Some growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of black and hybrid poplar clones under water stress

Some growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of black and hybrid poplar clones under water stress

The effects of water stress on some growth and chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters were investigated in two native blackpoplar (Populus nigra L.) clones (Kocabey and Gazi) and in two hybrid poplar (Populus × euramericana (Dode) Guinier) clones (I-214and I-45/51) to determine which among the four clones is the best adapted to water-stress conditions. The potted seedlings were grownunder three watering regimes. As a result of the applied watering regimes, the predawn water potential (ψpd) of seedlings was maintainedat about –0.3, –0.9, and –1.6 MPa in control, moderate, and severe water-stress treatments during the experiment, respectively. Droughttreatment had significant effects on the morphology and growth characteristics of the clones but had generally insignificant effects onsurvival and the photochemical activity of photosystem II (PSII). Results obtained from the present study demonstrate that I-214 wasthe most successful in terms of its higher root/shoot ratio (Rs), maximum fluorescence yield (Fm), maximum quantum efficiency of PSII(Fv/Fm) values, and lower number of leaves among the examined four poplar clones under drought stress conditions. Consequently, theI-214 poplar clone may have the potential to be used in drought areas.

___

  • Bacon MA (1999). Biomechanical control of leaf expansion. Plant Growth Regu 29: 101-112.
  • Baker NR (1991). A possible role for photosystem II in environmental perturbations of photosynthesis. Physiol Plant 81: 563-570.
  • Baquedano FJ, Valladares F, Castillo FJ (2008). Phenotypic plasticity blurs ecotypic divergence in the response of Quercus coccifera and Pinus halepensis to water stress. Eur J For Res 127: 495-506.
  • Björkman O, Demming B (1987). Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plant plants of diverse origins. Planta 170: 489-504.
  • Blum A (2011). Drought resistance–is it really a complex trait? Funct Plant Biol 38: 753-757.
  • Bota J, Flexas J, Medrano H (2001). Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grape vine cultivars. Ann Appl Biol 138: 353-361.
  • Boureima S, Oukarroum A, Diouf M, Cisse N, Van Damme P (2012). Screening for drought tolerance in mutant germplasm of sesame (Sesamum indicum) probing by chlorophyll a fluorescence. Environ Exp Bot 81: 37-43.
  • Brignolas F, Thierry C, Guerrier G, Boudouresque E (2000). Compared water stress response of two Populus x euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp. Ann For Sci 57: 261-266.
  • Chaves MM, Osório J, Pereira JS (2004). Water use efficiency and photosynthesis. In: MA Bacon, editor. Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing/CNR Press, pp. 42-74.
  • Çiçek N, Arslan Ö, Çulha-Erdal Ş, Eyidoğan F, Ekmekçi Y (2015). Are the photosynthetic performance indexes and the drought factor index satisfactory selection criterion for stress? Fresen Environ Bull 24: 4190-4198.
  • Colom MR, Vazzana C (2003). Photosynthesis and PS II functionality of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants. Environ Exp Bot 49: 135-144.
  • Cornic G (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci 5: 187-188.
  • Flexas J, Bota J, Escalona JM, Sampol B, Medrano H (2002). Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomal and mesophyll limitations. Funct Plant Biol 29: 461-471.
  • Hopkins WG (1995). Introduction to Plant Physiology. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
  • Işık F, Toplu F (2004). Variation in juvenile traits of natural black poplar (Populus nigra L.) clones in Turkey. New Forest 27: 175- 187.
  • Kalaji HM, Jajoo A, Oukarroum A, Brestic M, Zivcak M, Samborska IA, Cetner MD, Lukasik I, Goltsev V, Ladle RJ (2016). Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool to monitor physiological status of plants under abiotic stress conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 38: 102.
  • Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG (1991). The Physiological Ecology of Woody Plants. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
  • Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995). Water Relations of Plants and Soils. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Larcher W (1995). Physiological Plant Ecology, Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Lichtenthaler HK, Langsdorf G, Lenk S Buschmann C (2005). Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of photosynthetic activity with the flash-lamp fluorescence imaging system. Photosynthetica 43: 355-369.
  • Lu C, Qiu N, Lu Q, Wang B, Kuang T (2003). PSII photochemistry, thermal energy dissipation, and the xanthophylls cycle in Kalanchoe daigremontiana exposed to a combination of water stress and high light. Physiol Plant 118: 173-182.
  • Martinez-Ferri E, Balaguer L, Valladares F, Chico JM, Manrique E (2000). Energy dissipation in drought-avoiding and droughttolerant tree species at midday during the Mediterranean summer. Tree Physiol 20: 131-138.
  • Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence–a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51: 659-668.
  • Mazzoleni S, Dickman DI (1988). Differential physiological and morphological responses of two hybrid Populus clones to water stress. Tree Physiol 4: 61-70.
  • Monclus R, Dreyer E, Villar M, Delmotte FM, Delay D, Petit JM, Barbaroux C, Thiec DL, Bréchet C, Brignolas F (2006). Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides × Populous nigra. New Phytol 169: 765-777.
  • Nahar K, Hasanuzzaman M, Alam Md. M, Fujita M (2015). Glutathione-induced drought stress tolerance in mung bean: coordinated roles of the antioxidant defence and methylglyoxal detoxification systems. AoB Plants 7: plv069.
  • OGM (2015). Orman Genel Müdürlüğü 2015 Yılı Performans Programı. Ankara, Turkey: Strateji Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı (in Turkish).
  • Oukarroum A, Schansker G, Strasser RJ (2009). Drought stress effects on photosystem I content and photosystem II thermotolerance analyzed using Chl a fluorescence kinetics in barley varieties differing in their drought tolerance. Physiol Plant 137: 188-199.
  • Öz MT, Turan Ö, Kayihan C, Eyidoğan, F Ekmekçi Y, Yücel M, Öktem HA (2014). Evaluation of photosynthetic performance of wheat cultivars exposed to boron toxicity by the JIP fluorescence test. Photosynthetica 52: 555-563.
  • Pallardy SG, Kozlowski TT (1981). Water relations of Populus clones. Ecology 62: 159-169.
  • Poplar and Fast Growing Forest Tree Research Institute (1994). Poplar cultivation in Turkey. İzmit, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Rhodenbaugh EJ, Pallardy SG (1993). Water stress, photosynthesis and early growth patterns of cuttings of three Populus clones. Tree Physiol 13: 213-226.
  • Rivas R, Falcao HM, Ribeiro RV, Machado EC, Pimentel C, Santos MG (2016). Drought tolerance in cowpea species is driven by less sensitivity of leaf gas exchange to water stress and rapid recovery of photosynthesis after rehydration. S Afr J Bot 103: 101-107.
  • Souza RP, Machado EC, Silva JAB, Lagoa AMMA, Silveira JAG (2004). Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) during water stress and recovery. Environ Exp Bot 51: 45-56.
  • Stanhill G (1986). Water use efficiency. Adv Agron 39: 53-85.
  • Strasser RJ, Srivastava A, Tsimilli-Michael M (2000). The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus M, Pathre P, Mohanty P, editors. Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanisms, Regulation and Adaptation. Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, pp. 445-483.
  • Strasser RJ, Tsimilli-Michael M, Qiang S, Goltsev V (2010). Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820-nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. BBA-Bioenergetics 1797: 1313-1326.
  • Strong T, Hansen EA (1991). Response of Three Populus Species to Drought. USDA-FS Research Paper NC-302. Washington, DC, USA: USDA.
  • Taiz L, Zeiger E (1998). Plant Physiology. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA (1994). Water-stress tolerance of black cottonwood and eastern cottonwood clones and four of their hybrid progeny. II. Metabolites and inorganic ions that constitute osmotic adjustment. Can J Forest Res 24: 681-687.
  • Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA, Gebre GM, Todd DE (1998). Drought resistance of two hybrid Populus clones grown in large-scale plantation. Tree Physiol 24: 346-371.
  • Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA, Gunderson GA (1994). Water-stress tolerance of black cottonwood and eastern cottonwood clones and four of their hybrid progeny. I. Growth, water relations and gas exchange. Can J Forest Res 24: 346-371.
  • Tunçtaner K (1998). Conservation of genetic resources of black poplar (Populus nigra L.) in Turkey. In: Zencirci N, Kaya Z, Anikster Y, Adams WT, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity, Ankara, Turkey: Central Research Institute for Field Crops, pp. 265-270.
  • Türkeş M (1996). Spatial and temporal analysis of annual rainfall variations in Turkey. Int J Climatol 16: 1057-1076.
  • Yin C, Peng Y, Zang R, Zhu Y, Li C (2005a). Adaptive responses of Populus kangdingensis to drought stress. Physiol Plant 123: 445-451.
  • Yin C, Wang X, Duan B, Luo J, Li C (2005b). Early growth, dry matter allocation and water use efficiency of two sympatric Populus species as effected by water stress. Environ Exp Bot 53: 315- 322.
  • Zhang X, Zang R, Li C (2004). Population differences in physiological and morphological adaptations of Populus davidiana seedlings in response two progressive drought stress. Plant Sci 166: 791- 797.