Determining the Relationships between Yield and Yield Attributes in Sunflower

Relationships between seed yield and agronomic characters in sunflower were investigated without considering genetic effects. Sunflower hybrids were evaluated in 3 categories: constant hybrids, control hybrids (mostly the same in each year), and test hybrids (changing each year). Seed yield was positively correlated with oil content, plant height, and 1000-seed weight, but flowering and physiological maturity period correlated negatively with yield based on the analyses in this research. A diverse relationship was determined between the seed yield of the hybrids and oil content. Results of the regression analysis indicated that, up to 40%-45% oil content, there was a negative correlation between yield and oil content, but both values increased equivalently after this point. Up to 70 g 1000-seed weight, sunflower seed yield increased, but hybrids would sacrifice yield performance to get larger size seeds after this point. Seed yield gradually increased with increasing plant height and earlier maturing hybrids demonstrated higher yield performance in this research. The relationships between seed yield and other components gave similar results in the same climatic conditions, except Tarsan-1018 and Sanbro hybrids with respect to each characteristic observed.

Determining the Relationships between Yield and Yield Attributes in Sunflower

Relationships between seed yield and agronomic characters in sunflower were investigated without considering genetic effects. Sunflower hybrids were evaluated in 3 categories: constant hybrids, control hybrids (mostly the same in each year), and test hybrids (changing each year). Seed yield was positively correlated with oil content, plant height, and 1000-seed weight, but flowering and physiological maturity period correlated negatively with yield based on the analyses in this research. A diverse relationship was determined between the seed yield of the hybrids and oil content. Results of the regression analysis indicated that, up to 40%-45% oil content, there was a negative correlation between yield and oil content, but both values increased equivalently after this point. Up to 70 g 1000-seed weight, sunflower seed yield increased, but hybrids would sacrifice yield performance to get larger size seeds after this point. Seed yield gradually increased with increasing plant height and earlier maturing hybrids demonstrated higher yield performance in this research. The relationships between seed yield and other components gave similar results in the same climatic conditions, except Tarsan-1018 and Sanbro hybrids with respect to each characteristic observed.

___

  • Badwal, S.S., R.K. Raheja, K.L. Ahuja and B.S. Bawa. 1993. Path analysis of oil yield in sunflower (H. annuus L.) hybrids. Indian J. Genetics. 53: 387-390.
  • Chikkadevaiah, S.H.L. and Nandini R. 2002. Correlation and path analysis in sunflower. Helia. 25: 109-118
  • Dusanic, N., V. Miklic, J. Joksimovic, J. Atlagic and J. Crnobarac. 2004. Path coefficient analysis of some yield components of sunflower. In: Proc. of 16thInternational Sunflower Conf. (Ed: G.J. Seiler). Fargo, ND, US. pp. 531-537.
  • Gangappa, E., K.M. Channakrishhnaiah, C. Thakur and S. Ramesh. 1997. Genetic architecture of yield and its attributes in sunflower (H. annuus L.). Helia. 20: 85-94.
  • Hladni, N., D. Skoric, M. K. Balalic, Z. Sakac and D. Jovanovic. 2006. Combining ability for oil content and its correlation with other yield components in sunflower (H. annuus L.). Helia. 29: 111- 120.
  • Joksimovic, J., J. Atlagic, D. Jovanovic R. Marinkovic, N. Dusanic and V. Miklic. 2004. Path coefficient analysis of some head and seed components in sunflower. In: Proc. of 16thInter. Sunflower Conf. (Ed: G.J. Seiler). Fargo, US. pp. 525-530.
  • Joksimovic, J., J. Atlagic, R. Marinkovic, and D. Jovanovic. 2006. Genetic control of oleic and linoleic acid contents in sunflower. Helia. 29: 33-40.
  • Kaya, Y. 2003. The problems and solution suggestions of oil sunflower production in Turkey. Cine Tarim Magazine. 43: 34-35.
  • Kaya, Y. and I.K. Atakişi. 2003. Path and correlation analysis in different yield characters in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Anadolu Journal. 13: 31-45.
  • Kaya, Y., G. Evci, V. Pekcan and T. Gücer. 2003. The Determination of the Contribution on Important Yield Components to Seed and Oil Yield in Sunflower. In: Proceedings of 5thTurkish Field Crops Congress (Eds: M. Karaca and M. Bilgen). Antalya, Turkey. pp. 120-125.
  • Marinkovic, R. 1992. Path coefficient analysis of some yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica. 60: 201-205
  • Miller, J.F. and G.N. Fick. 1997. Sunflower Genetics. In: Sunflower Technology and Production. (Ed: A.A. Schneiter), Agronomy Monograms, 35. ASA. CSSA and SSSA. Madison, WI, USA. pp. 441-495.
  • Ortis, L., G. Nestares, E. Frutos, N. Machado. 2005. Combining ability analysis for agronomic traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Helia. 28: 125-134.
  • Petakov D. 1998. Variation and correlation in sunflower hybrids. In: Proceedings of 2ndBalkan Symposium on Field Crops. Novi Sad, Yugoslavia. pp. 333-336.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK