Organik Olarak Üretilen Yumurtaların Bazı Besinsel ve Duyusal Özelliklerinin İyileştirilme Olanakları

Organik olarak üretilen tavuk yumurtasının daha fazla besleyicilik ve duyusal özelliklere sahip olmasının yanı sıra sağlığa zararlı herhangi bir madde içermemesi, tüketicinin öncelikli beklentilerindendir. Araştırmalar, beklenenin aksine; kafes yumurtaları ile organik yumurtaların kuru madde, lipit ve yağ asitleri arasında önemli bir farklılık bulunmadığını göstermektedir. Organik yumurtanın kafes yumurtasına göre yaklaşık iki kat fiyata satılmasının sadece psikolojik ve etik motivasyon taşıdığı bildirilmektedir. Avrupa Birliği Konseyi organik yumurta üretiminde tavukların bazal rasyonun yanı sıra yeşil kaba yem materyallerine erişimini de gerekli görmektedir. Ancak bu erişimin sağlanması durumunda, organik olarak üretilen yumurta tüketici beklentilerine karşılık verebilir. Araştırmalar ülkemiz Organik Tarım Kanuna göre tavuk başına ayrılan 4 m2 'lik gezinti alanının bu talepleri karşılamada yeterli olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu durum tavuklara ayrılan gezinti alanının çeşitli yem bitkileri ile rotasyona uygun olarak ekili olmasını sağlayacak şekilde artırılmasını veya gezinti alanına dışarıdan ilave yeşil kaba yem materyallerinin getirilmesini zorunlu kılmaktadır. Böylece fonksiyonel gıda özelliği olan bir ürün elde etmenin yanı sıra gagalama ve kanibalizmin azalarak hayvan refahının arttığı bir üretim tarzına ulaşılmış olacaktır. Bu derlemede organik yumurta üretiminde başta karotenoidler olmak üzere yağ asitleri gibi kimyasal içeriklerin artırılması ile renk, koku ve tat gibi duyusal özelliklerin iyileştirilme olanaklarına yönelik uygulamalara yer verilmiştir.

Improvement Possibilities of Some Nutritional and Sensory Properties of Organically Produced Laying Hen Eggs

Organically produced chicken eggs have more nutritional and sensory properties, and they do not contain any harmful substances to the health of the consumer. Research has shown that, unlike what is expected, there is no significant difference between dry matter, lipid and fatty acids of eggs produced in cages and organic. It has been reported that sold the organic egg about two times fee according to the cage egg has only psychological and ethical motivation. The Council of the European Union considers it necessary for chickens to have access to green roughage materials as well as basal rations in the production of organic eggs. However, if this access is provided, the organically produced egg may respond to consumer expectations. The studies shows that the 4m2 outdoor area allocated per chicken according to Turkey's Organic Agriculture Legislation is not enough to meet these demands. This situation necessitate an increase in the outdoor area separated to the chickens so as to provide rotation with the various plants or the supply of additional green feed materials to the outdoor area. Thus, in addition to obtaining a product with functional food characteristics, a production mode in which animal welfare is increased by the decrease of pecking and cannibalism will be attained. In this review, it is mentioned what applications are increasing the chemical contents such as carotenoids, fatty acids and improving the sensory properties such as color, smell and taste in organic egg production.

___

  • Anonim. 2014. Organik Tarım Kanunu ve Organik Tarımın Esasları ve Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik. Ankara.
  • Anonim. 2015. Organik Tarımın Esasları ve Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelikte Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik. T.C. Resmi Gazete, Tarih: 22.07.2015, Sayı: 29422, Ankara.
  • Anonymous. 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. Official Journal of the European Union, L 189: 1–23.
  • Anonymous. 2014. Council Regulation No:836/2014 amending Regualtion No.889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control.
  • Beardsworth PM, Hernandez JM. 2004. Yolk colour–An important egg quality attribute. Int. Poult. Prod. 12: 17-18.
  • Castellini C, Dal Bosco A, Mugnai C, Bernardini M. 2002. Performance and behaviour of chickens with different growing rate reared according to the organic system. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 1: 291-300.
  • Castellini C, Dal Bosco A, Mugnai C, Pedrazzoli M. 2006. Comparison of two chicken genotypes organically reared: Oxidative stability and other qualitative traits of the meat. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 5: 29-42.
  • Cherian G, Holsonbake TB, Goeger MP. 2002. Fatty Acid Composition and Egg Components of Specialty Eggs. Poult. Sci. 81:30-33.
  • Fraeye I, Bruneel C, Lemahieu C, Buyse J, Muylaert K, Foubert I. 2012. Dietary enrichment of eggs with omega-3 fatty acids: A review. Food Res. Int., 48(2):961-969.
  • Gerzilov V, Nikolov A, Petroy P, Bozakova N, Penchev G, Bochukov A. 2015. Effect of a dietary herbal mixture supplement on the growth performance, egg production and health status in chickens. J Cent Eur Agr, 16:10-27.
  • Giannenas I, Nisianakis P, Gavriil A, Kontopidis G, Kyriazakis I. 2009. Trace mineral content of conventional, organic and courtyard eggs analysed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Food Chem, 114:706– 711.González-Esquerra R, Leeson S. 2001. Alternatives for enrichment of eggs and chicken meat with omega-3 fatty acids. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 81(3):295-305.
  • Granado F, Olmedilla B, Blanco I. 2003. Nutritional and clinical relevance of lutein in human health. Br. J. Nutr., 90(3): 487- 502.
  • Hammershøj M, Johansen NF. 2016. The effect of grass and herbs in organic egg production on egg fatty acid composition, egg yolk colour and sensory properties. Livest Sci, 194:37-43.
  • Hammershøj M, Kidmose U, Steenfeldt S. 2010. Deposition of carotenoids in egg yolk by short-term supplement of coloured carrot (Daucus carota) varieties as forage material for egg-laying hens. J. Sci. Food Agric., 90:1163-1171.
  • Hammershøj M, Steenfeldt S. 2005. Effects of blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) in organic layer diets and supplementation with foraging material on egg production and some egg quality parameters. Poult. Sci., 84(5):723-733.
  • Hammershøj M, Steenfeldt S. 2012. The effects of kale (Brassica oleracea ssp. acephala), basil (Ocimum basilicum) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) as forage material in organic egg production on egg quality. Br. Poult. Sci., 53(2):245-256.
  • Hammershøj M, Steenfeldt S. 2015. Organic egg production. II: The quality of organic eggs is influenced by hen genotype, diet and forage material analyzed by physical parameters, functional properties and sensory evaluation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 208:182-197.
  • Hidalgo A, Rossi M, Clerici F, Ratti S. 2008. A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systems. Food Chem, 106(3):1031-1038.
  • Horsted K, Hammershøj M, Hermansen JE. 2006. Short term effects on productivity and egg quality in nutrient restricted versus non-restricted organic layers with Access to different forage crops. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci., 56:42-54.
  • Horsted K, Hammershøj M, Allesen‐Holm BH. 2010. Effect of grass–clover forage and whole‐wheat feeding on the sensory quality of eggs. J. Sci. Food Agric., 90(2):343-348.
  • Hughes BO, Dun P. (1983). Production and behaviour of laying domestic fowls in outside pens. Appl. Anim Ethology, 11(2):201-206.
  • Jeroch H. 1986. Use of mixed maize grain and cob silage in the feeding of laying hens. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 36:885-893.
  • Karsten HD, Patterson PH, Stout R, Crews G. 2010. Vitamins A, E and fatty acid composition of the eggs of caged hens and pastured hens. Renew Agr Food Syst, 25:45-54.
  • Kovacs-Nolan J, Phıllıps M, Mine Y. 2005. Advances in the value of eggs and egg components for human health. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53:8421-8431.
  • Küçükyılmaz K, Bozkurt M, Herken EN, Çınar M, Çatlı AU, Bintaş E, Çöven F. 2012a. Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci., 25(4): 559-568.
  • Küçükyılmaz K, Bozkurt M, Yamaner C, Cınar M, Catlı AU, Konak R. 2012b. Effect of an organic and conventional rearing system on the mineral content of hen eggs. Food. Chem., 132:989-992.
  • Leth T, Jakobsen J, Andersen NL. 2000. The intake of carotenoids in Denmark. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol, 102(2):128-132.
  • Loetscher Y, Kreuzer M, Messikommer RE. 2013. Utility of nettle (Urtica dioica) in layer diets as a natural yellow colorant for egg yolk. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 186:158- 168.
  • Matt D, Veromann E, Luik A. (2009). Effect of housing systems on biochemical composition of chicken eggs. Agron. Res., 7(2):662-667.
  • Minelli G, Sirri F, Folegatti E, Meluzzi A, Franchini A. 2007. Egg quality traits of laying hens reared in organic and conventional systems. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6(1):728-730.
  • Mugnai C, Dal Bosco A, Castellini C. 2009. Effect of rearing system and season on the performance and egg characteristics of Ancona laying hens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 8:175-188.
  • Mugnai C, Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Ruggeri S, Mattioli S, Castellini C. 2013. The effects of husbandry system on the grass intake and egg nutritive characteristics of laying hens. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94, 459-467.
  • Nys Y. 2000. Dietary carotenoids and egg yolk coloration – A review. Arch Geflugelkd, 64: 45–54.
  • Parrott PAW. 2004. Hen welfare: the consumers’ perspective. In: Perry, G. (Ed.), Welfare of the Laying Hen. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 11-22.
  • Richter T, Braun P, Fehlhaber K. (2002) Influence of spiced feed additives on taste of hen’s eggs. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr., 115:200-202.
  • Rizzi C, Chiericato GM. 2010. Chemical composition of meat and egg yolk of hybrid and Italian breed hens reared using an organic production system. Poult. Sci., 89:1239-1251.
  • Rizzi C, Marangon A. 2012. Quality of organic eggs of hybrid and Italian breed hens. Poult. Sci., 91: 2330-2340.
  • Rizzi C, Marangon A, Chiericato GM. 2007. Effect of Genotype on Slaughtering Performance and Meat Physical and Sensory Characteristics of Organic Laying Hens. Poult. Sci., 86:128-135.
  • Samman S, Kung FP, Carter LM, Foster MJ, Ahmad ZI, Phuyal JL, Petocz P. 2009. Fatty acid composition of certified organic, conventional and omega-3 eggs. Food Chem, 116(4):911-914.
  • Sikder AC, Chowdhury SD, Rashid MH, Sarker AK, Das SC. 1998. Use of dried carrot meal (DCM) in laying hen diet for egg yolk pigmentation Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci., 11:239-244.
  • Simopoulos, AP. 2008. The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases. Exp. Biol. Med., 233:674-688.
  • Skrivan M, Englmaierova M. 2014. The deposition of carotenoids and alphatocopherol in hen eggs produced under a combination of sequential feeding and grazing. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 190:79-86.
  • Steenfeldt S, Hammershøj M. 2015. Organic egg production. I: Effects of different dietary protein contents and forage material on organic egg production and nutrient digestibility of two hen genotypes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 209:186- 201.
  • Surai PF, MacPherson A, Speake BK, Sparks NHC. 2000. Designer egg evaluation in a controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr, 54(4): 298.
  • Tserveni-Gousi AS. 2001. Sensory evaluation of eggs produced by laying hens fed diet containing flaxseed and thymus meal. Arch Geflugelkd, 65:214-218.
  • van Ruth S, Alewijn M, Rogers K, Newton-Smith E, Tena N, Bollen M, Koot A. 2011. Authentication of organic and conventional eggs by carotenoid profiling. Food Chem, 126(3):1299-1305.
  • Wang D, Rosen C, Kinkel L, Cao A, Tharayil N, Gerik J. 2009. Production of methyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide from soil-incorporated plant materials and implications for controlling soil borne pathogens. Plant Soil, 324(1-2):185- 197.
  • Woods VB, Fearon AM. 2009. Dietary sources of unsaturated fatty acids for animals and their transfer into meat, milk and eggs: a review. Livest Sci, 126:1-20.
  • Wechsler B, Huber-Eicher B. 1998. The effect of foraging material and perch height on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 58:131- 141.