Nutrient uptakes and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes with diferent levels of terminal drought resistance

Nutrient uptakes and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes with diferent levels of terminal drought resistance

Diferent peanut yields under terminal drought might be due to the diferent nutrient uptakes among peanut genotypes.Nutrient uptake was presumed to be a drought-resistant trait and might involve drought tolerance mechanisms. Te aims of this study,therefore, were to characterize the efect of terminal drought on peanut nutrient uptake and to investigate the genotypic variabilityof nutrient uptake and its interactions with terminal drought. Field experiments were conducted at the Field Crop Research Stationof Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Tailand, from October 2010 to January 2011 and October 2011 to January 2012. Six peanutgenotypes were tested under well-watered and terminal drought conditions. Data were recorded for N, P, K, Ca, and Mg uptake andbiomass (BM) and pod yield (PY); the ratio of nutrient uptake under stress condition was calculated. Terminal drought signifcantlyreduced nutrient uptake in both years, and peanut genotypes difered considerably with respect to nutrient uptakes under well-wateredand terminal drought conditions. ICGV 98324 and ICGV 98348 were the best genotypes for nutrient uptake under terminal drought.Tainan 9 and Tifon 8 had low nutrient uptake under both conditions. ICGV 98308 and Tifon 8 had medium uptake and Tainan 9 hadthe lowest. Signifcant correlations between nutrient uptakes and BM and PY were mostly observed under well-watered and droughtconditions. Based on nutrient uptake, ICGV 98324 and ICGV 98348 were identifed as drought-tolerant lines. Tese genotypes couldmaintain high nutrient uptakes across water regimes; consequently, these traits can also be used as efcient tools for selecting peanutgenotypes with terminal drought tolerance.

___

  • Al-Karaki GN, Al-Raddad A (1997). Efects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress on growth and nutrient uptake of two wheat genotypes difering in drought resistance. Mycorrhiza 7: 83 – 88.
  • Arunyanark A, Jogloy S, Akkasaeng C, Vorasoot N, Kesmala T, Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC, Patanothai A (2009). Association between afatoxin contamination and drought tolerance traits in peanut. Field Crops Res 114: 14–22.
  • Baligar VC, Fageria, NK, He ZL (2001). Nutrient use efciency in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 921–950.
  • Barber SA (1985). Potassium availability at the soil-root interface and factors infuencing potassium uptake. In: Munson RD, editor. Potassium in Agriculture. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 309–324.
  • Boote KJ (1982). Growth stage of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci 9: 35–40.
  • Bricker AA (1989). MSTAT-C User’s Guide. East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University.
  • Clavel D, Diouf O, Khalfaoui JL, Braconnier S (2006). Genotypes variations in fuorescence parameters among closely related groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) lines and their potential for drought screening programs. Crop Sci 34: 92–97.
  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1992). Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. In: Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO, editors. Calculation of Crop Water Requirement: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 24. Rome, Italy: FAO, pp. 1–65.
  • Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Clark RB (2002). Micronutrients in crop production. Adv Agron 77: 185–268.
  • Garg BK (2003). Nutrient uptake and management under drought: nutrient–moisture interaction. Curr Agric 27: 1–8.
  • Girdthai T, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Wongkaew S, Holbrook CC, Patanothai A (2010). Associations between physiological traits for drought tolerance. Plant Breeding 129: 693–699.
  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultur- al Research. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Gunes A, Cicek N, Inal A, Alpaslan M, Eraslan F, Guneri E, Guzelordu T (2006). Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought stress implemented at pre- and post-anthesis stages and its relations with nutrient uptake and efciency. Plant Soil Environ 52:368–37.
  • Htoon W, Jogloy S, Toomsan B, Sanitchon J (2009). Response to early drought for traits related to nitrogen fxation and their correlation to yield and drought tolerance traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Asian J Plant Sci 8: 138–145.
  • Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G, Patanothai A (2012). Classifcation of root distribution patterns and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes under mid-season drought stress. Field Crops Res 127: 181–190.
  • Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G, Patanothai A (2011). Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with diferent yield responses to pre-fowering drought stress. Field Crops Res 120: 262–270.
  • Junjittakarn J, Pimratch S, Jogloy S, Htoon W, Singkham N, Vorasoot N, Toomsan B, Holbrook CC, Patanothai A (2013). Nutrient uptake of peanut genotypes under diferent water regimes. Int J Plant Prod 7: 677–692.
  • Kaewpradit W, Toomsan B, Cadisch G, Vityakon P, Limpinuntana V, Saenjan P, Jogloy S, Patanothai A (2009). Mixing groundnut residues and rice straw to improve rice yield and N use efciency. Field Crops Res 110: 130–138.
  • Kambiranda DM, Vasanthaiah HKN, Katam R, Ananga A, Basha SM, Naik K (2012). Impact of drought stress on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L . ) productivity and food safety. In: Vasanthaiah HKN, Kambiranda DM, editors. Plants and Environment. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 249–272.
  • Kolay AK (2008). Soil moisture stress and plant growth. In: Kolay AK, editor. Water and Crop Growth. New Delhi, India: Atlantic, pp. 43–48.
  • Koolachart R, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Wongkaew S, Holbrook CC, Jongrungklang N, Kesmala T, Patanothai A (2013). Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with diferent yield responses to terminal drought. Field Crops Res 149: 366–376.
  • Kramer PJ (1980). Drought stress and the origin of adaptation. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ, editors. Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 7–20.
  • Kuchenbuch R, Claassen N, Jungk A (1986). Potassium availability in relation to soil moisture. II. Calculations by means of a mathematical simulation model. Plant Soil 95: 221–231.
  • Kulkarni JH, Ravindra V, Sojitra VK, Bhatt DM (1988). Growth, nodulation and N uptake of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as infuenced by water defcits stress at diferent phenophase. Oleagineus 43: 415–419.
  • Marschner H (1986). Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Nageswara Rao RC, Singh S, Sivakumar MVK, Srivastava KL, Wil- liams JH (1985). Efect of water defcit at diferent growth phase of peanut. I Yield responses. Agron J 77: 782–786.
  • Nautiyal PC, Ravinda V, Zala PV, Joshi YC (1999). Enhancement of yield in peanut following the imposition of transient soil- moisture-defcit stress during the vegetative phase. Exp Agric 35: 371–385.
  • Nigam SN, Chandra S, Sridevi RK, Bhukta M, Reddy AGS, Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC, Reddy PV, Deshmukh MP, Mathur RK et al. (2005). Efciency of physiological trait-based and empirical selection approaches for drought tolerance in groundnut. Ann App Biol 146: 433–439.
  • Pimratch S, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Toomsan B, Kesmala T, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC (2008). Efect of drought stress on traits related to N 2-fxation in eleven peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes difering in degrees of resistance to drought. Asian J Plant Sci 7: 334–342.
  • Ravindra V, Nautiyal PC, Joshi YC (1990). Physiological analysis of drought resistance and yield in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Trop Agric Trinidad 67: 290–296.
  • Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbumozhi V (2003). Physiological responses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: a critical review. Plant Growth Regul 41: 75–88.
  • Richards RA, Condon AG, Rebetzke GJ (2001). Traits to improve yield in dry environments. In: Reynolds MP, Ortiz-Monasterio IJ, McNab, A, editors. Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. Mexico City, Mexico: CIMMYT, pp. 89–100.
  • Samarah N, Mullen R, Cianzio S (2004). Size distribution and mineral nutrients of soybean seeds in response to drought stress. J Plant Nutr 27: 815–835.
  • Schuman GE, Stanley MA, Knudson D (1973). Automated total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant samples. Soil Sci Amer Proc 37: 480–481.
  • Singh S, Russell MB (1981). Water use by maize/pigeonpea intercrop on a deep Vertisol. In: Singh S, Russell MB, editors. Proceed- ings of International Workshop on Pigeonpeas, 15–19 Decem- ber 1980. Patancheru, India: ICRISAT Center, pp. 271–282.
  • Songsri P, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC (2008). Root distribution of drought-resistant peanut genotypes in response to drought. J Agron Crop Sci 194: 92–103.
  • Suther DM, Patel MS (1992). Yield and nutrient absorption by groundnut and iron availability in soil as infuenced by lime and soil water. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 40: 594–596.
  • Vorasoot N, Songsri P, Akkasaeng C, Jogloy S, Patanothai A (2003). Efect of water stress on yield and agronomic characters of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Sci Tec 25: 283–288.
  • Wallace DH, Baudoin JP, Beaver J, Coyne DP, Halseth DE, Masaya PN, Munger HM, Myers JR, Silberrnagel M, Yourstone KS et al (1993). Improving efciency of breeding for higher crop yield. Teor Appl Genet 86: 27–40.
  • Wright GC, Nageswara Rao RC (1994). Groundnut water relations. In: Smartt J, editor. Te Groundnut Crop. London, UK: Chap- man and Hall, pp. 281–325.
  • Wright GC, Nageswara Rao RC, Basu MS (1996). A physiological approach to the understanding of genotype by environment interactions - a case study on improvement of drought adaptation in groundnut. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL, editors. Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 365–380.
  • Xia MZ (1997). Efects of soil drought during the generative development phase on seed yield and nutrient uptake of faba bean (Viciafaba ). Aust J Agric Res 48: 447–452.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding

Mahmut KAPLAN, Taner AKAR, Adem KAMALAK, Sancar BULUT

Irrigation scheduling of grapefruit trees in a Mediterranean environment throughout evaluation of plant water status and evapotranspiration

Mustafa ÜNLÜ, Rıza KANBER, D. Levent KOÇ, Bülent ÖZEKİCİ, Uğur KEKEÇ

Application of a multicriteria decision-making approach for rice land suitability analysis in Turkey

İsmail SEZER, Orhan DENGİZ

Is canopy interception increased in semiarid tree plantations? Evidence from a feld investigation in Tehran, Iran

Seyed Mohammad Moein SADEGHI, Pedram ATTAROD, Tomas GRANT PYPKER, David DUNKERLEY

Nutrient uptakes and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes with diferent levels of terminal drought resistance

Wanwipa KAEWPRADIT, Wunna HTOON, Banyong TOOMSAN, Naveen PUPPALA, Sanun JOGLOY, Nimitr VORASOOT, Aran PATANOTHAI

Optimization of Orius majusculus release: photoperiodic sensitivity at different temperatures and storage of diapausing adults

Şerife Ünal BAHŞİ, İrfan TUNÇ

Hybrid performance and heterosis in F1 offspring of triticale (× Triticosecale Wittm.)

Mustafa YILDIRIM, Hasan GEZGİNÇ, Ali Haydar PAKSOY

Genetic analysis for grain flling duration in wheat using joint segregation analysis

Imdad Ullah KHAN, Kalim ULLAH, Naqib Ullah KHAN, Shah Jehan KHAN, Muhammad Irfaq KHAN, Rehmat Ullah KHAN, Samrin GUL

L-arginine impact on cherry rootstock rooting and biochemical characteristics in tissue culture

Virginia SARROPOULOU, Kortessa DIMASSI-THERIOU, İoannis THERIOS

Germination and electrical conductivity tests on artificially aged seed lots of 2 wall-rocket species

Simona-laura LAZAR, Sara MIRA, Doru PAMFIL, Juan Bautista MARTÍNEZ-LABORDE