Impact of long term soil management practices on the fertility and weed flora of an almond orchard

Impact of long term soil management practices on the fertility and weed flora of an almond orchard

Soil management techniques can definitely influence soil quality, and particularly soil organic matter content, biological complexity, structure, and water holding capacity. Tillage may also have a negative effect by increasing erosion and organic matter oxidation processes, which have unavoidable repercussions on fertility. The objective of the current research was to test the effects of five different management techniques applied for 35 years on a rain-fed almond grove (Prunus amygdalus Batsch) in a hot-dry environment on some physicochemical, hydrological, and biological parameters. The following soil management techniques were compared: no-till (NT), with weed control by preemergence herbicides; NT, with chemical weed control by foliar herbicides; NT, with weed control by mowing; tillage, with sowing and field bean green manuring; and conventional tillage. The current survey supplied interesting results, considering the typical soil and climate conditions of the tested area (southern Italy), characterized by high summer temperatures, low rainfall, clay loam soil, and an arable layer of 0.40 m. The most influenced values are those concerning the organic matter due to the supply of biomass resulting from weed mowing or field bean green manuring. The NT system with a single mowing in the spring seems to induce a higher water holding capacity ( 15,000 hPa) as compared with the traditionally plowed soil. The biomass incorporation through field bean green manure resulted in a higher available water content (11.82%). All practices favoring an increase in organic matter induced a subsequent increase of microbial biomass content. The number of existing families and species of weed flora was largely influenced by different soil management techniques, as shown by the greater adaptation of grasses to the management practices involving weed control by foliar herbicide or mowing, and of several species associated with the technique involving the application of preemergence herbicides. In general, the almond orchard management involving minimum soil disturbance and the supply of biomass resulting from specially sown cover crops or weed development have shown substantial benefits to the physicochemical, hydrologic, and biologic soil properties.

___

  • Angers DA, Bissonnette N, Legere A, Samson N (1993). Microbial and biochemical changes induced by rotation and till in a soil under barley production. Can J Soil Sci 73: 39–50.
  • Armengot L, José-María L, Blanco-Moreno JM, Bassa M, Chamorro L, Sans FX (2013). Weed harrowing in organically grown cereal crops avoids yield losses without reducing weed diversity. Agron Sustain Dev 33: 405–411.
  • Balota EL, Auler PAM (2011). Soil microbial biomass under different management and tillage systems of permanent intercropped cover species in an orange orchard. R Bras Ci Solo 35: 1873– 1883.
  • Banu NA, Singh B, Copeland L (2004). Microbial biomass and microbial biodiversity in some soils from New South Wales, Australia. Soil Res 42: 777–782.
  • Crecchio C, Curci M, Pellegrino A, Ricciuti P, Tursi N, Ruggiero P (2007). Soil microbial dynamics and genetic diversity in soil under monoculture wheat grown in different long–term management systems. Soil Biol Biochem 39: 1391–1400.
  • Cucci G, Lacolla G, Caranfa L (2008). Improvement of soil properties by application of olive oil waste. Agron Sustain Dev 28: 521– 526.
  • Duchaufour P (1970). Precis de Pedologie. Paris, France: Masson et Cie (in French).
  • Entry JA, Reeves DW, Backman CB, Raper RL (1996). Influence of wheel traffic and tillage on microbial biomass, residue decomposition and extractable nutrients in a Coastal Plain Soil. Plant Soil 180: 129–137.
  • Galantini JA, Rosell RA (2006). Long-term fertilization effects on soil organic matter quality and dynamics under different production systems in semiarid Pampean soils. Soil Till Res 87: 72–79.
  • Gucci R, Caruso G, Bertolla C, Urbani S, Taticchi A, Esposto S, Servili M, Sifola M, Pellegrini S, Pagliai M et al. (2012). Changes of soil properties and tree performance induced by soil management in a high-density olive orchard. Eur J Agron 41: 18–27.
  • Hernandez AJ, Lacasta C, Pastor J (2005). Effects of different management practices on soil conservation and soil water in a rainfed olive orchard. Agric Water Manage 77: 232–248.
  • Jackson ML (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
  • Kladivko EJ (2001). Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil Till Res 61: 61–76.
  • Martens R (1995). Current methods for measuring microbial biomass C in soil: potential and limitations. Biol Fertil Soils 19: 87–99.
  • Olsen SR, Dean LA (1965). Phosphorus. In: Black, CA, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 1044–1045.
  • Patel K, Nirmal Kumar JI, Kumar RN, Kumar Bhoi R (2010). Seasonal and temporal variation in soil microbial biomass C, N and P in different types land uses of dry deciduous forest ecosystem of Udaipur, Rajasthan, western India. Appl Ecol Env Res 8: 377–390.
  • Pisante M, Stagnari F, Grant CA (2012). Agricultural innovations for sustainable crop production intensification. Italian Journal of Agronomy 7: 300–311.
  • Pratt PF, Holowaychuk N (1954). A comparison of NH4 OAc,Ba(OAc)2, and buffered BaCl2 method of determining cation exchange capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am Pro 18: 365–368.
  • Ramos ME, Robles AB, Sánchez-Navarro A, González-Rebollar JL (2011). Soil responses to different management practices in rainfed orchards in semiarid environments. Soil Till Res 112: 85–91.
  • Roberson EB, Sagir S, Firestone MK (1991). Cover crop management of polysaccharide-mediated aggregation in an orchard soil. Soil Sci 55: 734–739.
  • Sequi P, De Nobili M, Leita L, Cercignani G (1986). A new index of humification. Agrichimica 30: 175–179.
  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press.
  • Singh S, Ghoshal N, Singh KP (2007). Variations in soil microbial biomass and crop roots due to differing resource quality inputs in a tropical dryland agroecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 39: 76–86.
  • Smith J, Halvorson JJ, Bolton H (1995). Determination and use of a corrected control factor in the chloroform fumigation method of estimating soil microbial biomass. Biol Fertil Soils 19: 287– 291.
  • Soil Survey Staff (2010). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 11th ed. Washington, DC, USA: USDA NRCS.
  • Stockdale EA, Brookes PC (2006). Detection and quantification of the soil microbial biomass–impacts on the management of agricultural soils. J Agr Sci 144: 285–302.
  • Unger PW, Stewart BA, Parr JF, Singh RP (1991). Crop residue management and tillage methods for conserving soil and water in semi-arid regions. Soil Till Res 20: 219–240.
  • Vance ED (2000). Agricultural site productivity: principles derived from long-term experiments and their implications for intensively managed forests. Forest Ecol Manag 138: 369–396.
  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 703–707.
  • Walkley A, Black IJ (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63: 251–263.
  • Watanabe FS, Olsen SR (1965). Test of ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci 29: 677–678.
  • Yeomans JC, Bremner M (1988). A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plan 19: 1467–1476.