Changes in some vegetation properties of the rangelands of the Palandoken Mountains, Erzurum, over two decades

Changes in some vegetation properties of the rangelands of the Palandoken Mountains, Erzurum, over two decades

Plant community responses to environmental changes depend upon management strategies, climate, topography, and time. The objective herein was to determine canopy coverage and botanical changes in Turkish highland rangelands with different topographical characteristics between 1993 and 2013. Trends in the plant composition changed depending on the slope aspect (compass direction) and topography. The contribution of the grasses to the canopy decreased, while that of legumes and the other families increased. The results indicated that rangeland degradation occurred under uncontrolled grazing conditions. Suitable range management changes are recommended for the conservation of natural resources in the highland rangelands of Turkey.

___

  • Amezaga I, Mendarte S, Albizu I, Besga G, Garbisu C et al. (2004). Grazing intensity, aspect, and slope effects on limestone grassland structure. Journal of Range Management 57: 606- 612.
  • Amiri F, Ariapour A, Fadai S (2008). Effects of livestock grazing on vegetation composition and soil moisture properties in grazed and non-grazed range site. Journal of Biological Science 8: 1289-1297.
  • Arnalds O, Barkarson BH (2003). Soil erosion and land use policy in Iceland in relation to sheep grazing and government subsidies. Environmental Science and Policy 6: 105-113.
  • Ateş E (2017). Slope aspect has effects on vegetation and forage traits of anthropogenic pasture under two grazing treatments. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad del Zulia 34: 236-252.
  • Aygün C, Koç A, Turan M (2018). Patlangaç (Colutea cilicica Boiss. & Bal.) çalısının yem değeri ve bozkır meraları açısından önemi. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 11: 38-41 (in Turkish).
  • Beguin J, Pothier D, Cote SD (2011). Deer browsing and soil disturbance induce cascading effects on plant communities: a multi-level path analysis. Ecological Applications 21: 439-451.
  • Canfield R (1941). Application of line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39: 388-394.
  • Faria N, Peco B, Carmona CP (2018). Effects of haying on vegetation communities, taxonomic diversity and sward properties in Mediterranean dry grasslands: a preliminary assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 251: 48-58.
  • Gamoun M (2014). Grazing intensity effects on the vegetation in desert rangelands of Southern Tunisia. Journal of Arid Land 6: 324-333.
  • Gibbens RP, McNeely RP, Havstad KM, Beck RF, Nolen B (2005). Vegetation changes in the Jornada Basin from 1858 to 1998. Journal of Arid Environment 61: 651-668.
  • Graff P, Aguiar MR, Chaneton EJ (2007). Shifts in positive and negative plant interactions along a grazing intensity gradient. Ecology 88: 188-199.
  • Gong X, Brueck H, Giese KM, Zhang L, Sattelmacher B et al. (2008). Slope aspect has effects on productivity and species composition of hilly grassland in the Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Environment 72: 483-493.
  • Holechek JL, Pieper RD, Herbel CH (2011). Range Management: Principles and Practices. Upper Saddle River, NY, USA: Prentice Hall.
  • Koç A, Gökkuş A (1993). Mera idaresinde bitki-hayvan ilişkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 24: 185-201 (in Turkish).
  • Koç A, Gökkuş A (1994). Güzelyurt köyü mera vejetasyonunun botanik kompozisyonu ve toprağı kaplama alanı ile bırakılacak en uygun anız yüksekliğinin belirlenmesi. Türk Tarım ve Ormancılık Dergisi 18: 495-500 (in Turkish).
  • Koç A (1995). The effect of topography and soil climate on some properties of rangeland vegetation. PhD, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Koç A (2001). Autumn and spring drought periods effect vegetation on high elevation rangelands of Turkey. Journal of Range Management 54: 622-627.
  • Koç A, Gökkuş A (1997). The effect of topographical factors on forage and grazing periods and carrying capacity in Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. In: Proceeding of the XVIII International Grassland Congress; Winnipeg, MB, Canada. pp. 2-21.
  • Koç A, Güllap MK, Erkovan Hİ (2013). The soil seed bank pattern in highland rangelands of eastern Turkey under different grazing systems. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 18: 109-117.
  • Koç A, Kaya A, Güllap MK, Erkovan Hİ, Macit M et al. (2014). The effect of supplemental concentrate feed on live weight gain of yearling heifers over grazing season in sub-irrigated rangelands of East Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 38: 278-284.
  • Koç A, Schacht WH, Erkovan Hİ (2015). The history and current direction of rangeland management in Turkey. Rangelands 37: 39-46.
  • Ledgard SF, Sheath GW, Gillingham AG (1982). Influence of some soil and pasture components on the growth of hill country pastures: 1. winter and spring production. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 10: 239-244.
  • Leps J, Smilauer P (2003). Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mirzabaev A, Ahmed M, Werner J, Pender J, Louhaichi M (2016). Rangelands of Central Asia: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Arid Land 8: 93-108.
  • Öztaş T, Koç A, Çomaklı B (2003). Changes in vegetation and soil properties along a slope on overgrazed and eroded rangelands. Journal of Arid Environment 55: 93-100.
  • Partridge TR, Allen RB, Johnson PN, Lee WG (1991). Vegetation/ environment relationships in lowland and montane vegetation of the Kawarau Gorge, Central Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 29: 295-310.
  • Rashvand S, Yeganeh H, Amiri F (2017). Determining the preference value of perennial grasses using preference index and sheep grazing time methods in grasslands of the Middle Alborz, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science 7: 1-10.
  • Rosenberg NJ, Blad BL, Verma SB (1983). Microclimate the Biological Environment. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  • SAS Institute (1998). Statistical Analysis System Institute: StatView Reference Manual. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
  • Shewmaker GE, Mayland HF, Rosenau RC, Asay KH (1989). Silicon in C-3 grasses: effects on forage quality and sheep preference. Journal of Range Management 42: 122-127.
  • Soil Survey Laboratory Staff (1992). Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No: 42. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS).
  • Sürmen M, Erkovan Hİ, Koç A (2012). The spatial distribution of rangeland vegetation depending on distance to settlement in highland rangelands of Turkey. In: Proceedings of 9th European Dry Grassland Meeting (EDGM); Prespa, Greece. pp. 71-77.
  • Suckling FET (1975). Pasture management trials on unploughable hill country at Te Ava. III. Results for 1959-1969. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3: 351-436.
  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002). Canoco Reference Manual and Canodraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen University and Research Centre.
  • Thurow TL (1991). Hydrology and erosion. In: Heitschmidt RK, Stuth JW (editors). Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective. Portland, OR, USA: Timber Press Inc., pp. 141-160.
  • Wu GL, Du GZ, Lui ZH, Thirgood S (2008). Effect of fencing and grazing on a Kobresia-dominated meadows in the QuinghaiTibetan Plateau. Plant and Soil 319: 115-126.
  • Zhang C, Dong Q, Chu H, Shi J, Li S et al. (2018). Grassland community composition response to grazing intensity under different grazing regimes. Rangeland Ecology and Management 71: 196-204.