Savaş ATASEVER

Relationships between Animal Welfare Scores and Milk Somatic Cell Count in Anatolian Buffaloes

The objective of the present study was to determine the relationships between animal welfare score (AWS) and milk somatic cell count (SCC) in Anatolian buffaloes. The study carried out on 39 buffalo farms of Bafra district of Samsun province of Turkey between January and March 2020. To obtain AWS data, a scale with 1 to 100 points (1-25: poor, 26-50: moderate, 51-75: suitable and ≥76: excellent) was used. Locomotion ability (LA), social interaction (SI), flooring (F), indoor conditions (IC) and effect of stockman (S) were used to be AWS parameters. Milk samples were analyzed by SCC using a portable cell counter. The SCC values were transferred to log10 base before the analyses. To assess the effects of AWS on logSCC, independent sample t-test was performed. The relations of all parameters with each other were calculated by Kendall rank correlation method and the statistical analyses were carried out by SPSS 17.0. The highest and the lowest means were obtained from SI (79.66±1.28) and F (61.79±2.51), respectively. While the highest correlation was estimated between IC and AWS (r=0.724), all AWS parameters had approximately moderate relations with AWS. Positive or negative, but insignificant correlation coefficients were estimated between any traits and logSCC. The means of SCC (136841±15522 cells/ml) and AWS (68.70±1.67) of the present study were found within the suitable thresholds. Routinely keeping the records on AWS and its components, and adding AWS data to the herd management programs was suggested to the buffalo farm owners.

PDF

___

Angrecka S, Herbut P. 2015. Conditions for cold stress development in dairy cattle kept in free stall barn during severe frosts. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 60, 2015(2): 81–87. doi:10.17221/7978-CJAS
Atasever S, Erdem H, Kul E. 2011. Relationship between somatic cell count and catalase activity in raw milk of Anatolian buffaloes. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(19): 4109-4112. doi:10.5897/SRE11.609
Atasever S, Stadnik L. 2015. Factors affecting daily milk yield, fat and protein percentage, and somatic cell count in primiparous Holstein cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 49(3):313-316. doi:10.5958/0976-0555.2015.000 48.5
Atasever S, Tóth V, Mikóné Jónás E. 2020. Factors affecting mastitis cases and the correlations of somatic cell count with milk production in Holstein cows. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(1): 171-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i1.171-173.2937
Bartussek H. 2001. An historical account of the development of the animal needs index ANI-35L as part of the attempt to promote and regulate farm animal welfare in Austria: an example of the interaction between animal welfare science and society. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, 51 (suppl. 30): 34-41. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/090647001316923036
DeVries TJ, Aarnoudse MG, Barkema HW, Leslie KE, von Keyserlingk MAG. 2012. Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science, 95 (10): 5730-5739. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5375
DeVries M, Bokkers EAM, vanSchaik G, Botreau R, Engel B, Dijkstra T, deBoer IJM. 2013. Evaluating results of the welfare quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(10): 6264–6273. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.2012- 6129
Durmaz C, Atasever S. 2019. Correlations of animal welfare scores with first lactation milk yield of dual-purpose cows. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(10): 1607-1610. doi: https://doi.org/10.24925/ turjaf.v7i10.1607- 1610.2653
Erdem H, Okuyucu IC. 2019. Influence of hygiene status of cows on somatic cell count and milk components during summer season. Large Animal Review, 25: 7-10.
Frössling J, Ohlson A, Hallén-Sandgren C. 2017. Incidence and duration of increased somatic cell count in Swedish dairy cows and associations with milking system type. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(9):7368-7378. doi: https://doi.org/10.31 68/jds.2016-12333
Furnaris F, Ghımpeteanu O, Predoi G. 2016. Dairy cows’ welfare assessment in a farm from south eastern Romania. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 10: 403- 407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.09.081
Gonzalo C, Linage B, Carriedo JA, de la Fuente F, San Primitivo F. 2006. Evaluation of the overall accuracy of the DeLaval Cell Counter for somatic cell counts in ovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 89:4613-4619. doi: doi.org/10.3168/jds. S0022- 0302(06)72511-5
Hristov S, Zlatanović Z, Stanković B, Dokmanović M, Ostojić- Andrić D, Cvijan M. 2014. The relationship between rearing system, animal needs index and dairy cows milk traits. Mljekarstvo, 64(3): 186-194.
Islam M, Sharma A, Ahsan A, Mazumdar S, Rudra KC, Phillips CJC. 2020. Welfare assessment of dairy cows in small farms in Bangladesh. Animals, 10: 394. doi:10.3390/ani10030394
Kappes R, Knob DA, Thaler Neto A, Alessio DRM, Rodrigues WB et al. 2020. Cow’s functional traits and physiological status and their relation with milk yield and milk quality in a compost bedded pack barn system. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 49: e20190213. doi: https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz 4920190213
Kecici PD, Yalcintan H, Ozturk N, Soysal MI, Kocak O. 2021. Investigating current welfare status of the buffalo farms by ANI evaluation method. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53: 437. doi:10.1007/s11250-021-02876-z
Leliveld LMC, Riva E, Mattachini G, Finzi A, Lovarelli D, Provolo G. 2022. Dairy cow behavior is affected by period, time of day and housing. Animals, 12: 512. doi:10.3390/ani 12040512
Mazurek M, Prendiville DJ, Crowe MA, Veissier I, Earley B. 2010. An on-farm investigation of beef suckler herds using an animal welfare index (AWI). BMC Veterinary Research, 6:55.
Moroni P, Rossi CS, Pisoni G, Bronzo V, Castiglioni B, Boettcher PJ. 2006. Relationships between somatic cell count and intramammary infection in buffaloes. Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 998-1003. doi:10.1186/1746-6148-6-55
Ozenc E, Vural ME, Seker E, Ucar M. 2008. An evaluation of subclinical mastitis during lactation in Anatolian Buffaloes. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences; 32(5): 359-368.
Penev T, Radev V, Slavov T, Kirov V, Dimov D, Atanassov A, Marinov I. 2014. Effect of lighting on the growth, development, behaviour, production and reproduction traits in dairy cows. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, (11): 798-810.
Sahin A, Yildirim A, Ulutas Z. 2016. Effect of various environmental factors and management practices on somatic cell count in the raw milk of Anatolian Buffaloes. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 48(2): 325-332.
Sant’anna AC, Paranhos da Costa MJR. 2011. The relationship between dairy cow hygiene and somatic cell count in milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 94 (8): 3835-3844. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3951
Sel V, Yilmaz I, Yanar M. 2020. Some factors affecting the somatic cell count in the milk of Anatolian Water Buffalos (Bubalus bubalis) raised in Igdir province. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 52(4): 1225-1230. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.17 582/journal.pjz/20180919120921
Tančin V, Miklaš š, Mačuhova M. 2018. Possible physiological and environmental factors affecting milk production and udder health of dairy cows: a review. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 51 (1): 32-40.
Yamane T. 1967. Elemantary Sampling Theory. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewoods, 98-100, New Jersey.