The Non-Linear Relation between Governance and Efficiency: Evidence from Agriculture

This study aims to explore the relations between governance and agricultural performance of countries. Data Envelopment Analysis was used to find out agricultural performance of 81 countries at first stage. Panel data regression was employed in the second stage to assess the relations between performance levels of countries and their governance. Six governance indicators namely; voice and accountability, control of corruption, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and political stability and violence were analyzed in this stage. Findings show that firstly, governance indicators are highly correlated with each other. Secondly, developed countries are more efficient and have better governance than developing and undeveloped countries. Finally, a quadratic form of regression was the fitting model that is the marginal effects of good governance on performance are increasing in high values of governance.

___

References Azmat F, Coghill K. 2005. Good governance and marketbasedreforms: a study of Bangladesh. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71: 625-638.

Bayyurt N, Yilmaz S. 2012. The impacts of governance andeducation on agricultural efficiency: an international analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 1158 – 1165.

Bayyurt N, Serin ZV, Arıkan FE. 2015. Good Governance and Agricultural Efficiency, Journal of Social and Development Sciences Vol. 6, No. 1, March, pp. 14-23.

Beckmann V, Boger S. 2003. Courts and contract enforcement intransition agriculture: theory and evidence from Poland. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists.

Boland M. 2009. What is Value-added Agriculture? AgriculturalMarketing Resource Center. Available at http://www.agmrc.org/business_development/getting_prepared/ valueadded_agriculture/articles/

Campos JE, Lien D, Pradhan S. 1999. “The Impact of Corruptionon Investment: Predictability Matters”, World Development, Vol.27, Issue:6, pp.1059–1067

Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring theefficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6): 429-444.

Charnes, A, Cooper WW, Lewin AY, Seiford LM. 1994. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications.

Çakmak E, Dudu H, Öcal N. 2008. Efficiency in TurkishAgriculture and a Quantitative Analysis (Turkish), Ankara: TEPAV De Gorter H, Tsur Y. 1991. Explaining Price Policy Bias InAgriculture: The Calculus of Support-Maximising Politicians. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4): 1244– 1254.

Deliktaş E, Ersungur SM, Candemir M. 2005. The comparasion of agricultural efficiency and productivity growth in the EU and Turkey, 1980-2002. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 1, pp.109-124

Feng Y. 2003. Democracy, Governance and EconomicPerformance: Theory and Evidence, Cambridge: MA, MIT Press.

Fuglie KO, Wang SL. 2013. New evidence points to robust butuneven productivity growth in global agriculture. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 5(1): 23-30.

Ghalambaz F, Moghaddasi R, Moohammadinejad A. 2015. Theimpact of good governance indicators on agricultural efficiency of developing countries. MAGNT Research Report (ISSN,144-8939), 3(2): 12-20.

Globerman S, Shapiro D, Tang Y. 2006. Foreign directinvestment in emerging and transition European countries. Center for International Business, Western Washington University

Graham J, Amos B, Plumptre T. 2003. Principles for goodgovernance in the 21st century. Policy brief, 15: 1-6.

Harvey DR. 2004. Policy Dependency and Reform: EconomicGains versus Political Pains. Agricultural Economics, 31, 265–275.

Hayami Y, Ruttan V. 1985. Agricultural Development: AnInternational Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

IFAD. 1999. International Fund for Agricultural Development Good Governance: An Overview, International Fund for Agricultural Development, Executive Board – Sixty-Seventh Session Rome, 8-9 September

IFPRI. 2014. International Food Policy Research Institute. Governance for Agricultural and Rural Development Program, Available at http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/ govbrochure_1.pdf,[11.1.2014 ]

Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. 2006a. Governance mattersIII: Governance indicators for 1996-2005. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 3106. Washington, D.C, World Bank.

Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. 2006b. Governancematters V: Aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996–2005. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 4012, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Kaufmann D, Kraay A. 2008. Governance indicators: Where arewe, where should we be going?. The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1): 1-30.

Kaya A, Avcı MA. 2008. ‘Efficiency and Total FactorAnalysis in Trasition Economies and Turkish Agricultur 1992-2004’, (Turkish) Ege Academic Review,Vol. 8, pp. 843-860

Knack SF. 2003. Democracy, governance, and growth.Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Keefer P, Knack S. 1997. Why Don't Poor Countries Catch Up? ACross‐National Test of an Institutional Explanation. Economic Inquiry, 35(3): 590-602.

Lio M, Liu MC. 2008. Governance and agricultural productivity:a cross-national analysis. Food Policy, 33(6): 504–512.

Malhotra C, Chariar VM, Das LK, Ilavarasan PV. 2007. ICT for Rural Development: An Inclusive Framework for eGovernance. Computer Society of India, 216-226.

Massuanganhe I. 2008. Policies, Natural Resource GovernanceAnd Local Development In Mozambique. Phd dissertation, University of Free State, Bloemfontein. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/53061/2/Thesis_PhD__v 5_Final_Published.pdf.

Meidari A, 2004. Change in World Banks policies and theemergence of the theory of good governance. Journal of Economy, 10: 93-118.

Méon P, Weill L. 2005. Does better governance fosterefficiency? An aggregate frontier analysis. Economics of Governance, 6(1): 75- 90.

Minh NK, Long GT. 2008. Measuring agricultural productionefficiency in Vietnam: An application of data envelopment analysis. Working Paper 0813, Vietnam Development Forum.

Niyongabo G. 2003. Trade openness policy, quality of institutionsand economic growth. University Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France. MAGNT Research Report (ISSN. 1444-8939), 3(2): 12-20.

Nguyen KM, Giang TL 2009. Measuring Agricultural Production Efficiency in Vietnam: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Agricultural Economics Review, Vol 10, No 2.

Ogundari K, Amos TT, Okoruwa VO. 2012. A review ofNigerian agricultural efficiency literature, 1999–2011: What does one learn from frontier studies?. African Development Review, 24(1): 93-106.

Olson M. 1996. Distinguished lecture economics in government big bills left on the sidewalk: Why some nations are rich, and others poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2): 3-24

Otsuka K. 2013. Food security, income inequality and the changing comparative advantage in world agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 44: 1-12.

Pender J, Fafchamps M. 2001. Land lease markets and agriculturalefficiency: Theory and evidence from Ethiopia. Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute. Available athttp://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/eptdp81.p df

Rivera-Batiz FL. 2002. Democracy, governance, and economicgrowth: Theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 6(2): 225–247.

Serrao A. 2003. Agricultural productivity analysis of EuropeanUnion and eastern regions. In presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting. Canada.

Siudek T, Zawojska A. 2014. Quality of national governance andrural development: The case of the European Union countries. EAAE 2014 Congress “Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies”, Ljubljana, Slovenia,

Stigler J. 1951. The Division of Labor is limited by the Extent ofthe Market. Journal of Political Economy, 59, 185–194
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Physical Quality of Milled Rice as Affected by Moisture Content and Relative Humidity during Delayed Rough Rice Drying

Tamrin ., Filli PRATAMA, Bagus SEPTİAN

Jeopolimer Betonun Hayvan Barınaklarında Kullanılabilme Potansiyelinin Araştırılması

SELÇUK MEMİŞ, Gökhan KAPLAN, SADIK ALPER YILDIZEL

6360 Sayılı Büyükşehir Yasasının Kırsal Yaşama Olası Etkileri: Kocaeli Örneği

Ayşe Köşker YAMAN, İLKAY KUTLAR

Akkaraman Koyunlarında Gebeliği Son Döneminde Yapılan Ek Yemlemenin Kuzularda Doğum ve Çeşitli Dönemlerdeki Canlı Ağırlıklar Üzerine Etkisi

EMRE ŞİRİN, Ümit UÇAN, UĞUR ŞEN, ERCAN SOYDAN

Türkiye Mercimek (Lens culinaris Medik.) Üretimindeki Yabancı Ot Sorunlarının Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını - Şanlıurfa Örneği

ZÜBEYDE FİLİZ ARSLAN, Ayçin Aksu ALTUN, Ayşin BİLGİLİ

In situ predation of Boops boops (Linnaeus, 1758) on the rare hydrozoan, Geryonia proboscidalis (Forsskål, 1775), in the Aegean Sea, Turkey

SALİM CAN AKÇINAR

Antibacterial Activity and Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Some Galium (Rubiaceae) Species Against Pathogenic Bacteria

Filiz YAĞIZ, RİFAT BATTALOĞLU, SEDEF İLK, Ahmet SAVRAN

Ayçiçeği Genotiplerinin Demir Noksanlığına Karşı Tolerans Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi

AYFER ALKAN TORUN, HALİL ERDEM, MUSTAFA BÜLENT TORUN

Isolation and Molecular Identification of Some Blue-Green Algae (Cyanobacteria) from Freshwater Sites in Tokat Province of Turkey

Tünay KARAN, RAMAZAN ERENLER, Zekeriya ALTUNER

Stability of Durum Wheat Genotypes in Some Agronomic Traits Under Bursa Ecological Conditions

ESRA AYDOĞAN ÇİFCİ, PAKİZE ÖZLEM KURT POLAT, EMRE ŞENYİĞİT, Ramazan DOĞAN