Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Vicia L. (Fabaceae) Taxa Growing in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey: Based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)

Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Vicia L. (Fabaceae) Taxa Growing in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey: Based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)

Leguminosae or Fabaceae is the third-largest flowering plant family and is important in terms of both food production and soil fertility. Wild Vicia species and the genetic diversity of the Southeastern Anatolia Region provide an invaluable resource for the improvement of cultivated temperate feed and legume crops. The rapid progress of technology in recent years has nowmade it possible to use modern techniques in phylogenetic studies and to examine plants in a greater detail using biochemical, cytological and molecular methods to supplement purely systematic studies. The use of molecular phylogenetic analysis is the most attractive alternative strategy for a more accurate identification of the species of the Vicia genus. In the current study, some Vicia L. taxa growing naturally in the Southeastern Anatolia Region were investigated using molecular phylogenetic analysis. Internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA were sequenced in order to study the phylogenetic relationships of Vicia L. taxa. Lathyrus inconspicuous L. and Lathyrus cassius Boiss. were used as an outgroup. The ITS area was determined to be approximately 479- 672 bp. The ITS sequences were submitted to the NCBI database and accession numbers obtained. The resulting tree clearly groups and separates the sect. Narbonensis, Ervilia, Peregrinae, Lathyroides, Vicia and Cracca species but was less able to distinguish species from sect. Hypechusa and Lentopsis. The data acquired were observed to be reliable in terms of solving the taxonomical problems of the Vicia L. taxa. The morphological distinctions are greatly supported by DNA sequence studies. The species-specific markers developed in this study are useful for early detection of targeted Vicia taxa and can act as a guide to the basic data required for the evolution of systematic breeding and conservation strategies, as well as for germplasm resources

___

  • Aceto S, Caputo P, Cozzolino S, Gaudio L. and Moretti A. 1999. Phylogeny and Evolution of Orchis and Allied Genera Based on ITS DNA Variation: Morphological Gaps and Molecular Continuity, Mol Phylo and Evol., 13 (1): 67-76.
  • Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojcıechowoski MF, Campell CS and Donoghue MJ. 1995. The ITS Region of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA: A Valuable Source of Evidence on Angiosperm Phylogeny, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 250-272.
  • Başbağ M, Hoşgören H, Aydın A. 2013. Vicia Taxa in the Flora of Turkey, Anadolu J. Agr. Sci., 28(1):59-66.
  • Binzat OK. 2012. Revision of Vicia L. (Leguminosae) in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Ph.D. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, September, Ankara.
  • Bryant JA, Hughes SG. 2011. Vicia, Chapter 14, C.kole (ed.). Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Legume Crops and Forages, Spriger verlag, Heidelberg.
  • Caputo P, Frediani M, Venora G, Ravalli C, Ambrosio M and Cremonini R. 2006. Nuclear DNA contents, rDNAs and karyotypes evolution in subgenus Vicia: III. Heterogeneous section Hypechusa, Protoplasma, 228: 167- 177.
  • Castiglione MR, Frediani M, Gelati MT, Ravalli C, Venora G, Caputo P and Cremonini R. 2007. Cytological and molecular characterization of Vicia esdraelonensis Warb. & Eig: a rare taxon, Protoplasma, 231: 151- 159.
  • Davis PH. 1970. Vicia L. In: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol.3 (ed. Davis, P.H). p. 274-325. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
  • El-Shanshoury AR, Soliman SA. 1996. Electrophoretic Evidence for Subgeneric and Sectional Relationships of Some Species in Vicia L., Pak J Bot., 28: (2) 173-182.
  • Emre İ. 2011. Determination of Genetic Diversity in the Vicia L. (section Vicia) by Using SDS-PAGE, Pak J Bot., 43(3): 1429- 1432.
  • Enneking D, Maxted N. 1995. Narbon bean (Vicia narbonensis L.). Evolution of Crop Plants, 2nd ed. Smartt, J., Simmonds, N. W., Longman: London, p. 316-321.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap, Evolution., 39: 783- 791. 242.
  • Fennel SR, Powell W, Wright F, Ramsay G. and Waugh R. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships between Vicia faba (Fabaceae) and related species inferred from chloroplast trnL sequences, Pl Syst Evol., 212:247- 259.
  • Foladi FZ, Salimpour F, Sharifnia F, Ghanavati F. 2013. Phylogenetic study of tribe Vicieae based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS), Ann of Biol Res., 4 (1):75-79.
  • Freeman S. and Herron JC. 1999. Evrimsel Analiz, Çıplak, B., Başıbüyük. H.H., Karaytuğ,S. ve Gündüz. İ. (ed.), Palme Publishing., 28- 29, 438- 449.
  • Guidetta R. and Michelozzi G. 1986. Biosystematic stu-dies on the Vicia villosa complex in Europe, Cando/lea., 41 (2): 399- 411.
  • Haider N, Nabulsi I, Kamary Y. 2010. Identification of species of Orchidaceae in Northern West of Syria based on chloroplast DNA, Russ J Genet., 46: 1067-1078.
  • Haider N, Nabulsi I, Mıralı N. 2012. Identification of species of Vicia subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae) using chloroplast DNA data, Turk J Agric For., 36: 1105-17.
  • Hanelt P. and Mettin D. 1989. Biosystematics of the genus Vicia L. (Leguminosae), Annu Rev Ecol Syst., 20: 199-223.
  • Heywood VH, Brummit RK, Culham A, Seberg O. 2007. Flowering Plant Families Of The World, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
  • Hosseinzadeh Z, Pakravan M. and Tavassoli A. 2008. Micromorphology of Seed in Some Vicia Species from Iran, Rostaniha., 9(2): 97-107.
  • Jaaska V. 2005. Isozyme Variation and Phylogenetic Relationships in Vicia subgenus Cracca (Fabaceae), Ann of Bot., 96: 1085-1096.
  • Jaaska V. 2008. Isozymes Evidence on the Specific Distinctness and Phylogenetic Position of Vicia incisa (Fabaceae), Cent Europ J Biol., 3(2):169- 176.
  • Kahraman A, Binzat OK, Doğan M. 2013. Pollen morphology of some taxa of Vicia L. subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae) Turkey, Plant syst evol., 299: 1749-1760.
  • Kaplan A. 2014. The Morphological and Molecular Revision of the Genus Vicia L. (Fabaceae) Growing in the South Eastern Anatolia Region, Ph.D. Thesis, Dicle University, Institute of Natural And Applied Sciences,Diyarbakır.
  • Kimura MA. 1980. Simple Method for Estimating Evolutionary Rates of Base Substitutions Through Comparative Studies of Nucleotide Sequences, J Mol Evol., 16: 111-120.
  • Kress WJ, Liu AZ, Newman M, Li QJ. 2005. The molecular phylogeny of Alpinia (Zingiberaceae): a complex and polyphyletic genus of gingers, American J Bot., 92(1): 167- 178.
  • Kupicha FK. 1976. The infrageneric structure of Vicia L. Notes Roy Bot Garden Edinburgh, 34: 287-326. Lefort F, Lally M, Thompson D, Douglas GC. 1998.
  • Morphological traits, microsatellite fingerprinting and genetic relatedness of a stand of elite oaks (Q. robur L.) at Tullynally, Ireland, Silvae Genetica, 47: 257-262.
  • Leht M. 2009. Phylogenetics of Vicia (Fabaceae) based on morphological data, Feddes Repertorium., 120 (7- 8): 379- 393.
  • LPWG, 2017. A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny: The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) ,Taxon, 66 :44- 77.
  • Maxted N, Douglas C. 1997. A phenetic investigation of Vicia section Hypechusa (Alef.) Asch. & Graebner (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Vicieae), Lagascalia., 19(1- 2):345- 370.
  • Maxted N. 1995. An ecogeographical study of Vicia subgenus Vicia. Systematic and ecogeographic studies on crop genepools 8. International plant genetic Resources Institute. Rome. Italy.
  • Miller JT, Murphy DJ, Brown GK, Richardson DM, González‐ Orozco CE. 2011. The evolution and phylogenetic placement of invasive Australian Acacia species. Diversity and Distributions (Diversity Distrib.)., 17: 848-860.
  • Navratilova A, Neumann P. and Macas J. 2003. Karyotype analyses of four Vicia species using in situ hybridization with repetetive sequnces, Ann of Bot., 91: 921-926,
  • Potokina EK, Tomooka N, Vaughan DA, Alexandrova T. and Xu RQ. 1999. Phylogeny of Vicia (Fabaceae) based on analaysis of RAPDs and RFLP of PCR amplified chloroplast genes, Gen Res and Crop Evol., 46: 149- 161.
  • Saqer MMF. 2014. Phylogenetic Relationship among Closely Related Species of the Genera Lens, Vicia, Lathyrus and Pisum (Leguminosae) in Palestine. MSc Thesis. An-Najah National University. Faculty of Graduate Studies. Palestine. Schaefer H, Hechenleitner, P, Santos-Guerra A, Menezes de Sequeira M, Pennington TR, Kenicer G, Carine AM. 2012. Systematic, biogeography, and character evolution of the legume tribe Fabeae with special focus on the middle-Atlantic island lineages, BioMed Cent Evol Biol., 12: 250.
  • Simpson MG. 2012. Plant Systematics (2.edition ), Aytaç Z. (ed.), Nobel Publishing.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, and Milligan BG. 1992. Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation: Systematic and phylogenetic implications, p. 117-150, In P. S. Soltis et al. (ed.) Molecular systematic of plants, Chapman Hall. New York.
  • Tabur S, Civelek Ş and Bağcı E. 2002. Cytotaxonomic Studies on Some Vicia L. Species Growing in the Eastern Mediterranean and Southern Aegean Regions II, Acta Bot Hung., 44(1–2): 185- 204,
  • Van de Wouw M, Maxted N, Chabane K, Ford-Lloyd BV. 2001. Molecular Taxonomy of Vicia ser. Vicia Based on Amplified Fragment Lenght Polymorphisms, Plant Syst Evol., 229: 91- 105.
  • Vavilov N. 1994. Origin and Geography of Cultivated Crops. Cambridge Univ. Press. U. K.
  • Vavilov NI. 1950. The orgin, Variation, immunity and Breding of Cultivated Plants, Chronica Botanica.,13.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Innis, M., Gelfand, D., Sninsky, J., White, T. (ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, 315-322.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)