Efficient protoplast isolation from ovule-derived embryogenic callus in Citrus volkameriana

The present study reports on the isolation of viable protoplast from ovule-derived embryogenic calli of Volkameriana (Citrus volkameriana L.), which is a rootstock in high demand for lemon production.Ovules of C. volkameriana isolated at 3 different immature fruit stages, comprising4, 8, and 12 weeks after anthesis (WAA), were cultured on5 different media in order to produce embryogenic callus lines as a source material for protoplast isolation. EME medium (MT basal medium + 0.5 gL(-1) malt extract), with the addition of phytohormones [kinetin (KIN), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)] at different concentrations, were tested for callogenesis. According to 2-way ANOVA, significant effects were determined as a result of the immature fruit stage and type of culture media (P

Keywords:

Citrus, rootstock, embryogenic callus protoplast isolation,

PDF

___

Abbate L, 2019, EUR J PLANT PATHOL, V153, P837, DOI 10.1007/s10658-018-1599-0
Al-Taha H. A., 2012, Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, V99, P185
Cai XD, 2010, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V32, P215, DOI 10.1007/s11738-009-0396-y
Cai XD, 2009, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V122, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.05.017
Carimi F, 1998, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V54, P183, DOI 10.1023/A:1006113731428
Chamandoosti F, 2017, INT J ENV AGR RES, V3, P36
Chen YM, 2019, BOT STUD, V60, DOI 10.1186/s40529-019-0257-y
Chetto O, 2016, INT J INNOVATION APP, V17, P236
Chumakov MI, 2012, APPL BIOCHEM MICRO+, V48, P657, DOI 10.1134/S0003683812080017
Cimen B, 2016, ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC STRESS IN PLANTS - RECENT ADVANCES AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES, P527, DOI 10.5772/62047
Da Gloria FJM, 2000, PESQUI AGROPECU BRAS, V35, P727, DOI 10.1590/S0100-204X2000000400008
Dambier D, 2011, PLANT CELL REP, V30, P883, DOI 10.1007/s00299-010-1000-z
Davey MR, 2005, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V23, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.09.008
DENG XX, 1992, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V49, P55, DOI 10.1016/0304-4238(92)90142-Y
Fowler J, 1998, PRACTICAL STAT FIELD, P272
GMITTER FG, 1986, PLANT CELL TISS ORG, V6, P139
Grosser J. W., 1990, Plant Breeding Reviews, V8, P339
Grosser JW, 1996, PLANT CELL REP, V15, P672, DOI 10.1007/BF00231922
GROSSER JW, 1988, PLANT CELL REP, V7, P5, DOI 10.1007/BF00272965
Grosser JW, 2000, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V36, P434
GROSSER JW, 1994, HORTSCIENCE, V29, P812, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.29.7.812
Guo WW, 2013, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V163, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.018
Guo WW, 2001, EUPHYTICA, V118, P175, DOI 10.1023/A:1004147208099
Hasan M. N., 2019, American Journal of Plant Sciences, V10, P285, DOI 10.4236/ajps.2019.102022
Koc N. K., 1999, Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry, V23, P157
Machado MP, 2015, ACTA HORTIC, V1065, P657
MURASHIGE T, 1962, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V15, P473, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
MURASHIGE T., 1969, Proceedings 1st int. Citrus Symp., Univ. California, Riverside 1968., V3, P1155
OHGAWARA T, 1985, THEOR APPL GENET, V71, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00278245
Raikar SV, 2008, PLANT BIOTECHNOL REP, V2, P171, DOI 10.1007/s11816-008-0058-3
Ramdan R., 2014, Journal of Applied Biosciences, V73, P5959
Ricci Adriana Patrícia, 2002, Sci. agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.), V59, P41, DOI 10.1590/S0103-90162002000100005
Rizkalla A. A., 2007, J APPL SCI RES, V3, P1186
Roose M.L., 2014, CITRUS PRODUCTION MA, P95
Saunt J, 2000, CITRUS VARIETIES WOR .
Savita, 2011, Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, V17, P161, DOI 10.1007/s12298-011-0055-9
Schinor EH, 2011, REV BRAS FRUTIC, V33, P526, DOI 10.1590/S0100-29452011005000050
SINGH S, 1994, HORTSCIENCE, V29, P214, DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.29.3.214
Sinha A, 2003, AUST J BOT, V51, P103, DOI 10.1071/BT01104
STARRANTINO A, 1980, HORTSCIENCE, V15, P296
Tavano ECR, 2009, BIOL PLANTARUM, V53, P395, DOI 10.1007/s10535-009-0075-2
Zhou QY, 2019, TURK J AGRIC FOR, V43, P275, DOI 10.3906/tar-1805-62