Response of five triticale genotypes to salt stress in in vitro culture

Response of five triticale genotypes to salt stress in in vitro culture

Salinity is one of the important abiotic stresses that restrict plant development. Triticale is a highly adaptable crop, knownfor its high-quality grain, yield potential, and resistance to disease. Responses of five cultivated genotypes (Ümran Hanım, Mikham2002, Melez 2001, Tatlıcak, and Alper Bey) of triticale to salt stress were tested in callus and embryogenic callus formation in this study.Cotyledon explants were selected as explants for callus induction and embryogenic callus formation. The five tested triticale genotypesvaried in their callus growth and embryogenic callus formation. Ümran Hanım, Tatlıcak, and Alper Bey were observed for better callusinduction; similarly, the same genotypes responded with better embryogenic callus formation in the salt in vitro media. A significantdecrease in embryogenic callus growth was observed under salt stress. Based on the responses to NaCl in terms of embryogenic callus,the five triticale genotypes were ranked in the order of Tatlıcak > Ümran Hanım > Alper Bey > Mikham 2002 > Melez 2001. Moreproline and sugar were accumulated in these five triticale genotypes than in control plants when all were subjected to salt stress. Prolinelevel peaked at 200 mM while the lowest and highest content was obtained at 0–200 mM salt concentrations. The accumulation ofsoluble sugars was strongly linked to 0–200 mM salt concentrations. Antioxidant enzyme activities exhibited an increasing trend inresponse to the increasing concentration of NaCl.

___

  • Ahmad P, John R, Sarwat M, Umar S (2008). Responses of proline, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzymes in two varieties of Pisum sativum L. under salt stress. Int J Plant Prod 2: 353- 366.
  • Amini F, Ehsanpour AA (2006). Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars to MS, water agar and salt stress in in vitro culture. Asian J Plant Sci 9: 170-175.
  • Amor NB, Hamid KB, Debez A, Grignon C, Abdelly C (2005). Physiological and antioxidant responses of the perennial halophyte Crithmum maritimum to salinity. Plant Sci 168: 889- 899.
  • Ashraf M, Harris JC (2004). Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci 166: 3-16.
  • Balatero CH, Darvey NL, Lucket DJ (1995). Genetic analysis of anther culture response in 6x triticale. Theor Appl Genet 90: 279-284.
  • Bang KH, Kim YC, Lim JY, Kim JU, Lee JW, Kim DH, Kim KH, Jo IH (2015). Internal transcribed spacer barcoding DNA region coupled with high resolution melting analysis for authentication of Panax species. Korean J Med Crop Sci 23: 439-445.
  • Barakat MN, Abdel-Latif TH (1996). In vitro selection of wheat callus tolerant to high levels of salt and plant regeneration. Euphytica 91: 127-140.
  • Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare D (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205-207.
  • Bregitzer P, Somers DA, Rines HW (1989). Development and characterization of friable, embryogenic oat callus. Crop Sci 29: 798-803.
  • Cherian S, Reddy MP (2003). Evaluation of NaCl tolerance in the callus cultures of Suaeda nudiflora Moq. Biol Plant 46: 193-198.
  • Djukic JM, Stanisavljevic NR, Jovanovic Z, Mikic A, Maksimovic V (2013). Differential response of three contrasting pea (Pisum arvense, P. sativum and P. fulvum) species to salt stress: assessment of variation in antioxidative defence and miRNA expression. Australian J Crop Sci 7: 2145-2153.
  • Elmaghrabi AM, Ochatt S, Rogers HJ, Francis D (2013). Enhanced tolerance to salinity following cellular acclimation to increasing NaCl levels in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 114: 61-70.
  • Farooq MA, Saqib ZA, Akhtar J (2015). Silicon-mediated oxidative stress tolerance and genetic variability in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown under combined stress of salinity and boron toxicity. Turk J Agric For 39: 718-729.
  • Gandonou CB, Errabii T, Abrini J, Mohamed I, Senhaji NS (2006). Selection of callus cultures of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) tolerant to NaCl and their response to salt stress. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 87: 9-16.
  • Ghadakchiasl A, Mozafari A, Ghaderi N (2017). Mitigation by sodium nitroprusside of the effects of salinity on the morphophysiological and biochemical characteristics of Rubus idaeus under in vitro conditions. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 23: 73-83.
  • Gong Y, Toivonen O, Lau L, Wiersma PA (2001). Antioxidant system level in ‘Braeburn’ apple is related to its browning disorder. Bot Bull Aca Sin 42: 259-265.
  • Hariadi Y, Marandon K, Tian Y, Jacobsen SE, Shabala S (2011). Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.) plants grown at various salinity levels. J Exp Bot 62: 185-193.
  • He DG, Tanner G, Scott K (1986). Somatic embryogenesis and morphogenesis in callus derived from the epiblast of immature embryos of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci 45:19-24.
  • He S, Han Y, Wang Y, Zhai H, Liu Q (2009). In vitro selection and identification of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) plants tolerant to NaCl. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 96: 69-74.
  • Hussain K, Majeed A, Nawaz K, Khizar HB, Nisar MF (2009). Effect of different levels of salinity on growth and ion contents of black seeds (Nigella sativa L.). Curr Res J Biol Sci 1: 135-138.
  • Immonen S (1996). Triticale breeding and synthesis applications of tissue culture. PhD, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • James RA, Blake C, Byrt CS, Munns R (2011). Major genes for Na+ exclusion, Nax1 and Nax2 (wheat HKT1;4 and HKT1;5), decrease Na+ accumulation in bread wheat leaves under saline and waterlogged conditions. J Exp Bot 8: 2939-2947.
  • Jo IH, Bang KH, Hong CE, Kim JU, Lee JW, Kim DH, Hyun DY, Ryu H, Kim YC (2016). Analysis of the chloroplast genome and SNP detection in a salt tolerant breeding line in Korean ginseng. J Plant Biotechnol 43: 417-421.
  • Khedr AHA (2003). Proline induces the expression of salt-stressresponsive proteins and may improve the adaptation of Pancratium maritinum L. to salt stress. J Exp Bot 54: 2553-2562.
  • Kiss A (1966). Neue Richtung in der Triticale-Zuchtung. Z Pflanzenzuchtung 55: 309-329 (in German).
  • Koca M, Bor M, Ozdemir F, Turkan I (2007). The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzymes and proline content on sesame cultivars. Environ Exp Bot 60: 344-351.
  • Koskeroglu S, Tuna AL (2010). The investigation on accumulation levels of proline and stress parameters of the maize (Zea mays L.) plants under salt and water stress. Acta Physiol Plant 32:541-549.
  • Lelley T, Gimbel EM (1989). ‘Genome combining ability’ of wheat and rye in triticale. Plant Breed 102: 273-280.
  • Li L, Staden JV (1998). Effect of plant growth regulators on the antioxidant system in callus of two maize cultivars subjected to water stress. Plant Growth Regul 24: 55-66.
  • Lokhande VH, Nikam TD, Penna S (2010). Biochemical, physiological and growth changes in response to salinity in callus cultures of Sesuvium portulacastrum L. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 102: 17-25.
  • Lokhande VH, Srivastava S, Patade VY, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD, Nikam TD, Suprasanna P (2011). Investigation of arsenic accumulation and tolerance potential of Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Chemosphere 82: 529-534.
  • Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J (1999). Improvement of rice callus regeneration in the presence of NaCl. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 57: 3-11.
  • Machzynska J, Orlowska R, Mankowski DR, Zimny J, Bednarek PT (2014). DNA methylation changes in triticale due to in vitro culture plant regeneration and consecutive reproduction. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 199: 289-299.
  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473-497.
  • Nabors MW, Gibbs GE, Bernstein CS, Meis ME (1980). NaCltolerant tobacco plants from cultured cells. Z Pflanzenphysiol 97: 13-17.
  • Nakano Y, Asada K (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22: 867-880.
  • Naqvi SMS, Yasmin T, Rashid H, Chaudary Z, Qureshi A (2002). Callus induction from seeds of Zea mays var. EV-2097. Pakistan J Biol Sci 5: 956-958.
  • Nawaz MF, Gul S, Tanvir MA, Akhtar J, Chaudary S, Ahmad I (2016). Influence of NaCl-salinity on Pb-uptake behavior and growth of River Red gum tree (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.). Turk J Agric For 40: 425-432.
  • Nuriyeva S, Akparov Z, Hajiyev E, Abbasov M, Sharma RC (2016). Evaluation of wheat genetic resources of Azerbaijan on normal and saline fields. Turk J Agric For 40: 186-193.
  • Ochatt SJ, Marconi PL, Radice S, Arnozis PA, Caso OH (1999). In vitro recurrent selection of potato: production and characterization of salt tolerant cell lines and plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 55: 1-8.
  • Özgen M, Türet M, Özcan S, Sancak C (1996). Callus induction and plant regeneration from immature and mature embryos of winter durum wheat genotypes. Plant Breeding 115: 455-458.
  • Patade VY, Bhargava S, Suprasanna P (2012). Halopriming mediated salt and iso-osmotic PEG stress tolerance and gene expression profiling in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Mol Biol Rep 39: 9563-9572.
  • Piwowarczyk B, Tokarz K, Kamińska I (2016). Responses of grass pea seedlings to salinity stress in in vitro culture conditions. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 124: 227-240.
  • Prakash SN, Jack MW (1993). Comparison of tissue culture and whole plant responses to salinity in potato. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 33: 273-280.
  • Rahnama A, James RA, Poustini K, Munns R (2010). Stomatal conductance as a screen for osmotic stress tolerance in durum wheat growing in saline soil. Funct Plant Biol 37: 255-263.
  • Rai MK, Kalia RK, Singh R, Gangola MP, Dhawan AK (2011). Developing stress tolerant plants through in vitro selection— an overview of the recent progress. Env Exp Bot 71: 89-98.
  • Rashid H, Ghani RA, Chaudhry Z, Naqvi SMS, Quraishi A (2002). Effects of media, growth regulators and genotypes on callus induction and regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biotechnology 1: 46-54.
  • Richards RA (1996). Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Reg 20: 157-166.
  • Rozema J, Flowers T (2008). Ecology: crops for a salinized world. Science 322: 1478-1480.
  • Sairam RK, Srivastava GC (2002). Changes in antioxidant activity in sub cellular fractions of tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to long-term salt stress. Plant Sci 162: 897-904.
  • Santos I, Fidalgo F, Almeida CM, Salema R (2004). Biochemical and ultrastructural changes in leaves of potato plants grown under supplementary UV-B radiation. Plant Sci 167: 925-935.
  • Sekmen AH, Türkan İ, Takio S (2007). Differential responses of antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation to salt stress in salt-tolerant Plantago maritima and salt-sensitive Plantago media. Physiol Plant 131: 399-411.
  • Semiz GD, Suarez DL (2015). Tomato salt tolerance: impact of grafting and water composition on yield and ion relations. Turk J Agric For 39: 876-886.
  • Troncoso A, Matte C, Cantos M, Lavee S (1999). Evaluation of salt tolerance of in vitro-grown grapevine rootstock varieties. Vitis 38: 55-60.
  • Watanabe S, Kojima KY, Sasaki S (2000). Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 63: 199-206.
  • Yang AF, Duan XG, Gu XF, Gao F, Zhang JR (2005). Efficient transformation of beet (Beta vulgaris) and production of plants with improved salt-tolerance. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 83: 259- 270.
  • Zhao X, Tan HJ, Liu YB, Li XR, Chen GX (2009). Effect of salt stress on growth and osmotic regulation in Thellungiella and Arabidopsis callus. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 98: 97-103.
  • Zimny J, Becker D, Brettschneider R, Lörz H (1995). Fertile, transgenic Triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack). Mol Breeding 1: 155-164.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK