The application for fertilizer-yield relationships of the ET-yield response factor equation

Many attempts have been made to understand the plant response to water using plant growth models. The effects of fertilizer on crop yield are greater than those of water. Therefore, some models that have been developed for the evaluation of water-yield relationships can also be used for fertilizer-yield relationships. The purpose of this study was to develop an equation to use in fertilizer applications similar to one used to evaluate crop production under adequate and deficit water supply regimes. The equation can be rewritten for the fertilizer consumed by plants instead of the evapotranspiration (ET). Sample applications showed that the resulting ET-yield response factor equation can be used successfully in the evaluation of fertilizer-yield relationships. Thus, the yield loss per unit of fertilizer deficiency can be determined more precisely by the equation.

The application for fertilizer-yield relationships of the ET-yield response factor equation

Many attempts have been made to understand the plant response to water using plant growth models. The effects of fertilizer on crop yield are greater than those of water. Therefore, some models that have been developed for the evaluation of water-yield relationships can also be used for fertilizer-yield relationships. The purpose of this study was to develop an equation to use in fertilizer applications similar to one used to evaluate crop production under adequate and deficit water supply regimes. The equation can be rewritten for the fertilizer consumed by plants instead of the evapotranspiration (ET). Sample applications showed that the resulting ET-yield response factor equation can be used successfully in the evaluation of fertilizer-yield relationships. Thus, the yield loss per unit of fertilizer deficiency can be determined more precisely by the equation.

___

  • Bauder JW, Bauder T, Cardon G, Schneekloth J (2006). Guide to Choosing Crops Well-Suited to Limited Irrigation. Bozeman, MT, USA: Montana State University Extension Water Quality Program.
  • Cooper PJM, Gregory PJ, Keatinge JDH, BrownSC (1987). Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in Northern Syria 2. Soil water dynamics and crop water use. Field Crop Res 16: 67–84.
  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979). Yield Response Factor to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  • Ejieji CJ, Adeniran KA (2010). Effects of water and fertilizer stress on the yield, fresh and dry matter production of grain Amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus). Aust J Agr Eng 1: 18–24.
  • Erdal İ, Ertek A, Şenyiğit U, Yılmaz Hİ (2006). Effects of different irrigation programs and nitrogen levels on nitrogen concentration, uptake and utilisation in processing tomatoes. Aust J Exp Agr 46: 1653–1660.
  • Ertek A, Erdal İ, Yılmaz HI, Şenyiğit U (2012). The appropriate water and nitrogen application levels for the optimum of processing tomato yield and efficient water usage. J Agric Sci Technol 14: 889–902.
  • Ertek A, Şensoy S, Küçükyumuk C, Gedik İ (2006). Determination of plant-pan coefficients for field-grown eggplant using class A pan evaporation values. Agr Water Manage 85: 58–66.
  • Eryuce N, Kilic C (2001). A review on potassium and stress relations in plants. In: Johnston AE, Bern IPI, editors. Regional Workshop on Potassium and Water Management in West Asia and North Africa, Amman, Jordan. Bern, Switzerland: IPI, pp. 103–110.
  • Kacar B, İnal A (2008). Bitki Analizleri. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık (in Turkish).
  • Kassam A, Smith M (2001). FAO Methodologies on Crop Water Use and Crop Water Use and Crop Water Productivity. In: Expert Meeting on Crop Water Productivity, 3–5 December 2001. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Paper No. CWP-M07.
  • Kirda C (2002). Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. In: Deficit Irrigation Practices, FAO Water Reports 22. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • Li F, Song L, Guan C, Ge D, Liu Z (2000). Coupling effect of water and fertilizers on spring wheat yield in semi-arid area of western Liaoning Province. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 11: 535–539.
  • Li W, Li W, Li Z (2004). Irrigation and fertilizer effects on water use and yield of spring wheat in semi-arid regions. Agr Water Manage 67: 35–46.
  • Liu WZ, Hunsaker DJ, Li YS, Xie XQ, Wall GW (2002). Interrelations of yield evapotranspiration and water use efficiency from marginal analysis of water production functions. Agr Water Manage 56: 143–151.
  • Moutonnet P (2000). Yield response factors of field crops to deficit irrigation. In: Deficit Irrigation Practices FAO Water Report 22. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • Scholberg J, McNeal BL, Boote K, Jones JW, Locascio SJ, Olson SM (2000). Nitrogen stress effects on growth and nitrogen accumulation by field-grown tomato. Agron J 92: 159–167.
  • Stewart JI, Cuenca RH, Pruitt WO, Hagan RM, Tosso J (1977). Determination and Utilization of Water Production Functions for Principal California Crops. Davis, CA, USA: University of California Davis W-67 CA Contributing Project Report.
  • Wu IP (1988). Linearized water application function for drip irrigation schedules. Am Soc Agr Eng 31: 1743–1749.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Siberian elm responses to diferent culture conditions under short rotation forestry in Mediterranean areas

Juan CARRASCO, Ignacio PEREZ, Javier PEREZ, Pilar CIRIA

Influence of natural zeolite on nitrogen dynamics in soil

Stanislav TORMA, Jozef VILCEK, Peter ADAMISIN, Emilia HUTTMANOVA, Ondrej HRONEC

The application for fertilizer yield relationships of the ET yield response factor equation

Ahmet ERTEK

Efects of ripening degree and sample preparation on peach aroma profle characterization by headspace solid-phase microextraction

Mojca BACVONKRALJ, Tjasa JUG, Erika KOMEL, Nikita FAJT, Kristjan JARNI, Jelena ZIVKOVIC, Ibrahim MUJIC, Natasa TRUTIC

Siberian elm responses to different culture conditions under short rotation forestry in Mediterranean areas

Ignacio PÉREZ, Javier PÉREZ, Juan CARRASCO, Pilar CIRIA

Transcriptomic analysis of tomato lines reveals putative stress-specifc biomarkers

Abdullah ALSADON, Mahmoud ALLAH WAHB, Monther SADDER

Development of microsatellite markers in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Jyothi BADRI, Vijay YEPURI, Anuradha GHANTA, Sivaramakrishnan SIVA, Ebrahimali Abubacker SIDDIQ

Methyl jasmonate treatments influence bioactive compounds and red peel color development of Braeburn apple

Burhan ÖZTÜRK, Yakup ÖZKAN, Kenan YILDIZ

The application for fertilizer-yield relationships of the ET-yield response factor equation

Ahmet ERTEK

Fine root architecture, morphology, and biomass response to cutting in a Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis Blume) forest

Chuang MA, Wenhui ZHANG, Jianyun ZHOU, Min WU, Yaoqin XUE, Liwei MA