Influence of Nutrient Concentrations and NaCl Salinity on the Growth, Photosynthesis, and Essential Oil Content of Peppermint and Lemon Verbena

Growth and essential oil content of peppermint (Menhta piperita var. officinalis) and lemon verbena (Lipia citriodora var. Verbena) were evaluated in response to salinity and nutrient solution concentrations, measured as electrical conductivity (EC 0.7, 1.4, 2.8, 5.6, and 5.6Na dS m-1). In peppermint, the highest fresh weight and dry weight were observed in the 1.4 dS m-1 treatment. The increased EC with either NaCl or all nutrients at 5.6 dS m-1 reduced the fresh weight of lemon verbena. The maximum fresh weight and dry weight in lemon verbena were obtained in both 1.4 and 2.8 dS m-1 treatments. Increasing EC level up to 2.8 dS m-1 increased leaf area but the leaf area was reduced by 5.6 dS m-1 treatment achieved by adding NaCl or all nutrients. The rate of photosynthesis (Pn) was higher in treatments with EC levels of 1.4 and 2.8 as compared to the other treatments. In both peppermint and lemon verbena, the concentrations of N, P, and K increased as the EC of the solution increased from 0.7 to 5.6 dS m-1 but in the 5.6Na treatment their concentrations fell. The total content of essential oil was reduced by increasing the EC of the solution because of the reduction in total fresh weight of the plants. In peppermint, the essential oil content in the 1.4 dS m-1 treatment was 55.0% and 40.5% higher than those of both 5.6 and 5.6Na treatments, respectively. The major constituents of the essential oil in peppermint were menthol and menthone and in lemon verbena they were geranial and neral in all treatments. The increased Pn and leaf area in moderate EC level led to improved plant growth. Consequently, 1.4-2.8 dS m-1 could be an optimum EC value in peppermint and lemon verbena production.

Influence of Nutrient Concentrations and NaCl Salinity on the Growth, Photosynthesis, and Essential Oil Content of Peppermint and Lemon Verbena

Growth and essential oil content of peppermint (Menhta piperita var. officinalis) and lemon verbena (Lipia citriodora var. Verbena) were evaluated in response to salinity and nutrient solution concentrations, measured as electrical conductivity (EC 0.7, 1.4, 2.8, 5.6, and 5.6Na dS m-1). In peppermint, the highest fresh weight and dry weight were observed in the 1.4 dS m-1 treatment. The increased EC with either NaCl or all nutrients at 5.6 dS m-1 reduced the fresh weight of lemon verbena. The maximum fresh weight and dry weight in lemon verbena were obtained in both 1.4 and 2.8 dS m-1 treatments. Increasing EC level up to 2.8 dS m-1 increased leaf area but the leaf area was reduced by 5.6 dS m-1 treatment achieved by adding NaCl or all nutrients. The rate of photosynthesis (Pn) was higher in treatments with EC levels of 1.4 and 2.8 as compared to the other treatments. In both peppermint and lemon verbena, the concentrations of N, P, and K increased as the EC of the solution increased from 0.7 to 5.6 dS m-1 but in the 5.6Na treatment their concentrations fell. The total content of essential oil was reduced by increasing the EC of the solution because of the reduction in total fresh weight of the plants. In peppermint, the essential oil content in the 1.4 dS m-1 treatment was 55.0% and 40.5% higher than those of both 5.6 and 5.6Na treatments, respectively. The major constituents of the essential oil in peppermint were menthol and menthone and in lemon verbena they were geranial and neral in all treatments. The increased Pn and leaf area in moderate EC level led to improved plant growth. Consequently, 1.4-2.8 dS m-1 could be an optimum EC value in peppermint and lemon verbena production.

___

  • Adams, P. 1991. Effect of increasing salinity of the nutrient solution with major nutrient or sodium chloride on the yield, quality and composition of tomato grown in rockwool. J. Hort. Sci. 66: 201
  • Adams, P. and C. Ho. 1989. Effect of constant and fluctuating salinity on the yield, quality and calcium status of tomatoes. J. Hort. Sci. 64: 725-732.
  • Aflatuni,, A. 2005. The yield and essential oil content of mint (Mentha ssp) in northern Ostrobothnia. J. Essen. Oil Res. 14: 243-246.
  • Ball, M.C. and G.D. Farquhar. 1984. Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of two angrove species, Avicenna marina and Aegiceras corniculatum, to long-term salinity and humidity conditions. Plant Physiol. 74: 1-6.
  • Chapin, F.S., J.J. Bloom, C.B. Field and R.H. Waring. 1987. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. BioSci. 37: 49-57.
  • Charles, D.J., R.J. Joly and J.E. Simon. 1990. Effect of osmotic stress on the essential oil content and composition of peppermint. Phytochemistry 29: 2837-2840.
  • Cornish, P.S. 1992. Use of high electrical conductivity of nutrient solution to improve the quality of salad tomatoes grown in hydroponic culture. Aus. J. Exp. Agric. 32: 513-520.
  • Cramer, G.R. 2002. Deferential effects of salinity on leaf elongation kinetics of three grass species. Plant Soil 253: 233-244.
  • Dorais, M., A.P. Papadopoulos, S. Leonhart, A. Gosselin and L. Gaudrean. 2001. Greenhouse production of medicinal plant in northeastern Canada. Acta Hort. 554: 297-303.
  • Gershenzon, J., M. Maffei and R. Croteau 1989. Biochemical and histochemical localization of monoterpene biosynthesis in the glandular trichomes of Spearmint (Mentha spicata). Plant Physiol. 89: 1351-1357.
  • Grattan, S.R. and C.M. Grieve. 1999. Salinity mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Scientia Hort. 78: 127-157.
  • Greenway, H. and R. Munns. 1980. Mechanism of salt tolerance in non- halophytes. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32: 149-190.
  • Groenewegen, W.A., D.W. Knight and S. Heptinstall. 1992. Progress in the medicinal chemistry of the herb feverfew. In: Progress in medicinal chemistry (Eds. G.P. Ellis and D.K. Luscombe). Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 217–238.
  • Ho, L., C. Belda, R. Brown, J. Andrews and P. Adams. 1993. Uptake and transport of calcium and the possible causes of blossom end rot in tomato. J. Expt. Bot. 259: 509-518.
  • Hoagland, D.R. and D.S. Arnon. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 347: 1-32.
  • Hsiao, T.C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24: 519-570.
  • Hyden, A. 2006. Aeroponic and hydroponic systems for medicinal herb, rhizome, and root crops. HortScience 41: 536-538.
  • Kang, J.G. and M.W. Van Iersel. 2004. Nutrient solution concentration affects shoot:root ratio, leaf area ratio, and growth of sub- irrigated salvia (Salvia splendens). HortScience 39: 49-54.
  • Lipp, F.J. 1996. The efficacy, history, and politics of medicinal plants. Alternative Therapies in Health Med. 2: 36-41.
  • Lopez, M.V. and S.M.E. Satti. 1996. Calcium and potassium-enhanced growth and yield of tomato under sodium chloride stress. Plant Science 114: 19-27.
  • Maffei, M. and M. Mucciarellib. 2003. Essential oil yield in peppermint/soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Res. 84: 229-240.
  • Maffei, M. and T. Sacco. 1987. Chemical and morphometrical comparison between two peppermint notomorphs. Planta Med. 53: 214-216.
  • Maia, N.B., O.A. Bovi and M.M.. Newton. 2001. Essential oil production and quality of Mentha arvensis grown in nutrient solution. Acta Hort. 548: 181-187.
  • Marschner, H. 1995: Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London.
  • Massey, D.M., A.C. Hayward and G.W. Winsor. 1984. Some response of tomatoes to salinity in nutrient film culture. Glasshouse Crops Res. Inst., Ann. Rep. pp 60-62.
  • Munns, R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant Cell Envir. 16: 15-24.
  • Munsi, P.S. 1992. Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition response in Japan’s mint cultivation. Acta Hort. 306: 436-443.
  • Rudich, J., E. Rendon, M.A. Stevens and A. Ambri. 1981. Use of leaf water potential to determine water stress in field grown tomato plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106: 732-736.
  • Sangwan, N.S., A.H. Farooqi, A.F. Shabih and R.S. Sangwan. 2001. Regulation of essential oil production in plants, Plant Growth Regul. 34: 3-21.
  • Schwarz, M. 1995: Soilless Culture Management, Springer. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Shannon, M.C. and C.M. Grieve. 1999. Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Scientia Hort. 75: 5-38.
  • Staple, R.C. and G.H. Toenniessen. 1984: Salinity tolerance in plants. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto, Canada. pp. 142-180.
  • Stutte, G.W. 2006. Process and product: recirculation hydroponics and bioactive compounds in a controlled environment. HortScience 41: 526-530.
  • Tabatabaei, S.J. 2006. Effects of salinity and N on the growth, photosynthesis and N status of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees. Scientia Hort. 108: 432-438.
  • Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2002: Plant Physiology. Sinaur Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA. pp. 283-306.
  • Turner, G.W., J. Gershenzon and R.B. Croteau. 2000. Distribution of peltate glandular trichomes on developing leaves of peppermint. Plant Physiol. 124: 655-663.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK