Genotypic differences for reproductive growth, yield, and yield components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Özet: Bu çalışma, sekiz yerfıstığı genotipinde generatif büyüme, tohumda yağ ve protein birikimi ile bazı verim unsurlarını belirlemek amacıyla 2001 ve 2002 yıllarında yürütülmüştür. Genotiplerin generatif gelişimlerinin başlamasından sonra periyodik sayımlarla çiçek, ginefor ve meyve sayıları belirlenmiştir. Meyve tutumundan sonra 15 gün aralıklarla her parselden altı bitki hasat edilerek, tohumlardaki yağ ve protein oranları belirlenmiştir. Yetişme dönemi sonunda genotiplerin ürettikleri toplam çiçek, ginefor ve meyve sayıları belirlenerek, çiçeklerin ginefora ve meyveye dönme oranları ile gineforların meyveye dönme oranları hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıca hasat sonunda genotiplerin bazı verim unsurları ve meyve verimi belirlenmiş, generatif büyüme parametreleri ile meyve verimi arasındaki korelasyonlar hesaplanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, generatif büyüme özelliklerinin genotiplere göre önemli derecede değişiklik gösterdiği saptanmıştır. Oluşan çiçek sayısının, çiçeklerin ginefor ve meyveye dönme oranlan ile negatif ilişkili olduğu, ancak çiçeklerin ginefora ve meyveye dönme oranlan ile meyve veriminin pozitif ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. En yüksek tohum verimi, toplam çiçek sayısı en az ancak çiçeklerin meyveye dönme oranı en yüksek olan Osmaniye 2005 çeşidinden elde edildiği saptanmıştır. Genotiplerde yağ birikimi genelde benzer eğilim göstermiş ve ilk olgunlaşma dönemine (R7) kadar hızlı bir artış görülürken, daha sonra fizyolojik olum dönemine (R8) doğru azalma göstermiştir. Protein birikimi ise genel olarak tüm genotiplerde fizyolojik olum dönemine kadar sürekli bir artış göstermiştir.

Yerfıstığında (Arachis hypogaea L.) generatif büyüme, verim ve verim unsurları yönünden genotipik farklılıklar

Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate reproductive growth, oil and protein accumulation in seeds, and some yield components of 8 groundnut genotypes in 2001 and 2002. The number of flowers, pegs, and pods per plant during the reproductive period were determined with periodic counts starting from flowering. The percentage of flowers turned to pegs and pods, and the percentage of pegs turned to pods were calculated at the end of the growing period. After pod setting, 6 plants per plot were harvested at 15-day intervals to determine oil and protein content of seeds. At final harvest pod yield and some yield components were determined, and correlations between reproductive growth parameters and pod yield were calculated. Genotypes had significantly different reproductive growth parameters. Total number of flowers per plant was negatively correlated with the percentage of flowers turned to pegs and pods, whereas the percentage of flowers turned to pegs and pods was positively correlated with pod yield. The highest pod yield was obtained from ev. Osmaniye 2005, which had the lowest number of flowers per plant and the highest percentage of flowers turned to pods. The results of the current study showed that percentage of flowers turned to pegs and the percentage of pegs turned to pods were the most promising generative plant characteristics that could contribute to seed yield increase in groundnut production in a typical eastern Mediterranean climate. Seed oil content of the groundnut genotypes increased rapidly until initiation of first maturity (R7) and then declined in the later growth stages, whereas protein content generally increased gradually until physiological maturity (R8) in all genotypes.

___

  • Abdel Rahman, A.H.Y. 1982. Changes in chemical composition of peanut during development and ripening. Riv. Ital. Delle Sostanze Grasse. 59: 285-286.
  • American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS). 1993. Official methods and recommended practices. The American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS), Champaign, IL.
  • Arıoğlu, H., M.E. Çalışkan and S. Çalışkan. 2000. Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesi koşullarına uygun yerfıstığı çeşitlerinin geliştirilmesi üzerine araştırmalar. MKU Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 5: 7-28.
  • Awal, M.A. and T. Ikeda. 2003. Controlling canopy formation, flowering, and yield in field-grown stands of peanut (Arachis . hypogaea L.) with ambient and regulated soil temperature. Field Crops Res. 81: 121-132.
  • Basha, S.M. 1991. Deposition pattern of methionine rich protein in peanuts. J. Agric. and Food Chem. 39: 88-91.
  • Baydar, H. and S. Erbaş. 2005. Influence of seed development and seed position on oil, fatty acids and total tocopherol contents in sunflower {Helianthus annuus L). Turk. J. Agric. For. 25: 179- 186.
  • Bell, M.J., R. Shorter and R. Mayer. 1991. Cultivar and environmental effect on growth and development of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). II. Reproductive development. Field Crops Res. 27: 35-49.
  • Bhardwaj, HI. and A.A. Hamama. 2003. Accumulation of glucosinolate, oil and erucic acid in developing Brassica seeds. Ind. Crops Prod. 17:47-51.
  • Bovi, M.C.A. 1983. Genotypic and environmental effects on fatty acid composition, iodine value and oil content of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Dissertation Abstracts International B. 44.406.
  • Caliskan, S., M.E. Caliskan, E. Erturk, M. Arslan, and H. Arioglu. 2008. Growth and development of Virginia type groundnut cultivars under Mediterranean conditions. Acta Agr. Scan. Section B: Plant and Soil Sci. 58: 105-113.
  • Chung, C.H., YJ. Yee, D.H. Kim, H.K. Kim and D.S. Chung. 1995. Changes of lipid, protein, RNA.and fatty acid composition in developing sesame {Sesamum indicum L.) seeds. Plant Sci. 109: 237-243.
  • Coolbear, P. 1994. Reproductive biology and development. In: The Groundnut Crop. A scientific basis for improvement (Ed. J. Smartt), Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp. 700-720.
  • Dwivedi, S.L., S.N. Nigam, R.C. Nageswara Rao, U. Singh and K.V.S. Rao. 1996. Effect of drought on oil, fatty acids and protein contents of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds. Field Crops Res. 48: 125-133.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 1974. ' Soil map of the world, Scale: 1: 5000.000, Volume 1 legend. World Soil Resources Report 59, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2007. Statistical Database of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). www.fao.org/waicent/portal/ statistics_en.asp
  • Gardner, F.P. and E.O. Auma. 1989. Canopy structure, light . interception, and yield and market quality of peanut genotypes as influenced by planting pattern and planting date. Field Crops Res. 20: 13-29.
  • Ishag, H.M. 2000. Phenotypic and yield response of irrigated groundnut cultivars in a hot environment. Exp. Agric. 36: 303-312.
  • Ishikawa, G.,. H. Hasegawa, Y. Takagi and T. Tanisaka. 2001. The accumulation pattern in developing seeds and its relation to fatty acid variation in soybean. Plant Breeding 120: 417-423.
  • Ketring, D.L. 1984. Temperature effects on vegetative and reproductive development of peanut. Crop Sci. 24: 877-882.
  • Lim, E.S. and 0. Hamdan. 1984. The reproductive characters of four varieties of groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L). Pertanica. 7: 25- 31.
  • Moctezuma, E. 2003. The peanut gynophore: A developmental and physiological perspective. Can. J. Bot. 81: 183-190.
  • Nagaraj, G., S. Chauhanjand V. Ravinada. 1989. Peanut composition and oil quality as influenced by genotype and harvest stages. J. Oil Tech. Ass. India. 21:60-63.
  • Prasad, P.V.V., P.Q. Craufurd and RJ. Summerfield. 1999. Sensitivity of peanut to timing of heat stress during reproductive development. Crop Sci. 39: 1352-1357.
  • Prasad, P.V.V., P.Q. Craufurd and RJ. Summerfield. 2000. Effect of high air and soil temperature on dry matter production, pod yield and yield components of groundnut. Plant and Soil. 222: 231- 239.
  • Prasad, P.V.V., P.Q. Craufurd, V.G. Kakani, T.R. Wheeler, and K.J. Boote. 2001. Influence of temperature during pre- and postanthesis stages of floral development on fruit-set and pollen germination in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Aust. J. Plant Phy. 28: 233-240.
  • Rao, V.R. and U.R. Murty. 1994. Botany-morphology and anatomy. In: The Groundnut Crop. A scientific basis for improvement (Ed. J. Smartt), Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp. 43-95.
  • Rather, E.I., R. Lobel, H. Feldhay and A. Hartzook. 1979. Some characteristics of symbiotic nitrogen fixation, yield, protein and oil accumulation in irrigated peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L). Plant and Soil 51: 373-386.
  • Sanders, T.H. 1980. Effects of .variety and maturity on lipid class composition of peanut oil. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 57: 8-11. Savage, G.P. and J.I. Keenan. 1994. The composition and nutritive value of groundnut kernels. In: The Groundnut Crop. A scientific basis for improvement (Ed. J. Smartt), Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp. 173-213.
  • Seiler, GJ. 1983. Effect of genotype, flowering date, and environment on oil content and oil quality of wild sunflower seed. Crop Sci. 23: 1063-1068.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Biological Control of Bacterial Spot Disease of Pepper with Bacillus Strains

Mustafa MİRİK, Yeşim AYSAN, Özden ÇINAR

Genotypic differences for reproductive growth, yield, and yield components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Mehmet ARSLAN, Mehmet Emin ÇALIŞKAN, Sevgi ÇALIŞKAN

Effects of Loaf Weight and Storage Time on the Qualitative Properties of White and Traditional Vakfıkebir Breads

H. Gürbüz KOTANCILAR, K. Emre GERÇEKASLAN, M. Murat KARAOĞLU

Feeding and Foraging Behaviour in Two Coccinellid Predators: Scymnus levaillanti Muls. and Cycloneda sanguinea L.

Ali Arda IŞIKBER

Effects of loaf weight and storage time on the qualitative properties of white and traditional Vakfikebir breads

H. Gürbüz KOTANCILAR, M. Murat KARAOĞLU, K. Emre GERÇEKASLAN

Rapid Characterization of Garlic Clones with Locus-Specific DNA Markers

Meryem İPEK, Ahmet İPEK, Philipp W. SIMON

Biological, serological, and molecular characterization of citrus tristeza virus ısolates from different citrus cultivation regions of Turkey

Bayram ÇEVİK, Savaş KORKMAZ, Serkan ÖNDER, N. Kemal KOÇ

Feeding and foraging behaviour in two coccinellid predators: Scymnus Ievaillanti muls. and Cycloneda sanguinea L.

Ali Arda IŞIKBER

Pilot Study for an Assessment of Vegetation Structure for Steppe Rangelands of Central Anatolia

Hüseyin Kansur FIRINCIOĞLU, Bilal ŞAHİN, Steven SEEFELDT, Fehmi MERT, Basri Hakan HAKYEMEZ, Mecit VURAL

Yerfıstığında (Arachis hypogaea L.) Generatif Büyüme, Verim ve Verim Unsurları Yönünden Genotipik Farklılıklar

Sevgi ÇALIŞKAN, Mehmet Emin ÇALIŞKAN, Mehmet ARSLAN