Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under Different Levels of Irrigation and Fertigation through Drip System

There are very few studies on cabbage at different fertigation levels in the Marmara Region, where this study was conducted. In this respect, our study has a unique quality. This study was carried out in Bursa Uludag University Yenisehir İbrahim Orhan Vocational School application greenhouses in 2014-2015 years. Five different irrigation treatments (T1: 100% (full irrigation), T2: 75%, T3: 50%, T4: 25%, T5: 0% (non-irrigated)) and two different fertigation treatments; F1.0: 100% (100:100:100 NPK) fertigation and F0.5: 50% (50:50:50 NPK) fertigation were combined together to determine the effects on yield and quality parameters of potatoes. The amount of irrigation water in 2014 and 2015 years varied between 0.0-630.0 mm and 0.0-660 mm, respectively, while evapotranspiration values varied between 180.0-670 mm and 190.0-675 mm, respectively. It was determined that irrigation water and fertigation levels, yield and quality parameters of potatoes were affected significantly. In both application years, the highest yield was obtained from T1F1.0 treatment as 45.0 and 47.0 tons’ ha-1 respectively, while the lowest yield was obtained from T5F1.0 treatment as 4.0 and 5.0 tons ha-1 , respectively. In 2014 and 2015 years the crop response factor (ky) values of potato were calculated as 1.11-1.11 and 1.21-1.14, respectively. When the full fertigation (F1.0: 100% -100:100:100 NPK) and the insufficient F0.5: 50% - (50:50:50 NPK) fertigation treatments are compared, significant differences have arisen in terms of yield and quality parameters. T2F1.0 and T2F0.5 treatments can be recommended as the most effective irrigation and fertilization levels of potato.

___

Abdulrahman FA, Salih SA, Mahmood YA. 2018. The effect of different irrigation interval on tuber yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research (KJAR), 3(2): 27-31.

Abubaker BMA, Shuang-En Y, Guang-Cheng S, Alhadi M and Elsidding A. 2014. Effects of irrigation levels on the growth, yield and quality of potato. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(No 2): 303-309.

Adhikari RC, Rana MK. 2017. Effects of irrigation and potash levels on growth and yield of potato. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment Vol (18): 106-114.

Agrawal N, Tamrakar SK, Tripathi MP, Tiwari RB. 2018. Response of cabbage under different levels of irrigation and fertigation through drip. Int.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.Special Issue 6: 750-759.

Alva AK, Moore AD, Collins HP. 2012. Impact of deficit irrigation on tuber yield and quality of potato cultivars. Journal of Crop Improvement, 26: 211-227.

Anonymous. 2016a. The Annual Report of Meteorological Station, Bursa, Turkey. www.mgm.gov.tr/verideğerlendirme/ il-ve-ilceler-statistic.aspx?k

Anonymous. 2016b. The Meteorological Station of Greenhouse Application Area, Yenişehir-Bursa, Turkey. www.mgm.gov.tr/ verideğerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-statistic.aspx?k

Anonymous. 2019. Product Tables; Potatoes in the world (Potatoes Bulletin). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Turkey.

Anonymous 2020. Registered varieties in our country. http://www.sorhocam.com.

AOAC. (Association of Official Analytical Chemistry) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA.

Ashraf SO, Ewees MSA. 2008. The possible use of humic acid incorporated with drip irrigation system to alleviate the harmful effects of saline water on tomato plants. – Fayoum J. Agric. Res. & Dev. 22(1).

Ayas S, Korukçu A. 2010. Water-yield relationships in deficit irrigated potato. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 24 (2): 23–36.

Ayas S. 2013. The Effects of different regimes on potato (Solanum Tuberosum L., Hermes) yield and quality characteristics under unheated greenhouse conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19 (No 1): 87-95.

Badr MA, El-Tohamy WA, Zaghloul AM. 2012. Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 110: 9-15.

Bero NJ, Ruark MD, Lowery B. 2014. Controlled-Release Fertilizer Effect on Potato and Groundwater Nitrogen in Sandy Soil. Agronomy, Soils & Environmental Quality, Agronomy Journal, Vol. 106, Issue 2: 359-368.

Bos MG. 1980. Irrigation efficiencies at crop production level. – ICID Bull.29: 18-25.

Cabrera JR, Zotarelli L, Rowland DL, Dukes MD, Sargent SA. 2014. Drip as alternative irrigation method for potato in Florida Sandy Soils. Am. J. Potato Res. DOI 10.1007/s12230- 014-9381-0.

Çetin Ö, Bilgel L. 2002. Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton. In Agric. Wate. Manage, vol. 54, 2002, no. 1, pp. 1–15.

Çetin Ö, Tolay İ. 2009. Fertigation Book (Hasad Publishing), Istanbul/Turkey. www.hasad.com.tr.

Çetin Ö, Akalp E. 2019. Efficient use of water and fertilizers in irrigated agriculture: drip irrigation and fertigation. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae 2, pp.97-102.

Davis AR, Webber CL, Perkins-Veazie P, Ruso V, Lopez Galarza S, Sakata Y. 2008. A Review of production systems on watermelon quality. Roceedings of the IXth EUCARPIA Meeting on 98 Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae (M. PITRAT, editor), INRA, Avignon, France, 515-520.

Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33, Rome.

Eid SFM, Tarek SM, El Samra EA. 2017. Irrigation scheduling of potato to increase the water productivity under drip irrigation system on sandy soil. J. Soil Sci. And Agric. Eng., Mansoura Univ., Vol. 8(12): 779-785.

Eid MAM, Abdel-Salam AA, Salem HM, Mahrous SE, Seleiman MF, Alsadon AA, Solieman THI and İbrahim AA. 2020. Interaction effects of nitrogen source and irrigation regime on tuber quality, yield and water use efficiency of solanum tuberosum L. Plants 2020, 9, 110; MDPI, doi:10.3390/ plants9010110.

Ektiren Y, Değirmenci H. 2018. Effect of deficit irrigation applications on plant leaf nutrition elements of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). KSU J. Agric Nat 21(5): 691-698.

Erdem T, Erdem Y, Orta AH, Okursoy H. 2006. Water-yield relationships of potato under different irrigation methods and regimens. Sci. Agric. (Pracicaba Brazil), 63 (3): 226–231.

Essah SYC, Andales AA, Bauder TA, Holm DG. 2020. Response of two colarado Russet potato cultivars to reduced irrigation water use. American Journal of Potato Research 97: 221-233.

Fakhari R, Tube A, Hasanzadeh N, Barghi A and Shiri M. 2013. Studying effects of different irrigation levels land planting patterns on yield and water use efficiency in potato. The International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 4: 1941–1945.

FAO. 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT, Available from: http://www.fao.org/ faostat/en/ #data/oc[Accessed September 2021].

Feng Z, Kang Y, Wan S and Liu S. 2018. Effect of drip fertigation on potato productivity with basal application of loss control fertilizer in sandy soil. Irrigation and Drainage 67: 210-2018.

Gültekin R, Ertek A. 2018. Effects of deficit irrigation on the potato tuber development and quality. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 2(3): 93-98.

İşcan S, Uyan A, Tepeli E, Alaç V, Sarıtaş H, Gökalp Y, Çınar M, Çelik A. 2002. Fertilizer applications with irrigation systems. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas, The Management of Adana Agricultural Production Enterprise and Personnel Training Center. Pub. No: 6 Adana, Turkey.

Kasssu T, Tilahun H, Yared D, Watanabe H. 2017. Effect of irrigation regimes on yield and water use efficiencies of potato. International Journal of Plant Production. 11(3):389- 406.

Kızıloğlu F M, Şahin Ü, Tunç T, Diler S. 2006. The Effect of deficit irrigation on potato evapotranspiration and tuber yield under cool season and semiarid climatic conditions. Journal of Agronomy 5 (2): 284-288.

King BA, Stark JC, Neibling H. 2020. Potato irrigation management. Potato Production Systems, pp 417-446.

Mokh FE, Nagaz K, Masmoudi MM, Mechlia NB. 2014. Effects of surface and subsurface drip irrigation regimes with saline water on yield and water use efficiency of potato in arid conditions of Tunisia. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development-JAEID, 108 (2): 227-246

Mokh, FE, Nagaz K, Masmoudi MM, Mechlia NB. 2015. Yield and water productivity of drip-irrigated potato under different nitrogen levels and irrigation regime with saline water in arid Tunisia. American Journal of Plant Sciences 6: 501–510.

Nagaz K, Mokh FE, Alva AK, Masmoudi MM. 2016. Potato response to different irrigation regimes using saline water. Irrig. and Drain. 65: 654–663.

Nikzad M, Kumar JSA, Anjanappa M, Amarananjundeswara H, Dhananjaya BN, Basavaraj G. 2020. Effect of fertigation, levels on growth and yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea l. var.capitata). Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9 (1): 1240- 1247.

Önder S, Önder D. 2006. Water-yield relationships in potato. 4th National Potato Congress, Niğde, Turkey. Pp. 194 – 201.

Postel S, Polak P, Gonzales F, Keller J. 2001. Drip irrigation for small farmers. A new initiative to alleviate hunger and poverty. In Water Intern., Vol. 26, 2001, No. 1, pp. 3–13.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill, NewYork, pp.186–187.

Stewart JI, Misra RD, Pruitt WO, and Hagan RM. 1975. Irrigating corn and sorghum with a deficient water supply. Trans. ASAE, 18: 270–280.

Ünlü M, Kanber R, Şenyiğit U, Onaran H, Diker K. 2006. Trickle and sprinkler irrigation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the middle Anatolian region in Turkey. Agricultural Water Management, 79: 43–71.

Zhang H, Wang X, You M, Liu C. 1999. Water-yield relations and water-use efficiency of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Irrigation Science 19: 37-45.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Inhibitory Effect of Probiotics Lactobacillus Supernatants Against Streptococcus Mutans and Preventing Biofilm Formation

TUĞBA DEMİR, Hakan DEMİR

Effect of Tillage Techniques on Depth, Furrow Slice and Water Retention in Maugo Smallholder Rice Scheme in Kenya

Pius Kipchumba CHEBOI, Clement Kiprotich KIPTUM, Japheth O. ONYANDO

Alterations of Stress Parameters and Histology of Asian Catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus) in Transport

Semra KÜÇÜK, Sema MİDİLLİ, Deniz ÇOBAN

The Effects of Lead and NTA Mixtures on ALP levels in blood tissue of Oreochromis niloticus

Tüzün AYTEKİN, Özge TEMİZ, Ferit KARGIN, Hikmet Yeter ÇOĞUN

Marketing Analysis of Vegetables: The Case of Carrot and Cucumber Marketing in Enugu State, Nigeria

Ridwan MUKAİLA, Angela Ebere OBETTA, Festus Eluwande Durojaye AWOYELU, Chinedum Jachinma CHIEMELA, Anthony Onyedika UGWU

Su Sertliğinin Filtre Kahvenin Uçucu Bileşenlerine ve Lezzetine Etkisi

Ceyda DADALI, YEŞİM ELMACI

Çevre Duyarlılığının Çevreci Satın Alma Davranışına Etkisinin Belirlenmesi

Yeşim AYTOP, Semiha ÇETİNKAYA, Cihangir TULAN

Determination of Drying Characteristics, Energy Consumption and Quality Values of Black Mulberry Fruit (Morus nigra L.) Dried Under Different Conditions

Muhammed TAŞOVA, Hakan POLATCI, ADİL KORAY YILDIZ

Hayvan Yemi Olarak Kullanılan Şekerpancarı Yapraklarının Nitrat İçeriğine Azot-Bor Uygulamasının ve Zamanın Etkisi

Bedriye BİLİR, Kadir SALTALI

Farklı Dozlarda Fosfor Uygulamasının Şeker pancarı (Beta Vulgaris L.) Bitkisinin Verimine ve Besin Elementleri Alımına Etkisi

Ahmet DEMİRBAŞ