Ruziye KARAMAN, Muharrem KAYA, Cengiz TÜRKAY

İkinci Ürün Olarak Yetiştirilen Maş Fasulyesinde Farklı Hasat Zamanlarının Ot Kalitesi ve Mineral İçeriğine Etkileri

Araştırma, Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Eğitim, Araştırma ve UygulamaÇiftliği deneme arazilerinde 2017 yılında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın amacı, ikinci ürün olarakyetiştirilen ve farklı zamanlarda hasat edilen maş fasulyesi genotiplerinde ot verimi, kalitesi vemineral içeriğinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada 02 G 06 ve 70 S 01 maş fasulyesi genotipleri tohummateryali olarak kullanılmış olup, deneme tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre faktöriyel düzende3 tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Çalışmada bitki boyu, kuru madde oranı, ADF, NDF, ADL, TSBMdeğeri, hemiselüloz, selüloz, nisbi yem değeri, metabolik enerji özellikleri ile Mg, K, Ca, P, Fe, Cu,Mn ve Zn içerikleri incelenmiştir. Elde edilen verilere göre, bitki boyu 6,45-53,78 cm, kuru maddeoranı %18,42-23,82, ADF içeriği %15,21-20,99, NDF içeriği %30,99-39,87, ADL içeriği %4,39-7,0,TSBM değeri %66,61-70,95, hemiselüloz %13,81-24,66, selüloz %8,21-14,35, nisbi yem değeri179,8-228,9, metabolik enerji 10,33-11,10 MJ kg-1 , Mg içeriği %0,34-0,46, K içeriği %2,39-3,41, Caiçeriği %2,39-2,84, P içeriği %0,30-0,38, Fe içeriği 202,67-586,0 ppm, Cu içeriği 7,67-11,50 ppm,Mn içeriği 121,75-245,0 ppm ve Zn içeriği 29,0-38,17 ppm arasında değişim göstermiştir. Sonuçolarak, yöre koşullarında maş fasulyesinin tahıl hasadından sonra ikinci ürün olarak ekilebileceği vehayvan besleme yönünden kaliteli bir kaba yem olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Determination of Forage Yield, Quality and Mineral Content Mung BeanGrowing as Second Crop

It was carried out in Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture Education, Research and Application Farm experiment fields in 2017. The aim of the study is determinate the effects of mung bean genotypes grown as second crops on forage yield, quality and mineral content. 02 G 06 and 70 S 01 mung bean genotypes were used as seed material in the study. The study was conducted to completely randomized block design in the factorial design with three replications. It was examined plant height, dry weight, ADF, NDF, ADL, TDN, hemicellulose, cellulose, relative feed value, metabolic energy properties and Mg, K, Ca, P, Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn contents in the study.According to obtained data, it was varied between plant height 6.45-53.78 cm, dry material ratio 18.42-23.82%, ADF content 15.21-20.99%, NDF content 30.99-39.87%, ADL content 4.39-7.0%, TDN 66.61-70.95%, hemicellulose 13.81-24.66%, cellulose 8.21-14.35%, relative feed value 179.8-228.9, metabolic energy 10.33-11.10 MJ kg-1, Mg content 0.34-0.46%, K content 2.39-3.41%, Ca content 2.39-2.84%, P content 0.30-0.38%, Fe content 202.67-586.0 ppm, Cu content 7.67-11.50 ppm, Mn content 121.75-245.0 ppm and Zn content 29.0-38.17 ppm. As a result, it is thought that mung beans can be grown as a second product after the grain harvest and be a quality forage.

PDF

___

Akpapunam M. 1996. Mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Food and Feed from Legumes and Oilseeds, 209-215.
Anonymous 2012. FAO, Grassland Index. A searchable catalogue of grass and forage legumes. FAO, Rome, Italy. https://web.archive.org/web/20170120044942/http://www.fa o.org/ag/ AGP/AGPC/ doc/GB. (Erişim: 13.03.2020)
ARC 1980. The Nutrient requirement of Ruminant Livestock. Slough, UK: Commonwealty Agricultural Bureaux.
Asekova S, Shannon JG, Lee JD. 2014. The current status of forage soybean. Plant Breed. Biotech., 2(4): 334-341.
Balabanli C, Albayrak S, Yuksel O. 2010. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on the quality and yield of native rangeland. Turk J Fıeld Crops, 15(2): 164-168.
Blaser RE, Hames RC, Fontenot JP, Bryant HT, Polan CE, Wolf DD, McClaugherty FS, Kline RG, Moore JS. 1986. Growth stages of plants, forage quality and animal production. In: Holliman MC ed. Forageanimal management systems. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Stations Bulletin 86-7: P. 9.
Borreani G, Peiretti P G, Tabacco E. 2007. Effect of harvest time on yield and pre-harvest quality of semi-leafless grain peas (Pisum sativum L.) as whole-crop forage. Field Crops Res., 100: 1–9.
Cho HS, Seong KY, Park TS, Seo MC, Kim MH, Kang HW, Lee HJ. 2013. Effect of seeding rate of Crotalaria (Crotalaria juncea L.) on Green Manure Yield and Nitrogen Prodution in Upland Soil. Korean J. Soil. Sci. Fer. 46(6): 445-451.
Creswell DC. 1981. Nutritional evaluation of mung beans (Phaseolus aureus) for young broiler chickens. Poult.Sci., 60(8): 1905-1909.
Darby HM, Lauer JG. 2002. Harvest date and hybrid influence on corn forage yield, quality, and preservation. Agron. J., 94(3): 559-566.
Fitzherbert A. 2007. Water management, livestock and the opium economy: livestock feed and products. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit's three-year study “Applied Thematic Research into Water Management, Livestock and the Opium Economy”. DAACAR, AREU, Welt Hunger Hilfe. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/14364 (Son Erişim Tarihi: 09.02.2020)
Gebreyowhans S, Gebremeskel K. 2014. Forage production potential and nutritive value of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) genotypes in the northern lowlands of Ethiopia. EJARD, 5(4): 066-071.
Hintz RW, Albrecht KA. 1994. Dry matter partitioning and forage nutritive value of soybean plant components. Agron. J., 86(1): 59-62.
Kacar B, İnal A, 2010. Bitki Analizleri. Nobel Yayınları, 1241, ss: 892.
Kacar B, Katkat V. 2010. Bitki Besleme, Nobel Yayınları, 5. Baskı, ss: 678.
Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Gurbuz Y, Erol A, Ozay O, 2005. Effect of maturity stage on chemical composition, in vitro and in situ dry matter degradation of tumbleweed hay (Gundelia tournetortii L.) Small Rum Res, 58: 149-156.
Kaplan M, Kamalak A, Özkan ÇÖ, Atalay Aİ. 2014. Vejetasyon döneminin yabani korunga otunun potansiyel besleme değerine, metan üretimine ve kondense tanen içeriğine etkisi. Harran Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 3(1): 1-5.
Kaplan M, Üke, Ö, Kale H, Yavuz S, Kurt Ö, Atalay Aİ. 2016. Olgunlaşma döneminin teff otunun potansiyel besleme değeri, gaz ve metan üretimine etkisi. Iğdır FBED, 6(4): 181- 186.
Khatik KL, Vaishnava CS, Lokesh G. 2007. Nutritional evaluation of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) straw in sheep and goats. Indian J. Small Rumin., 13 (2): 196-198.
Koukolova V, Weisbjerg MR, Homolka P, Kobes M. 2009. The effects of altitude and harvest time on the feed value of extensive mountain pastures. J Agro Biol, 26: 101-112.
Mansoer Z, Reeves DW, Wood C. 1997. Suitability of sunn hemp as an alternative late-summer legume cover crop. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 61(1): 246-253.
McMeniman NP, Elliott R, Ash AJ. 1988. Supplementation of rice straw with crop by-products. I. legume straw supplementation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 19 (1-2): 43-53.
Mengel K, Kirkby EA, Kosegarten H, Appel T. 2001. Principles of Plant Nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Meral N, Çiftçi CY, Ünver S. 1998. Bakteri aşılama ve değişik azot dozlarının nohut (Cicer arietinum L.)’un verim ve verim öğelerine etkileri. Tarım Dergisi, 7(1): 44-49.
Moore JE, Undersander DJ. 2002. Relative forage quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. In Proceedings 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, 32: 16-29.
Mosjidis JA, Wang ML. 2011. Crotalaria. In: C. Kole, editor, Wild crop relatives: Genomic and breeding resources, Industrial Crops. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. p.63– 69.
NRC 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
Özdüven ML, Koç F, Polat C, Coşkuntuna L, Başkavak S, Şamlı HE 2009. Bazı mısır çeşitlerinde vejetasyon döneminin silolamada fermantasyon özellikleri ve yem değeri üzerine etkileri. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2): 121-129.
Rohweder D, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N. 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. JAS, 47(3): 747-759.
Srisaikham S, Lounglawan P. 2017. Effect of cutting age and cutting height on production and nutritive value of sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea) harvest in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. IV Asia Symposium on Quality Management in Postharvest Systems 1210, pp. 29-34.
Tan M, Bakoglu A, Koç A. 1997. The changing of aboveground biomass and chemical composition of birdsfood trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) during growing period. II. Field Crops Congress in Turkey, Samsun. Pp. 693-695.
Tan M, Serin Y. 1996. The effects of mixture rates and cutting dates on the macro nutrient compositions in vetch + cereal mixtures. III. Grassland and Forage Congress in Turkey, Erzurum. Pp. 308-315.
Temel S, Keskı̇n B, Yıldız V, Kır A. E. 2015. Investigation of dry hay yield and quality characteristics of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) cultivars for in Igdir plain download conditions. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(3): 67- 76.
Temel S. 2019. Yem Kaynağı Olarak Değerlendirilen Noaea mucronata’nın Aktif Gelişme Süresince Besin Kompozisyonundaki Değişimler. IJAWS, 5(1): 117-123.
Tomooka N, Akito K, Takehisa I, Duncan V, Peerasak S, Prakit S, Souvanh T, Chay B, Kongpan K, Phoumi I, Muthaian P, Natesan S, Nanappan R, Jaiwal P K, Tian J, Umezawa K, Yokoyama T. 2011. Vigna Genetic Resources. https://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/pdf/ misc/international-WS_14_11.pdf (Son erişim tarihi: 13.05.2019).
Topçu GD, Özkan ŞS. 2019. Akdeniz Ekolojik Koşulları için Alternatif Bir Bitki: Crotalaria juncea L.(Krotalarya). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22(2): 339-345.
Tripathi MK, Chaudhary B, Singh SR, Bh HR. 2013. Growth and yield of sunnhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) as influenced by spacing and topping practices. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 8(28): 3744- 3749.
Türk M, Albayrak S. 2012. Effect of harvesting stages on the forage yields and quality in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Turk. J. Field Crop, 17: 111-4.
Türk M, Albayrak S, Yüksel O. 2009. Effects of fertilisation and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.). New Zeal J Agr Res 52(3): 269-275.
Türk M, Albayrak S, Yüksel O. 2007. Effects of phosphorus fertilisation and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of narbon vetch. New Zeal J Agr Res., 50(4): 457-462.
Uludere (Eşder) E.I. (2019). Farklı gelişme dönemlerinde bazı arpa hasılının besin madde içeriği ve sindirilebilir organik madde miktarına etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tekirdağ Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tekirdağ, 59s.
Üke Ö, Kale H, Kaplan M, Kamalak A. 2017. Olgunlaşma döneminin kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)’da ot verimi ve kalitesi ile gaz ve metan üretimine etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(1): 42- 46
Ülger İ, Kaplan M, Atasagun B, Kardeş YM, Doran T, Kamalak A. 2018. Vejetasyon Döneminin Erciyes Korungasının (Onobryhis argaea) Yem Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi. Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1): 38-49.
Van Dyke NJ, Anderson PM. 2000. Interpreting a forage analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular ANR-890.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Dairy Sci. 74: 3587-3597.
Van Soest PJ. 1994. Fiber and physicochemical properties of feeds in: Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Second edition. Cornell University press. Ithaca, NY
Warren J, Wilson T, Edwards J, 2012. Using sunnhemp as a cover crop in Oklahoma. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, PSS-2273.
Zhai G, Shen Y, Zhai Y, Liu X, Jiang H. 2008. Forage yield performance and nutritive value of selected wild soybean ecotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci., 88(3): 465-472.
Zhiqiang L, Weiwei S, Yaqing M, Yulan P. 2008. Study on the variation dynamic state of Fiber content in forage maizes at different harvest time. China Dairy Cattle, 12s.