Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding

Einkorn and emmer wheat are still cultivated in the mountainous areas of Turkey. They are resistant to biotic and abiotic stress conditions and are routinely used as food stuffs due to reasonable dietary fiber rate and vitamin and micronutrient content. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the feed potential of einkorn and emmer wheat populations. A total of 17 hulled wheat populations collected from different provinces of Turkey were studied during the years 2012 and 2013. Experiments were carried out in randomized complete block design with 3 replications to investigate grain yield, harvest index, chemical composition, and gas and methane production of the grain. Grain yield varied between 2.477 and 4.617 t ha–1, harvest index between 27.55% and 36.03%, crude protein (CP) between 6.69% and 16.22%, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) between 25.99% and 31.99%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) between 14.35% and 19.05%, crude oil (CO) between 1.33% and 2.05%, crude ash (CA) between 4.23% and 5.22%, metabolizable energy (ME) between 2.58 and 2.25 Mcal kg–1 DM, organic matter digestibility (OMD) between 65.59% and 72.73%, and gas production (GP) between 46.01 and 52.22 mL. While einkorn populations had higher ME, OMD, CP, and CO content values, emmer wheat populations had higher ADF and NDF rates. Moreover, there were significant variations in gas and methane production in all hulled wheat populations. Genotype-trait biplot analysis clearly indicated the variation limits of NDF, ADF, CP, OMD, ME, methane, GP, CO, and CA of hulled wheat populations. There were also significant linear relationships between CP and ME (0.585) and OMD (0.613); between CO and GP (0.513); and between GP and ME (0.623) and OMD (0.696). It was concluded that with regard to higher yield and digestibility, these hulled wheat populations could be used as basic germplasm for breeding of new einkorn and emmer wheat cultivars to be used as alternative feedstuff.

Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding

Einkorn and emmer wheat are still cultivated in the mountainous areas of Turkey. They are resistant to biotic and abiotic stress conditions and are routinely used as food stuffs due to reasonable dietary fiber rate and vitamin and micronutrient content. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the feed potential of einkorn and emmer wheat populations. A total of 17 hulled wheat populations collected from different provinces of Turkey were studied during the years 2012 and 2013. Experiments were carried out in randomized complete block design with 3 replications to investigate grain yield, harvest index, chemical composition, and gas and methane production of the grain. Grain yield varied between 2.477 and 4.617 t ha–1, harvest index between 27.55% and 36.03%, crude protein (CP) between 6.69% and 16.22%, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) between 25.99% and 31.99%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) between 14.35% and 19.05%, crude oil (CO) between 1.33% and 2.05%, crude ash (CA) between 4.23% and 5.22%, metabolizable energy (ME) between 2.58 and 2.25 Mcal kg–1 DM, organic matter digestibility (OMD) between 65.59% and 72.73%, and gas production (GP) between 46.01 and 52.22 mL. While einkorn populations had higher ME, OMD, CP, and CO content values, emmer wheat populations had higher ADF and NDF rates. Moreover, there were significant variations in gas and methane production in all hulled wheat populations. Genotype-trait biplot analysis clearly indicated the variation limits of NDF, ADF, CP, OMD, ME, methane, GP, CO, and CA of hulled wheat populations. There were also significant linear relationships between CP and ME (0.585) and OMD (0.613); between CO and GP (0.513); and between GP and ME (0.623) and OMD (0.696). It was concluded that with regard to higher yield and digestibility, these hulled wheat populations could be used as basic germplasm for breeding of new einkorn and emmer wheat cultivars to be used as alternative feedstuff.

___

  • Abdel-Aal E-SM, Hucl P, Sosulski FW (1995). Compositional and nutritional characteristics of spring einkorn and spelt wheats. Cereal Chem 72: 621–624.
  • Acquistucci R, D’Egidio MG, Vallega V (1995). Amino acid composition of selected strains of diploid wheat, Triticum monococcum L. Cereal Chem 72: 213.
  • Akçura M (2011). The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turk J Agric For 35: 115–125.
  • Akgün İ, Kaya M, Altındal D (2007). Determination of yield and yield components in some triticale lines/genotypes under Isparta ecological conditions. Akdeniz Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg 20: 171–182 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • AOAC (1990). Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  • Blümmel M, Ørskov ER (1993). Comparison of an in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Tech 40: 109– 119.
  • Buerli M (2006). Farro in Italy. A Desk Study. Rome, Italy: Global Facilitation Unit for Underutilized Species.
  • Cubadda R, Marconi E (1994). Aspetti relativi alla utilizzazione e alla caratterizzazione tecnologica e nutrizionale del farro. In: Perrino P, Semeraro D, Laghetti G, editors. Proc. Il farro: un cereale della salute Potenza, Italy. Bari, Italy: CNR, pp. 82–88 (in Italian).
  • Cubadda R, Marconi E (2002). Spelt wheat. In: Belton PS, Taylor JRN, editors. Pseudocereals and Less Common Cereals – Grain Properties and Utilization Potential. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 153–173.
  • D’Antuono LF (1994). Obsolete wheats in Italy: an overview on cultivation, use and perspectives for their conservation. In: Padulosi S, Ager H, Frison E, editors. Report of the IPGRI Workshop on Conservation and Use of Underutilized Mediterranean Species. Rome, Italy: IPGRI, pp. 41–48.
  • D’Egidio MG, Nardi S, Vallega V (1993). Grain, flour, and dough characteristics of selected strains of diploid wheat, Triticum monococcum L. Cereal Chem 70: 298–303.
  • FAO (1990). Micronutrient Assessment at the Country Level: An International Study. Rome, Italy: FAO Soils Bulletin 63.
  • Feil B (1992). Breeding progress in small grain cereals. A comparison of old and modern cultivars. Plant Breeding 108: 1–11.
  • Feldman M, Horowitz A, Anikster Y (1988). Utilization of biodiversity from in situ reserves, with special reference to wild wheat and barley. Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement 21: 311–323.
  • Gebre-Mariam H, Larter EN (1979). Effect of plants density on yield, yield components and quality in triticale and Glenlea wheat. Can J Plant Sci 59: 679–683.
  • Goel G, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2008). Effect of Sesbania sesban and Carduus pycnocephalus leaves and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds and their extract on partitioning of nutrients from roughage-and concentrate-based feeds to methane. Anim Feed Sci Tech 147: 72–89.
  • Grausgruber H, Scheiblauer J, Schönlechner R, Ruckenbauer P, Berghofer E (2004). Variability in chemical composition and biologically active constituents of cereals. In: Vollmann J, Grausgruber H, Ruckenbauer P, editors. Genetic Variation for Plant Breeding. Proceedings of the 17th EUCARPIA General Congress, Tulln, Austria, 8–11 September 2004, pp. 23–26.
  • Hammer K, Perrino P (1984). Further information on farro (T. monococcum L. and T. monococcum Schrank) in South Italy. Kulturpflanze 32: 143–151.
  • Konvalina P, Capouchová I, Stehno Z (2011). Genetic resources of hulled wheat species in Czech organic farming. In: 62. Tagung der Vereinigung der Pflanzenzüchter und Saatgutkaufleute Österreichs 2011, pp. 81–86.
  • Lipkovich I, Smith EP (2002). Biplot and singular value decomposition macros for excel. Blacksburg, VA, USA: Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech.
  • Lİje H, Mİller B, Laustsen AM, Hansen A (2003). Chemical composition, functional properties and sensory profiling of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.). J Cereal Sci 37: 231–240.
  • Lopez S, Makkar HPS, Soliva CR (2010). Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In: Vercoe PE, Makkar HPS, Schlink A, editors. In Vitro Screening of Plant Resources for Extra Nutritional Attributes in Ruminants: Nuclear and Related Methodologies. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 191–231.
  • Menke KH, Steingass H (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Develop 28: 9–55.
  • Mielke H, Rodemann B (2007). Der Dinkel, eine besondere Weizenart-Anbau, Pflanzenschutz, Ernte und Verarbeitung. J Cult Plant 59: 40–45 (in German).
  • Moudry J (1999). Productivity of spelt wheat (Triticum spelta L.) spike. Sci Agric 30: 15–26.
  • NRC (1996). Nutrient Requirement of Beef Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
  • NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
  • Pelillo M, Ferioli F, Iafelice G, Marconi E, Caboni MF (2010). Characterisation of the phospholipid fraction of hulled and naked tetraploid and hexaploid wheats. J Cereal Sci 51: 120– 126.
  • Peterson DM (1992). Composition and nutritional characteristics of oat grain products. In: Marshall HG, Sorrells ME, editors. Oat Science and Technology. Madison, WI, USA: ASA, pp. 265–292.
  • Piergiovanni AR, Laghetti G, Perrino P (1996). Characteristics of meal from hulled wheats (Triticum dicoccon Schrank and T spelta L.): an evaluation of selected accessions. Cereal Chem 73: 732–735.
  • Plant Breeding International (1990). Cereals. Cambridge, UK: Plant Breeding International.
  • Rüegger A, Winzeler H, Noseberg J (1990). Die Ertragsbildung von Dinkel (Triticum spelta L.) und Weizen (Triticum aestivum L.) unter verschiedenen Umweltbedingungen im Freiland. J Agron Crop Sci 164: 145–162.
  • SAS Institute (1999). SAS/ETS User’s Guide, Version 9.0. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute, Inc.
  • Schmid JE, Winzeler M, Winzeler H (1994). Analysis of disease resistance and quality characters of F1 hybrids of crosses between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and spelt (Triticum spelta). Euphytica 75: 105–110.
  • Sharma HC, Waines JG, Foster KW (1981). Variability in primitive and wild wheats for useful genetic characters. Crop Sci 21: 555–559.
  • Shewry PR, Hawkesford MJ, Piironen V, Lampi AM, Gebruers K, Boros D, Andersson AAM, Aman P, Rakszegi M, Bedo Z et al. (2013). Natural variation in grain composition of wheat and related cereals. J Agric Food Chem 61: 8295–8303.
  • Stehno Z, Bradove J, Dotlacil Konvalina P (2010). Landraces and obsolete cultivars of minor wheat species in the Czech collection of wheat genetic restuffs. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 46: 100–105.
  • Suchowilska E, Wiwart M, Borejszo Z, Packa D, Kandler W, Krska R (2009). Discriminant analysis of selected yield components and fatty acid composition of chosen Triticum monococcum, Triticum dicoccum and Triticum spelta accessions. J Cereal Sci 49: 310–315.
  • TOVEP (1991). Türkiye toprakları verimlilik envanteri. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü (in Turkish).
  • Troccoli A, Codianni P (2005). Appropriate seeding rate for einkorn, emmer, and spelt grown under rainfed condition in southern Italy. Europ J Agronomy 22: 293–300.
  • Van Slageren MW (1994). Wild Wheats: A Monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub and Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University/ICARDA.
  • Van Soest PJ (1963). The use of detergents in the analysis of fibre feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. J Assoc Off Ana Chem 46: 829–835.
  • Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1967). The use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. J Assoc Off Ana Chem 50: 50–55.
  • Wieser H (2000). Comparative investigations of gluten proteins from different wheat species. I. Qualitative and quantitative composition of gluten protein types. Eur Food Res Technol 211: 262–268.
  • Yan W, Kang MS (2003). GGE-Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Yan W, Rajcan I (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci 42: 11–20.
  • Yan W, Reid JF (2008). Breeding line selection based on multiple traits. Crop Sci 48: 417–423.

___

Bibtex @ { tbtkagriculture139363, journal = {Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, issn = {1300-011X}, eissn = {1303-6173}, address = {}, publisher = {TÜBİTAK}, year = {2014}, volume = {38}, number = {6}, pages = {838 - 846}, doi = {10.3906/tar-1401-20}, title = {Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding}, key = {cite}, author = {Kaplan, Mahmut and Akar, Taner and Kamalak, Adem and Bulut, Sancar} }
APA Kaplan, M. , Akar, T. , Kamalak, A. & Bulut, S. (2014). Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding . Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry , 38 (6) , 838-846 . DOI: 10.3906/tar-1401-20
MLA Kaplan, M. , Akar, T. , Kamalak, A. , Bulut, S. "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding" . Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38 (2014 ): 838-846 <
Chicago Kaplan, M. , Akar, T. , Kamalak, A. , Bulut, S. "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38 (2014 ): 838-846
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding AU - MahmutKaplan, TanerAkar, AdemKamalak, SancarBulut Y1 - 2014 PY - 2014 N1 - doi: 10.3906/tar-1401-20 DO - 10.3906/tar-1401-20 T2 - Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 838 EP - 846 VL - 38 IS - 6 SN - 1300-011X-1303-6173 M3 - doi: 10.3906/tar-1401-20 UR - Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding %A Mahmut Kaplan , Taner Akar , Adem Kamalak , Sancar Bulut %T Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding %D 2014 %J Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry %P 1300-011X-1303-6173 %V 38 %N 6 %R doi: 10.3906/tar-1401-20 %U 10.3906/tar-1401-20
ISNAD Kaplan, Mahmut , Akar, Taner , Kamalak, Adem , Bulut, Sancar . "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38 / 6 (Haziran 2014): 838-846 .
AMA Kaplan M. , Akar T. , Kamalak A. , Bulut S. Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2014; 38(6): 838-846.
Vancouver Kaplan M. , Akar T. , Kamalak A. , Bulut S. Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2014; 38(6): 838-846.
IEEE M. Kaplan , T. Akar , A. Kamalak ve S. Bulut , "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding", , c. 38, sayı. 6, ss. 838-846, Haz. 2014, doi:10.3906/tar-1401-20
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Optimization of Orius majusculus release: photoperiodic sensitivity at diferent temperatures and storage of diapausing adults

Şerife BAHŞİ ÜNAL, İrfan TUNÇ

Germination and electrical conductivity tests on artificially aged seed lots of 2 wall-rocket species

Simona-laura LAZAR, Sara MIRA, Doru PAMFIL, Juan Bautista MARTÍNEZ-LABORDE

Optimization of Orius majusculus release: photoperiodic sensitivity at different temperatures and storage of diapausing adults

Şerife Ünal BAHŞİ, İrfan TUNÇ

Nutrient uptakes and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes with different levels of terminal drought resistance

Wunna HTOON, Sanun JOGLOY, Nimitr VORASOOT, Banyong TOOMSAN

First report of Adoxophyes orana in northwestern Turkey: population fuctuation and damage on diferent host plants

Bilgi PEHLEVAN, Orkun Barış KOVANCI

Postharvest performance of cut marigold, rose, and sunfower stems as infuenced by homemade and commercial foral preservatives

Ifikhar AHMAD, John Martin DOLE

Characterization for drought resistance at early stages of wheat genotypes based on survival, coleoptile length, and seedling vigor

Ali ÖZTÜRK, Sinan BAYRAM, Kamil HALİLOĞLU, Murat AYDIN, Özcan ÇAĞLAR, Sancar BULUT

First report of Adoxophyes orana in northwestern Turkey: population fluctuation and damage on different host plants

Bilgi PEHLEVAN, Orkun Barış KOVANCI

L-arginine impact on cherry rootstock rooting and biochemical characteristics in tissue culture

Virginia SARROPOULOU, Kortessa DIMASSI-THERIOU, İoannis THERIOS

Irrigation scheduling of grapefruit trees in a Mediterranean environment throughout evaluation of plant water status and evapotranspiration

Mustafa ÜNLÜ, Rıza KANBER, D. Levent KOÇ, Bülent ÖZEKİCİ, Uğur KEKEÇ