Environmental concerns together with social and ethical issues raise consumers’ interest in sustainable production and consumption practices. With rising trends of fair trade and high popularity of organic and local production in recent years, the demand for geographical indication registration has also increased by agricultural producers as a way of transmitting further information to raise reputation of their products. This research aims to assess the impact of geographical indications on export performance of Turkish agricultural products and foodstuffs. Findings reveal that geographical indications increase export revenues. Results communicate an important message to policy makers to promote the protection of geographical indications.
___
Agostino M, Trivieri F. 2014. Geographical Indication and Wine Exports. An Empirical Investigation Considering the Major European Producers. Food Policy, 46: 22 -36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.002
Agostino M, Trivieri F. 2016. European Wine Exports Towards Emerging Markets. The Role of Geographical Identity. Journal of Industry. Competition and Trade, 16: 233 – 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-015-0210-z
Barham E, Sylvander B (Eds). 2011. Labels of Origin for Food: Local Development, Global Recognition, CAB International, Wallingford. . ISBN-13: 978 1 84593 352 4.
Barjolle D, Sylvander B, Thevenod – Motted E. 2011. Public Policies and Geographical Indications. In: Barham E, Sylvander B (Editors). Labels of Origin for Food: Local Development, Global Recognition, CAB International, Wallingford. pp. 92 – 105. ISBN-13: 978 1 84593 352 4.
Beletti G, Marescotti A. 2011. Origin Products, Geographical Indications and Rural Development. In: Barham E, Sylvander B (Editors). Labels of Origin for Food: Local Development, Global Recognition, CAB International, Wallingford. pp. 75 – 91. ISBN-13: 978 1 84593 352 4.
Beletti G, Marescotti A, Touzard J-M. 2017. Geographical Indications, Public Goods and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies. World Development, 98: 45 – 57.
Bramley C, Kirsten JF. 2007. Exploring the Economic Rationale for Protecting Geographical Indicators in Agriculture. Agrekon, 46(1): 47 – 71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853. 2007.9523761
Cadot O, Carrere C, Strauss – Kahn V. 2011. Export Diversification: What’s Behind the Hump? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2): 590 – 605. https://doi.org/ 10.1162/REST_a_00078
Çukur F, Çukur T. 2017. Coğrafi İşaretli Ürünlerin Kırsal Kalkınma Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: Muğla İli Örneği. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics, 23(2): 187 – 194. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.364914
Ingram V, Hansen ME, Bosselmann AS. 2020. To Label or Not? Governing the Costs and Benefits of Geographic Indication of an African Forest Honey Value Chain. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Sept. (3): 102.
Kan M, Gülbuçuk B, Küçükçongar M. 2012. Coğrafi İşaretlerin Kırsal Turizmde Kullanılma Olanakları. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(22): 93 – 101.
Kan M, Kan A, Gülbuçuk B, Peker K. 2016. Türkiye’de Yerel Ürünlerin Bölgesel Kalkınma Dinamikleri içindeki Önemi. In: Peker AE (Ed.) Bölgesel Kalkınma, Paradigma Akademi, Çanakkale, Türkiye. pp. 231 – 280. ISBN: 978-605-82909-0-7
Kan M, Kan A. 2020. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Geographical Indication System in Turkey. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences, 8(2): 114 – 123. https//doi.org/10.22194/JGIASS/8.899
Mercan ŞO, Üzülmez, M. 2014. Coğrafi İşaretlerin Bölgesel Turizm Gelişimindeki Önemi: Çanakkale İli Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 29(2): 67 – 94.
Orhan A. 2010. Yerel Değerlerin Turizm Ürününe Dönüştürülmesinde ‘Coğrafi İşaretlerin’ Kullanımı: İzmit Pişmaniyesi Örneği, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(2): 243 – 254.
Raimondi V, Falco C, Curzi D, Olper A. 2020. Trade Effects of Geographical Indication Policy: The EU Case. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2): 330 – 356.
Santos Silva J, Tenreyro S. 2006. The Log of Gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641 – 658. https://doi.org/ 10.1162/rest.88.4.641
Santos Silva J, Tenreyro S. 2011. Further Simulation Evidence on the Performance of the Poisson Pseudo – Maximum Likelihood Estimator. Economics Letters, 112(2): 220 – 222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008
Sorgho Z, Larue, B. 2014. Geographical Indication Regulation and Intra-trade in the European Union. Agricultural Economics, 45(S1): 1- 12.
Stock J, Yogo M. 2005. Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. In: Andrews, D. W. K. (Ed.). Identification and Inference for Econometric Models, 1 st . Ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, U.S., pp. 80 – 108.
Thiedig F, Sylvander B. 2000. Welcome to the Club? An Economical Approach to Geographical Indications in the European Union. Agrarwirtschaft, 49 (12): 428 – 437.
Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (TPO) Geographic Indications and Designations of Origin Database. Available from: https://www.ci.gov.tr/veri-tabani (accessed on 15.01.2021).
UN Comtrade Database (COMTRADE). Available from: https://comtrade.un.org/data/ (accessed on 16.12.2020).
Unnevehr, L.; Eales, J.; Jensen, H.; Lusk, J.; McCluskey, J.; Kinsey, J. 2010. Food and Consumer Economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(2), 506 – 521. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aaq007
World Integrated Trade Solution – Trade Analysis and Information System (WITS-TRAINS). Available from: https://wits.worldbank.org/tariff/trains/countrybyhs6product.aspx?lang=en#apl_T (accessed on 12.01.2021).
World Intellectual Property Indicators (WIPO) Statistics Database. Available from: https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/ index.htm?tab=geographical (accesses on 04.01.2021).
World Trade Organization Integrated Trade Intelligence Portal (WTO I-TIP). Available online: https://i-tip.wto.org/goods/ Forms/ProductViewNew.aspx?data=default (accessed on 16.12.2020).
Yenipınar U, Köşker H, Karacaoğlu S. 2014. Turizmde Yerel Yiyeceklerin Önemi ve Coğrafi İşaretleme: Van Oltu Peyniri. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2(2): 13 – 23.