia Plantarum 35: 152-157.
  • Brooks TJ, Wall GW, Pinter Jr PJ, Kimball BA, LaMorte RL et al. (2000). Acclimation response of spring wheat in a freeair CO2 enrichment (FACE) atmosphere with variable soil nitrogen regimes. 3. Canopy architecture and gas exchange. Photosynthesis Research 66: 97-108.
  • Buckley TN (2005). The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytologist 168: 275-292.
  • Byun J, Lee W, Nor D, Kim S, Choi J et al. (2010). The relationship between tree radial growth and topographic and climate factors in red pine and oak in central regions of Korea. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 99: 908-913 (in Korean with English abstract).
  • Casper BB, Forseth IN, Kempenich H, Seltzer S, Xavier K (2001). Drought prolongs leaf life span in the herbaceous desert perennial Crytantha flave. Functional Ecology 15: 740-747.
  • Chapman SP, Paget CM, Johnson GN, Schwartz JM (2015). Flux balance analysis reveals acetate metabolism modulates cyclic electron flow and alternative glycolytic pathways in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 474.
  • Comstock JP (2002). Hydraulic and chemical signaling in the control of stomatal conductance and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 195-200.
  • Daie J (1985). Carbohydrate partitioning and metabolism in crops. Horticultural Reviews 7: 69-108.
  • Dale JE (1992). How do leaves grow? BioScience 42: 423-432.
  • Davies SJ (1998). Photosynthesis of nine pioneer Macaranga species from Borneo in relation to life history. Ecology 79: 2292-2308.
  • Dostál R (1927). Űber die sommerperiodizität bei Quercus und Fagus. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 45: 436-447.
  • Ewert F (2004) Modeling plant responses to elevated CO2 : How important is leaf area index? Annals of Botany 93: 619-627.
  • Farrar JF, Gunn S (1996). Effects of temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide on source-sink relations in the context of climate change. In: Zamski E Schaffer AA, editors. Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops Source-Sink Relationships. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc., pp 389-406.
  • Feitz A, Jenkins C, Schacht U, McGrath A, Berko H et al. (2014). An assessment of near surface CO2 leakage detection techniques under Australian conditions. Energy Procedia 63: 3891-3906.
  • Hansen J (2004). Defusing the global warming time bomb. Scientific American 290: 68.
  • He W, Moonis M, Chng H, Yoo G (2016). Effects of high soil CO2 concentrations on seed germination and soil microbial activities. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 53: 117-126.
  • Hepple RP (2002). Implications of surface seepage on the effectiveness of geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Paper LBNL51267.
  • Hiscox JD, Israelstam GF (1979). A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1332-1334.
  • IPCC (2005). IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jones DG, Barkwith AKAP, Hannis S, Lister TR, Gal F et al. (2014). Monitoring of near surface gas seepage from a shallow injection experiment at the CO2 Field Lab, Norway. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 28: 300-317.
  • Jones HG (2007). Monitoring plant and soil water status: established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 119-130.
  • Jones HG, Tardieu F (1988). Modeling water relations of horticultural crops: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 74: 21-46.
  • Kim HJ, Han SH, Kim S, Chang H, Son Y (2018a). Effects of artificial CO2 release in soil on chlorophyll content and growth of Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis seedlings. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 107: 351-360 (in Korean with English abstract).
  • Kim HJ, Han SH, Kim S, Yun HM, Jun SC et al. (2017a). Spatio-temporal monitoring of soil CO2 fluxes and concentrations after artificial CO2 release. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 26: 93- 104 (in Korean with English abstract).
  • Kim HJ, Han SH, Kim S, Yun ST, Jun SC et al. (2018b). Characterizing the spatial distribution of CO2 leakage from the shallow CO2 release experiment in South Korea. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 72: 152-162.
  • Kim YJ, Chen X, He W, Yoo G (2017b). Corn Growth and development influenced by potential CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage (CCS) site. Journal of Climate Change Research 8: 257- 264 (in Korean with English abstract).
  • Kim YJ, He W, Ko D, Chung H, Yoo G (2017c). Increased N2 O emission by inhibited plant growth in the CO2 leaked soil environment: simulation of CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage (CCS) site. Science of The Total Environment 607-608: 1278-1285.
  • Kirschbaum MUF (2004). Direct and indirect climate change effects on photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Biology 6: 242-253.
  • Klepper B (1991). Root-shoot relationships. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U, editors. Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc., pp. 265-286.
  • Lichtenthaler HK (1996). Vegetation stress: An introduction to the stress concept in plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 148: 4-14.
  • Marron N, Dreyer E, Boudouresque E, Delay D, Petit J-M et al. (2003). Impact of successive drought and re-watering cycles on growth and specific leaf area of two Populus × canadensis (Moench) clones, ‘Dorskamp’ and ‘Luisa_Avanzo’. Tree physiology 23: 1225- 1235.
  • Millard P, Proe MF (1992). Storage and internal cycling of nitrogen in relation to seasonal growth of Sitka spruce. Tree Physiology 10: 33-43.
  • Noomen MF, Skidmore AK (2009). The effects of high soil CO2 concentrations on leaf reflectance of maize plants. International Journal of Remote Sensing 30: 481-497.
  • Norby RJ, Luo Y (2006). Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi-factor world. New Phytologist 162: 281-293.
  • Patil RH (2012). Impacts of carbon dioxide gas leaks from geological storage sites on soil ecology and above-ground vegetation. Diversity of Ecosystems: 27-50.
  • Pfanz H, Vodnik D, Whittman C, Aschan G, Batic F et al. (2007). Photosynthetic performance (CO2 compensation point, carboxylation efficiency, and net photosynthesis) of timothy grass (Phleum pratense L.) is affected by elevated carbon dioxide in postvolcanic mofette areas. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61: 41-48.
  • Pierce S, Sjögersten S (2009). Effects of below ground CO2 emissions on plant and microbial communities. Plant Soil 325: 197.
  • Poorter H (1993). Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentration. Vegetatio 104: 77-97.
  • Price PN, McKone TE, Sohn MD (2007). Carbon sequestration risks and risk management. Berkeley, CA, USA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
  • Rogers HH, Prior SA, Runion GB, Mitchell RJ (1996). Root to shoot ratio of crops as influenced by CO2 . Plant Soil 187: 229-248.
  • Romberger JA (1963). Meristems, growth, and development in woody plants. Technical Bulletin No. 1293. Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
  • Schulze ED (1983). Root–shoot interactions and plant life forms. Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 291-303.
  • Schulze ED, Robichaux RH, Grace J, Randel PW, Ehleringer JR (1987). Plant water balance. Bioscience 37: 30-37.
  • Smith TM, Smith RL (2015). Elements of Ecology: 9th edition. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson Education.
  • Stalker L, Noble R, Pejcic B, Leybourne M, Hortle A et al. (2012). Feasibility of monitoring techniques for substances mobilised by CO2 storage in geological formations. Energy Procedia 23: 439- 448.
  • Vodnik D, Kastelec D, Phanz H, Mack I, Turk B (2006). Small-scale spatial variation in soil CO2 concentration in a natural carbon dioxide spring and some related plant responses. Geoderma 133: 309-319.
  • Wilson EJ, Johnson TL, Keith DW (2003). Regulating the ultimate sink: managing the risks of geologic CO2 storage. Environmental Science & Technology 37: 3476-3483.
  • Wu Y, Ma X, Li YE, Wan YF (2014). The impacts of introduced CO2 flux on maize/alfalfa and soil. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 23: 86-97.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK