Effect of Tillage Implements and Operating Speeds on Soil Physical Properties and Wheat Emergence

Tillage is an operation to improve soil conditions for optimal crop emergence and yield. Different tillage implements and operational variables may affect soil physical properties. An experiment with different primary tillage implements and operating speeds and their influence on physical properties of loamy soil and wheat seedling emergence was conducted in northeast Anatolia in 2003. The compared tillage implements were: 1. Moldboard plow (MP); 2. Slatted moldboard plow (SMP); 3. Disk plow (DP); 4. Chisel plow (CP); and primary tillage + rotary harrow systems (mounted at the back of this primary tillage): 5. MPH, 6. SMPH, 7. DPH, and 8. CPH. In the experiment, the operating speeds used for each tillage implement were 1.25, 1.5, and 1.75 m s-1. Effects of tillage implements on mean weight diameter (MWD), moisture content, penetration resistance, bulk density, and emergence rate index (ERI) were determined. Tillage implements had a significant effect on soil physical properties and ERI. The best ERI and optimum soil physical properties were found with the operating speed of 1.5 m s-1.

Effect of Tillage Implements and Operating Speeds on Soil Physical Properties and Wheat Emergence

Tillage is an operation to improve soil conditions for optimal crop emergence and yield. Different tillage implements and operational variables may affect soil physical properties. An experiment with different primary tillage implements and operating speeds and their influence on physical properties of loamy soil and wheat seedling emergence was conducted in northeast Anatolia in 2003. The compared tillage implements were: 1. Moldboard plow (MP); 2. Slatted moldboard plow (SMP); 3. Disk plow (DP); 4. Chisel plow (CP); and primary tillage + rotary harrow systems (mounted at the back of this primary tillage): 5. MPH, 6. SMPH, 7. DPH, and 8. CPH. In the experiment, the operating speeds used for each tillage implement were 1.25, 1.5, and 1.75 m s-1. Effects of tillage implements on mean weight diameter (MWD), moisture content, penetration resistance, bulk density, and emergence rate index (ERI) were determined. Tillage implements had a significant effect on soil physical properties and ERI. The best ERI and optimum soil physical properties were found with the operating speed of 1.5 m s-1.

___

  • Abu-Hamdeh, N. and R.C. Reeder. 2003. A nonlinear 3D finite element analysis of the soil forces acting on a disk plow. Soil and Tillage Res. 74: 115-124.
  • ASAE Standards. 1998. Agricultural Engineers Yearbook of Standards, 45thEd. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI-49085, USA.
  • Aykas, E., E. Cakır and E. Gulsoylu. 2004. The effect of tillage parameters on the performance of the heavy duty offset disk harrow. Asian J. Plant Sci. 3: 425-428.
  • Bauder, J.W., G.W. Randall and J.B. Swann. 1981. Effect of four continuous tillage systems on mechanical impedance of a clay loam soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 802-806.
  • Bengough, A.G. and C.E. Mullins. 1990. Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J. Soil Sci. 41: 341-358.
  • Bernacki, H., J. Haman and Cz. Kanafojski. 1972. Agricultural Machines, Theory and Construction I. Warsaw.
  • Boydaş, M.G. 2007. Effect of different soil tillage implements and working speeds on soil surface roughness. Akdeniz Univ. Agr. Fac. J. 20: 111-117.
  • Brady, N.C. 1984. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 9th Ed. Macmillan Publishing, New York.
  • Buschiazzo, D.E., J.L. Panigatti and P.W. Unger. 1998. Tillage effects on soil properties and crop production in the subhumid and semiarid Argentinean Pampas. Soil and Tillage Res. 49: 105-116.
  • Braunack, M.V. 1995. Effect of aggregate size and soil water content on emergence of soybean (Glycine max, L. Merr.) and maize (Zea mays, L.). Soil and Tillage Res. 33: 149-161.
  • Carter, L.M., J.R. Stockton, J.R. Tavernetti and R.F. Colwick. 1965. Precision tillage for cotton production. Transactions of the ASAE. 8: 177-179.
  • Carter, M.R. 1996. Characterization of soil physical properties and organic matter under long-term primary tillage in a humid climate. Soil and Tillage Res. 38: 251-263.
  • Çarman, K. 1997. Effect of different tillage systems on soil properties and wheat yield in middle Anatolia. Soil and Tillage Res. 40: 201- 207.
  • Demir, F., M. Konak, H. Doğan and H. Hacıseferoğulları. 1996. Effect on working quality, drawbar power requirement and physical properties of soil of slatted moldboard and traditional moldboard plows. Selçuk Univ. Agr. Fac. J. 9: 161-170.
  • Durr, C. and A. Jean-Noel. 2000. Emergence of seedling of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as affected by size, roughness and position of aggregates in the seedbed. Plant Soil. 219: 211-220.
  • Eghball, B., L.N. Mielke, G.A. Calvo and W.W. Wilhelm. 1993. Fractal description of soil fragmentation for various tillage methods and crop sequences. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57: 1337-1341.
  • Erbach, D.C. 1987. Measurement of soil bulk density and moisture. Transactions of the ASAE.30: 922-929.
  • Erbach, D.C., J.G. Benjamin, R.M. Cruse, M.A. Elamin, S. Mukhtar and C.H. Choi. 1992. Soil and corn response to tillage with paraplow. Transactions of the ASAE. 35: 1347-1354.
  • Gan, Y., E.H. Stobe and J. Moes. 1992. Relative data of wheat seedling emergence and its impact on grain yields. Crop Sci. 32: 1275- 1281.
  • Glinski, J. and J. Lipiec. 1990. Soil Physical Conditions and Plant Roots. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • Grant, C.A. and G.P. Lafond. 1993. The effects of tillage systems and crop sequences on soil bulk density and penetration resistance on a clay soil in southern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Soil Sci. 73: 223- 232.
  • Hakansson, I., M. Stenberg and T. Rydberg. 1998. Long-term experiments with different depths of mouldboard ploughing in Sweden. Soil and Tillage Res. 46: 209-223.
  • Hajabbasi, M.A. and A. Hemmat. 2000. Tillage impacts on aggregate stability and crop productivity in a clay-loam soil in central Iran. Soil and Tillage Res. 56: 205-212.
  • Hillel, D. 1982. Introduction to Soil Physics. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando, FL. USA.
  • Hill, P.R. and D.E. Stott. 2000. Corn residue retention by a combination chisel plow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64: 293-299.
  • Hughes, K.A., and C.J. Baker. 1977. The effects of tillage and zero- tillage systems on soil aggregates in a silt loam. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 22: 291-301.
  • Husnjak, S., D. Filipovic and S. Kosutic. 2002. Influence of different tillage systems on soil physical properties and crop yield. Rostlinna Vyroba. 48: 249-254.
  • Kar, S., S.B. Varade, T.K. Subramanyam and B.P. Ghildyal. 1976. Soil physical conditions affecting rice root growth: bulk density and submerged soil temperature regime effects. Agron. J. 68: 23-26.
  • Kasap, A. 2001. Effects of the conventional and direct drilling on soil properties, operational time, fuel consumption and yield. Tarımsal Mekanizasyon 20. Ulusal Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 91-95.
  • Lal, R. 1997. Long-term tillage and maize monoculture effects on a tropical alfisol in western Nigeria. I. Crop yield and soil physical properties. Soil and Tillage Res. 42: 145-160.
  • Lyles, L., and N.P. Woodruff. 1962. How moisture and tillage affect cloddiness for wind erosion control. Agric. Eng., 42: 150-153.
  • McKyes, E. 1985. Soil Cutting and Tillage. Development in Agricultural Engineering 7, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
  • Mielke, L.N., W.W. Wilhelm, K.A. Richards and C.R. Fenster. 1984. Soil physical characteristics of reduced tillage in a wheat-fallow system. Transactions of the ASAE. 27: 1724-1728.
  • Mohanty, M. and D.K. Painuli. 2004. Modeling rice seedling emergence and growth under tillage and residue management in rice-wheat system on a Vertisol in Central India. Soil and Tillage Res. 76: 167-174.
  • Nasr, H.M. and F. Selles. 1995. Seedling emergence as influenced by aggregate size, bulk density, and penetration resistance of the seedbed. Soil and Tillage Res. 34: 61-76.
  • Özpınar, S. and A. Çay. 2005. Effects of minimum and conventional tillage systems on soil properties and yield of winter (triticum aestivum L.) in clay-loam in Çanakkale region. Turk J. Agric. For. 29: 9-18.
  • Raney, W.A. and A.W. Zingg. 1957. Principles of Tillage. The Yearbook of Agriculture. USDA, Washington, DC.
  • Singh, K.K., T.S. Colvin, D.C. Erbach and A.Q. Mughal. 1992. Tilth index: An approach to quantifying soil tilth, Transactions of the ASAE. 35: 1777-1785.
  • Taniguchi, T., J.T. Makanga, K. Ohtoma and T. Kishimoto. 1999. Draft and soil manipulation by a moldboard plow under different forward speed and body attachments. Transactions of the ASAE. 42: 1517-1521.
  • Tessier, S., M. Peru, F.B. Dyck, R.P. Zentner and C.A. Campbell. 1990. Conservation tillage for spring wheat production in semi-arid Saskatchewan. Soil and Tillage Res. 18: 73-89.
  • Van Bavel, C.M. 1949. Mean weight diameter of soil aggregates as a statistical index of aggregation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 14: 20-23.
  • Vepraskas, M. J. 1994: Plant response mechanisms to soil compaction. In: R.E. Wilkinson (Ed.), Plant-Environment Interactions. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.