Comparison of computational fluid dynamics-based simulations and visualized seed trajectories in different seed tubes

Comparison of computational fluid dynamics-based simulations and visualized seed trajectories in different seed tubes

The objective of this study was to compare computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based simulations and visualized seed trajectories in different seed tubes that can provide seed incorporation into the soil with enhanced seed spacing. The other objective was to determine the relation between the seed trajectories and peripheral speed of the vacuum disk. In order to meet the first objective, 2 different seeds (corn and cotton) and artificial spherical material (empty set10 mm) were tested under laboratory conditions. The seeds and artificial material were released by free fall into the semitransparent seed tubes (seed tubes A and B) from different release points, and their trajectories were recorded using a video camera. For the second objective, corn seeds were used and released from a vacuum-type metering unit equipped with a semitransparent seed tube (seed tube A) at 3 different peripheral speeds of the vacuum disk, as a function of 3 forward speeds of the seeder. For both objectives, the seed tubes were modeled and release of the seeds into the seed tubes was simulated and analyzed using ANSYS Fluent for CFD. The results obtained from the captured video and simulations were compared. As a result of the comparisons, it was found that the seed release point was an effective parameter on both the seed trajectory and seed spacing, since seed bouncing and skating in the seed tube, based on the release point, may occur. The results also showed that the lab tests and simulations were found to be very similar in terms of the seed trajectories and seed spacings. It is believed that this study, using CID, will be an example and enable the development and design of new seed tubes in order to obtain better seed distribution uniformity.

___

  • ANSYS (2016). Fluent Theory Guide, Release 16.2. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS, Inc.
  • Bayati M, Johnston C (2017). CFD-DEM Investigation of seed clustering in an air seeder with the immersed boundary method. Semantic Scholar Corpus ID: 199385580.
  • Gaspardo (2007a). Operational manual SP 2007-12. Morsano al Tagliamento, Italy: Gaspardo Seminatrici SpA.
  • Gaspardo (2007b). Operational manual MT 2007-12. Morsano al Tagliamento, Italy: Gaspardo Seminatrici SpA.
  • Han D, Zhang D, Jing H, Yang L, Cui T et al. (2018). DEM-CFD coupling simulation and optimization of an inside-filling airblowing maize precision seed-metering device. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 150: 426-438. doi: 10.1016/j. compag.2018.05.006
  • Kocher MF, Coleman JM, Smith JA, Kachman SD (2011). Corn seed spacing uniformity as affected by seed tube condition. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 27 (2): 177-183. doi:10.13031/2013.36484
  • Lei X, Liao Y, Liao Q (2016). Simulation of seed motion in seed feeding device with DEM-CFD coupling approach for rapeseed and wheat. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 131: 29- 39. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.006
  • Smith JA, Kocher MF (2008). Evaluate planter meter and seed tube systems for seed spacing performance of confection sunflower seed to improve plant spacing in the field. In: 2008 National Sunflower Workshop–National Sunflower Association; Mandan, ND, USA.
  • Taylor R, Koller A, Yazgi A, Ciampiti I, Schlegel A et al. (2015). Evaluation of Corn Seed Orientation. In: 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting; New Orleans, LA, USA.
  • White FM (2001). Fluid Mechanics. 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill.
  • Yazgı A (2013). Effect of the seed plate position on in-row seed distribution uniformity for pneumatic precision seeders. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 50 (3): 251-260.
  • Yazgi A (2016). Effect of seed tubes on corn planter performance. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 32 (6): 783-790.
  • Yazgi A, Taylor RK, Navid H, Weckler P (2017). Performance modeling and seed releasing characteristics of a corn planter metering unit using response surface methodology. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 33 (2): 181-189.