Demographic factors affecting Regular Bottled Water Consumption: Adana Province/Turkey

Türkiye'de ambalajlı su sektörü 1990'lardan bu yana hızlı bir gelişme göstermiştir. Bu çalışma Adana'da ambalajlı su tüketimini etkileyen demografik ve ekonomik faktörleri ortaya koymak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre üniversite ve daha yüksek seviyede eğitime sahip bireyler, kadınlar ve aylık geliri 2500 TL üzerinde olan bireylerin ambalajlı su tüketme olasılıkları daha yüksektir. Ancak yaş, medeni durum ve hane halkı büyüklüğü ile ambalajlı su tüketimi arasında bir ilişki yoktur. Ambalajlı su şirketleri, pazarlama stratejilerinde cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi ve gelir düzeyini dikkate almalıdır.

Demographic factors affecting Regular Bottled Water Consumption: Adana Province/Turkey

In Turkey, bottled water market has shown a rapid development since the 1990s. This study is aim to reveal demographic and economic factors affecting on bottled water consumption in Adana. A logistic regression model was used to achieve research goal. The results of the study showed that women consumers, with undergraduate and higher education consumers and individuals with monthly income of 2500 TL are more likely to consume bottled water. However, there is no relationship between age, marital status and household size variables and bottled water consumption. Bottled water companies should take into account to gender, education level and income level in their marketing strategies.

___

  • Alexandria, V. A. (2018). Consumers Reaffirm Bottled Water is America’s Favorite Drink. Erişim: https://www.bottledwater.org/consumers–reaffirm-bottled-water-america %E2%80%99s-favorite-drink (16.02.2020)
  • Aliaga, M. Gunderson, B. (2002) Interactive Statistics. [Thousand Oaks]: Sage Publications
  • Bal Ekmekçi Z. (2014). Tokat İl Merkezinde Tüketicilerin Ambalajlı Su Tüketimleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tokat, 58 p.
  • Doria MF. 2006. Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers’ preferences. J. Water Health 4 (2) 271–276.
  • Doria, M. F., Pidgeon, N., Hunter, P. R. (2009). Perceptions of Drinking Water Quality and Risk and Its Effect on Behavior: A cross-national study. Sci Total Environ 407, 5455–5464 (2009).
  • Dupont DP, Adamowicz W, Krupnick A (2010) Differences in water consumption choices in Canada: the role of socio-demographics, experiences and perceptions of risks. J Water Health 8:671–686
  • Etale, A., Jobin, M., Siegrist, M. (2018). Tap Versus Bottled Water Consumption: The Influence of Social Norms, Affect and Image on Consumer Choice. Appetite, 121, 138– 146.
  • Ferrier C. 2001. Bottled Water: Understanding a Social Phenomenon. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-30.2.118
  • Fife-Shaw, C., Kelay, T., Vloerbergh, I., Chenoweth, J., Morrison, G., and Lundéhn, C. (2007). Consumer Preferences: An Overview. Techneau. http://www.techneau.org/fileadmin/files/Publications/Publications/Deliverables/D6.2.1.pdf, (Access Date: Mar 31 2011).
  • Foote ML. 2011. Examining Reasons for Bottled Water Consumption: A Case Study in Pensacola. MSc Thesis. Florida University of South Florida.
  • Ge, Withmore, (2007). Binary Response and Logistic Regression in Recent Accounting Research Publications: A Methodological Note. Lecture note. McGill University, Desautels Faculty of Management
  • Geerts, R., Vandermoere, F., Van Winckel, T., Halet, D., Joos, P., Van Den Steen, K., VanMeenen, E., Blust, R., Borregán-Ochando, E., Vlaeminck, S.E., (2020). Bottle or tap? To-ward an integrated approach to water type consumption. Water Res. 173, 115578.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Hobson, W., Knochel, M., Byington, C., Young, P., Hoff, C., and Buchi, K. (2007). Bottled, Filtered, and Tap Water Use in Latino and Non-Latino Children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 161(5): 457-461.
  • Janmaat J. (2007). Divergent drinking water perceptions in the annapolis valley. Canadian Water Resources Association. Vol. 32(2):99-110.
  • Jones AQ, Dewey CE, Dore K, Majowicz SE, MCeven SA, Waltner-Toews D. (2006). Drinking water consumption patterns of residents in a Canadian community. Journal of Water and Health. IWA Publishing.
  • Jonstone, N., Serret, Y. (2012). Determinants of bottled and purified water consumption: results based on an OECD survey. Water Policy (2012) 14 (4): 668–679. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2011.048
  • Kudaka, 2012. Ambalajlı İçme Suyu Sektörü. http://www.kudaka.org.tr/ekler/5dc8b-ambalajli_icme_suyu_projesi.pdf (Acces Date: 16.05.2020).
  • Miller M. (2006). Bottled water: Why Is It So Big? Causes for the Rapid Growth of Bottled Water Industries. University Honors Program. URL: https://digital.library.txstate.edu/bitstream/handle /10877/3296/fulltext.pdf (Accesed 21 February 2020).
  • Ross, V. L., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: Testing a social-psychological model. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 61–68.
  • Saylor, A.; Prokopy, L.S.; Amberg, S. (2011). What’s wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and BottledWater at Purdue University. Environ. Manag. 2011, 48, 588–601.
  • Statista Research Department (2020). Global Water Consumption 2007-2017. Erişim: https://www.statista.com/statistics/387255/global-bottled-water-consumption/ (16.02.2020)
  • SUDER (2019). Genel Yapı ve Rakamsal Büyüklük. Erişim: http://suder.org.tr/sektor-hakkinda/genel-yapi-ve-rakamsal-buyukluk/ (17.02.2020)
  • Talatala S. (2008). The effect of Tap Water Perception on the Consumption of Bottled Water. Published in: Public Perception of Tap Water. URL: https://nature.berkeley.edu/classes/es196/projects/2008final/Talatala_2008.pdf (Accesed 11 May 2017).
  • Tümer İkikat E, Birinci A, Yildirim Ç. (2011). Ambalajlı Su Tüketimini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi: Ankara İli Keçiören İlçesi Örneği. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 11-19.
  • Wells, W. D., Prensky, D. (1996). Consumer Behavior. Kanada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  • Yoo, S., Yang, C. (2000) Dealing with bottled water expenditures data with zero observations: A semiparametric specification. Economics Letters, Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 151-157.
Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-3647
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Mevlüt AKÇURA
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Bingöl Yöresinde Morkaraman Koyunlarının Moleküler Filogenetik Analizi

İsmail AKYOL, Oğuz AĞYAR, M. Sait EKİNCİ, Emin ÖZKÖSE

Aras vadisi Cleonini ve Tanymecini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) türleri üzerinde biyolojik ve biyocoğrafik notlar

Neslihan GÜLTEKİN, Celalettin GÖZÜAÇIK, Ersin AYKUT, Levent GÜLTEKİN, Boris A. KOROTYAEV

Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis Of Morkaraman Sheeps In Bingol Region

Oğuz AĞYAR, Emin ÖZKÖSE, Mehmet Sait EKİNCİ, İsmail AKYOL

Tarımsal Verimliliğin Arttırılmasında Kamusal Ar-Ge Desteklerinin Etkisi: Ab Üyesi Geçiş Ekonomileri Örneği

Mehmet AKYOL, Semanur SOYYİĞİT

The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops

Unal KILIC, Abdulkadir ERISEK, Ali Vaiz GARIPOĞLU, İlknur AYAN, Hasan ONDER

Tarımsal bir Atık Tarafından Malaşit Yeşilinin Adsorpsiyonu: Pirinç Kavuzu

Nagihan METİN, Serpil SAVCI

Hacıhaliloğlu’ Kayısı Çeşidinde Meyve Gelişimi Sırasındaki Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Değişimlerin Belirlenmesi

Mehmet ÖZELÇİ, Rafet ASLANTAŞ, Duygu ÖZELÇİ, Erdoğan ÇÖÇEN

Farklı Sıcaklıkların Mürdümüğün (Lathyrus Sativus L.) Çimlenme ve Erken Fide Gelişimine Etkisi

Hazım Serkan TENİKECİER, Adnan ORAK, Mithat Gür ÇUBUK, Sude DEVECİ

Bazı Brassica Grubu Yem Bitkilerinin Yem Değeri ve Sindirilebilirlikleri Üzerine Farklı Kaba Yem Tipinin Etkileri

Unal KILIC, Abdulkadir ERISEK, Ali Vaiz GARIPOĞLU, Hasan ONDER, İlknur AYAN

Arazi Toplulaştırma Projelerinin Arazi Parçalanma Değişimine Etkisi: Türkiye ve Polonya Örneği

Ela ERTUNÇ, Jaroslaw JANUS