Physico-chemical Status of Vermicompost Processed by Earthworm Specie Eisenia fetida

Huge amount of organic wastes including agricultural field wastes, food wastes, municipal solid waste and manures can be converted into a safe and usable product that can be used as a possible substitute for chemical fertilizers. In this regard, the proposed study was designed with the aim to prepare macro and micronutrients rich vermicompost from different bio-wastes that can be used as a possible substitute to chemical fertilizers for improving plant growth. A 90 days vermicomposting experiment was conducted in wooden boxes (1×1 m) containing animal manure and waste material (grasses, brewed black tea leaf and dry leaf) mixed in 3:1 ratio with a 2.5 cm thin layer of soil. The material was at the bottom of the bed and around 10.000 earthworms of Eisenia fetida were settled in the box. The boxes were irrigated by sprinkled water daily and tilled from the top once every week for maintaining aeration and proper decomposition. The vermicompost production was continued for about 90 days in each box under 21-23°C room temperature. The results showed that by using animal manure and waste materials, the physical parameters like moisture content was increased upto50 % on day 90. Likewise, the percent increase recorded for total N, organic N, total P and soluble K content on day 90 was maximum in the vermicompost prepared from animal manure and waste material. It can be concluded from this experiment that with the help of earthworm’s, different field and garden residues, wastes and manures can be converted into a nutrient rich and environment friendly vermicompost that can be used as a possible substitute to chemical fertilizers for improving plant growth.

___

Balamurugan V, Gobi M, Vijayalakshmi G. 1999. Comparative studies on degradation of press mud using cellulolytic fungi and exotic species of earthworms with a note on its gut microflora. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences, 1:131–134.

Buchanam MA, Rusell E, Block SD. 1988. Chemical characterization and nitrogen mineralization potentials of vermicompost derived from differing organic wastes. In: Edwards, C.A., Neuhauser, E.F. (Eds.), Earthworms in Environmental and Waste Management. SPB Academic Publishing, The Netherlands, 231–240.

Cabrera ML, Kissel DE, Vigil MF. 2005. Nitrogen mineralization from organic residues: research opportunities. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34(1):75–79.

Chan PLS, Griffiths DA, 1988.Chemical composting of pretreated pig manure. Biol. Waste, 24: 57–69.

Coulibaly SS, Zoro Bi IA. 2010. Influence of animal wastes on growth and reproduction of the African earthworm species Eudriluseugeniae (Oligochaeta). Eur. J. Soil Biol. 46, 225- 229.

Crawford JH.1983. Review of composting. Process of Biochemistry, 8: 14–15.

Crescent T. 2003. Vermicomposting. Development Alternatives (DA) Sustainable Livelihoods, Retrieved from: (http:// www.dainet.org/livelihoods/default.htm).

Delgado M, Bigeriego M, Walter I, Calbo R. 1995. Use of California redworm in sewage sludge transformation. Turrialba, (45):33–41.

Desai VR, Sabale RN, Raundal PV. 1999. Integrated nitrogen management in wheat coriander cropping system, Journal of Maharasthra Agricultural Universities, 24(3): 273–275.

Doan TT, Henry-des-Tureaux T, Rumpe C, Janeau JL, Jouquet P. 2015. Impact of compost, vermicompostandbiochar on soilfertility, maizeyieldandsoilerosion in Northern Vietnam: a threeyearmesocosmexperiment, Sci. Total Environ., 514:147-154.

Domínguez J. 2004. State of the art and new perspectives on vermicomposting research. In: C.A. Edwards (Ed.). Earthworm Ecology (2nd edition), CRC Press LLC., 401- 424.

Edwards CA, Bater JE. 1992. The use of earthworm in environmental management. Soil Biol. Biochem., 24, 1683–1689.

Edwards CA. 1998. The use of earthworms in the breakdown and management of organic wastes. InC. A. Edwards (ed.) Earthworm Ecology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 327-354.

Fang M, Wong MH, Wong JWC. 2001. Digestion activity of thermophilic bacteria isolated from ash-amended sewage sludge compost. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 126:1-12.

Gandhi M, Sangwan V, Kapoor KK, Dilbaghi N. 1997. Composting of household wastes with and without earthworms, Environment and Ecology, 15(2), 432–434.

Garg P, Gupta A, Satya S. 2006. Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eiseniafoetida: A comparative study. Bioresource Technology, 97: 391–395.

Harris RC, Knox K, Walker N. 1990. Strategies for the development of sustainable land fill design. In: IWM Proceeding, 26–29.

Hartenstein R, Bisesi MS. 1989. Use of earthworm biotechnology for the management of effluents from intensively housed livestock. Outlook Agric., 18: 3–7.

Ismail SA. 2000.Organic waste management. In: Technology Appreciation Programme on Evaluation of Biotechnological Approaches to Waste Management held on 26th October 2000. Industrial Association-ship of IIT, Madras, 28–30.

Kale RD, Bano K, Krishnamoorthy RV. 1982. Potential of Perionyxexcavatusfor utilizing organic wastes. Pedobiologia, 23(6):419–425.

Karmegam N, Daniel T. 2000. Effect of vermicompost on the growth and yield of green gram (PhaseolusaureusRob.), Tropical Agriculture, 76 (2): 143–146.

Kaushikand P, Garg VK. 2003. Vermicomposting of mixed solid textile mill sludge and cow dung with the epigeice arthworm Eiseniafoetida. BioresourceTechnology, 90(3): 311–316.

Li R, Wang JJ, Zhang Z, Shen F, Zhang G, Qin R, Li X, Xiao R. 2012. Nutrient transformations during composting of pig manure with bentonite. Bioresour. Technol, 121:362-368.

Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY. 2016. Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. J. Clean. Prod., 111:262-278.

Logsdson G. 1994. Worldwide progress in vermicomposting. Biocycle, 35:63–65.

Najar IA, Khan AB, Hai A. 2015. Effect of macrophytevermicompost on growth and productivity of brinjal (Solanummelongena) under field conditions. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric., 4: 73-83.

Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA, Das KC. 2000. Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresource Technology,71(1):5–12.

Pattnaik S, Vikram Reddy M. 2010. Nutrient status of vermicompost of urban green waste processed by three earthworm species—Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus geniae, and Perionyx excavatus. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2010(1): 121-125.

Rai N, Ashiya P, Rathore DS. 2014. Comparative Study of the Effect of Chemical Fertilizers and Organic Fertilizers on Eiseniafoetida. Int. J. Innov. Res. in Sci., Eng. and Tech., 2(5):12991-12998.

Rakkini VM, Vincent S, Kumar, AS, Baskar K, 2018. Organic waste management by earthworm. J. Civil Eng. Environ. Sci., 3(1):13-17.

Rao S, Rao AS, Takkar PN. 1996. Changes in different forms of K under earthworm activity. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Organic Farming and Sustainable Agriculture, Ghaziabad, India, 9–11.

Saranraj P, Stella D. 2012.Vermicomposting and its importance in improvement of soil nutrients and agricultural crops.Novus Natural Science Research, 1(1): 14-23.

Senapati BK, Julka JM, 1993. Selection of suitable vermicomposting species under Indian conditions. In: Earthworm Resources and Vermiculture. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, 113–115.

Shrestha K, Shrestha PE, Adetutu MK,Walsh B, Harrower K, Ball AS. 2011. Changes in microbial and nutrient composition associated with rumen content compost incubation. Bioresource Technology, 102: 3848-3854.

Simard RR. 1993. Ammonium acetate extractable elements. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, R. Martin and S.Carter, Eds., 39–43.

Singh NB, Khare AK, Bhargava DS, Bhattacharya S. 2004. Optimum moisture requirement during vermicomposting using Perionyx excavates. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2: 53–62.

Sinha RK, Agarwal S, Chauhan K,Valani D. 2010. The wonders of earthworms & its vermicompost in farm production: Charles Darwin’s ‘friends of farmers’, with potential to replace destructive chemical fertilizers from agriculture. Agric. Sci., 1(2): 76-94.

Soltanpour PN, Schwab AP. 1977. A newsoil test for simultaneous extraction of macro and micro‐nutrients in alkaline soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal., 8: 195-207.

Sreenivas CH, Muralidhar S, Singa Rao M. 2000. Yield and quality of ridge gourd fruits as influenced by different levels of inorganic fertilizers and vermicompost. Ann. Agric. Res., 21(1): 262-266.

Suthar S. 2006. Potential utilization of guar gum industrial waste in vermicompostproduction.Bioresource Technology, (97): 2474–2477.

Suthar S. 2007 Nutrient change sand biodynamics of epigeic earthworm Perionyx excavatus (Perrier) during recycling of some agriculture wastes. Bioresource Technology, 98(8): 1608–1614.

Sutharand S, Singh S. 2008. Vermicomposting of domestic waste by using two epigeic earthworms (Perionyxexcavatus and Perionyxsansibaricus). International Journal of Environment Science and Technology, 5(1): 99–106.

Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418:671-677.

Walkley AJ, Black IA. 1934. Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37: 29-38.

Wang Q, Li R, Cai H, Awasthi MK, Zhang Z, Wang JJ, Ali A, Amanullah M. 2016. Improving pig manure composting efficiency employing Ca-bentonite. Ecol Engin., 87: 157-161.

Waste Atlas. University of Leed and ISWA. Retrieved 6 April, 2019.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Erkenez Çayı’nda (Kahramanmaraş) Süt Ürünleri, Boya ve Tekstil Fabrikası Atık Sularından Kaynaklanan Ağır Metal Kirliliğinin Belirlenmesi

Özgür CANPOLAT, Ece VANLI

Karayaka Koyunlarında Gebelikte Kondisyon Puanı ve Transabdominal Ultrasonografi Yönteminin Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Araştırma

HİLAL TOZLU ÇELİK, Fatih ASLAN, Yeliz ARICI, Metehan KAHVECİ, İbrahim KİPER

Ordu İli Halk Elinde Yetiştirilen Karayaka Koçlarının Spermatolojik Parametreleri Değerlendirilmesi

Fatih ASLAN, HİLAL TOZLU ÇELİK, Yeliz ARICI, Kalbiye KONANÇ, Metehan KAHVECİ, İbrahim KİPER

Ekmeklik Buğdayda (Triticum aestivum L.) Başaklanma Döneminde Toprak ve Yapraktan Uygulanan Ürenin Tane Verimi ve Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Erdinç SAVAŞLI, Oğuz ÖNDER, Yaşar KARADUMAN, Ramis DAYIOĞLU, Didem ÖZEN, Suat ÖZDEMİR, Arzu AKIN, Zafer TUNCA, Bedrettin DEMİR, Nevzat AYDIN

Fındık Üreticilerinin Tarım Sigortası Yaptırmaya Yönelik Davranışları ve Bunu Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi: Giresun İli Bulancak İlçesi Örneği

Hayriye BAL, Rüveyda YÜZBAŞIOĞLU, ESRA KAPLAN

Comparative Evaluation and Demonstration of Field Pea Production Practices in Intermediate Altitudes of Northeastern Amhara, Ethiopia

Ademe MİHİRETU, Netsanet ASSEFA

Chemical Composition and mineral bioavailability of Tetrapleura tetraptera (Schumach & Thonn.) Taub. Fruit Pulp Consumed as Spice in South-eastern Côte d’Ivoire.

N zebo N ZEBO, Am d e AHİ, Kouakou DJE, Aka KABRAN, Lucien KOUAM

Kastamonu’da Su Ürünleri Tüketim Tercihleri ve Balık Talebi

Serkan DİLEK, Şükrü PARUĞ, Ayla PARUĞ, HAYRETTİN KESGİNGÖZ

Antosiyaninlerin Stabilitesini Etkileyen Faktörler

Buket AŞKIN, Erdoğan KÜÇÜKÖNER

Effects of Different Pruning Systems on Fruit Yield and Quality in Plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.)

BURHANETTİN İMRAK, Ali KÜDEN, Ayzin KÜDEN