Siberian elm responses to diferent culture conditions under short rotation forestry in Mediterranean areas

Siberian elm responses to diferent culture conditions under short rotation forestry in Mediterranean areas

Tis work explores the possibilities of biomass production, for energy purposes, of Siberian elm in Mediterranean areas,including marginal lands with poor soil and low water availability. To achieve this, the infuence of soil type, planting density, and wateravailability on biomass production were analyzed afer the frst 3 years of the growing cycle in 2 diferent locations. Moreover, a methodto estimate biomass production as a function of some morphological parameters of the trees, as well as the use of leaf water potential as agood indicator of trees water status, are discussed. Te analysis of parameters having an infuence on elm growth showed that soil type isthe most important factor to obtain a good yield. In soils with enough nutrients and higher water-holding capacity, biomass productionsin the range 13 14 Mg DM ha 1 were achieved even under rainfed conditions. In irrigated plots, Siberian elm production was more thandouble the production of biomass under rainfed conditions; however, signifcant diferences were not found between the 2 diferentirrigation doses under study. Biomass yield was greater for the highest planting density (6666 plants ha 1). Leaf water potential has beenshown to be a useful tool for fnding out plant water status. Tree growth showed a direct relationship to midmorning leaf water potential,and it was equal to 0 for leaf water potentials lower than 1.83 MPa; this value indicates a great resistance to drought by the species.

___

  • Argent RM, Geyer WA, Walawender WP (1985). Siberian elm: from windbreaks to wood energy. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Kansas Academy of Science. Pittsburg, KS, USA, pp. 1–3.
  • Armstrong A, Johns C, Tubby I (1999). Efects of spacing and cutting cycle on the yield of poplar grown as an energy crop. Biomass Bioenerg 17: 305–314.
  • Baeza P, Sanchez P, Centeno A, Junquera P, Linares R, Lissarrague JR (2007). Water relations between leaf water potential, photosynthesis and agronomic vine response as a tool for establishing thresholds in irrigation scheduling. Sci Hortic 114: 151–158.
  • BOE (2011). Real Decreto 1628/2011, de 14 de noviembre, por el que se regula el listado y catálogo español de especies exóticas invasoras. BOE 298 (12 December 2011): 132711–132735 (in Spanish).
  • Cañellas I, Huelin P, Hernández MJ, Ciria P, Calvo R, Gea-Izquierdo G, Sixto H (2012). Te efect of density on short rotation Populus sp. plantations in the Mediterranean area. Biomass Bioenerg 46: 645–652.
  • Ciria P, Pérez J, Solano MP, Carrasco JE (2007). Poplar biomass production estimation on short rotation conditions as a function of the tree physical parameters. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition - From Research to Market Deployment - Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection. Berlin, Germany, pp. 628–632.
  • Fernández J, Iriarte L, Sanz M, Curt MD (2009). Preliminary study of Siberian elm (Ulmus Pumila L.) as an energy crop in a continental-Mediterranean Climate. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition - From Research to Industry and Markets. Hamburg, Germany, pp 148–153.
  • Galan del Castillo E, Velazquez E (2001). From water to energy content and water footprint of biofuel consumption in Spain. Energy Policy 30: 1345–1352.
  • Geyer WA (1989). Biomass yield potential of short-rotation hardwoods in the great plains. Biomass 20: 167–175.
  • Geyer WA (1993). Infuence of environmental factors on woody biomass productivity in the Central Great Plains, U.S.A. Biomass Bioenerg 4: 333–337.
  • Geyer WA (2006). Biomass production in the Central Great Plains USA under various coppice regimes. Biomass Bioenerg 30: 778–783.
  • Geyer WA, Argent RM, Walawender WP (1987). Biomass properties and gasifcation behavior of 7 year-old Siberian elm. Wood Fiber Sci 19: 176–182.
  • Geyer WA, Iriarte L, Cunningham R (2007). Ulmus pumila L. seed source performance in Kansas. Arid Ecosystems 13: 73–79.
  • Geyer WA, Mechilar WW (1986). Short-rotation forestry research in the United States. Biomass 9: 125–133.
  • Girona J, Mata M, Del Campo J, Arbonés A, Bartra E, Marsal J (2006). Te use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling defcit irrigation in vineyards. Irrig Sci 24: 115–127.
  • Guidi W, Piccioni E, Bonari E (2008). Evapo-transpiration and crop coefcient of Populus spp. and willow short-rotation coppice used as vegetarian flter. Bioresour Technol 99: 4832–4840.
  • Iriarte L, Fernández J (2006). Stem weight ratios of Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L.) grown as a short rotation crop. In: Proceedings of World Bioenergy 2006. Jönköping, Sweden, pp. 217–221.
  • Iriarte L (2008). Caracterización del olmo de Siberia (Ulmus pumila L.) como cultivo energético. PhD, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain (in Spanish).
  • Karačić A, Weih M (2006). Variation in growth and resource utilisation among eight poplar clones grown under diferent irrigation and fertilisation regimes in Sweden. Biomass Bioenerg 30: 115–124.
  • Kitsaki CK, Drossopoulos JB (2005). Environmental efect on ABA concentration and water potential in olive leaves (Olea europaea L. cv. “Koroneiki”) under non-irrigated feld conditions. Environ Exp Bot 54: 77–89.
  • Labrecque M, Teodorescu TI, Cogliastro A, Daigle S (1993). Growth patterns and biomass productivity of two Salix species grown under short-rotation intensive culture in southern Quebec. Biomass Bioenerg 4: 419–425.
  • Laureysens I, Pellis A, Willems J, Ceulemans R (2005). Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. III. Second rotation results. Biomass Bioenerg 29: 10–21.
  • Loucks WL, Keen RA (1973). Submersion tolerant of selected seedling trees. J For 71: 496–497.
  • Moore LM (2003). Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila L). In: Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Guide. Washington, DC, USA: USDA. Available at http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/ pdf/cs_ulpu.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2013.
  • Qu YY, Mu P, Li XQ, Tian YX, Wen F, Zhang HL, Li ZC (2008). QTL mapping and correlations between leaf water potential and drought resistance in rice under upland and lowland environments. Acta Agron Sin 34: 198–206.
  • Sage RF, Coiner HA, Way DA, Runion GB, Prior SA, Torbert HA, Sicher R, Ziska L (2009). Kudzu [ Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr. variety lobata ]: a new source of carbohydrate for bioethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg 33: 57–61.
  • Sanz M, Curt MD, Plaza A, García-Müller M, Fernández J (2011). Assessment of Siberian elm coppicing cycle. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition - From Research to Industry and Markets. Berlin, Germany, pp. 601– 605.
  • Scholander PF, Brandstreet ED, Hammel HT, Hemmingen E (1965). Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339–346.
  • Sevine E, Gasol CM, Brun F, Rovira L, Pagés JM, Camps F, Rieradevall J, Gabarell X (2011). Water and energy consumption of Populus spp. bioenergy systems: a case study in southern Europe. J Renew Sustain Energy 15: 1133–1140.
  • Sixto H, Hernández MJ, Barrio M, Carrasco JE, Canñellas I (2007). Plantaciones del género Populus para la producción de biomasa con fnes energéticos: revisión. Inv Agrar-Sist Recursos Fores 16: 277–294 (in Spanish).
  • Tüfekçioğlu A, Altun L, Kalay HZ, Yılmaz M (2005). Efects of soil properties on the growth of hybrid poplar in Terme-Gölardı region of Turkey. Turk J Agric For 29: 221–226.
  • USDA Forest Service (2012). Field Guide for Managing Siberian Elm in the Southwest. Washington, DC, USA: USDA. Available at http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/ stelprdb5410128.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2014.
  • Van Heerden PD, Krüger GHJ (2002). Separately and simultaneously induced dark chilling and drought stress efects on photosynthesis, proline accumulation and antioxidant metabolism in soybean. J Plant Physiol 159: 1077–1086.
  • Xu HW, Song FB, Zhu XC (2010). Changes of husk leaf water potential of maize and relationship with environmental factors in black soil region of Northeast China. J Food Agric Environ 8: 936–939.
  • Yuanwen T, Mingxian X (1991). A study on external factors for control of leaf water potential of apricots. Acta Bot Sin 33: 69–77.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Modeling of rheological properties of mellorine mix including different oil and gum types by combined design, ANN, and ANFIS models

Salih KARASU, Mahmut DOĞAN, Ömer Said TOKER, Erdal CANIYILMAZ

Transcriptomic analysis of tomato lines reveals putative stress-specific biomarkers

Monther SADDER, Abdullah ALSADON, Mahmoud WAHB-ALLAH

Methyl jasmonate treatments influence bioactive compounds and red peel color development of Braeburn apple

Burhan ÖZTÜRK, Yakup ÖZKAN, Kenan YILDIZ

Smart biologics for crop protection in agricultural systems

Ömür BAYSAL, Mahmut TÖR

Infuence of natural zeolite on nitrogen dynamics in soil

Stanislav TORMA, Jozef VILCEK, Peter ADAMISIN, Emilia HUTTMANOVA, Ondrej HRONEC

The application for fertilizer-yield relationships of the ET-yield response factor equation

Ahmet ERTEK

Effects of ripening degree and sample preparation on peach aroma profile characterization by headspace solid-phase microextraction

Mojca BACVONKRALJ, Tjasa JUG, Erika KOMEL, Nikita FAJT

Somatic embryogenesis and encapsulation of immature bulblets of an ornamental species, grape hyacinths (Muscari armeniacum Leichtlin ex Baker)

Bahtiyar Buhara YÜCESAN, Feride ÇİÇEK, Ekrem GÜREL

Modeling of rheological properties of mellorine mix including diferent oil and gum types by combined design, ANN, and ANFIS models

Ömer Said TOKER, Salih KARASU, Mahmut DOĞAN, Erdal CANIYILMAZ

Efects of plasma treatment and sanding process on surface roughness of wood veneers

Cenk DEMİRKIR, Semra ÇOLAK, İsmail AYDIN, Gürsel ÇOLAKOĞLU