Effect of Production System and Age on Egg Quality Parameters: A Case of Niğde Province Çamardı District, Turkey

This study compared egg quality parameters in layers under free-range system with prefabricated pens and backyard while emphasizing hen age. A total of 300 eggs collected from prefabricated pens and backyard farming families in the Çamardı District of Niğde Province were used as study materials. The assessed external and internal egg quality characteristics included egg weight, shape index, shell thickness, shell breaking strength, albumen index, Haugh unit, yolk index, and yolk colour. The effect of production system on albumen index, Haugh unit, and yolk colour score was found statistically significant. There was a significant effect of age on shape index, shell thickness, shell breaking strength, albumen index, Haugh Unit, yolk index, and yolk colour score. The effect of interaction between age and production system was statistically significant for shape index, shell thickness, yolk index, Haugh Unit, and yolk colour score. It was determined that the egg`s meat and blood spots percentages from the free-range and backyard systems were 10.6% and 15.3%, respectively. It was concluded that while eggs produced from free-range system are superior in terms of egg weight, shape index, and Haugh unit those obtained from backyard hens are higher in eggshell thickness, eggshell breaking strength, and egg yolk colour.

___

Bari MS, Cohen-Barnhouse AM, Campbell D. 2020. Early rearing enrichments influenced nest use and egg quality in free-range laying hens. Animal, 14(6): 1249-57. doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119003094.

Doyon G, Bernier-Cardou M, Hamilton RM, Castaigne F, MacLean H. 1985. Egg quality. 1. Shell strength of eggs from five commercial strains of white leghorn hens during their first laying cycle. Poultry Science, 64(9): 1685-95. doi.org/10.3382/ps.0641685.

Duman M, Sekeroglu A, Yildirim A, Eleroglu H, Camci O. 2016. Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics. European Poultry Science, 80:1-9. doi.org/10.1399/eps.2016.117.

Englmaierová M, Tůmová E, Charvátová V, Skřivan M. 2014. Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech Jornal of Animal Science, 59(8): 345–352.

Hanusova E, Hrnčár C, Hanus A, Oravcova M. 2015. Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, 18(1): 20-4. doi.org/10.15414/ afz.2015.18.01.20–24.

Henchion M, Hayes M, Mullen AM, Fenelon M, Tiwari B.2017. Future protein supply and demand: strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium. Foods, 6(7): 53. doi.org/10.3390/foods6070053.

Hocking PM. 2015. Contribution of genetic selection and breeding structures to the economic development of the poultry industry. In, Proceedings of 3rd International Poultry Meat Congress. 22– 26 July, Antalya, Turkey.

Kraus A, Zita L, Krunt O, Härtlová H, Chmelíková E. 2021. Determination of selected biochemical parameters in blood serum and egg quality of Czech and Slovak native hens depending on the housing system and hen age. Poultry Science, 100(2): 1142-1153. doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020. 10.039.

Lewko L, Gornowicz E. 2011. Effect of housing system on egg quality in laying hens. Annals of Animal Science, 11(4): 607- 11. doi.org/10.2478/v10220-011-0012-0.

Lordelo M, Fernandes E, Bessa RJ, Alves SP. 2017. Quality of eggs from different laying hen production systems, from indigenous breeds and specialty eggs. Poultry Science, 96(5): 1485-91. doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew409.

Mohammed KA, Sarmiento-Franco L, Santos-Ricalde R, SolorioSanchez JF. 2013. Egg production, egg quality and crop content of Rhode Island Red hens grazing on natural tropical vegetation. Tropical animal health and production, 45(2): 367-72. doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0225y.

Molnar A, Maertens L, Ampe B, Buyse J, Kempen I, Zoons J, Delezie AE. 2016. Changes in egg quality traits during the last phase of production: is there potential for an extended laying cycle? British Poultry Science, 57(6): 842-7. doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1209738.

Nalbandov AV, Card LE. 1944. The problem of blood clots and meat spots in chicken eggs. Poultry Science, 23(3): 170-80. doi.org/10.3382/ps.0230170.

Ochs DS, Wolf CA, Widmar NJ, Bir C. 2018. Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems. Poultry Science, 97(10): 3390-6. doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey205.

Petek M, Alpay F, Gezen SS, Cibik R. 2009. Effects of housing system and age on early-stage egg production and quality in commercial laying hens. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 15: 57-62. doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2008.65-A.

Philippe FX, Mahmoudi Y, Cinq-Mars D, Lefrançois M, Moula N, Palacios J, Pelletier F, Godbout S. 2020. Comparison of egg production, quality and composition in three production systems for laying hens. Livestock Science, 232: 103917. doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103917.

Released SI. 2008. SPSS statistics for windows, version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc

Rohlf VI, Howell TJ, Coleman G, Rault JL. 2019. Engagement through online discussion: perceptions of laying hen welfare in furnished cages. Animal, 13(9): 1999-2006. doi.org/10. 1017/S1751731118003427.

Rondoni A, Asioli D, Millan E. 2020. Consumer behaviour, perceptions, and preferences towards eggs: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 106: 391-401. doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.038.

Samiullah S, Roberts JR, Chousalkar KK. 2014. Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23(1): 59-70. doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013- 00805.

Samiullah S, Omar AS, Roberts J, Chousalkar K. 2017. Effect of production system and flock age on eggshell and egg internal quality measurements. Poultry Science, 96(1): 246-258. doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew289.

Sarıca M, Erensoy K, Özsoy Aİ. 2021. Fertility of Uncontrolled Village Flock Eggs and Comparison of Quality Traits of Table-Eggs Produced in Different Production Systems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(2): 356-361. doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i2. 356-361.4004.

Scrinis G, Parker C, Carey R. 2017. The caged chicken or the free-range egg? The regulatory and market dynamics of layerhen welfare in the UK, Australia and the USA. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30(6): 783-808. doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9699-y.

Șekeroğlu A, Dİktaș M. 2012. Effect of free fange production system on slower-growing broiler carcass characteristics and meat quality. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(6): 1007-1013. doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2012.6922.

Şekeroğlu A, Duman M, Tahtalı Y, Yıldırım A, Eleroğlu H. 2014. Effect of cage tier and age on performance, egg quality and stress parameters of laying hens. South African Journal of Animal Science, 44(3): 288-297. doi.org/10.4314/sajas. v44i3.11.

Sirri F, Zampiga M, Soglia F, Meluzzi A, Cavani C, Petracci M. 2018. Quality characterization of eggs from Romagnola hens, an Italian local breed. Poultry Science, 97(11): 4131-4136. doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey275.

Sokołowicz Z, Dykiel M, Krawczyk J, Augustyńska-Prejsnar A. 2019. Effect of layer genotype on physical characteristics and nutritive value of organic eggs. CyTA-Journal of Food, 17(1): 11-19. doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2018.1541480.

Tainika B, Şekeroğlu A. 2020. Effect of Production Systems for Laying Hens on Hen Welfare. 2020. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(1): 239-245. doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i1.239-245.3151.

Tufarelli V, Ragni M, Laudadio V. 2018. Feeding forage in poultry: a promising alternative for the future of production systems. Agriculture, 8(6): 81. doi.org/10.3390/agriculture80 60081.

Van Den Brand H, Parmentier HK, Kemp AB. 2004. Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. British Poultry Science, 45(6): 745-752. doi.org/10.1080/00071660400014283.

Vlčková J, Tůmová E, Míková K, Englmaierová M, Okrouhlá M, Chodová D. 2019. Changes in the quality of eggs during storage depending on the housing system and the age of hens. Poultry Science, 98(11): 6187-6193. doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez 401.

Widmar N, Bir C, Wolf C, Lai J, Liu Y. 2020. # Eggs: social and online media-derived perceptions of egg-laying hen housing. Poultry Science, 99(11): 5697-5706. doi.org/10.1016/j.psj. 2020.07.011.

Widowski TM, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Rault JL. 2016. Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 72(2): 333-342. doi.org/10.1017/ S0043933916000027.

Yenice G, Kaynar O, Ileriturk M, Hira F, Hayirli A. 2016. Quality of eggs in different production systems. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 34(4): 370-376. doi.org/10.17221/33/2016- CJFS.

Yılmaz Dikmen BY, Ipek A, Şahan Ü, Sözcü A, Baycan SC. 2017. Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 41(1): 77-84. doi.org/10.3906/vet1604-71.

Żakowska-Biemans S, Tekień A. 2017. Free range, organic? Polish consumers preferences regarding information on farming system and nutritional enhancement of eggs: A discrete choice based experiment. Sustainability, 9(11): 1999. doi.org/10.3390/su9111999.

Zita L, Jeníková M, Härtlová H. 2018. Effect of housing system on egg quality and the concentration of cholesterol in egg yolk and blood of hens of native resources of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 27(3): 380-8. doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfy009.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Bioactive, Physicochemical and Antimicrobial Properties of Koruk (Unripe Grape, Vitis vinefera L.) Products

Berna ÖZTÜRK, İlkin Yücel ŞENGÜN

Comparison of mineral content of bottled spring and mineral waters marketed in Turkey

Şeref TURHAN, Haydar YÜKSEK, Aybaba HANCERLİOGULLARI

Does the Presence and Absence of Queen Bee in the Production of Royal Jelly Affect the Amount of Soluble Protein and Ratio of 10-Hydroxy-2-Decenoic Acid?

AYTÜL UÇAK KOÇ, Mete KARACAOĞLU, Zehra Burcu BAKIR, Burcu KESER

Hygiene Practice and Protective Management in Biological and Pharmaceutical Laboratory

Nasrin BANU, Md. SALAUDDİ, Kazi AL NOMAN, Shabnam MOSTARI, Suruj AHAMMED, Masud PARVEJ

Determination of Some Agronomic and Fruit Quality Characteristics of Some Watermelon Accessions from Turkish Watermelon Germplasm

Ercüment ATLI, İlknur SOLMAZ, Nebahat SARI, HAŞİM KELEBEK

A Comparative Study on the Effects of Use Hemp Seed Oil Substitute to Soybean Oil in Growing Quail Diets

Gülşah KANBUR, Rabia GÖÇMEN

Model Sistem Tavuk Eti Emülsiyonlarında Nar (Punica granatum) Çekirdeği Tozu Kullanımının Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Elnaz SHAREFIABADI, Özlem YÜNCÜ, Sahar SEYEDHOSSEINI, Hülya Serpil KAVUŞAN, Meltem SERDAROĞLU

The Use of Different Fat Sources on Performance, Egg Quality and Egg Yolk Fatty Acids Content in Laying Quails

Rabia GÖÇMEN, Gülşah KANBUR, YUSUF CUFADAR

Phenolic Contents of Different Potato Genotypes Grown in the Central Northern Region in Turkey

Yasin Bedrettin KARAN, TARIK BALKAN, Ramazan ERENLER

Advantages of Grain Legume-Cereal Intercropping in Sustainable Agriculture

Aybegün TON