Transcriptomic analysis of tomato lines reveals putative stress-specific biomarkers

Different abiotic stresses recruit dedicated signaling and regulatory genes in plants. Genome-wide stress-specific biomarkers were investigated in tomatoes. Three major abiotic stresses were compared: drought, heat, and salinity. For each stress type, 2 different tomato lines were included: susceptible and tolerant. Gene expression was examined by hybridizing to an available tomato microarray. Several stress responsive genes were upregulated in tolerant as well as in susceptible lines for each stress. Comparative analysis of gene expression in response to stress (drought, heat, or salinity) resolved a number of common biomarkers, while other groups of putative biomarkers were associated with each abiotic stress. MYB transcription factors, SAUR family proteins, and NAC domain proteins were among the highly upregulated genes under drought, while both proteinase inhibitors and heat shock proteins were prominent in the heat-tolerant line. For salinity stress, the expression of phosphate starvation-induced proteins was observed. Putative abiotic stress biomarkers can be utilized in breeding programs to improve the selection process and to aid in gene stacking.

Transcriptomic analysis of tomato lines reveals putative stress-specific biomarkers

Different abiotic stresses recruit dedicated signaling and regulatory genes in plants. Genome-wide stress-specific biomarkers were investigated in tomatoes. Three major abiotic stresses were compared: drought, heat, and salinity. For each stress type, 2 different tomato lines were included: susceptible and tolerant. Gene expression was examined by hybridizing to an available tomato microarray. Several stress responsive genes were upregulated in tolerant as well as in susceptible lines for each stress. Comparative analysis of gene expression in response to stress (drought, heat, or salinity) resolved a number of common biomarkers, while other groups of putative biomarkers were associated with each abiotic stress. MYB transcription factors, SAUR family proteins, and NAC domain proteins were among the highly upregulated genes under drought, while both proteinase inhibitors and heat shock proteins were prominent in the heat-tolerant line. For salinity stress, the expression of phosphate starvation-induced proteins was observed. Putative abiotic stress biomarkers can be utilized in breeding programs to improve the selection process and to aid in gene stacking.

___

  • Albacete A, Ghanem ME, Dodd IC, Pérez-Alfocea F (2010). Principal component analysis of hormone profiling data suggests an important role for cytokinins in regulating leaf growth and senescence of salinized tomato. Plant Signal Behav 5: 45–48.
  • Alsadon AA, Sadder MT, Wahb-Allah MA (2013). Responsive gene screening and exploration of genotypes responses to salinity tolerance in tomato. Aust J Crop Sci 7: 1383–1395.
  • Amtmann A (2009). Learning from evolution: Thellungiella generates new knowledge on essential and critical components of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Mol Plant 2: 3–12.
  • Areshchenkova T, Ganal M (1999). Long tomato microsatellite are predominantly associated with centromeric regions. Genome 42: 536–544.
  • Chen Y, Qiu K, Kuai B, Ding Y (2011). Identification of an NAP- like transcription factor BeNAC1 regulating leaf senescence in bamboo (Bambusa emeiensis ‘Viridiflavus’). Physiol Plantarum 142: 361–371.
  • Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK (2005). Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci 45: 437–448.
  • Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ (2000). Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 117–124.
  • Daldoul S, Höfer MU, Linhard C, Jallouli N, Mliki A, Reustle GM, Ghorbel A (2008). Expression analysis of salt stress responsive genes in grapevines. In: Abdelly C, Öztürk M, Ashraf M, Grignon C, editors. Biosaline Agriculture and High Salinity Tolerance. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. 297–303.
  • Dombrowski JE (2003). Salt stress activation of wound-related genes in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 132: 2098–2107.
  • Foolad R (2004). Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Org 76: 101–119.
  • Grover A, Chandan S, Sanan N, Grover A (1999). Taming abiotic stresses in plants through genetic engineering: current strategies and perspective. Plant Sci 143: 101–111.
  • Halford NG, Hey S, Jhurreea D, Laurie S, McKibbin RS, Paul M, Zhang Y (2003). Metabolic signaling and carbon partitioning: role of Snf1‐related (SnRK1) protein kinase. J Exp Bot 54: 467–475.
  • Hazen SP, Wu Y, Kreps JA (2003). Gene expression profiling of plant responses to abiotic stress. Funct Integr Genomics 3: 105–111.
  • Herbers K, Prat S, Willmitzer L (1994). Cloning and characterization of a cathepsin D inhibitor gene from Solanum tuberosum L. Plant Mol Biol 26: 73–83.
  • Kant S, Bi YM, Zhu T, Rothstein ST (2009). SAUR39, a small auxin- up RNA gene, acts as a negative regulator of auxin synthesis and transport in rice. Plant Physiol 151: 691–701.
  • Kawasaki S, Borchert C, Deyholos M, Wang H, Brazille S, Kawai K (2001). Expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 13: 889–905.
  • Knight H, Knight MR (2001). Abiotic stress signalling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci 6: 262–267.
  • Kodaira KS, Qin F, Tran LS, Maruyama K, Kidokoro S, Fujita Y, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2011). Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc-finger proteins AZF1 and AZF2 negatively regulate abscisic acid-repressive and auxin-inducible genes under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Physiol 157: 742–756.
  • Krasensky J, Jonak C (2012). Drought, salt, and temperature stress- induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J Exp Bot 63: 1593–1608.
  • Liu X, Baird WV (2003). Differential expression of genes regulated in response to drought or salinity stress in sunflower. Crop Sci 43: 678–87.
  • Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408.
  • Ma S, Gong Q, Bohnert HJ (2006). Dissecting salt stress pathways. J Exp Bot 57: 1097–1107.
  • Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005). Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophy 444: 139–158.
  • Mosolov VV, Valueva TA (2011). Inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes under abiotic stresses in plants. Appl Biochem Microbiol 47: 453–459.
  • Munns R, Tester M (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 651–681.
  • Nakashima K, Ito Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2009). Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol 149: 88–95.
  • Orellana S, Yañez M, Espinoza A, Verdugo I, González E, Ruiz-Lara S, Casaretto JA (2010). The transcription factor SlAREB1 confers drought, salt stress tolerance and regulates biotic and abiotic stress-related genes in tomato. Plant Cell Environ 33: 2191–2208.
  • Ouyang B, Yang T, Li H, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Fei Z, Ye Z (2007). Identification of early salt stress response genes in tomato root by suppression subtractive hybridization and microarray analysis. J Exp Bot 58: 507–520.
  • Park JM, Park CJ, Lee SB, Ham BK, Shin R, Paek KH (2001). Overexpression of the tobacco Tsi1 gene encoding an EREBP/ AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco. Plant Cell 13: 1035–1046.
  • Poysa V, He C, Yu K (2003). Development and characterization of simple repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 106: 363–373.
  • Rai A, Mishra U, Singh M, Kumar R, Dubey RS, Singh NK, Jain N, Pandey HP (2010). Expression Data in Response to Abiotic Stresses in Tomato at Flowering Stage. Gene Expression Omnibus, Series: GSE22304. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University.
  • Reviron MP, Vartanian N, Sallantin M, Huet JC, Pernollet JC, de Vienne D (1992). Characterization of a novel protein induced by progressive or rapid drought and salinity in Brassica napus leaves. Plant Physiol 100: 1486–1493.
  • Rolan P, Atkinson AJ, Lesko LJ (2003). Use of biomarkers from drug discovery through clinical practice: Report of the Ninth European Federation of Pharmaceutical Sciences Conference on Optimizing Drug Development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 73: 284–291.
  • Seo PJ, Xiang F, Qiao M, Park JY, Lee YN, Kim SG, Lee YH, Park WJ, Park CM (2009). The MYB96 transcription factor mediates abscisic acid signaling during drought stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 151: 275–289.
  • Shan L, Li C, Chen F, Zhao S, Xia G (2008). A Bowman-Birk type protease inhibitor is involved in the tolerance to salt stress in wheat. Plant Cell Environ 31: 1128–1137.
  • Sun W, Xu X, Zhu H, Liu A, Liu L, Li J, Hua X (2010). Comparative transcriptomic profiling of a salt-tolerant wild tomato species and a salt-sensitive tomato cultivar. Plant Cell Physiol 51: 997– 1006.
  • Swami AK, Alam SI, Sengupta N, Sarin R (2011). Differential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in Sorghum bicolor leaves. Environ Exp Bot 71: 321–32.
  • Taji T, Seki M, Satou M, Sakurai T, Kobayashi M, Ishiyama K, Narusaka Y, Narusaka M, Zhu JK, Shinozaki K (2004). Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray. Plant Physiol 135: 1697–1709.
  • Tamoi M, Kurotaki H, Fukamizo T (2007). Beta-1,4-glucanase-like protein from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803 is a beta-1,3-1,4-glucanase and functions in salt stress tolerance. Biochem J 405: 139–146.
  • Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003). Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218: 1–14.
  • Zamboni A, Zanin L, Tomasi N, Pezzotti M, Pinton R, Varanini Z, Cesco S (2012) Genome-wide microarray analysis of tomato roots showed defined responses to iron deficiency. BMC Genomics 13: 101.
  • Zhang H, Han B, Wang T, Chen S, Li H, Zhang Y, Dai, S (2012). Mechanisms of plant salt response: insights from proteomics. J Proteome Res 11: 49–67.
  • Zhang L, Zhao G, Xia C, Jia J, Liu X, Kong X (2012). A wheat R2R3- MYB gene, TaMYB30-B, improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 63: 5873–5885.
  • Zhang X, Zhang Z, Chen J, Chen Q, Wang XC, Huang R (2005). Expressing TERF1 in tobacco enhances drought tolerance and abscisic acid sensitivity during seedling development. Planta 222: 494–450.
  • Zhu C, Schraut D, Hartung W, Schäffner AR (2005). Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. J Exp Bot 56: 2971–2981.
  • Zhu JK (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 53: 247–273.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effects of plasma treatment and sanding process on surface roughness of wood veneers

Cenk DEMİRKIR, İsmail AYDIN, Semra ÇOLAK, Gürsel ÇOLAKOĞLU

Development of microsatellite markers in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Jyothi BADRI, Vijay YEPURI, Anuradha GHANTA, Sivaramakrishnan SIVA, Ebrahimali Abubacker SIDDIQ

Analysis of variability, heritability, and genetic advance in seed yield and related traits of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) populations

Hayati ŞEKER, Ayşe YAZICI, Pınar UYSAL

Influence of natural zeolite on nitrogen dynamics in soil

Stanislav TORMA, Jozef VILCEK, Peter ADAMISIN, Emilia HUTTMANOVA, Ondrej HRONEC

Methyl jasmonate treatments influence bioactive compounds and red peel color development of Braeburn apple

Burhan ÖZTÜRK, Yakup ÖZKAN, Kenan YILDIZ

The application for fertilizer yield relationships of the ET yield response factor equation

Ahmet ERTEK

Efects of ripening degree and sample preparation on peach aroma profle characterization by headspace solid-phase microextraction

Mojca BACVONKRALJ, Tjasa JUG, Erika KOMEL, Nikita FAJT, Kristjan JARNI, Jelena ZIVKOVIC, Ibrahim MUJIC, Natasa TRUTIC

Transcriptomic analysis of tomato lines reveals putative stress-specifc biomarkers

Abdullah ALSADON, Mahmoud ALLAH WAHB, Monther SADDER

Fine root architecture, morphology, and biomass response to cutting in a Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis Blume) forest

Chuang MA, Wenhui ZHANG, Jianyun ZHOU, Min WU, Yaoqin XUE, Liwei MA

Association of digital photo parameters and NDVI with winter wheat grain yield in variable environments

Alexey MORGOUNOV, Nurberdi GUMMADOV, Savaş BELEN, Yüksel KAYA, Mesut KESER, Jamala MURSALOVA